Chapter 9 Experimental Research An Overview 2007 ThomsonSouthWestern

  • Slides: 30
Download presentation
Chapter 9 Experimental Research: An Overview © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved.

Chapter 9 Experimental Research: An Overview © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved.

LEARNING OUTCOMES After studying this chapter, you should be able to 1. Create an

LEARNING OUTCOMES After studying this chapter, you should be able to 1. Create an experimental, independent variable through a valid experimental manipulation of its value 2. Understand minimize the systematic experimental error 3. Know ways of minimizing experimental demand characteristics 4. Avoid unethical experimental practices 5. Weigh the trade-off between internal and external validity 6. Recognize the appropriate uses of testmarketing © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 2

The Nature of Experiments • Experiment Defined Ø A research investigation in which conditions

The Nature of Experiments • Experiment Defined Ø A research investigation in which conditions are controlled. • Experimental Research Ø Allows a researcher to control the research situation so that causal relationships among variables may be evaluated. v Independent variables are expected to determine the outcomes of interest. v Dependent variables are the outcomes of interest to the researcher and the decision makers. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 3

Basic Issues in Experimental Design Manipulation of the independent variable Control over extraneous variables

Basic Issues in Experimental Design Manipulation of the independent variable Control over extraneous variables Experimental Design Selection and measurement of the dependent variable Selection and assignment of experimental subjects © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 4

Issues in Experimental Design • Manipulation of the Independent Variable Ø Independent variable: a

Issues in Experimental Design • Manipulation of the Independent Variable Ø Independent variable: a variable with values that can be manipulated, or altered, independently of any other variable. • Experimental Treatment Ø The term referring to the way an experimental variable is manipulated. v Experimental group: a group of subjects to whom an experimental treatment is administered. v Control group: a group of subjects to whom no experimental treatment is administered. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 5

Experimental Design (cont’d) • Selection and Measurement of the Dependent Variable Ø Dependent variable:

Experimental Design (cont’d) • Selection and Measurement of the Dependent Variable Ø Dependent variable: the criterion by which the results of an experiment are judged; a variable expected to be dependent on the experimenter’s manipulation of the independent variable. v Selecting dependent variables that are relevant and truly represent an outcome of interest is crucial. v Choosing the right dependent variable is part of the problem definition process—thorough problem definition will help the researcher select the most important dependent variable(s) whose results will help managers in decision making. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 6

Experimental Design (cont’d) • Selection and Assignment of Test Units Ø Test units: the

Experimental Design (cont’d) • Selection and Assignment of Test Units Ø Test units: the subjects or entities whose responses to treatment are measured or observed. • Sample Selection And Random Sampling Errors Ø Systematic or nonsampling error v Subject selection, experimental design, and unrecognized extraneous variables Ø Overcoming sampling errors v Randomization v Matching v Repeated measures v Control over extraneous variables © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 7

Experimental Design (cont’d) • Sampling Errors (cont’d) Ø Experimental Confound v When there is

Experimental Design (cont’d) • Sampling Errors (cont’d) Ø Experimental Confound v When there is an alternative explanation beyond the experimental variables for any observed differences in the dependent variable. v Once a potential confound is identified, the validity of the experiment is severely questioned. v Sources: – – – Sampling error Systematic error Later-identified extraneous variables v Careful experimental design can reduce the likelihood of confounds. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 8

Demand Characteristics • Demand Characteristic Ø An experimental design element or procedure that unintentionally

Demand Characteristics • Demand Characteristic Ø An experimental design element or procedure that unintentionally provides subjects with hints about the research hypothesis. • Demand Effect Ø Occurs when demand characteristics actually affect the dependent variable. • Experimenter Bias Ø The influence of the presence, actions, or comments of an experimenter on subjects’ behavior. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 9

Demand Characteristics (cont’d) • Reducing Demand Characteristics 1. Use an experimental disguise. 2. Isolate

Demand Characteristics (cont’d) • Reducing Demand Characteristics 1. Use an experimental disguise. 2. Isolate experimental subjects. 3. Use a “blind” experimental administrator. 4. Administer only one treatment level to each subject. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10

EXHIBIT 9. 1 By Smiling or Looking Solemn, Experimenters Can Modify Subjects’ Behavior ©

EXHIBIT 9. 1 By Smiling or Looking Solemn, Experimenters Can Modify Subjects’ Behavior © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 11

Establishing Control • Constancy of Conditions Ø Subjects in all experimental groups are exposed

Establishing Control • Constancy of Conditions Ø Subjects in all experimental groups are exposed to identical conditions except for the differing experimental treatments. • Counterbalancing Ø Attempts to eliminate the confounding effects of order of presentation by varying the order of presentation (exposure) of treatments to subject groups. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 12

Ethical Issues in Experimentation • Debriefing experimental subjects Ø Communicating the purpose of the

Ethical Issues in Experimentation • Debriefing experimental subjects Ø Communicating the purpose of the experiment Ø Explaining the researcher’s hypotheses about the nature of consumer behavior • Attempts to interfere with a competitor’s testmarketing efforts Ø Such acts as changing prices or increasing advertising to influence (confound) competitors’ testmarketing results are ethically questionable. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 13

Fundamental Questions in Experimentation • Laboratory Experiment Ø A situation in which the researcher

Fundamental Questions in Experimentation • Laboratory Experiment Ø A situation in which the researcher has more complete control over the research setting and extraneous variables. • Field Experiments Ø Research projects involving experimental manipulations that are implemented in a natural environment. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 14

EXHIBIT 9. 5 The Artificiality of Laboratory versus Field Experiments © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All

EXHIBIT 9. 5 The Artificiality of Laboratory versus Field Experiments © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 15

Issues of Experimental Validity • Internal Validity Ø The extent that an experimental variable

Issues of Experimental Validity • Internal Validity Ø The extent that an experimental variable is truly responsible for any variance in the dependent variable. v Did the experiment answer the question of causal effect? v Did the manipulation do what it was supposed (predicted) to do? • Manipulation Checks Ø A validity test of an experimental manipulation to make sure that the manipulation does produce differences in the independent variable. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 16

Extraneous Variables Affecting Internal Validity Maturation History Mortality Selection © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights

Extraneous Variables Affecting Internal Validity Maturation History Mortality Selection © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. Internal Validity Testing Instrumentation 17

Effects of Extraneous Variables on Validity • History Effect Ø Occurs when some change

Effects of Extraneous Variables on Validity • History Effect Ø Occurs when some change other than the experimental treatment occurs during the course of an experiment that affects the dependent variable. • Cohort Effect Ø A change in the dependent variable that occurs because members of one experimental group experienced different historical situations than members of other experimental groups. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 18

Effects of Extraneous Variables… (cont’d) • Maturation Effects Ø Effects that are a function

Effects of Extraneous Variables… (cont’d) • Maturation Effects Ø Effects that are a function of time and the naturally occurring events that coincide with growth and experience. • Testing Effects Ø A nuisance effect occurring when the initial measurement or test alerts or primes subjects in a way that affects their response to the experimental treatments. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 19

Effects of Extraneous Variables… (cont’d) • Instrumentation Effect Ø A change in the wording

Effects of Extraneous Variables… (cont’d) • Instrumentation Effect Ø A change in the wording of questions, a change in interviewers, or a change in other procedures causes a change in the dependent variable. • Selection Effect Ø Sample bias that results from differential selection of respondents for the comparison groups, or a sample selection error. • Mortality Effect (Sample Attrition) Ø Occurs when some subjects withdraw from the experiment before it is completed. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 20

Issues of Experimental Validity (cont’d) • External Validity Ø The accuracy with which experimental

Issues of Experimental Validity (cont’d) • External Validity Ø The accuracy with which experimental results can be generalized beyond the experimental subjects. v Student surrogates: Atypical? • Trade-Offs Between Internal and External Validity Ø Artificial laboratory experiments usually are high in internal validity, while naturalistic field experiments generally have less internal validity, but greater external validity. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 21

Classification of Experimental Designs • Basic Experimental Design Ø An experimental design in which

Classification of Experimental Designs • Basic Experimental Design Ø An experimental design in which only one variable is manipulated. • Diagramming Experimental Designs: Symbols © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 22

Examples of Quasi-Experimental Designs • Quasi-experimental Designs Ø Experimental designs that do not involve

Examples of Quasi-Experimental Designs • Quasi-experimental Designs Ø Experimental designs that do not involve random allocation of subjects to treatment combinations. • One Shot Design (After Only): X O 1 • One Group Pretest–Posttest: O 1 X O 2 X O 1 • Static Group Design: Experimental Control O 2 © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 23

Alternative Experimental Designs • Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design (Before–After with Control) Ø Experimental R

Alternative Experimental Designs • Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design (Before–After with Control) Ø Experimental R O 1 X O 2 Ø Control R O 3 X O 4 • Posttest Only Control Group (After-Only with Control) Ø Experimental R X O 1 Ø Control R O 2 • Compromise Designs © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 24

EXHIBIT 9. 3 Product Preference Measure in an Experiment © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights

EXHIBIT 9. 3 Product Preference Measure in an Experiment © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 25

Test-Marketing • Test Marketing Ø An experimental procedure that provides an opportunity to test

Test-Marketing • Test Marketing Ø An experimental procedure that provides an opportunity to test a new product or a new marketing plan under realistic market conditions to measure sales or profit potential. Not just trying something out But scientific testing Controlled Experimentation © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 26

Uses of Test-Marketing Forecasting New Product Success Testing the Marketing Mix Test. Marketing Identifying

Uses of Test-Marketing Forecasting New Product Success Testing the Marketing Mix Test. Marketing Identifying Product Weaknesses © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 27

Factors to Consider in Test-market Selection Population Size Demographic Composition and Lifestyles Overused Test-markets

Factors to Consider in Test-market Selection Population Size Demographic Composition and Lifestyles Overused Test-markets Self-Contained Trading Area Media Isolation © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. Test-market Selection Competitive Situation Media Coverage and Efficiency 28

Key Terms and Concepts • Independent variable • Experimental treatment • Experimental group •

Key Terms and Concepts • Independent variable • Experimental treatment • Experimental group • Demand characteristic • Demand effect • Constancy of conditions • Control group • Dependent variable • Test units • Counterbalancing • Debriefing • Laboratory experiment • Systematic (or non-sampling error) • Randomization • Tachistoscope • Field experiments • Internal validity • Matching • Repeated measures • Confound • Manipulation check • History effect • Cohort effect © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 29

Key Terms and Concepts (cont’d) • Maturation effects • Testing effects • Instrumentation effect

Key Terms and Concepts (cont’d) • Maturation effects • Testing effects • Instrumentation effect • Mortality effect (or sample attrition) • External validity • Basic experimental design • Quasi-experimental designs • One-shot design • One-group pretest–posttest design • Static group design • Pretest–posttest control group design • Posttest–only control group design © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 30