- Slides: 45
Chapter 9 Leader or Follower?
Chapter Overview What Goes On in Groups? Leader or Follower? • Communication Patterns • Social Influence • Social Loafing • Group Polarization Why Join a Group? Kinds of Groups • Primary Groups • Secondary Groups • Collectives • In-Groups and Out-Groups How Do Groups Form?
Chapter Overview cont’d Leader or Follower? The Fiasco of Groupthink n. Group Conflict cont’d Are Leaders Made or Born? • The Great Man Theory • Situational Explanations • Contingency Theory • Contemporary Theory • Gender and Leadership • Culture and Leadership When Groups Go Wrong
CHAPTER SUMMARY KINDS OF GROUPS • • • Primary groups Secondary groups Collectives In-groups Out-groups
CHAPTER SUMMARY CONT’D HOW DO GROUPS FORM? WHY JOIN A GROUP? WHAT GOES ON IN GROUPS? • • Communication Social influence Social loafing Group polarization
CHAPTER SUMMARY ARE LEADERS MADE OR BORN? • • • The great man theory Situational explanations of leadership Contingency theory Contemporary theories Gender and leadership Culture and leadership WHEN GROUPS GO WRONG THE FIASCO OF GROUPTHINK • Group conflict CONT’D
Kinds of Groups • Primary groups: small, intimate, face-to-face groups. • Example: a family
• Kinds of Groups cont’d. Secondary groups: larger and less intimate than primary groups. They often disband when the reason for their existence disappears. Example: classes in schools or committees.
Kinds of Groups cont’d Collectives: very large groups that usually have no leader and no concrete rules. Example: audiences at official functions.
Kinds of Groups cont’d In-groups: the group with which we identify. Example: a college sorority or small military squadron.
Kinds of Groups cont’d Out-groups: the groups we perceive as being different from (outside of) our own group. Example: an ethnic or racial group different from our group
Kinds of Groups cont’d In-group/Out-group processes: processes • Prejudice: Prejudice an unfair, often negative attitude toward another person or group based solely on group membership. • Stereotyping: Stereotyping widespread generalizations about people (based on their group membership) which have little if any basis in fact. • Discrimination: Discrimination unfair treatment or negative treatment to groups on the basis of such features as age, sex, or race. Frederick Douglas
Kinds of Groups cont’d • Culture also matters when it comes to the value of in-groups and out-groups. Individualistic cultures--value an individual’s gain over group gains. • Example: United States Collectivistic cultures--value group gain over individual gain. • Example: Many Asian cultures
How Do Groups Form? • Forming: the initial state of group development when individuals first come together. • Storming: the second stage of development where members begin to conflict with each other as they come to know one another’s opinions. • Norming: the group comes to agreement about the rules under which it will operate. • Performing: the group eventually comes to agreement (or consensus) and begins to function better.
How Do Groups Form? cont’d Forming Storming Performing Norming This cycle repeats itself even within the same group.
Why Join a Group? • To affiliate or be with others. • To learn information we otherwise wouldn’t know. • To compare ourselves relative to others (social comparison). comparison • For social support in times of need. • To benefit from collective power.
What Goes On in Groups? • • Communication Social Influence Social Loafing Group Polarization
Communication Patterns • Centralized Networks: One or two individuals control the flow of information Example: A supervisor of multiple work groups
Communication Patterns cont’d • Decentralized Networks: individuals communicate in relatively freely with one another; no one person is central to the group. Example: the rumor mill
Communication Patterns cont’d Centralized Networks • If the central person is not competent, the group is not competent • Best for simple group decision-making • These groups usually perform efficiently • Satisfaction of individual members is not particularly high
Communication Patterns cont’d Decentralized Networks • Best for complicated decision-making (“two heads are sometimes better than one”) • Group functioning is often disjointed; no one person has all the information • If everyone can communicate, it can become distorted or noisy • Individual members may feel they have more freedom to communicate
Communication Patterns cont’d Group Size • A group with many members has the potential to generate many ideas • The number of ideas generated is not directly proportional to the group size • Interactions in large groups are more likely to be formal (i. e. , more rules) • In large groups, a few members are likely to dominate
Communication Patterns cont’d Electronic Communication • …includes e-mail, cell phones, voice mail, text and instant messaging. • The impact of nonverbal cues is diminished: miscommunication is more likely • Status inequities (high and low) are reduced • Group members are more likely to communicate than in face-to-face interactions • It is more efficient because it is more taskoriented
Social Influence • …involves efforts on the part of one person to alter the behavior or attitudes of one or more other people There are three types of social influence: • Conformity • Compliance • Obedience
Social Influence cont’d Conformity is a change in behavior due to the real or imagined influence of other people. • Small groups (about four people) are most likely to exhibit conformity. • When there are no allies, a nonconformist will not hold his or her ground. • Some cultures encourage conformity (e. g. collective societies); in American society we encourage nonconformity and individualism.
The Asch Conformity Experiment Standard A B C
Social Influence cont’d Compliance a change in behavior in response to a direct request from another person to do so. • An example: when someone asks you for a loan. There is subtle pressure to comply, especially if you borrowed from the individual in the past. • Some people comply publicly, but disagree in private with the request.
Social Influence cont’d Methods Designed to Induce Compliance • The norm of reciprocity--an unwritten rule whereby when someone does you a favor, you are obligated to return a favor • Ingratiation--managing the impressions you leave on others so that they will like you more and comply with your requests (e. g. , flattery) • The door-in-the-face-effect happens when someone issues a large, unreasonable request, and then when you refuse, asks for a smaller and more likely-to-be granted request
Social Influence cont’d Obedience occurs following a direct order or command. • In a classic experiment on obedience, 65% of Americans obeyed a command to shock another person (Milgram, 1974). One way to reduce obedience is to place the “victim” closer to the person issued the order to do harm.
A Shock Generator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 XXX-Extreme Shock
Social Influence cont’d Obedience • One way to reduce obedience is to place the “victim” closer to the person issued the order to do harm.
Social Loafing …means that individuals contribute less to a group effort than they would contribute as a single individual. Ways to reduce social loafing: • inform people that their individual performance will be evaluated • reinforce to the group that the task is important • make the task challenging so people enjoy it • assure the group that failure IS possible but NOT acceptable • The Nominal Group Technique – a systematic (round-robin polling) approach to soliciting individual input into a group project.
THE BOSS Group Polarization EMPLOYEE 1 EMPLOYEE 2 EMPLOYEE 3 ? • Psychologists once believed that groups made riskier decisions • A newer idea is that than individuals. groups make EITHER Individuals probably riskier or more feel more responsible conservative for failure than decisions than members of a group. individuals. • This is known as the group polarization effect.
Are Leaders Made or Born? • The Great Man Theory: leaders are born with (or acquire) a set of traits common to all leaders. There is little empirical support for this theory. • Situational Explanations of Leadership: a leader is simply in the right place at the right time, such as at the head of the table. • Contingency theory: combines both approaches. . .
Are Leaders Made or Born? cont’d Contingency Theory • Common Traits of leaders: person-centered • • (or people-oriented) VERSUS task-centered (or oriented toward getting the job done) Situations vary in the level of control the leader has as well as other factors, such as whether subordinates respect the leader Both traits and situations interact to determine whether the leader and group will perform well. People-oriented leaders are better in medium control situations. Task-oriented leaders are better in situations of high or low control.
The Effects of Leader Style and Situational Control as They Affect Group Performance (According to Contingency Theory):
Contemporary Theories • Many leaders have high levels of emotional intelligence-the ability to regulate one’s own intelligence emotions as well as be empathetic toward others. • Charismatic leaders inspire social change, are visionary, and appeal to their follows’ self-concepts and values. • Transformational leaders stimulate interest among followers to view their own work from a new perspective. They generating awareness of the mission/vision of the group, moving individuals beyond their own needs.
Gender and Leadership • Women tend to be more democratic; are more likely to consult with subordinates. • Men and women are equally effective as leaders, but adopt different styles • As leaders, women are generally evaluated less positively than men • Women leaders may be more conflicted than men about career versus family life
Culture and Leadership • Styles of interaction between President George W. Bush and leaders and subordinates differ Prime Minister Koizumi -- Japan across cultures. Power distance is the idea that • High power-distance people in groups accept the cultures emphasize concept that people in a group leader-driven decision rightfully have different levels of making (e. g. Asian power and authority. countries). • …an important element of • Low power-distance interaction in various cultures: (e. g. U. S. ) subordinates expect and promote more participatory styles of leadership.
When Groups Go Wrong The Fiasco of Groupthink is the tendency for groups to reach consensus prematurely because of the desire for harmony. Symptoms of groupthink: • The group develops an illusion of vulnerability. • Mindguards “guard” the few ideas generated. • There appears to be little disagreement as members censor their concerns. • Group members derogate the out-group. • Members become rather self-righteous.
The Fiasco of Groupthink cont’d Consequences of groupthink • few ideas are generated • the group fails to discuss the problems related to their proposed solution • no contingency plans are developed in the event a problem develops First teacher in space. A shuttle explosion ended her life. Psychologists suspect groupthink caused the explosion.
The Fiasco of Groupthink cont’d Preventing groupthink • promote open inquiry and skepticism • form subgroups and request each to develop several ideas • the leader should refrain from expressing an opinion • call in outside experts to provide needed feedback • hold a “second chance” meeting in case doubts arise after the decision is made
Group Conflict • …can occur within a group or between groups. • …is good in that it can result in positive change. • …can be used to provide a growth experience. • Conflicts can often spiral out of control. • Threats, stereotypes, prejudices, etc. , also contribute to escalation of conflict.
Group Conflict cont’d Culture and Conflict • Collectivistic societies: face-saving is very important; disputants try to maintain each others’ self-respect, dignity. • Individualistic societies: disputants are concerned with preserving their own selfimage. Styles of managing conflict also differ: Members of individualistic societies try to overpower opponents; members of collective societies try to avoid conflict altogether.
Group Conflict cont’d Conflict can be managed if each person knows what the other person really wants-communication is very important! • GRIT (Graduated and Reciprocated Initiative in Tension-Reduction) is a method whereby each side gradually concedes something to the other side. Concessions are usually made public. • Mediation is when a neutral person helps disputants resolve or manage their conflict. • Arbitration is where a neutral person decides how the conflict will be resolved. Arbitrators generally try to mediate first.