Chapter Seven Revealed Preference Revealed Preference Analysis u
- Slides: 127
Chapter Seven Revealed Preference
Revealed Preference Analysis u Suppose we observe the demands (consumption choices) that a consumer makes for different budgets. This reveals information about the consumer’s preferences. We can use this information to. . .
Revealed Preference Analysis – Test the behavioral hypothesis that a consumer chooses the most preferred bundle from those available. – Discover the consumer’s preference relation.
Assumptions on Preferences u Preferences – do not change while the choice data are gathered. – are strictly convex. – are monotonic. u Together, convexity and monotonicity imply that the most preferred affordable bundle is unique.
Assumptions on Preferences x 2 If preferences are convex and monotonic (i. e. well-behaved) then the most preferred affordable bundle is unique. x 2* x 1
Direct Preference Revelation u Suppose that the bundle x* is chosen when the bundle y is affordable. Then x* is revealed directly as preferred to y (otherwise y would have been chosen).
Direct Preference Revelation x 2 The chosen bundle x* is revealed directly as preferred to the bundles y and z. x* y z x 1
Direct Preference Revelation u That x is revealed directly as preferred to y will be written as p x D y.
Indirect Preference Revelation u Suppose x is revealed directly preferred to y, and y is revealed directly preferred to z. Then, by transitivity, x is revealed indirectly as preferred to z. Write this as x z p I p p D y and y D z x p so x I z.
Indirect Preference Revelation x 2 z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* z x 1
Indirect Preference Revelation x 2 x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. x* y* z x 1
Indirect Preference Revelation x 2 z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. x* y* z x 1
Indirect Preference Revelation x 2 z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. y* z x 1
Indirect Preference Revelation z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. But x*x* y* y* D z p x 2 x 1
Indirect Preference Revelation z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. But x*x* y* y* D z and y* z p p x 2 D x 1
Indirect Preference Revelation z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. But x*x* y* y* D z and y* z p p D x 1 so x* p x 2 I z.
Two Axioms of Revealed Preference u To apply revealed preference analysis, choices must satisfy two criteria -- the Weak and the Strong Axioms of Revealed Preference.
The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) u If the bundle x is revealed directly as preferred to the bundle y then it is never the case that y is revealed directly as preferred to x; i. e. p D y not (y p x D x).
The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) u Choice data which violate the WARP are inconsistent with economic rationality. u The WARP is a necessary condition for applying economic rationality to explain observed choices.
The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) u What choice data violate the WARP?
x 2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) y x x 1
x is chosen when y is available so x y. p x 2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) D y x x 1
x is chosen when y is available so x y. p D y is chosen when x is available so y x. p x 2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) y D x x 1
x is chosen when y is available so x y. p D y is chosen when x is available so y x. D These statements are inconsistent with x each other. x 1 p x 2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) y
Checking if Data Violate the WARP u. A consumer makes the following choices: – At prices (p 1, p 2)=($2, $2) the choice was (x 1, x 2) = (10, 1). – At (p 1, p 2)=($2, $1) the choice was (x 1, x 2) = (5, 5). – At (p 1, p 2)=($1, $2) the choice was (x 1, x 2) = (5, 4). u Is the WARP violated by these data?
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Checking if Data Violate the WARP Red numbers are costs of chosen bundles.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP Circles surround affordable bundles that were not chosen.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP Circles surround affordable bundles that were not chosen.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP Circles surround affordable bundles that were not chosen.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Checking if Data Violate the WARP (10, 1) is directly revealed preferred to (5, 4), but (5, 4) is directly revealed preferred to (10, 1), so the WARP is violated by the data.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP x 2 p D (10, 1) p (5, 4) D (5, 4) x 1
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference (SARP) u If the bundle x is revealed (directly or indirectly) as preferred to the bundle y and x ¹ y, then it is never the case that the y is revealed (directly or indirectly) as preferred to x; i. e. x y or x y p p D x or y p not ( y I I x ).
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference u What choice data would satisfy the WARP but violate the SARP?
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference u Consider the following data: A: (p 1, p 2, p 3) = (1, 3, 10) & (x 1, x 2, x 3) = (3, 1, 4) B: (p 1, p 2, p 3) = (4, 3, 6) & (x 1, x 2, x 3) = (2, 5, 3) C: (p 1, p 2, p 3) = (1, 1, 5) & (x 1, x 2, x 3) = (4, 4, 3)
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference A: ($1, $3, $10) (3, 1, 4). B: ($4, $3, $6) (2, 5, 3). C: ($1, $5) (4, 4, 3).
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference In situation A, bundle A is directly revealed preferred to bundle C; A C. p D
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference In situation B, bundle B is directly revealed preferred to bundle A; B A. p D
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference In situation C, bundle C is directly revealed preferred to bundle B; C B. p D
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference The data do not violate the WARP.
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference We have that D B p p p D C, B p A A. A and C D so, by transitivity, p I p A B, B I C and C I The data do not violate the WARP but. . .
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference We have that p p D C, B D p A A and C D B I so, by transitivity, p p I B, B I p A I C and C I A. I The data do not violate the WARP but. . .
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference p D A is inconsistent p B with A I B. I I I The data do not violate the WARP but. . .
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference p D C is inconsistent p A with C I A. I I I The data do not violate the WARP but. . .
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference p D B is inconsistent p C with B I C. I I I The data do not violate the WARP but. . .
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference The data do not violate the WARP but there are 3 violations of the SARP. I I I
The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference u That the observed choice data satisfy the SARP is a condition necessary and sufficient for there to be a well-behaved preference relation that “rationalizes” the data. u So our 3 data cannot be rationalized by a well-behaved preference relation.
Recovering Indifference Curves u Suppose we have the choice data satisfy the SARP. u Then we can discover approximately where are the consumer’s indifference curves. u How?
Recovering Indifference Curves u Suppose we observe: A: (p 1, p 2) = ($1, $1) & (x 1, x 2) = (15, 15) B: (p 1, p 2) = ($2, $1) & (x 1, x 2) = (10, 20) C: (p 1, p 2) = ($1, $2) & (x 1, x 2) = (20, 10) D: (p 1, p 2) = ($2, $5) & (x 1, x 2) = (30, 12) E: (p 1, p 2) = ($5, $2) & (x 1, x 2) = (12, 30). u Where lies the indifference curve containing the bundle A = (15, 15)?
Recovering Indifference Curves u The table showing direct preference revelations is:
Recovering Indifference Curves Direct revelations only; the WARP is not violated by the data.
Recovering Indifference Curves u Indirect preference revelations add no extra information, so the table showing both direct and indirect preference revelations is the same as the table showing only the direct preference revelations:
Recovering Indifference Curves Both direct and indirect revelations; neither WARP nor SARP are violated by the data.
Recovering Indifference Curves u Since the choices satisfy the SARP, there is a well-behaved preference relation that “rationalizes” the choices.
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E B A A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) B: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(10, 20) C: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(20, 10) D: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 5); (x 1, x 2)=(30, 12) E: (p 1, p 2)=(5, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(12, 30). C D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E B A A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) B: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(10, 20) C: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(20, 10) D: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 5); (x 1, x 2)=(30, 12) E: (p 1, p 2)=(5, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(12, 30). C D x 1 Begin with bundles revealed to be less preferred than bundle A.
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15). A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15). A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15). A is directly revealed preferred to any bundle in A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) B: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(10, 20). E B A C D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) B: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(10, 20). B A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A is directly revealed preferred to B and … B A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 B is directly revealed preferred to all bundles in B x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 B so, by transitivity, A is indirectly revealed preferred to all bundles in x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 so A is now revealed preferred to all bundles in the union. B A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) E C: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(20, 10). B A C D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) C: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(20, 10). A C x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A is directly revealed preferred to C and. . . A C x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 C is directly revealed preferred to all bundles in C x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 so, by transitivity, A is indirectly revealed preferred to all bundles in C x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 so A is now revealed preferred to all bundles in the union. B A C x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 so A is now revealed preferred to all bundles in the union. Therefore the indifference curve containing A must lie B everywhere else above A this shaded set. C x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves u Now, what about the bundles revealed as more preferred than A?
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E B A A A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) B: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(10, 20) C: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(20, 10) D: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 5); (x 1, x 2)=(30, 12) E: (p 1, p 2)=(5, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(12, 30). C D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) D: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 5); (x 1, x 2)=(30, 12). A D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. A D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex A D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and D are A preferred to A also. D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and D are A preferred to A also. D As well, . . . x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 all bundles containing the same amount of commodity 2 and more of commodity 1 than D are preferred to D and therefore are preferred to A A also. D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 bundles revealed to be strictly preferred to A A D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E B A A A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) B: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(10, 20) C: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(20, 10) D: (p 1, p 2)=(2, 5); (x 1, x 2)=(30, 12) E: (p 1, p 2)=(5, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(12, 30). C D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 A: (p 1, p 2)=(1, 1); (x 1, x 2)=(15, 15) E E: (p 1, p 2)=(5, 2); (x 1, x 2)=(12, 30). A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E is directly revealed preferred to A. E A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are E convex A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E A E is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and E are preferred to A also. x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E A E is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and E are preferred to A also. As well, . . . x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 all bundles containing the same amount of commodity 1 and more of commodity 2 than E are preferred to E and therefore are preferred to A also. E A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 More bundles revealed to be strictly preferred to A E A x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E B A Bundles revealed earlier as preferred to A C D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 E All bundles revealed to be preferred to A B A C D x 1
Recovering Indifference Curves u Now we have upper and lower bounds on where the indifference curve containing bundle A may lie.
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 All bundles revealed to be preferred to A A x 1 All bundles revealed to be less preferred to A
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 All bundles revealed to be preferred to A A x 1 All bundles revealed to be less preferred to A
Recovering Indifference Curves x 2 The region in which the indifference curve containing bundle A must lie. A x 1
Index Numbers u Over time, many prices change. Are consumers better or worse off “overall” as a consequence? u Index numbers give approximate answers to such questions.
Index Numbers u Two basic types of indices – price indices, and – quantity indices u Each index compares expenditures in a base period and in a current period by taking the ratio of expenditures.
Quantity Index Numbers u. A quantity index is a price-weighted average of quantities demanded; i. e. u (p 1, p 2) can be base period prices (p 1 b, p 2 b) or current period prices (p 1 t, p 2 t).
Quantity Index Numbers u If (p 1, p 2) = (p 1 b, p 2 b) then we have the Laspeyres quantity index;
Quantity Index Numbers u If (p 1, p 2) = (p 1 t, p 2 t) then we have the Paasche quantity index;
Quantity Index Numbers u How can quantity indices be used to make statements about changes in welfare?
Quantity Index Numbers u If then so consumers overall were better off in the base period than they are now in the current period.
Quantity Index Numbers u If then so consumers overall are better off in the current period than in the base period.
Price Index Numbers u. A price index is a quantity-weighted average of prices; i. e. u (x 1, x 2) can be the base period bundle (x 1 b, x 2 b) or else the current period bundle (x 1 t, x 2 t).
Price Index Numbers u If (x 1, x 2) = (x 1 b, x 2 b) then we have the Laspeyres price index;
Price Index Numbers u If (x 1, x 2) = (x 1 t, x 2 t) then we have the Paasche price index;
Price Index Numbers u How can price indices be used to make statements about changes in welfare? u Define the expenditure ratio
Price Index Numbers u If then so consumers overall are better off in the current period.
Price Index Numbers u But, if then so consumers overall were better off in the base period.
Full Indexation? u Changes in price indices are sometimes used to adjust wage rates or transfer payments. This is called “indexation”. u “Full indexation” occurs when the wages or payments are increased at the same rate as the price index being used to measure the aggregate inflation rate.
Full Indexation? u Since prices do not all increase at the same rate, relative prices change along with the “general price level”. u A common proposal is to index fully Social Security payments, with the intention of preserving for the elderly the “purchasing power” of these payments.
Full Indexation? u The usual price index proposed for indexation is the Paasche quantity index (the Consumers’ Price Index). u What will be the consequence?
Full Indexation? Notice that this index uses current period prices to weight both base and current period consumptions.
Full Indexation? x 2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice x 2 b x 1
Full Indexation? x 2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice x 2 b Current period budget constraint before indexation x 1 b x 1
Full Indexation? x 2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice Current period budget constraint after full indexation x 2 b x 1
Full Indexation? x 2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice Current period budget constraint after indexation x 2 b Current period choice after indexation x 1 b x 1
Full Indexation? x 2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice Current period budget constraint after indexation x 2 b x 2 Current period choice after indexation t x 1 b x 1 t x 1
Full Indexation? x 2 (x 1 t, x 2 t) is revealed preferred to (x 1 b, x 2 b) so full indexation makes the recipient strictly better off if relative prices change between the base and current periods. x 2 b x 2 t x 1 b x 1 t x 1
Full Indexation? u So how large is this “bias” in the US CPI? u A table of recent estimates of the bias is given in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 10, No. 4, p. 160 (1996). Some of this list of point and interval estimates are as follows:
Full Indexation?
Full Indexation? u So suppose a social security recipient gained by 1% per year for 20 years. u Q: How large would the bias have become at the end of the period?
Full Indexation? u So suppose a social security recipient gained by 1% per year for 20 years. u Q: How large would the bias have become at the end of the period? u A: so after 20 years social security payments would be about 22% “too large”.
- Revealed preference theory
- Revealed preference methods of environmental valuation
- Heavenly virtues
- Errors revealed by trial balance
- How to describe tone
- Kulliyyah of islamic revealed knowledge
- Theme picture examples
- When is the universal theme of a story often revealed?
- Classification of truth
- The wrath of god is being revealed
- Suratul feel
- What is revealed is condemned
- God is revealed in nature
- For the wrath of god is revealed
- Correction of errors in accounting questions
- Inferior view of sheep brain labeled
- Revealed knowledge in education
- Juliet seven character analysis
- The 7 commandments
- Preference utilitarianism
- Types of educational research
- State preference theory
- Free operant preference assessment data sheet
- Ma preference parcoursup
- Papi test
- Iupac nomenclature
- Preference utilitarianism
- Nilai waktu dari uang
- Etica de mill
- Wagner preference inventory
- Environmental ethics issues
- Liquidity preference theory of money demand
- A preference decision in capital budgeting
- Advantages and disadvantages of debentures
- Liquidity preference theory
- Course design tool
- Prologue definition
- Mii purchase preference
- Work preference inventory
- All athletes have an innate preference
- Abasement dalam psikologi
- Net profit after tax and preference dividends
- Androidx preference library
- Wishes in past
- Wagner preference inventory
- Preference schedule
- Preference testing questions
- Pet preference
- Paired stimulus preference assessment data sheet
- Would rather test
- Preference utilitarianism
- Administrasi tes holland
- Class preference
- Negative politeness examples
- Max martin kostick
- Define structural unemployment
- Animal preference
- Papi kostick test
- Circumcised vs uncircumcised preference
- Residual dividend policy advantages disadvantages
- A preference decision in capital budgeting
- Screening decisions and preference decisions
- Perbedaan teori permintaan uang klasik dan keynes
- Lossless compression algorithms in multimedia
- It is half past six
- Whats a quarter past 5
- Timeliness example news
- Chickering's seven vectors examples
- Vocabulary unit 7
- What are the seven s of crime scene investigation
- Seven possessive pronouns
- Major nutrients
- What caused the seven years war
- 7 woders of the world
- 7 wonders of the ancient world map
- Informativity definition
- The seven continents and their countries
- Characteristics of civilization
- Scientific method seven steps
- 7 steps of selling retail
- Masque of red death symbols
- Resolution of the masque of the red death
- The seven forms of energy
- 7 reading comprehension strategies
- Alchemical language
- Amendment 2
- Seven articles of the constitution
- The seven diatomic elements
- Snow white 1812
- Seven dwarfs once upon a time
- What caused the seven years war
- Different types of features
- Shirley jackson seven types of ambiguity
- Lord thy mercy on us cast
- Seven segment display introduction
- Principle of purposeful expression of feelings
- Seven pillars of good governance
- Seven jumps step
- Hills in jerusalem
- Lust spongebob
- Sda 28 fundamental beliefs quiz
- Seven contrary virtues
- Seven characteristics of technical communication
- Revelation 15:16
- Causes of the seven years war
- Philip crosby formulated the seven deadly diseases
- Process instrumentation in software project management
- 7 state process model
- Ukuran cangkang kapsul dan bobotnya
- Trays to be kept in labour room
- Five six seven eight
- Zero one two three four five
- Grand canyon seven wonders of the world
- Seven domains model
- Safe sleep seven
- Storyline online
- No line of symmetry
- Seven nutrients
- Kvale seven stages of interviewing
- Five seven
- The 7 steps of the scientific method
- Haccp 12 steps and 7 principles ppt
- Four score and seven years ago our fathers
- Four score and seven years ago meaning
- Seven marketing functions
- The seven forms of energy
- Anamnesis sacred seven
- Seven wonders of the world 2012