Chronic Kidney Disease Classification in Systolic Blood Pressure

Chronic Kidney Disease Classification in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Comparison Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and CKDEpidemiology Collaboration Definitions Rocco et al. Am J Nephrol 2016; 44: 130 -140 (DOI: 10. 1159/000448722) Table 1. Characteristics of SPRINT participants according to reclassification status © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved

Chronic Kidney Disease Classification in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Comparison Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and CKDEpidemiology Collaboration Definitions Rocco et al. Am J Nephrol 2016; 44: 130 -140 (DOI: 10. 1159/000448722) Fig. 1. Reclassification rates for SPRINT participants (n = 9, 308) across e. GFR categories by the CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations. Blue bars indicate reclassification to less advanced CKD stage (higher e. GFR); yellow bars, no reclassification; red bars, downward reclassification to more advanced CKD stage (lower e. GFR). © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved

Chronic Kidney Disease Classification in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Comparison Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and CKDEpidemiology Collaboration Definitions Rocco et al. Am J Nephrol 2016; 44: 130 -140 (DOI: 10. 1159/000448722) Fig. 2. Reclassification rates for SPRINT participants by age across e. GFR categories by the CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations. Blue bars indicate reclassification to less advanced CKD stage (higher e. GFR); yellow bars, no reclassification; red bars, downward reclassification to more advanced CKD stage (lower e. GFR). © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved

Chronic Kidney Disease Classification in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Comparison Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and CKDEpidemiology Collaboration Definitions Rocco et al. Am J Nephrol 2016; 44: 130 -140 (DOI: 10. 1159/000448722) Fig. 3. Reclassification rates for SPRINT participants by race (black or white only) Hispanic ethnicity and gender across e. GFR categories by the CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations. Blue bars indicate reclassification to less advanced CKD stage (higher e. GFR); yellow bars, no reclassification; red bars, downward reclassification to more advanced CKD stage (lower e. GFR). © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved

Chronic Kidney Disease Classification in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Comparison Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and CKDEpidemiology Collaboration Definitions Rocco et al. Am J Nephrol 2016; 44: 130 -140 (DOI: 10. 1159/000448722) Table 2. Reclassification of SPRINT participants with e. GFR <60 ml/min/1. 73 m 2 based on either MDRD or CKD-EPI study equations © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved

Chronic Kidney Disease Classification in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Comparison Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and CKDEpidemiology Collaboration Definitions Rocco et al. Am J Nephrol 2016; 44: 130 -140 (DOI: 10. 1159/000448722) Table 3. Agreement between e. GFR categories by the CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved