Chapter 6 Strategy Analysis Choice Strategic Management Concepts
- Slides: 40
Chapter 6 Strategy Analysis & Choice Strategic Management: Concepts & Cases 13 th Edition Fred David Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 2
Strategy Analysis & Choice n n n Subjective decisions based on objective information Generating alternative strategies Selecting strategies to pursue Best alternative course of action to achieve mission & objectives Derived from vision, mission, objectives, external audit, and internal audit Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3
Strategy Analysis & Choice Generating Alternatives – Participation in generating alternative strategies should be as broad as possible Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4
Comprehensive Strategy. Formulation Framework n Stage 1 - Input Stage q q q n Stage 2 - Matching Stage q q q n EFE Matrix IFE matrix CPM SWOT SPACE matrix BCG matrix IE Matrix Grand strategy matrix Stage 3 - Decision Stage q QSPM Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 5
Comprehensive Strategy. Formulation Framework n As shown in the previous Power. Point, strategy formulation techniques can be integrated into a three-stage decision-making framework. The tools presented in this framework are applicable to all sizes and types of organizations and can help strategists identify, evaluate, and select strategies Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 6
The Strategy-Formulation Analytical Framework n n n Stage 1 (Input Stage) summarizes the basic input information needed to formulate strategies. Stage 2 (Matching Stage) focuses on generating feasible alternative strategies by aligning key external and internal factors. Stage 3 (Decision Stage) uses the QSPM to objectively evaluate feasible alternative strategies identified in Stage 2. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 7
Strategy-Formulation Framework External Factor Evaluation Matrix (EFE) Stage 1: The Input Stage Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix (IFE) Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8
Stage 2: The Matching Stage n. Match between organization’s internal resources & skills and the opportunities & risks created by its external factors Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 9
Strategy-Formulation Framework SWOT Matrix SPACE Matrix Stage 2: The Matching Stage BCG Matrix IE Matrix Grand Strategy Matrix Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10
Stage 2: The Matching Stage SWOT Matrix n. Strengths n. Weaknesses n. Opportunities n. Threats Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 11
SWOT Matrix Four Types of Strategies n. Strengths-Opportunities (SO) n. Weaknesses-Opportunities n. Strengths-Threats (WO) (ST) n. Weaknesses-Threats (WT) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 12
SWOT Matrix n n SO strategies use a firm’s internal strengths to take advantage of external opportunities WO strategies improve internal weaknesses by taking advantage of external opportunities ST strategies use a firm’s strengths to avoid or reduce the impact of external threats WT strategies defensive tactics aimed at reducing internal weakness and avoiding external threats Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 13
Strategy-Formulation Framework SWOT Matrix SPACE Matrix Stage 2: The Matching Stage BCG Matrix IE Matrix Grand Strategy Matrix Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 14
Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix n The SPACE matrix’s four-quadrant framework indicates whether aggressive, conservative, defensive, or competitive strategies are most appropriate for a given organization. Its axes represent two internal dimensions (financial strength [FS] and competitive advantage [CA]) and two external dimensions (environmental stability [ES] and industry strength [IS]). Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 15
SPACE Matrix n Depending upon the type of organization, numerous variables could make up each of the dimensions represented on the axes of the SPACE matrix. Variables that were included in the firm’s EFE and IFE matrices should be considered in developing a SPACE matrix. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 16
SPACE Matrix n Internal dimensions q q n Financial position (FP) Competitive position (CP) External dimensions q q Environmental position (EP) Industry position (IP) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 17
Steps to Developing a SPACE Matrix Select a set of variables to define FS, CA, ES, and IS. Assign a numerical value: 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. From +1 to +6 to each FS & IS dimension From -1 to -6 to each ES & CA dimension Compute an average score for each FS, CA, ES, and IS. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 18
Steps to Developing a SPACE Matrix 4. 5. 6. Plot the average score on the appropriate axis. Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot the point. Add the two scores on the y-axis and plot the point. Plot the intersection of the new xy point. Draw a directional vector from the origin through the new intersection point. This vector reveals the type of strategies recommended for the organization. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 19
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 20
Strategy-Formulation Framework SWOT Matrix SPACE Matrix Stage 2: The Matching Stage BCG Matrix IE Matrix Grand Strategy Matrix Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 21
BCG Matrix n The BCG matrix helps multi-divisional firms formulate strategies. It graphically portrays differences among divisions in terms of relative market share position and industry growth rate. Relative market share position is defined as the ratio of a division’s own market share (or revenues) in a particular industry to the market share (or revenues) held by the largest rival firm in that industry. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 22
BCG Matrix n Relative market share position is given on the x-axis. The mid-point on the x-axis usually is set at. 50, corresponding to a division that has half the market share of the leading firm in the industry. The y-axis represents the industry growth rate in sales, measured in percentage terms. The growth rate percentages on the y-axis could range from 20 to +20%, with 0. 0 being the mid-point. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 23
BCG Matrix n An example of a BCG matrix appears in the next Power Point. Each circle represents a separate division. The size of the circle corresponds to the proportion of corporate revenue generated by that business unit, and the pie slice indicates the proportion of corporate profits generated by that division. Divisions located in Quadrant I are called “Question Marks; ” Quadrant II, “Stars; ” Quadrant III, “Cash Cows; ” and Quadrant IV, “Dogs. ” Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 24
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 25
BCG Matrix n n Question Marks – low relative market share in a high-growth industry Stars – high relative market share in a highgrowth industry Cash Cows – high relative market share in a low-growth industry Dogs – Low relative market share in a slow or no growth industry Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 26
Strategy-Formulation Framework SWOT Matrix SPACE Matrix Stage 2: The Matching Stage BCG Matrix IE Matrix Grand Strategy Matrix Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 27
The Internal-External Matrix n n Positions an organization’s various divisions in a nine-cell display Similar to BCG Matrix except the IE Matrix: q q Requires more information about the divisions Strategic implications of each matrix are different Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 28
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 29
IE Matrix n Based on two key dimensions q q n The IFE total weighted scores on the x-axis The EFE total weighted scores on the y-axis Divided into three major regions q q q Grow and build – Cells I, II, or IV Hold and maintain – Cells III, V, or VII Harvest or divest – Cells VI, VIII, or IX Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 30
Strategy-Formulation Framework SWOT Matrix SPACE Matrix Stage 2: The Matching Stage BCG Matrix IE Matrix Grand Strategy Matrix Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 31
Grand Strategy Matrix Tool formulating alternative strategies n n Based on two dimensions q Competitive position q Market growth Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 32
RAPID MARKET GROWTH 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WEAK COMPETITIVE POSITION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Quadrant II Market development Market penetration Product development Horizontal integration Divestiture Liquidation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Quadrant III Retrenchment Related diversification Unrelated diversification Divestiture Liquidation 1. 2. 3. Quadrant I Market development Market penetration Product development Forward integration Backward integration Horizontal integration Related diversification Quadrant IV Related diversification Unrelated diversification Joint ventures STRONG COMPETITIVE POSITION SLOW MARKET GROWTH Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 33
Strategy-Formulation Analytical Framework Stage 3: The Decision Stage Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 34
QSPM Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix n. Technique designed to determine the relative attractiveness of feasible alternative actions Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 35
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) n n The QSPM is an analytical technique designed to determine the relative attractiveness of feasible alternative strategies. Information from each of the matrices in Stages 1 and 2 is used to construct the QSPM. The left column of a QSPM consists of key external and internal factors (from Stage 1), and the top row consists of feasible alternative strategies (from Stage 2). Specifically, the left column consists of information obtained directly from the EFE matrix and the IFE matrix. In the column to the right of the key factors, the respective weights received by each factor in the EFE matrix and IFE matrix are recorded. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 36
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) n n The top row of a QSPM consists of alternative strategies derived from each matrix in Stage 2. These matching techniques usually generate similar feasible alternatives. However, not every strategy suggested by the matching techniques has to be evaluated in a QSPM. Strategists should use good intuitive judgment in selecting strategies to include in a QSPM. The basic format of the QSPM is illustrated in the following Power Point. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 37
Strategic Alternatives QSPM Key External Factors Economy Political/Legal/Governmental Social/Cultural/Demographic/ Environmental Technological Competitive Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 Key Internal Factors Management Marketing Finance/Accounting Production/Operations Research and Development Management Information Systems Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 38
Steps to Develop a QSPM 1. 2. Make a list of the firm’s key external opportunities/threats and internal strengths/weaknesses in the left column Assign weights to each key external and internal factor Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 39
Steps to Develop a QSPM 3. 4. 5. 6. Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices, and identify alternative strategies that the organization should consider implementing Determine the Attractiveness Scores Compute the Total Attractiveness Scores Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness Score Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 40
- Analysing the 6 strategic options megxit
- What is functional strategy
- Factors affecting strategic choice
- Functional strategy and strategic choice
- Subjective factors in strategic choice
- Chapter 6 strategy analysis and choice
- The nature of strategy analysis and choice
- Chapter 6 strategy analysis and choice
- What are the two external dimensions of the space matrix?
- Chapter 6 strategy analysis and choice
- Strategy analysis and choice
- Strategic analysis and choice
- Benefits of strategic management
- Basic concepts of strategic management
- Basic concepts of strategic management
- Mintzberg’s modes of strategic decision making
- Basic concepts of strategic management
- Strategic management in public sector
- Strategies in action
- Basic concepts of strategic management
- Basic concepts of strategic management
- Strategic competitiveness
- Masterful strategies come from
- What is corporate strategy in strategic management
- Parenting strategy in strategic management
- Corporate level cooperative strategy
- Strategic meetings management strategy
- Functional level strategy in strategic management
- Good choice or bad choice
- Reformative theory
- Rational choice theory key concepts
- Process of strategic choice
- Process of strategic choice
- Strategic choice approach
- Haley strategic family therapy
- Strategic management analysis tools
- External analysis in strategic management
- Grand strategy matrix
- Strategic fit vs strategic intent
- Complements and substitutes
- Strategy: core concepts and analytical approaches