chapter seven Decision Making Learning Creativity and Entrepreneurship

  • Slides: 54
Download presentation

chapter seven Decision Making, Learning, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship Mc. Graw-Hill/Irwin Contemporary Management, 5/e Copyright

chapter seven Decision Making, Learning, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship Mc. Graw-Hill/Irwin Contemporary Management, 5/e Copyright © 2008 The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Learning Objectives After studying the chapter, you should be able to: • Differentiate between

Learning Objectives After studying the chapter, you should be able to: • Differentiate between programmed and nonprogrammed decisions, and explain why nonprogrammed decision making is a complex, uncertain process. • Describe the six steps that managers should take to make the best decisions. • Explain how cognitive biases can lead managers to make poor decisions. 3

Learning Objectives • Identify the advantages and disadvantages of group decision making, and describe

Learning Objectives • Identify the advantages and disadvantages of group decision making, and describe techniques that can improve it. • Explain the role that organizational learning and creativity play in helping managers to improve their decisions. • Describe how managers can encourage and promote entrepreneurship to create a learning organization and differentiate between entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs 4

The Nature of Managerial Decision Making • Decision Making – The process by which

The Nature of Managerial Decision Making • Decision Making – The process by which managers respond to opportunities and threats that confront them by analyzing options and making determinations about specific organizational goals and courses of action. 5

The Nature of Managerial Decision Making • Decisions in response to opportunities • occurs

The Nature of Managerial Decision Making • Decisions in response to opportunities • occurs when managers respond to ways to improve organizational performance to benefit customers, employees, and other stakeholder groups • Decisions in response to threats • events inside or outside the organization are adversely affecting organizational performance 6

Decision Making Programmed Decision – Routine, virtually automatic decision making that follows established rules

Decision Making Programmed Decision – Routine, virtually automatic decision making that follows established rules or guidelines. • Managers have made the same decision many times before • Little ambiguity involved 7

Decision Making Non-Programmed Decisions – Nonroutine decision made in response to unusual or novel

Decision Making Non-Programmed Decisions – Nonroutine decision made in response to unusual or novel opportunities and threats. – The are no rules to follow since the decision is new. • Decisions are made based on information, and a manager’s intuition, and judgment. 8

Decision Making • Intuition – feelings, beliefs, and hunches that come readily to mind,

Decision Making • Intuition – feelings, beliefs, and hunches that come readily to mind, require little effort and information gathering and result in on-the-spot decisions 9

Decision Making • Reasoned judgment – decisions that take time and effort to make

Decision Making • Reasoned judgment – decisions that take time and effort to make and result from careful information gathering, generation of alternatives, and evaluation of alternatives 10

The Classical Model of Decision Making – A prescriptive model of decision making that

The Classical Model of Decision Making – A prescriptive model of decision making that assumes the decision maker can identify and evaluate all possible alternatives and their consequences and rationally choose the most appropriate course of action. – Optimum decision • The most appropriate decision in light of what managers believe to be the most desirable future consequences for their organization. 11

The Classical Model of Decision Making Figure 7. 1 12

The Classical Model of Decision Making Figure 7. 1 12

The Administrative Model of Decision Making – An approach to decision making that explains

The Administrative Model of Decision Making – An approach to decision making that explains why decision making is inherently uncertain and risky and why managers can rarely make decisions in the manner prescribed by the classical model 13

The Administrative Model of Decision Making – Bounded rationality • There is a large

The Administrative Model of Decision Making – Bounded rationality • There is a large number of alternatives and available information can be so extensive that managers cannot consider it all. • Decisions are limited by people’s cognitive limitations. – Incomplete information • Because of risk and uncertainty, ambiguity, and time constraints 14

Why Information Is Incomplete Figure 7. 2 15

Why Information Is Incomplete Figure 7. 2 15

Causes of Incomplete Information • Risk – Present when managers know the possible outcomes

Causes of Incomplete Information • Risk – Present when managers know the possible outcomes of a particular course of action and can assign probabilities to them. • Uncertainty – Probabilities cannot be given for outcomes and the future is unknown. 16

Causes of Incomplete Information Young Woman or Old Woman Ambiguous Information – Information whose

Causes of Incomplete Information Young Woman or Old Woman Ambiguous Information – Information whose meaning is not clear allowing it to be interpreted in multiple or conflicting ways. Figure 7. 3 17

Causes of Incomplete Information • Time constraints and information costs – managers have neither

Causes of Incomplete Information • Time constraints and information costs – managers have neither the time nor money to search for all possible alternatives and evaluate potential consequences 18

Causes of Incomplete Information • Satisficing – Searching for and choosing an acceptable, or

Causes of Incomplete Information • Satisficing – Searching for and choosing an acceptable, or satisfactory response to problems and opportunities, rather than trying to make the best decision. 19

Causes of Incomplete Information • Managers explore a limited number of options and choose

Causes of Incomplete Information • Managers explore a limited number of options and choose an acceptable decision rather than the optimum decision. • This is the typical response of managers when dealing with incomplete information. 20

Six Steps in Decision Making Figure 7. 4 21

Six Steps in Decision Making Figure 7. 4 21

Decision Making Steps Step 1. Recognize Need for a Decision – Sparked by an

Decision Making Steps Step 1. Recognize Need for a Decision – Sparked by an event such as environment changes. • Managers must first realize that a decision must be made. Step 2. Generate Alternatives – Managers must develop feasible alternative courses of action. • If good alternatives are missed, the resulting decision is poor. • It is hard to develop creative alternatives, so managers need to look for new ideas. 22

Decision Making Steps Step 3. Evaluate Alternatives – What are the advantages and disadvantages

Decision Making Steps Step 3. Evaluate Alternatives – What are the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative? – Managers should specify criteria, then evaluate. 23

Decision Making Steps Step 3. Evaluate alternatives 24

Decision Making Steps Step 3. Evaluate alternatives 24

General Criteria for Evaluating Possible Courses of Action Figure 7. 5 25

General Criteria for Evaluating Possible Courses of Action Figure 7. 5 25

Decision Making Steps Step 4. Choose Among Alternatives – Rank the various alternatives and

Decision Making Steps Step 4. Choose Among Alternatives – Rank the various alternatives and make a decision – Managers must be sure all the information available is brought to bear on the problem or issue at hand 26

Decision Making Steps Step 5. Implement Chosen Alternative – Managers must now carry out

Decision Making Steps Step 5. Implement Chosen Alternative – Managers must now carry out the alternative. – Often a decision is made and not implemented. Step 6. Learn From Feedback – Managers should consider what went right and wrong with the decision and learn for the future. – Without feedback, managers do not learn from experience and will repeat the same mistake over. 27

Feedback Procedure 1. Compare what actually happened to what was expected to happen as

Feedback Procedure 1. Compare what actually happened to what was expected to happen as a result of the decision 2. Explore why any expectations for the decision were not met 3. Derive guidelines that will help in future decision making 28

Cognitive Biases and Decision Making Heuristics – Rules of thumb that simplify the process

Cognitive Biases and Decision Making Heuristics – Rules of thumb that simplify the process of making decisions. – Decision makers use heuristics to deal with bounded rationality. • If the heuristic is wrong, however, then poor decisions result from its use. • Systematic errors – errors that people make over and that result in poor decision making 29

Sources of Cognitive Bias at the Individual and Group Levels Figure 7. 6 30

Sources of Cognitive Bias at the Individual and Group Levels Figure 7. 6 30

Types of Cognitive Biases • Prior Hypothesis Bias – Allowing strong prior beliefs about

Types of Cognitive Biases • Prior Hypothesis Bias – Allowing strong prior beliefs about a relationship between variables to influence decisions based on these beliefs even when evidence shows they are wrong. • Representativeness – The decision maker incorrectly generalizes a decision from a small sample or a single incident. 31

Types of Cognitive Biases • Illusion of Control – The tendency to overestimates one’s

Types of Cognitive Biases • Illusion of Control – The tendency to overestimates one’s own ability to control activities and events. • Escalating Commitment – Committing considerable resources to project and then committing more even if evidence shows the project is failing. 32

Group Decision Making • Superior to individual making • Choices less likely to fall

Group Decision Making • Superior to individual making • Choices less likely to fall victim to bias • Able to draw on combined skills of group members • Improve ability to generate feasible alternatives 33

Group Decision Making • Allows managers to process more information • Managers affected by

Group Decision Making • Allows managers to process more information • Managers affected by decisions agree to cooperate 34

Group Decision Making • Potential Disadvantages – Can take much longer than individuals to

Group Decision Making • Potential Disadvantages – Can take much longer than individuals to make decisions – Can be difficult to get two or more managers to agree because of different interests and preferences – Can be undermined by biases 35

Group Decision Making Groupthink – Pattern of faulty and biased decision making that occurs

Group Decision Making Groupthink – Pattern of faulty and biased decision making that occurs in groups whose members strive for agreement among themselves at the expense of accurately assessing information relevant to a decision 36

Improved Group Decision Making • Devil’s Advocacy – Critical analysis of a preferred alternative

Improved Group Decision Making • Devil’s Advocacy – Critical analysis of a preferred alternative to ascertain its strengths and weaknesses before it is implemented – One member of the group who acts as the devil’s advocate by critiquing the way the group identified alternatives and pointing out problems with the alternative selection. 37

Improved Group Decision Making • Dialectical Inquiry – Two different groups are assigned to

Improved Group Decision Making • Dialectical Inquiry – Two different groups are assigned to the problem and each group is responsible for evaluating alternatives and selecting one of them – Top managers then hear each group present their alternatives and each group can critique the other. • Promote Diversity – Increasing the diversity in a group may result in consideration of a wider set of alternatives. 38

Devil’s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Figure 7. 7 39

Devil’s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Figure 7. 7 39

Organizational Learning and Creativity • Organizational Learning – Managers seek to improve a employee’s

Organizational Learning and Creativity • Organizational Learning – Managers seek to improve a employee’s desire and ability to understand manage the organization and its task environment so as to raise effectiveness. • The Learning Organization – Managers try to maximize the people’s ability to behave creatively to maximize organizational learning. 40

Organizational Learning and Creativity – The ability of the decision maker to discover novel

Organizational Learning and Creativity – The ability of the decision maker to discover novel ideas leading to a feasible course of action. • A creative management staff and employees are the key to the learning organization. 41

Senge’s Principles for Creating a Learning? Figure 7. 8 42

Senge’s Principles for Creating a Learning? Figure 7. 8 42

Creating a Learning Organization 1. Personal Mastery – Managers empower employees and allow them

Creating a Learning Organization 1. Personal Mastery – Managers empower employees and allow them to create and explore. 2. Mental Models – Challenge employees to find new, better methods to perform a task. 3. Team Learning – Learning that takes place in a group or team. 43

Creating a Learning Organization 4. Build a Shared Vision – People share a common

Creating a Learning Organization 4. Build a Shared Vision – People share a common mental model of the firm to evaluate opportunities. 5. Systems Thinking – Knowing and understanding how actions in one area of the firm will impact other areas of the firm. 44

Building Group Creativity Brainstorming – Managers meet face-to-face to generate and debate many alternatives.

Building Group Creativity Brainstorming – Managers meet face-to-face to generate and debate many alternatives. • Group members are not allowed to evaluate alternatives until alternatives are listed. • When all are listed, then the pros and cons of each are discussed and a short list created. 45

Building Group Creativity • Production Blocking – Occurs because group members cannot simultaneously make

Building Group Creativity • Production Blocking – Occurs because group members cannot simultaneously make sense of all the alternatives being generated, think up additional alternatives, and remember what they were thinking 46

Building Group Creativity Nominal Group Technique – Provides a more structured way to generate

Building Group Creativity Nominal Group Technique – Provides a more structured way to generate alternatives in writing and gives each manager more time and opportunity to come up with potential solutions – Useful when an issue is controversial and when different managers might be expected to champion different courses of action 47

Building Group Creativity Delphi Technique – Written approach to creative problem solving. – Group

Building Group Creativity Delphi Technique – Written approach to creative problem solving. – Group leader writes a statement of the problem to which managers respond – Questionnaire is sent to managers to generate solutions – Team of managers summarizes the responses and results are sent back to the participants – Process is repeated until a consensus is reached 48

Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurs – Individuals who notice opportunities and take the responsibility for mobilizing the

Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurs – Individuals who notice opportunities and take the responsibility for mobilizing the resources necessary to produce new and improved goods and services. 49

Entrepreneurship Intrapreneurs – Individuals (managers, scientists, or researchers) who work inside an existing organization

Entrepreneurship Intrapreneurs – Individuals (managers, scientists, or researchers) who work inside an existing organization and notice an opportunity for product improvements and are responsible for managing the product development process. 50

Entrepreneurship and New Ventures Characteristics of entrepreneurs—most share these common traits: – Open to

Entrepreneurship and New Ventures Characteristics of entrepreneurs—most share these common traits: – Open to experience: they are original thinkers and take risks. – Internal locus of control: they take responsibility for their own actions. – High self-esteem: they feel competent and capable. – High need for achievement: they set high goals and enjoy working toward them. 51

Entrepreneurship and Management • People can become involved in entrepreneurial ventures by starting a

Entrepreneurship and Management • People can become involved in entrepreneurial ventures by starting a business from scratch • Frequently need to hire other people to help them run the business 52

Entrepreneurship and Management • Frequently, founding entrepreneur lacks the skills, patience, and experience to

Entrepreneurship and Management • Frequently, founding entrepreneur lacks the skills, patience, and experience to engage in the difficult and challenging work of management 53

Intrapreneurship and Organizational Learning organizations encourage their employees to act as intrapreneurs: – Product

Intrapreneurship and Organizational Learning organizations encourage their employees to act as intrapreneurs: – Product champions: taking ownership of a product from concept to market. – Skunkworks: keeping a group of intrapreneurs separate from the rest of the firm. – Rewards for innovation: linking innovation by workers to valued rewards. 54