Chapter 6 Theological controversy over predestination Confusion in
- Slides: 12
Chapter 6
Theological controversy over predestination Confusion in religious life Affirm Predestination Bible • Prosperity and decline • Happiness and misery • Salvation and damnation • Rise and fall of nations Refute Predestination
Section 1 The Predestination of God’s Will
= God’s Will Creation Restoration Absolute, Unique, Eternal and Unchanging Predestination of God’s Will: absolute
Section 2 The Predestination of the Way in which God’s Will is Fulfilled
100% = Fulfillment Of God’s Will ………Absolute God’s Responsibility 95 % + Providence of Restoration Human Responsibility 5% Predestination of the Fulfillment of God’s Will: conditional
Section 3 The Predestination of Human Beings
Adam Eve God’ Commandment + Obey Good ancestors Person God’s Responsibility + Persons responsibility Complete the mission Predestination of Human Beings: conditional
God’s Providence of Salvation: one point Whole Predestination of Providence of Salvation: central figure Whole Qualifications of central figure • Most fitting time and place • Qualities during early life 5 • Requisite character 4 3 2 1 • Ancestral line with many good i 1 accomplishments • Chosen People
Section 4 Elucidation of Biblical Verses Which support the Doctrine of Absolute Predestination
Rom 8: 29 - 30 (Words about human responsibility omitted) Justify Glorify + God’s Responsibility + Foreknow Predestine call Human Responsibility Fulfillment
• Depends solely on God Accomplishment Of God’s Will • Ignorance of relationship between God and Human responsibilities • Absolute and complete predestination (Calvin) • Believed even in our day
- Romans 9 predestination or free will
- Social predestination room
- Double predestination definition
- Tulip refuted
- Predestination manga 14
- Predestination vs determinism
- Chapter 16 the south and the slavery controversy
- Chapter 16 the south and the slavery controversy
- Pontius pilate allusion
- Mark bailey dallas theological seminary
- The cardinal and theological virtues
- Boston theological institute
- Is/ought distinction