CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to

































- Slides: 33

CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine Mc. Graw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Risk and Risk Aversion • Speculation – Considerable risk • Sufficient to affect the decision – Commensurate gain • Gamble – Bet or wager on an uncertain outcome 6 -2

Risk Aversion and Utility Values • Risk averse investors reject investment portfolios that are fair games or worse • These investors are willing to consider only risk-free or speculative prospects with positive risk premiums • Intuitively one would rank those portfolios as more attractive with higher expected returns 6 -3

Table 6. 1 Available Risky Portfolios (Risk -free Rate = 5%) 6 -4

Utility Function Where U = utility E ( r ) = expected return on the asset or portfolio A = coefficient of risk aversion s 2 = variance of returns 6 -5

Table 6. 2 Utility Scores of Alternative Portfolios for Investors with Varying Degree of Risk Aversion 6 -6

Figure 6. 1 The Trade-off Between Risk and Returns of a Potential Investment Portfolio, P 6 -7

Estimating Risk Aversion • Observe individuals’ decisions when confronted with risk • Observe how much people are willing to pay to avoid risk – Insurance against large losses 6 -8

Figure 6. 2 The Indifference Curve 6 -9

Table 6. 3 Utility Values of Possible Portfolios for an Investor with Risk Aversion, A = 4 6 -10

Table 6. 4 Investor’s Willingness to Pay for Catastrophe Insurance 6 -11

Capital Allocation Across Risky and Risk. Free Portfolios • Control risk – Asset allocation choice • Fraction of the portfolio invested in Treasury bills or other safe money market securities 6 -12

The Risky Asset Example Total portfolio value = $300, 000 Risk-free value = 90, 000 Risky (Vanguard & Fidelity) = 210, 000 Vanguard (V) = 54% Fidelity (F) = 46% 6 -13

The Risky Asset Example Continued Vanguard 113, 400/300, 000 = 0. 378 Fidelity 96, 600/300, 000 = 0. 322 Portfolio P Risk-Free Assets F Portfolio C 210, 000/300, 000 = 0. 700 90, 000/300, 000 = 0. 300, 000/300, 000 = 1. 000 6 -14

The Risk-Free Asset • Only the government can issue default-free bonds – Guaranteed real rate only if the duration of the bond is identical to the investor’s desire holding period • T-bills viewed as the risk-free asset – Less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations 6 -15

Figure 6. 3 Spread Between 3 -Month CD and T-bill Rates 6 -16

Portfolios of One Risky Asset and a Risk. Free Asset • It’s possible to split investment funds between safe and risky assets. • Risk free asset: proxy; T-bills • Risky asset: stock (or a portfolio) 6 -17

Example Using Chapter 6. 4 Numbers rf = 7% rf = 0% E(rp) = 15% p = 22% y = % in p (1 -y) = % in rf 6 -18

Expected Returns for Combinations rc = complete or combined portfolio For example, y =. 75 E(rc) =. 75(. 15) +. 25(. 07) =. 13 or 13% 6 -19

Combinations Without Leverage If y =. 75, then c c =. 75(. 22) =. 165 or 16. 5% If y = 1(. 22) =. 22 or 22% If y = 0 c = (. 22) =. 00 or 0% 6 -20

Capital Allocation Line with Leverage Borrow at the Risk-Free Rate and invest in stock. Using 50% Leverage, rc = (-. 5) (. 07) + (1. 5) (. 15) =. 19 c = (1. 5) (. 22) =. 33 6 -21

Figure 6. 4 The Investment Opportunity Set with a Risky Asset and a Risk-free Asset in the Expected Return-Standard Deviation Plane 6 -22

Figure 6. 5 The Opportunity Set with Differential Borrowing and Lending Rates 6 -23

Risk Tolerance and Asset Allocation • The investor must choose one optimal portfolio, C, from the set of feasible choices – Trade-off between risk and return – Expected return of the complete portfolio is given by: – Variance is: 6 -24

Table 6. 5 Utility Levels for Various Positions in Risky Assets (y) for an Investor with Risk Aversion A = 4 6 -25

Figure 6. 6 Utility as a Function of Allocation to the Risky Asset, y 6 -26

Table 6. 6 Spreadsheet Calculations of Indifference Curves 6 -27

Figure 6. 7 Indifference Curves for U =. 05 and U =. 09 with A = 2 and A = 4 6 -28

Figure 6. 8 Finding the Optimal Complete Portfolio Using Indifference Curves 6 -29

Table 6. 7 Expected Returns on Four Indifference Curves and the CAL 6 -30

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line • Passive strategy involves a decision that avoids any direct or indirect security analysis • Supply and demand forces may make such a strategy a reasonable choice for many investors 6 -31

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line Continued • A natural candidate for a passively held risky asset would be a well-diversified portfolio of common stocks • Because a passive strategy requires devoting no resources to acquiring information on any individual stock or group we must follow a “neutral” diversification strategy 6 -32

Table 6. 8 Average Annual Return on Stocks and 1 -Month T-bills; Standard Deviation and Rewardto-Variability Ratio of Stocks Over Time 6 -33
Capital allocation
Risk aversion indifference curve
Capital allocation line vs capital market line
Contiguous allocation vs linked allocation
Endowment effect and loss aversion
Business risk and financial risk leverage
Market risk credit risk operational risk
Financial markets and the allocation of capital
Behaviorism ap psychology example
Inequality aversion
What was pavlov criticized for ignoring
Pavlov conditioning
Behavioural finance
Evaluation of aversion therapy
Aversion therapy evaluation
Capital allocation line
Dominant capital allocation line
Econophysics
Capital allocation principles
Efficient diversification
What shape is the utility of a risk-averse investor?
Risk allocation in project finance
Net working capital refers to
Difference between capital reserve and reserve capital
Multinational capital structure
Difference between capital reserve and reserve capital
Constant and variable capital
Multinational cost of capital and capital structure
Capital market line
Capital budgeting under risk and uncertainty
Risk and refinements in capital budgeting
Residual risk and secondary risk pmp
Relative risk calculation
Relative risk