CITY SANITATION PLAN HINGOLI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM PAS

  • Slides: 55
Download presentation
CITY SANITATION PLAN HINGOLI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA)

CITY SANITATION PLAN HINGOLI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

CONTENTS SECTION I: OVERVIEW AND CONTEXT SETTING INTRODUCTION LOCATION AND REGIONAL SETTING DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

CONTENTS SECTION I: OVERVIEW AND CONTEXT SETTING INTRODUCTION LOCATION AND REGIONAL SETTING DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS AND SLUM PROFILE CONTEXT OF WATER SUPPLY IN HINGOLI SECTION II: SECTORAL ANALYSIS AND PLAN PROPOSALS ACCESS TO SANITATION FACILITY (TOILETS) – HOUSEHOLD, COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC SANITATION FACILITIES WASTEWATER, SEPTAGE AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SECTION III: MUNICIPAL FINANCE ANALYSIS FINANCING PLAN SECTION IV: SUMMARY AND FINANCING ALTERNATIVES PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SECTION I: OVERVIEW CONTEXT SETTING Ø INTRODUCTION Ø LOCATION AND REGIONAL SETTING Ø DEMOGRAPHIC

SECTION I: OVERVIEW CONTEXT SETTING Ø INTRODUCTION Ø LOCATION AND REGIONAL SETTING Ø DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Ø CITY ECOLOGY Ø CONTEXT OF WATER SUPPLY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

CITY PROFILE: HINGOLI INTRODUCTION AND REGIONAL SETTING § In 1960, Hingoli became part of

CITY PROFILE: HINGOLI INTRODUCTION AND REGIONAL SETTING § In 1960, Hingoli became part of Maharashtra as part of Parbhani district. 1 St § Later, on May 1999 Hingoli District came into existence with division of Parbhani. City Hingoli Civic status Nagar Parishad ‘B’ class Area 16. 74 sq. km Location Latitude 19. 43 N and Longitude 77. 11 E Number of Wards 7 prabhags/28 wards Connectivity Well connected by Hingoli Railway station. Airport at Nanded (88 km) Major Roads- SH 204, SH 215 Population 85, 401 Population density 5102 persons/ sq. km DEMOGRAPHY 100000 Population Growth Population Forecast Method Year AM IM GM PM Other 2012 86471 86506 87152 86767 860000 2013 87451 90272 88939 88134 90102 40000 2021 96099 96746 104616 99065 92000 2028 103588 109855 120585 109630 96028 2031 106797 108738 128155 112729 98000 2041 117495 121377 156990 126393 103500 2043 119635 123982+6000=129982*say 130000 163493 129126 105000 80000 20000 0 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 199120012011 Incremental increase method has been adopted since this method is appropriate for town like Hingoli PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

CITY PROFILE: HINGOLI ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY SLUM PROFILE Slum population Slum names 3 5 2

CITY PROFILE: HINGOLI ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY SLUM PROFILE Slum population Slum names 3 5 2 8 7 1 9 6 The city of area 16. 74 sq km is divided into 7 prabhags 47 status (%) Educational Male Female Prabhag no. 3 and 5 are dense occupied prabhags (Gaothan area) 36 30 28 27 8 9 slum pockets constituting 36% of the total population Prabhag Total HHS Total population 2060 11184 6 2089 11340 7 2458 13342 Total 15685 85401 Pucca PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT Semi Pucca T. . . 5 Post graduate S. . . 12463 . . 2296 R. 4 2 Structure of House (HH %) . . . 12451 M 2294 . . . 3 M 12391 7 Secondary Graduate J. . . 2283 . . 2 Primary G. 11966 B. . . 2205 B. . . 1 Illiterate 9 5 1 Mastanshah Nagar 496 2 Sidharth Nagar 3103 3 Garmal 1040 4 Bawankholi 2266 5 Risala Bazar/ Ganesh wadi 9545 6 Joona Aundha Naka 3879 7 Mahadev wadi 5743 8 Tallabkatta/ Mondipora 2886 9 Pensionpora 2016 Self. Salarie Occupation pattern emplo yed Other 12 32 d 3 Labor 49 Unof ficial 15 Rent ed 15 Agri or Agro based 4 Unoffi cial; 15 Own Mete r 66 MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

WATER SUPPLY IN CONTEXT OF HINGOLI Water supply network Length § Present quantity of

WATER SUPPLY IN CONTEXT OF HINGOLI Water supply network Length § Present quantity of water supply in the city is about 6. 30 MLD Total length of trunk main 23 km against the demand of 17. 55 MLD Total length of transmission main 40 km § Rate of water supply is only 72. 82 lpcd Total length of distribution network in city 250 km § Under of UIDSSMT scheme, a 48. 3% coverage of water supply proposal of augmentation of rate Total area under water distribution 13 sq. km of water supply to 135 lpcd Only 44. 70% of cost recovery 150 Purchase from neighbour or Private Party Sr. no Type of connections Number EXISTING STATUS 7150 6950 6750 6550 2008 -092009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 Series 1 6732 6837 6987 7047 Community Tap No. 100 Water audit and rehabilitation and augmentation of lines expected to complete by 2015 7500 2 Non-domestic 30 Total 50 0 Baudhawada Bawankholi Garmal 7530 Authorised consumption PROCESS OF WATER SUPPLY Lifting capacity – 13. 2 MLD Surface water WTP Storage River Darana siddheshwar Juna Aundha Mahadevwadi Naka Distribution 7. 30 MLD 1 GSR 4 ESR Meter Mastanshah Nagar Risala Bazar Siddharth Nagar Billed metered consumption: 0. 00 MLD Billed unmetered consumption: 5. 04 MLD Tallabkatta Revenue water 5. 04 MLD (72. 32%) Unbilled authorised consumption: 0. 04 MLD Unauthorised use and leakages on transmission mains and on distribution line: 2. 02 MLD Non revenue water 2. 26 MLD (27. 68%) Real losses dam Apparent losses 1 Residential PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SECTION II: SECTORAL ANALYSIS AND PLAN PROPOSAL Ø ACCESS TO SANITATION FACILITY (TOILETS) HOUSEHOLD

SECTION II: SECTORAL ANALYSIS AND PLAN PROPOSAL Ø ACCESS TO SANITATION FACILITY (TOILETS) HOUSEHOLD COMMUNITY & - PUBLIC SANITATION FACILITIES Ø WASTEWATER, SEPTAGE AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Ø SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

ACCESS TO SANITATION FACILITY (TOILETS) – Ø HOUSEHOLD SANITATION FACILITIES Ø COMMUNITY SANITATION FACILITIES

ACCESS TO SANITATION FACILITY (TOILETS) – Ø HOUSEHOLD SANITATION FACILITIES Ø COMMUNITY SANITATION FACILITIES Ø PUBLIC SANITATION FACILITIES PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SANITATION OVERVIEW SANITATION COVERAGE TOILET FACILITY 31% of population practices

HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SANITATION OVERVIEW SANITATION COVERAGE TOILET FACILITY 31% of population practices open defecation Prabhag 3, 4 and 6 – critical for availability of sanitation 2%facility 67% Latrine facility within the premises (%) Public latrine (%) Lack of knowledge about functioning of septic tanks ON-SITE COLLECTION/TREATMENT FACILITY 10% 3% Latrine with septic tank Pit Latrine 87% Latrine with direct disposal into the drain ISSUES IN HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SANITATION § § § PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT Prabhag 3, 4 and 6 - no availability of sanitation facilities Toilet seats in slums; -10% households are discharging toilet waste/black water directly into the open drains Households without individual toilets forced to defecate in open Effluents from septic tanks directly discharged into open drains Lack of awareness and motivation in ULB to maintain and clean the conveyance system MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS IN HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY Short Term (from year 2013 till 2015)

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS IN HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY Short Term (from year 2013 till 2015) Mitigate existing demand gaps Initiate schemes for household sanitation in slum areas (Rs. 2. 69 crore) At present: Households practicing OD in slums = 2, 791 (57%) Households covered under on-going ILCS scheme = 867 Considering similar schemes for remaining households = 1, 924 Initiate Promoting household sanitation through IEC campaigns in non-slum area (Rs. 0. 15 crore) Mid Term (from year 2015 till 2028) Enhancing service level and coverage Achieve 100% coverage of household level sanitation through initiating schemes for slum areas and promoting individual toilets in non-slum areas Up gradation of primary treatment depending on selected conveyance system and treatment for black and grey water At present: Households practicing OD in non-slum area = 3, 158 (31%) OD should be discouraged by promoting non-slum dwellers to have household sanitation facility IEC campaign is required to discourage OD Note: Cost for the household sanitation in non-slum area Rs. 4. 42 crore Enforce bye-laws for improved disposal systems in household sanitation for existing and new developments PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SUGGESTED PILOTS FOR HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SELECTION OF PILOTS Slum names Slum population

SUGGESTED PILOTS FOR HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SELECTION OF PILOTS Slum names Slum population % of OD Preference to Individual toilet (in %) Preference to CT (in %) Willing to invest in HH sanitation Mastanshah Nagar 496 77 92 8 Sidharth Nagar 3103 55 98 2 Garmal 1040 92 96 4 Upto Rs. 3000 (40%) Not willing to invest (50%) Rs. 5001 -10000 (36%) Bawankholi 2266 80 94 6 Upto Rs. 3000 (38%) Risala Bazar/Ganesh wadi 9545 85 93 7 Rs. 3001 -5000 (58%) Joona Aundha Naka 3879 100 95 5 Upto Rs. 3000 (58%) Mahadev wadi 5743 100 93 7 Rs. 3001 -5000 (54%) Tallabkatta/Mondipora 2886 100 90 10 Upto Rs. 3000 (35%) Rs. 3001 -5000(35%) Pensionpora 2016 47 94 6 Upto Rs. 3000 (63%) Remarks Selecting for community sanitation facility Selecting for HH sanitation facility PROVIDING INDIVIDUAL TOILETS IN MAHADEV WADI SLUM & TALLABKATTA SLUM With Rs. 12, 000 for individual toilet with septic tank, Schemes like Sujal Nirmal can be availed Slum No. of HH HH practicing OD Unit cost of toilet Total cost Grant under Sujal Nirmal/ILCS Paid by user + ULB Mahadev wadi 5743 Rs. 14, 000 Rs. 8. 04 Cr Rs. 6. 89 Cr Rs. 1. 15 Cr Tallabkatta 2886 Rs. 14, 000 Rs. 4. 04 Cr Rs. 3. 46 Cr Rs. 0. 58 Cr PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

COMMUNITY LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY LOCATION OF COMMUNITY BLOCKS CONDITION ASSESSMENT Community toilet Details Prabhag

COMMUNITY LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY LOCATION OF COMMUNITY BLOCKS CONDITION ASSESSMENT Community toilet Details Prabhag no. 1 Prabhag Prabhag no. 2 no. 3 no. 4 no. 5 no. 6 no. 7 Prabhag Households 2205 2283 2294 2296 2060 2089 2458 No. of toilet blocks Nil 3 2 4 Nil 3 1 No. of seats - 40 40 50 - 40 10 No. of men - 20 20 25 - 20 5 No. of women - 20 20 25 - 20 5 Seats for children - 0 0 0 - 0 0 No. of functional seats - 0 0 0 - 0 0 Managed by - ULB ULB - ULB User charges applicable - No No No - No No Type of on-site treatment - Septic tank - Septic tank Defunct Remark Defunct KEY ISSUES - COMMUNITY LEVEL SANITATION • About 31% households in the city practices open defecation • Almost 57% slum dwellers defecate in open areas in community toilet • Defunct septic tanks leading to unhygienic environment • Lack of awareness about sanitation and hygiene PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS IN COMMUNITY LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SHORT TERM (FROM YEAR 2013 TILL 2015)

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS IN COMMUNITY LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SHORT TERM (FROM YEAR 2013 TILL 2015) MID TERM (FROM YEAR 2015 TILL 2028) Mitigate existing demand gaps Reducing dependency on CTS Upgrading Community Blocks for improved infrastructure and on-site collection-treatment- disposal system (Rs. 0. 20 crore) Aiming at reducing the dependency of CTs through promotion of individual toilets Rehabilitation of all existing CT blocks with improved level of sanitation, water supply, infrastructure, regular cleaning of septic tank, etc. Introduce O&M of CTs on pilot basis Eradication of OD practices and improve present condition of ownership towards community sanitation facility in slum areas. IEC campaigns are required Initiating awareness generation strategies in slum areas (IEC cost) Eradication of OD practices and improve present condition of ownership towards community sanitation facility in slum areas. IEC campaigns are required PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SUGGESTED PILOTS FOR COMMUNITY LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SELECTION OF PILOTS Slum population Slum names

SUGGESTED PILOTS FOR COMMUNITY LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY SELECTION OF PILOTS Slum population Slum names 1 Mastanshah Nagar % of OD Preference to Individual toilet (in %) Preference to CT (in %) Willing to invest in HH sanitation 496 77 92 8 Upto Rs. 3000 (40%) 2 Sidharth Nagar 3103 55 98 2 Not willing to invest (50%) 3 Garmal 4 Bawankholi 5 Risala Bazar/Ganesh wadi 1040 2266 9545 92 80 85 96 94 93 4 6 7 Rs. 5001 -10000 (36%) Upto Rs. 3000 (38%) Rs. 3001 -5000 (58%) 6 Joona Aundha Naka 3879 100 95 5 Upto Rs. 3000 (58%) 7 Mahadev wadi 5743 100 93 7 Rs. 3001 -5000 (54%) 8 Tallabkatta/Mondipora 2886 100 90 10 9 Pensionpora 2016 47 94 6 Upto Rs. 3000 (35%) Rs. 3001 -5000(35%) Upto Rs. 3000 (63%) Remarks Selecting for community sanitation facility Selecting for HH sanitation facility JUNA AUNDHA NAKA SIDDHARTH NAGAR Upgrading existing infrastructure (Rs. 1. 50 lakhs) Improve septic tanks, water facility, taps and toilet pans, electricity, cleaning of toilet block premise and cleaning of Nalla Improve septic tanks, water facility, taps and toilet pans, electricity, Cleaning of toilet block premise and cleaning of Nalla Introducing O&M (Rs. 5, 000/month) Introducing O&M (Rs. 5, 000 pm) Outsourcing O&M to CBOs @ of Rs. 5, 000/month Letting out day to day maintenance to CBOs with Rs. 5000/ month Levying user fee (Rs. 18, 360/month) Levying user fee (Rs. 22, 500/month) With about Rs. 30 per HH and Rs. 2 for any visitors and Rs. 1 for use of urinal PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

PUBLIC LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY LOCATION OF PUBLIC BLOCKS ISSUES IN PUBLIC LEVEL SANITATION Water

PUBLIC LEVEL SANITATION FACILITY LOCATION OF PUBLIC BLOCKS ISSUES IN PUBLIC LEVEL SANITATION Water clogging in front of the toilet block Variable user charges Gandhi chowk Unhygienic surroundings due to dumping of solid (O&M by private waste in backyard of the block contractor) Lack of awareness towards use of public level sanitation infrastructure Experiences heavy influx of floating population Bhaji mandi (market visitors) (O&M by ULB) Unclean and unhygienic condition of available infrastructure Schools & Adequate toilet blocks Colleges Periodic maintenance by school administration Public Buildings Almost all buildings have toilet blocks often maintained by private contractor SUGGESTED STRATEGIES FOR PUBLIC LEVEL SANITATION Area (Existing toilets) Gandhi Chowk Bhaji Mandi No. of users 70 50 Present status • O&M given on contract with variable user charge • Irregular cleaning • O&M given on contract with fixed user charges • Urinals not provided • Toilet unclean Upgrading infrastructure of 2 public toilet blocks (Rs. 6. 00 lakhs) §Rehabilitation of these blocks to provide water facility, taps, electricity and improved infrastructure with on-site treatment of septic tanks is suggested §Cost per block upto Rs. 3 lakhs is assumed Introduce O&M of PTs on pilot basis through involvement of private contractor (Rs. 5, 000/month) §Involving private contractor to operate and maintain the PT blocks on user fee basis §Present users 40 -50 persons. With improved facilities, projected users 70 -80 persons §User fee of Rs. 2 person, approx. Rs. 160 per day (about Rs. 5, 000/ month) - for maintenance PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

ACCESS TO TOILET FACILITY Provide individual toilets in slum areas Rs. 2. 69 crore

ACCESS TO TOILET FACILITY Provide individual toilets in slum areas Rs. 2. 69 crore Provide public toilet block at Bhaji mandai Rs. 0. 05 crore Upgrading Public Toilet Blocks with improved infrastructure and on-site collection-treatment Rs. 0. 06 crore Upgrading Community Toilet Blocks with improved infrastructure and on-site collection-treatment Rs. 0. 20 crore

WASTE AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE

WASTE AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

GREY AND BLACK WATER MANAGEMENT WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT- VALUE CHAIN Kitchen Bathrooms Domestic washing activities

GREY AND BLACK WATER MANAGEMENT WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT- VALUE CHAIN Kitchen Bathrooms Domestic washing activities Into natural drain/ river No treatment Open/covered drains COVERAGE-CONVEYANCE SYSYTEM COVERAGE 15% 18% closed drains open drains 67% no drains ISSUES IN CONVEYANCE SYSTEM • § § PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT Sewerage network: There is no continuous sewerage network in the city Solid waste is disposed into the nalla, so it leads to water clogging No separate system of grey and black water Untreated wastewater directly discharged into natural drains and river bodies Partial conveyance system exists MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

GREY AND BLACK WATER MANAGEMENT SANITATION ZONES CRITERIA § Topography § Existing natural drainage

GREY AND BLACK WATER MANAGEMENT SANITATION ZONES CRITERIA § Topography § Existing natural drainage system § Human interventions (mainly urban development activities like construction of buildings and roads) SEWAGE GENERATION Zone 1 ZONE 1 2 Population Sewage generation(MLD) 1 61002 3. 5 2 24399 1. 4 3 85401 4. 9 % SEWAGE FLOW IN NALLAS ZONE 2 3 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT 1 Nalla emerging from old Siphon carries 30% of the total wastewater 2 Nalla flowing near Datta Mandir carries 30% of the total wastewater generated, and 3 Nalla flowing along the Parbani Road carries 40% of wastewater generated in the region MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

GREY AND BLACK WATER MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY SAMPLING WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 4 1 3

GREY AND BLACK WATER MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY SAMPLING WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 4 1 3 2 1. 2. 3. 4. Sampling locations Ambika Taki Nalla near market Nalla (old basti) Tap water near railway bridge Sample Location Desired standards Ambika Taki Nalla near market Tap water near railway bridge Nalla (old basti) BOD, mg/l COD, mg/l TSS, mg/l p. H 30 159 81 250 240 130 600 130 94 6. 5 -8. 5 7. 3 7. 6 9. 3 60 7. 2 7. 8 102 160 117 7. 2 Beyond CPCB effluent standards Within the CPCB effluent standards PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT: VALUE CHAIN USER INTERFACE COLLECTION/STORAGE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT CONVEYANCE DISPOSAL

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT: VALUE CHAIN USER INTERFACE COLLECTION/STORAGE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT CONVEYANCE DISPOSAL MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

PROPOSED WASTEWATER VALUE CHAIN PROPOSED VALUE CHAIN Option 1 - Sewer Network User interface

PROPOSED WASTEWATER VALUE CHAIN PROPOSED VALUE CHAIN Option 1 - Sewer Network User interface Collection Conveyance Treatment Disposal Toilets Septic tank Open/ closed drains No treatment River/ lake Old town area New Areas Rehabilitation of drains +intercepting sewer Settled sewer + intercepting sewer Toilets Septic tank Toilets Settled sewer + Intercepting sewer Conventional STP Agriculture use/ river City wide UGD Option 2 – On-site Sanitation (FSM) option Old & New town area User interface Collection Conveyance Treatment Disposal Toilets Septic tank No conveyance No treatment River/ Open plots Fecal sludge treatment Facility Reuse for agriculture/energy conversion Only effluent Soak Pit Septage Vacuum suction emptier trucks PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

STRATEGIES FOR WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE Wastewater Management – Short Term (from year 2013 till 2015)

STRATEGIES FOR WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE Wastewater Management – Short Term (from year 2013 till 2015) Wastewater Management – Mid Term (from year 2015 till 2028) Existing open drains shall be rehabilitated with respect to natural terrain and then covered Develop city wide conveyance system • Maximum collection and conveyance coverage to dispose maximum wastewater at desired point • Reducing incidents of mixing solid waste garbage in drains • Enhanced efficiency of the existing conveyance system Initiate pilot for developing under ground sewer system (Rs. 11. 70 crore) Rest of the area can be covered by underground sewerage network Proposing zone-wise DEWATS treatment units Ensuring treatment of collected and conveyed wastewater and reuse for agricultural purposes Developing suitable conveyance system in the area which grossly lacks any arrangements Initiating Pilot for DEWATS treatment unit (Rs. 0. 31 crore) Ensuring treatment of collected and conveyed wastewater and reuse for agricultural purposes in pilot areas PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

PILOT FOR WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PILOT AREA KEY MAP SPECIFICATIONS Prabhag

PILOT FOR WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PILOT AREA KEY MAP SPECIFICATIONS Prabhag 01 Newly developing areas Low dense area No conveyance system Almost 95% HHs having septic tanks or pits • Slope is towards the Kayadu River • • Existing Road length (m) 43. 89 km Population 2012* 11, 966 Population 2013* 12, 649 Population 2028* 15, 392 Population 2043* Estimated waste generation in 2043(MLD) Existing conveyance system 18, 215 1. 96 60% PROPOSED OPTION FOR PILOT AREA User interface On-site collection Conveyance Treatment Disposal PF toilet Septic tank Underground sewerage network DEWATS/Conventional STP River/lake/ agriculture use PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

STRATEGIES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT - PILOT Pilot for DEWATS Selected area – • Newly

STRATEGIES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT - PILOT Pilot for DEWATS Selected area – • Newly developed area on northern side • Low density area • Slope towards natural drain SPECIFICATIONS Value chain User interface Pour flush Latrines Conveyance Settled system sewer Treatment Septic tank as primary treatment DEWATS for secondary treatment Disposal Kayadhu River or open drains PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT Households Population Sewage generation Road length Construction periods Construction cost( lakhs) 187 935 0. 1 MLD 2. 57 km (approx. ) 6 months 0. 42 per cubic meter MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

PROPOSED STRATEGIES FOR SEPTAGE MANAGEMENT SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS SUGGESTED STRATEGIES Leach Pits Highly concentrated quasi-solids

PROPOSED STRATEGIES FOR SEPTAGE MANAGEMENT SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS SUGGESTED STRATEGIES Leach Pits Highly concentrated quasi-solids with high pathogen content and higher moisture content Pits can be emptied manually without the need for specialised equipment Septic tanks Varies enormously depending on the number of people utilising the septic tank, water consumption, tank size, and pumping frequency Septage vacuum trucks are widely utilised for cleaning of septic tanks Indicator 2011 2012 2013 Population 85, 401 86, 506 90, 272 Households in the town 15, 573 15, 774 16, 461 No. of households using septic tanks 7, 586 7, 684 8, 019 316 320 334 7902 8, 004 8, 353 15, 804. 00 16, 008. 49 16, 705. 41 43. 30 43. 86 45. 77 18 18 20 0. 04 0. 05 Pits to be cleaned every year Total (septic tank + pit ) Septage Generation @ 2 cum/septic tank or pit in a year DG - Daily Generation (for 365 days in a year) No. of fecal sludge and septage drying beds Indicative Site Area (Ha) PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT NATURAL DRAINS & LAKES DETAILS Population Area Length of nalla 85,

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT NATURAL DRAINS & LAKES DETAILS Population Area Length of nalla 85, 401 2, 669 Ha 13. 5 Km OBSERVATIONS • Major nallas and drains carrying wastewater and runoff, discharge it in Kayadhu River without treatment leads to pollution of the river • Jaleshwar Talav gets polluted due to wastewater discharge from nearby slum area • Dumping of solid waste into the drains/ nallas reduces water carrying capacity of drains/nallas • At present, there is no separate conveyance system for wastewater and storm water generated in the city • Inadequate drainage system in newly developed areas SLOPE OF THE CITY EXITING STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Solid waste dumped into drain PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT Black and grey water let into natural drains MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Drainage zones ZONING Zone 1 Major three nallas/drains flowing in the

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Drainage zones ZONING Zone 1 Major three nallas/drains flowing in the centre of the city carries storm water as well as wastewater generated in the core area/densely populated area of the city. Zone 2 One major nalla flowing on the peripheral part of the city carries the storm water generated in the newly developed areas mainly from government offices and residential blocks of the city Zone 1 SUGGESTED STRATEGIES Short term Zone 2 De-silting of existing Nallas (natural drains) Includes cleaning and removal of solid waste of Nallas by JCB Long term Channelisation of Nallas in phases Nallas within municipal limit will be channelised with RCC structure Considering width of these Nallas as 2. 1 m and slope 1: 500 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT – SETTLED + CONVENTIONAL SEWER Citywide Conventional UGD (Rs. 50. 20 crore)

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT – SETTLED + CONVENTIONAL SEWER Citywide Conventional UGD (Rs. 50. 20 crore) Treatment Plant (Rs. 2. 24 crore) Rehabilitate existing drains (Rs. 9. 39 crore) and initiate settled sewer (Rs. 8. 10 crore) Conventional UGD (Rs. 20 crore)

ON-SITE SANITATION SYSTEM User interface Collection Conveyance Septic tank To achieve. . . Universal

ON-SITE SANITATION SYSTEM User interface Collection Conveyance Septic tank To achieve. . . Universal Access to toilets Vacuum suction Effluent disposed through soak pit emptier trucks/trolley Universal access to improved septic tanks & soak pits Treatment Centralised or decentralised fecal sludge treatment facility Safe conveyance of septage for treatment/reuse Adequate treatment of septage Provision of adequate vacuum suction emptier trucks and a regulated service Provision of treatment facility like sludge drying beds for collected septage Possibility of outsourcing services to private sector Decentralised treatment sites to reduce transportation cost Reuse/disposal Reuse for industrial/agriculture/ energy conversion Economic revenue from reuse of treated septage By what means. . . Individual toilet Community toilet Public toilet Bathrooms New/refurbishment of septic tanks Connection of septic tank and grey water to household/ community level soak pits Possibility of DEWATS Revenue from sale of treated septage for agriculture purpose or conversion to energy

EXPLORING A CITYWIDE OSS PROPOSAL User Interface Collection Conveyance Treatment Reuse/disposal Universal access to

EXPLORING A CITYWIDE OSS PROPOSAL User Interface Collection Conveyance Treatment Reuse/disposal Universal access to toilets Universal access to improved septic tanks and soak pits Safe conveyance of septage for treatment/reuse Adequate treatment of septage Economic revenue from treated septage New individual toilets (2, 305), public urinals (2 seats) and refurbishment of community (13 blocks), public toilets (2 blocks) Up-gradation (2797) and refurbishment (3793) of nonfunctional septic tanks Additional emptier trucks (6) with linked service Treatment of fecal sludge (10, 034 sq mt) Income through sale of compost (4, 631 tonne /year sold at Rs. 500/ tonne) or for energy New soak pits (15, 267) Promotion programme for use of toilets, ‘septic tank conversion’ and Ongoing regulatory monitoring Rs. 3. 8 Crore Rs. 7. 9 Crore Public funds (subsidy), micro credit, PPP Public funds (subsidy), micro credit, household own funds Business model for community/public toilets, explore microcredit options Rs. 0. 6 Crore 0. 1 Crore Public funds, PPP, private entrepreneur Develop separate or integrated business models for septic tank emptying, treatment and explore option for reuse or energy conversion

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT – ON-SITE SANITATION OPTION Decentralised Fecal sludge treatment facility

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT – ON-SITE SANITATION OPTION Decentralised Fecal sludge treatment facility

COMPARISON OF WASTEWATER OPTIONS Aspects OPTION 1 OPTION 2 Option 3 Description of Option

COMPARISON OF WASTEWATER OPTIONS Aspects OPTION 1 OPTION 2 Option 3 Description of Option Conventional Sewer + Settled Sewer On-site Sanitation System Financial Aspects Capital Costs Rs. 40. 4 crore Rs. 22. 60 crore Rs. 5. 60 crore O&M Costs Rs. 1. 30 crore Rs. 0. 40 crore Rs. 0. 06 crore 5 5 4 (average/ annum) Revenues (average/ annum) Project Period Sanitation Score Access Both options will have the same outcomes as per NUSP Waste management “Universal Access to All and 100 % Sanitised City” Other consideration Institutional Flexibility Funding options Other parameters Required technical knowledge for implementation and operation of this project Extension of conventional sewer to new areas is difficult and expensive Can be easily extended to new areas, possibility of DEWATS in some areas Grants funding is essential Grants may be required or can be funded from ULB funds Appropriate design is essential Can be funded from ULB funds Need to assess soil permeability and water table levels for this proposal

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT EXISTING VALUE CHAIN FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COLLECTION Dustbin TRANSPORTATION TREATMENT

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT EXISTING VALUE CHAIN FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COLLECTION Dustbin TRANSPORTATION TREATMENT DISPOSAL Open space Ghantagadi No treatment Dustbin Dumper placer PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT Dumping site Dumping in Nalla MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 15 2 2 2 5 15 23 5 Ju Ta lla

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 15 2 2 2 5 15 23 5 Ju Ta lla bk at ar ag N ha M Si dd Ri sa ha ns ta as rt h la ev ad ah M r Ba w ag za i ad a ak ha nd na 100 ta 73 ar 85 N ol i an kh w ad aw dh Ba u Hotels and Restaurants 90 10 a 64% 85 N 50 33 7 Roadside 100 Au Street Sweeping 6% 100 al 7% Community Bins h 60 rm 10% Ghantagadi 10 30 Households Ba 3% Solid waste collection in slums Ga Solid Waste Generation Collection Of Solid Waste Area Transportation Collection number trips Waste collection in MT/day 4 4 4 1 2 Secondary collection Dumper placer 1 2 2 Tipper truck 1 2 4 Tractor trailer 2 3 6 Vehicle 3 wheeler auto tipper Residential area Door to door (D 2 D) – Coverage 50% (managed by private operator) Compactor (from transfer point) 40 waste bins from residential and Residential non-residential area Non-residential Open dumps and road side drains Nalla cleaning JCB (borrowing) Treatment & disposal Dumped at Ramleela ground (Transfer point) Dumping ground located 8 km away the city Twice in a year, specially during pre-monsoon Total waste collection MT/day 16 MT/day (78% of total waste generation) PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Treatment and Disposal § No scientific treatment and disposal techniques §

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Treatment and Disposal § No scientific treatment and disposal techniques § Collected waste dumped without segregation § Site is under the possession of Hingoli Nagar Parishad and is covered by a boundary wall. Dumping of waste in open areas, along nallas and open plots Overflowing waste bins Issues About 50% D 2 D coverage (only old city area is covered) Collection Inadequate number of waste bins (40 bins in use) Waste collection - 78% of waste generation Transport Inadequate number of vehicles for transportation Segregation Lack of segregation at source No facility for scientific treatment and disposal for municipal Processing and solid waste Disposal Absence of infrastructure for scientific disposal techniques PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

Mid Term (Year 2015 - 2028) Long Term (Year 2028 - 2043) Improvement in

Mid Term (Year 2015 - 2028) Long Term (Year 2028 - 2043) Improvement in existing system Achieving maximum coverage of collection New infrastructure Augment vehicles for waste collection depending upon urban sprawl and population changes New infrastructure Augment and upgrade existing vehicles for waste collection depending upon urban sprawl and population changes Segregation Improvement in existing system Initiate pilot project for segregation of waste in newly developed area Improvement in existing system Initiate citywide segregation of waste Improvement in existing system Developing treatment mechanism for biodegradable wastes New infrastructure Developing sanitary landfill site and treatment mechanism for wet garbage Initiating awareness generation campaigns for improved collection practices Identifying stakeholders like NGOs, CBOs, SHGs or women welfare groups to participate in management of the service at various levels like collection, segregation Achieve sustainability in solid waste management processes IEC and other Collection & transportation Short Term (Year 2013 - 2015) Treatment & Disposal SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS IN SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Improvement in existing system Involve private service providers for regular nalla cleaning New infrastructure Augment vehicles for waste collection Initiating IEC and capacity building programmes for service providers for improved service delivery PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS IN SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Cost estimation for vehicles (solid waste collection) Year

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS IN SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Cost estimation for vehicles (solid waste collection) Year Population MSW in MT/ Day Estimated requirement of Vehicles Residential * Non-residential** Total req. Existing vehicle Gap Estimated Cost Rs. in lakhs 2012 86, 506 17 14 4 10 40 2 2 0 -- 2013 90, 272 18 15 14 1 4 2 2 0 -- 2028 1, 09, 855 22 18 0 18 72 2 0 2 8 2043 1, 30, 000 26 20 0 20 80 3 8 Assumptions 3 wheeler Auto trippers- 0. 5 MT, 2 trips (Rs. 4 lakhs) OR 1 MT, 2 trips (Rs. 6 lakhs) – Both used for D 2 D collection Ghantagadi – 2 MT capacity, 1 trip (Rs. 8 lakhs) (Used for D 2 D collection), Tractor Trailer – 2 MT, 2 -3 trips (Rs. 8 lakhs) (used for nalla cleaning and commercial areas) The ratio of vehicle requirement for residential and non-residential is considered as 80 -20 based on survey Assuming 15 -20 years of life for vehicles; during mid term and long term period new vehicles is required to buy. Also, the cost may vary due to increase in market rates after year 15 -30 years Criteria for selecting pilot area • Newly developing and low density area • High income level (based on primary survey) • No door to door collection PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

SUMMARY - SANITATION PROPOSAL User interface Collection Conveyance Treatment Rehabilitation and closing of drains

SUMMARY - SANITATION PROPOSAL User interface Collection Conveyance Treatment Rehabilitation and closing of drains (Rs. 9. 39 crore) Pilot DEWATS in newly developing areas of Prabhag 1 Reuse/disposal Individual toilets on pilot basis in Mahadev wadi slum (Rs. 0. 60 crore) Refurbishment of all CTs in slum and non-slum areas (Rs. 0. 20 crore) Provision of individual toilets in slum areas (Rs. 2. 09 crore) Refurbishment of existing PTs (Rs. 0. 06 crore) Provision of 2 seats of public urinals in Bhaji mandi area (Rs. 0. 01 crore) Pilot for outsourcing O &M of CT to Private/CBO in Siddarthnagar slum Initiate outsourcing of O&M to private operator for CTs IEC campaigns Initiate citywide Settled Sewer Network or Initiate UGD in newly developing areas and settled sewer in old town (Rs. 20 crore/ Rs. 8. 10 crore) Prabhag 5 – Pilot for Settled Sewer Prabhag 1 - Pilot for UGD (if UDG in full city) Introduce Integrated Contracts for SWM and drain cleaning Centralised Treatment Facility as Waste Stabilisation pond (WSP) (Rs. 2. 24 Cr. ) Reuse for Agriculture and Irrigation Purposes Empanel septic tank emptying service providers De-silting & Rehabilitation of Natural drains (Rs. 0. 91 crore) Settled sewer : 36. 4 crores OR Settled + Conventional sewer : 51. 2 crores Access to toilets and Waste Water Proposal Increasing Door to Door collection of waste (Rs. 0. 44 crore) Initiate pilot project for segregation of waste in newly developed area (Rs 0. 02 crore) IEC campaigns Augmentation of vehicles (Rs. 0. 80 crore) Developing treatment mechanisms for wastes and developing sanitary landfill site (Rs. 3. 51 crore) Rs. 5. 24 crores Solid Waste Management

HINGOLI: SUMMARY OF BUDGETS SUMMARY OF FINANCES AFTER RECASTING Rs. in crore Items Opening

HINGOLI: SUMMARY OF BUDGETS SUMMARY OF FINANCES AFTER RECASTING Rs. in crore Items Opening Balance Revenue Receipts Revenue Expenditure Operating ratio Capital Account Capital Receipts Capital Expenditure Capital Utilisation Extra-ordinary Account Extraordinary Receipts Extraordinary Expenditure Summary Total Receipts Total Expenditure 2005 Actual 2006 Actual 0. 80 2007 Actual 1. 02 2008 Actual 1. 57 2009 Actual 1. 78 2. 95 4. 03 4. 75 4. 54 6. 69 6. 10 2. 69 2. 86 3. 45 4. 36 4. 40 0. 60 0. 76 0. 67 0. 75 2. 00 268% 0. 65 6. 71 - - 1. 91 0. 77 0. 72 28% 0% 0% 2010 RE 0. 72 3. 09 5. 69 10. 58 1. 86 - 4. 32 1. 01 2. 59 0% 60% - 0. 03 0. 11 0. 00 1. 57 - 0. 01 0. 04 0. 12 0. 10 0. 60 4. 77 11. 50 4. 57 6. 80 6. 10 11. 57 4. 69 4. 78 4. 25 5. 20 5. 51 13. 77 The municipal expenses have increased from Rs. 4. 7 crore in 2005 -06 to Rs. 5. 51 crore in 2009 -10 registering a CAGR of 4. 1% Similarly, municipal receipts have increased from Rs. 4. 8 crore to Rs. 6. 1 crore registering a CAGR of 6. 3% touching a high of Rs. 6. 8 crore in 2008 -09

HINGOLI: O&M EXPENSES Ø Property and water taxes are major own tax contributors. Property

HINGOLI: O&M EXPENSES Ø Property and water taxes are major own tax contributors. Property tax contributes 18% to the overall revenue receipts Ø Mudrank Shulka grants and entertainment tax grants are major grants received by HNP Ø The grant in lieu of octroi and dearness allowance grant also contribute significantly Ø Rents from properties, interest on investments are major non-tax contributors Almost all the capital works are carried out from grants Revenue Expenditures General administration department Social security 13% Ø Almost all the expenses towards public health are towards WSS (54% of all revenue expenses) 2% 23% 4% 3% Ø 56% expenses towards permanent establishments Public Health and Welfare Education 54%

HINGOLI: WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION (WSS) FINANCES Contribution to Receipts Ø WSS contributes only

HINGOLI: WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION (WSS) FINANCES Contribution to Receipts Ø WSS contributes only 8% towards overall revenue receipts but accounts for 53% of the revenue expenses WSS 8% Ø Water tax (Rs. 900 per connection per annum) is the only revenue stream for the sector Ø Collection efficiency of water tax is 60% compared to 68% for property tax Others 92% Ø Around 58% expenses establishments in WSS are towards Ø 73% of expenses in water supply are towards electricity and bulk water Ø Per capita spending on WSS (Rs. 297) is only 32% of High Powered Expert Committee (HPEC), 2011 norm of Rs. 926 Contribution to expenses Others 47% WSS 53%

HINGOLI: MUNICIPAL FINANCE FORECASTS Revenue expenses will grow at CAGR of 7. 1% While

HINGOLI: MUNICIPAL FINANCE FORECASTS Revenue expenses will grow at CAGR of 7. 1% While revenue receipts at 5. 3% Ø The budget size will grow to Rs. 13 crore by 2022 recording a CAGR of 7% from the last actual figure Ø The revenue receipts will grow to around Rs. 11. 4 crore against expenses of Rs. 10 crore in 2022 Ø The revenue surplus is projected to be around Rs 1. 4 crore after covering WSS deficit of Rs. 3. 6 crore Past trends Future projections 1. Financing Plan for Hingoli CSP is prepared for three scenarios ‘Business As Usual’ with committed UIDSSMT 2. Full CSP (+UIDSSMT) 3. Comparison of wastewater systems– a) Underground sewerage system (USS) b) Settled sewer system (SSS) c) On-site sanitation system (OSS)

I) BUSINESS AS USUAL – UIDSSMT Water supply scheme sanctioned under UIDSSMT Project components

I) BUSINESS AS USUAL – UIDSSMT Water supply scheme sanctioned under UIDSSMT Project components includes water supply network augmentation, storage capacity augmentation and water production augmentation Project cost Rs. 46 crore State government share – 90% Rs. 41 crore ULB share – 10% Rs. 4. 5 crore Year -wise Capex required. Additional O&M and revenue expected to be generated Impact of UIDSSMT on the Revenue Account Revenue account will continue to show surplus after the UIDSSMT Programme is implemented

II) FULL CSP (INCLUDING TOILETS, WASTEWATER, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER SUPPLY, UIDSSMT PROJECT) -

II) FULL CSP (INCLUDING TOILETS, WASTEWATER, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER SUPPLY, UIDSSMT PROJECT) - 1 Water supply Ø Water supply scheme – UIDSSMT Ø Slum infrastructure Ø Energy audit Ø Replace service line connections Ø Storage capacity Ø Collection efficiency of taxes Wastewater Ø Community and public toilets Ø Individual toilet provision Ø Sewerage network Ø Settled sewer Ø Suction emptier trucks Ø Wastewater treatment facility Ø Storm water drains Ø De-silting and channelisation of drains Ø IEC campaign Solid waste Ø Segregation of waste Ø Collection bins Ø New vehicles for solid waste transportation Ø Sanitary landfill site Ø IEC campaign

II) FULL CSP (INCLUDING TOILETS, WASTEWATER, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER SUPPLY, UIDSSMT PROJECT) -

II) FULL CSP (INCLUDING TOILETS, WASTEWATER, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER SUPPLY, UIDSSMT PROJECT) - 2 Revenue Income and Expenditure High revenue deficit after the CSP proposals are implemented Surplus/(Deficit) of Revenue Account

II) FULL CSP (INCLUDING TOILETS, WASTEWATER, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER SUPPLY, UIDSSMT PROJECT) -

II) FULL CSP (INCLUDING TOILETS, WASTEWATER, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER SUPPLY, UIDSSMT PROJECT) - 3 WSS Operating Plan Increment in tariff required to sustain operating costs Property tax, water supply tax, wastewater tax and solid waste charges WSS Capital Plan Grants of around Rs. 81 required to implement proposals of CSP crore is all the

III) COMPARING WASTEWATER (WITH TOILETS) PROPOSALS- 1 COMPARISON OF OPERATING COSTS FOR WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGIES

III) COMPARING WASTEWATER (WITH TOILETS) PROPOSALS- 1 COMPARISON OF OPERATING COSTS FOR WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGIES a) Underground Sewerage System Status of Revenue Account b) Settled Sewer System c) On-site Sanitation System

III) COMPARING WASTEWATER (WITH TOILETS) PROPOSALS- 2 COMPARISON OF OPERATING PLANS a) Underground sewerage

III) COMPARING WASTEWATER (WITH TOILETS) PROPOSALS- 2 COMPARISON OF OPERATING PLANS a) Underground sewerage system ~ Rs. 2. 3 crore/annum operating expenditure b) Settled sewer system ~ Rs. 1. 4 crore/annum operating expenditure c) On-site sanitation system ~ Rs. 1 crore/annum operating expenditure

III) COMPARING WASTEWATER (WITH TOILETS) PROPOSALS- 3 COMPARISON OF CAPITAL PLANS a) Underground sewerage

III) COMPARING WASTEWATER (WITH TOILETS) PROPOSALS- 3 COMPARISON OF CAPITAL PLANS a) Underground sewerage system Rs. 95 crore Capital expenditure requirement b) Settled sewer system Rs. 77 crore Capital expenditure requirement c) On-site sanitation system Rs. 63 crore Capital expenditure requirement

SUMMARY OF FINANCING PLAN CSP options Capital Finances Operating Finances Sources of funds (Rs.

SUMMARY OF FINANCING PLAN CSP options Capital Finances Operating Finances Sources of funds (Rs. in crore) Average per annum(Rs. in crore) Tariff increase required ULB funds Grants Internal funds Debt (HHs, PPP, micro -credit) Private Total Capex Additional Opex Revenue Base tariff = Rs. 1, 465/HH/ annum I) Business as Usual (BAU) scenario with committed projects 42. 6 9. 1 - - 51. 7 0. 9 Rs. 2, 066 II) Full CSP proposal with water supply actions 81. 0 10. 0 38. 0 3. 5 132. 0 2. 7 1. 2 Rs. 7, 545 (41%) (415%) III) Proposal with only wastewater technology options A. Citywide settled sewer and sewerage network 76. 1 9. 9 7. 0 1. 5 94. 5 2. 3 1. 2 Rs. 3, 602 B. Citywide settled sewer 60. 5 14. 7 - 2. 0 77. 2 1. 4 1. 7 Rs. 2, 055 C. On-site sanitation system 42. 6 15. 7 - 4. 7 63 1. 0 1. 5 Rs. 2, 055 (146%) (40%)

ASSUMPTIONS FOR CSP ACTIONS CSP Actions - HINGOLI (All costs in Rs. in crore)

ASSUMPTIONS FOR CSP ACTIONS CSP Actions - HINGOLI (All costs in Rs. in crore) Capital cost assumption Operating cost assumption Unit costs Capex Unit cost - 45. 70 14, 000 O&M Funding source Grants ULB Private 2% of capex 90% 10% - 1. 21 - 80% 10% - - Rs. 500/connection penalty charges Rs. 2, 000/ connection 0. 02 - - 100% - 0. 16 - - 100% - - 50% Committed projects Water augmentation scheme proposed under UIDSSMT Water distribution network, storage, water production 867 individual toilets proposed under ILCS Water supply actions Regularising illegal connections (1%) Energy audit Replacement of service line connections Improvement in collection efficiency of water supply charges Sanitation actions Construct new soak pits Rs. 3, 000/soak pit Provision of safe sanitation disposal system to existing Rs. 5, 000/septic tank unsanitary toilets (50% septic tanks – 3, 793, upgration of non. Rs. 15, 000/CT-PT functional septic tanks– 2, 797, upgradation of septic tanks of 13 septic tank CT and 2 PT) 5. 52 - 3. 99 - - 50% Rs. 1. 5 lakhs/ block 0. 24 Rs. 5, 000/ block/month (for all CT and PT) - 100% - Construction of community and public toilets Rs. 3 lakhs/block 0. 04 Rs. 5000/block/ month - 100% - Construction of additional individual toilets in non-sewered areas Rs. 14, 000/toilet 1. 83 - - 50% - 0. 47 - - 100% - Improve condition of existing community and public toilets IEC campaign for sanitation awareness

ASSUMPTIONS FOR CSP ACTIONS CSP Actions - HINGOLI (All costs in Rs. in crore)

ASSUMPTIONS FOR CSP ACTIONS CSP Actions - HINGOLI (All costs in Rs. in crore) Capital cost assumption Operating cost assumption Unit costs Capex Unit cost Rs. 25 lakhs/km 20. 45 Rs. 2000/ connection Upgradation of open drains to closed drains Construction of covered drains in unserved areas O&M Funding source Grants ULB Private 5% of capex 90% 10% - 1. 30 - - 100% - Rs. 12 lakhs/km 9. 39 - 100% - Rs. 16 lakhs/km 12. 7 2% of capex 100% - Procurement of suction emptier trucks Rs. 10 lakhs/ truck 0. 60 10% of capex - 100% - Construction of wastewater treatment plant Rs. 16 lakhs/ MLD 2. 25 7% of capex 90% 10% - 0. 10 5% of capex 100% - 8. 14 2% of capex 90% 10% - Wastewater actions Expanding or laying of new sewerage network (1. 5% DPR cost added) Household cost for connecting to sewerage network (6, 500 connections) Settled sewer in old city area Rs. 0. 06 lakhs/ cu. m Rs. 6. 8 lakhs/km Settled sewer in newly developing area Rs. 6. 8 lakhs/km 5. 43 2% of capex - 6. 50 - Segregation of waste collection and transportation - 0. 02 - - 100% - IEC for campaign for compliance and segregation - 0. 15 - - 100% - Rs. 4 lakhs/vehicle 0. 62 10% of capex - 100% - - 3. 51 5% of capex 90% 10% - Construction of sludge treatment facility De-silting and channelisation of natural drains 100% Solid waste actions Procurement of new vehicles for collection and transportation Construction of sanitary landfill facility

Thank You PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED

Thank You PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PAS) PROJECT MICRO CLOUD COMPUTING PRIVATE (INDIA) LIMITED