Chapter 6 Production Topics to be Discussed l
Chapter 6 Production
Topics to be Discussed l The Technology of Production l Production with One Variable Input (Labor) l Isoquants l Production with Two Variable Inputs l Returns to Scale © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 2
Introduction l Our study of consumer behavior was broken down into 3 steps: m Describing consumer preferences m Consumers face budget constraints m Consumers choose to maximize utility l Production decisions of a firm are similar to consumer decisions m Can also be broken down into three steps © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 3
Production Decisions of a Firm 1. Production Technology l Describe how inputs can be transformed into outputs Inputs: land, labor, capital and raw materials l Outputs: cars, desks, books, etc. l l Firms can produce different amounts of outputs using different combinations of inputs © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 4
Production Decisions of a Firm 2. Cost Constraints l l l Firms must consider prices of labor, capital and other inputs Firms want to minimize total production costs partly determined by input prices As consumers must consider budget constraints, firms must be concerned about costs of production © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 5
Production Decisions of a Firm 3. Input Choices m m Given input prices and production technology, the firm must choose how much of each input to use in producing output Given prices of different inputs, the firm may choose different combinations of inputs to minimize costs l If labor is cheap, firm may choose to produce with more labor and less capital © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 6
Production Decisions of a Firm l If a firm is a cost minimizer, we can also study m How total costs of production vary with output m How the firm chooses the quantity to maximize its profits l We can represent the firm’s production technology in the form of a production function © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 7
The Technology of Production l Production Function: m Indicates the highest output (q) that a firm can produce for every specified combination of inputs m For simplicity, we will consider only labor (L) and capital (K) m Shows what is technically feasible when the firm operates efficiently © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 8
The Technology of Production l The production function for two inputs: q = F(K, L) m Output (q) is a function of capital (K) and labor (L) m The production function is true for a given technology l If technology improves, more output can be produced for a given level of inputs © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 9
The Technology of Production l Short Run versus Long Run m It takes time for a firm to adjust production from one set of inputs to another m Firms must consider not only what inputs can be varied but over what period of time that can occur m We must distinguish between long run and short run © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 10
The Technology of Production l Short Run m Period of time in which quantities of one or more production factors cannot be changed m These inputs are called fixed inputs l Long Run m Amount of time needed to make all production inputs variable l Short run and long run are not time specific © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 11
Production: One Variable Input l We will begin looking at the short run when only one input can be varied l We assume capital is fixed and labor is variable m Output can only be increased by increasing labor m Must know how output changes as the amount of labor is changed (Table 6. 1) © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 12
Production: One Variable Input © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 13
Production: One Variable Input l Observations: 1. 2. 3. When labor is zero, output is zero as well With additional workers, output (q) increases up to 8 units of labor Beyond this point, output declines Increasing labor can make better use of existing capital early in the production process l After a point, more labor is not useful and can be counterproductive l © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 14
Production: One Variable Input l Firms make decisions based on the benefits and costs of production l Sometimes useful to look at benefits and costs on an incremental basis m How much more can be produced from an incremental unit of an input? l Sometimes useful to make comparison on an average basis © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 15
Production: One Variable Input l Average product of Labor - Output per unit of a particular product l Measures the productivity of a firm’s labor in terms of how much, on average, each worker can produce © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 16
Production: One Variable Input l Marginal Product of Labor – additional output produced when labor increases by one unit l Change in output divided by the change in labor © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 17
Production: One Variable Input © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 18
Production: One Variable Input l We can graph the information in Table 6. 1 to show m How output varies with changes in labor l Output is maximized at 112 units m Average and Marginal Products l Marginal Product is positive as long as total output is increasing l Marginal Product crosses Average Product at its maximum © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 19
Production: One Variable Input Output per Month D 112 Total Product C 60 At point D, output is maximized. B A 0 1 2 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 4 5 6 7 Chapter 6 8 9 10 Labor per Month 20
Production: One Variable Input Output per Worker • Left of E: MP > AP & AP is increasing • Right of E: MP < AP & AP is decreasing • At E: MP = AP & AP is at its maximum • At 8 units, MP is zero and output is at max 30 Marginal Product E 20 Average Product 10 0 1 2 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 4 5 6 7 Chapter 6 8 9 10 Labor per Month 21
Marginal and Average Product l When marginal product is greater than the average product, the average product is increasing l When marginal product is less than the average product, the average product is decreasing l When marginal product is zero, total product (output) is at its maximum l Marginal product crosses average product at its maximum © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 22
Product Curves l We can show a geometric relationship between the total product and the average and marginal product curves m Slope of line from origin to any point on the total product curve is the average product m At point B, AP = 60/3 = 20 which is the same as the slope of the line from the origin to point B on the total product curve © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 23
Product Curves q AP is slope of line from origin to point on TP curve q/L 112 TP C 60 30 20 B AP 10 MP 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Labor © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Labor 24
Product Curves q q MP is slope of line tangent to corresponding point on TP curve 112 TP 30 15 60 30 10 A 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Labor © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 AP MP 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Labor 25
Production: One Variable Input l From the previous example, we can see that as we increase labor the additional output produced declines l Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns: At some point in the production process, the additional output achieved from adding a variable input to a fixed input, will decline and eventually become negative © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 26
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns l Typically applies only for the short run when one variable input, such as labor, is fixed l Can be used for long-run decisions to evaluate the trade-offs of different plant configurations l Assumes the quality of the variable input is constant © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 27
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns l Easily confused with negative returns – decreases in output l Explains a declining marginal product, not necessarily a negative one m Additional output can be declining while total output is increasing © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 28
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns l Assumes a constant technology m Changes in technology will cause shifts in the total product curve m More output can be produced with same inputs m Labor productivity can increase if there are improvements in technology, even though any given production process exhibits diminishing returns to labor © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 29
The Effect of Technological Improvement Output Moving from A to B to C, labor productivity is increasing over time C 100 O 3 B A O 2 50 O 1 0 1 2 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 4 5 6 7 Chapter 6 8 9 10 Labor per time period 30
Malthus and the Food Crisis l Malthus predicted mass hunger and starvation as diminishing returns limited agricultural output and the population continued to grow (Essay on the Principle of Population) l Why did Malthus’ prediction fail? m Did not take into account changes in technology m Although he was right about diminishing marginal returns to labor © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 31
Labor Productivity l Macroeconomics are particularly concerned with labor productivity m The average product of labor for an entire industry or the economy as a whole m Links macro- and microeconomics m Can provide useful comparisons across time and across industries © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 32
Labor Productivity l Link between labor productivity and standard of living m m Consumption can increase only if productivity increases Growth of Productivity Growth in stock of capital – total amount of capital available for production 2. Technological change – development of new technologies that allow factors of production to be used more efficiently 1. © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 33
Labor Productivity l Trends in Productivity m Labor productivity and productivity growth have differed considerably across countries m U. S. productivity is growing at a slower rate than other countries m Productivity growth in developed countries has been decreasing l Given the central role of productivity in standards of living, understanding differences across countries is important © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 34
Labor Productivity in Developed Countries © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 35
Productivity Growth in US l Why has productivity growth slowed down? 1. 2. 3. 4. Growth in the stock of capital is the primary determinant of the growth in productivity Rate of capital accumulation (US) was slower than other developed countries because they had to rebuild after WWII Depletion of natural resources Environmental regulations © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 36
Production: Two Variable Inputs l Firm can produce output by combining different amounts of labor and capital l In the long run, capital and labor are both variable l We can look at the output we can achieve with different combinations of capital and labor – Table 6. 4 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 37
Production: Two Variable Inputs © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 38
Production: Two Variable Inputs l The information can be represented graphically using isoquants m Curves showing all possible combinations of inputs that yield the same output l Curves are smooth to allow for use of fractional inputs m Curve 1 shows all possible combinations of labor and capital that will produce 55 units of output © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 39
Isoquant Map E Capital 5 per year Ex: 55 units of output can be produced with 3 K & 1 L (pt. A) OR 1 K & 3 L (pt. D) 4 3 A B C 2 q 3 = 90 D 1 q 2 = 75 q 1 = 55 1 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 3 Chapter 6 4 5 Labor per year 40
Production: Two Variable Inputs l Diminishing Returns to Labor with Isoquants l Holding capital at 3 and increasing labor from 0 to 1 to 2 to 3 m Output increases at a decreasing rate (0, 55, 20, 15) illustrating diminishing marginal returns from labor in the short run and long run © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 41
Production: Two Variable Inputs l Diminishing Returns to Capital with Isoquants l Holding labor constant at 3 increasing capital from 0 to 1 to 2 to 3 m Output increases at a decreasing rate (0, 55, 20, 15) due to diminishing returns from capital in short run and long run © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 42
Diminishing Returns Capital 5 per year Increasing labor holding capital constant (A, B, C) OR Increasing capital holding labor constant (E, D, C 4 3 A B C D 2 q 3 = 90 E 1 q 2 = 75 q 1 = 55 1 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 3 Chapter 6 4 5 Labor per year 43
Production: Two Variable Inputs l Substituting Among Inputs m Slope of the isoquant shows how one input can be substituted for the other and keep the level of output the same m The negative of the slope is the marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) l Amount by which the quantity of one input can be reduced when one extra unit of another input is used, so that output remains constant © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 44
Production: Two Variable Inputs l The marginal rate of technical substitution equals: © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 45
Production: Two Variable Inputs l As labor increases to replace capital m Labor becomes relatively less productive m Capital becomes relatively more productive m Need less capital to keep output constant m Isoquant becomes flatter © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 46
Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution Capital per year 5 4 Negative Slope measures MRTS; MRTS decreases as move down the indifference curve 2 1 3 1 1 2 2/3 Q 3 =90 1 1/3 1 1 1 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 3 Chapter 6 4 Q 2 =75 Q 1 =55 5 Labor per month 47
MRTS and Isoquants l We assume there is diminishing MRTS m m Increasing labor in one unit increments from 1 to 5 results in a decreasing MRTS from 1 to 1/2 Productivity of any one input is limited l Diminishing MRTS occurs because of diminishing returns and implies isoquants are convex l There is a relationship between MRTS and marginal products of inputs © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 48
MRTS and Marginal Products l If we increase labor and decrease capital while keeping output constant: l We can see that there will be a decrease in output due to decreased capital usage, but an equally offsetting increase in output due to the increased labor usage m The change in output attributable to an increase in labor usage can be written: © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 49
MRTS and Marginal Products l Similarly, the decrease in output from the decrease in capital usage can be calculated: © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 50
MRTS and Marginal Products l If we are holding output constant, the net effect of increasing labor and decreasing capital must be zero l Using changes in output from capital and labor we can see © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 51
MRTS and Marginal Products l Rearranging equation, we can see the relationship between MRTS and MPs © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 52
Isoquants: Special Cases l Two extreme cases show the possible range of input substitution in production 1. Perfect substitutes m m MRTS is constant at all points on isoquant Same output can be produced with a lot of capital or a lot of labor or a balanced mix © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 53
Perfect Substitutes Capital per month A Same output can be reached with mostly capital or mostly labor (A or C) or with equal amount of both (B) B C Q 1 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 Q 2 Q 3 Labor per month 54
Isoquants: Special Cases 2. Perfect Complements m m Fixed proportions production function There is no substitution available between inputs The output can be made with only a specific proportion of capital and labor Cannot increase output unless increase both capital and labor in that specific proportion © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 55
Fixed-Proportions Production Function Capital per month Same output can only be produced with one set of inputs. Q 3 C Q 2 B K 1 Q 1 A Labor per month © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. L 1 Chapter 6 56
A Production Function for Wheat l Farmers can produce crops with different combinations of capital and labor m Crops in US are typically grown with capitalintensive technology m Crops in developing countries grown with labor-intensive productions l Can show the different options of crop production with isoquants © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 57
A Production Function for Wheat l Manager of a farm can use the isoquant to decide what combination of labor and capital will maximize profits from crop production m A: 500 hours of labor, 100 units of capital m B: decreases unit of capital to 90, but must increase hours of labor by 260 to 760 hours m This experiment shows the farmer the shape of the isoquant © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 58
Isoquant Describing the Production of Wheat Point A is more capital-intensive, and B is more labor-intensive. Capital 120 A 100 90 80 B Output = 13, 800 bushels per year 40 250 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 500 760 Chapter 6 1000 Labor 59
A Production Function for Wheat l Increase L to 760 and decrease K to 90 the MRTS =0. 04 < 1 m. When wage is equal to cost of running a machine, more capital should be used m Unless labor is much less expensive than capital, production should be capital intensive © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 60
Returns to Scale l How does a firm decide, in the long run, the best way to increase output? m Can change the scale of production by increasing all inputs in proportion m If double inputs, output will most likely increase but by how much? © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 61
Returns to Scale l Rate at which output increases as inputs are increased proportionately m Increasing returns to scale m Constant returns to scale m Decreasing returns to scale © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 62
Returns to Scale l Increasing returns to scale: output more than doubles when all inputs are doubled m Larger output associated with lower cost (cars) m One firm is more efficient than many (utilities) m The isoquants get closer together © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 63
Increasing Returns to Scale Capital (machine hours) A The isoquants move closer together 4 30 20 2 10 5 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 10 Chapter 6 Labor (hours) 64
Returns to Scale l Constant returns to scale: output doubles when all inputs are doubled m Size does not affect productivity m May have a large number of producers m Isoquants © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. are equidistant apart Chapter 6 65
Returns to Scale Capital (machine hours) A 6 30 4 20 2 Constant Returns: Isoquants are equally spaced 10 5 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 10 Chapter 6 15 Labor (hours) 66
Returns to Scale l Decreasing returns to scale: output less than doubles when all inputs are doubled m Decreasing efficiency with large size m Reduction of entrepreneurial abilities m Isoquants become farther apart © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 67
Returns to Scale Capital (machine hours) A Decreasing Returns: Isoquants get further apart 4 30 2 10 5 © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 10 Chapter 6 20 Labor (hours) 68
Returns to Scale Returns to scale not necessarily consistent across levels of output. One possibility might be: 1. There are constant returns to scale for relatively small plants 2. There are increasing returns to scale for relatively larger plants © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 69
Practice l Bridget's Brewery production function is given by l where K is the number of vats she uses and L is the number of labor hours. Does this production process exhibit increasing, constant or decreasing returns to scale? Holding the number of vats constant at 4, is the marginal product of labor increasing, constant or decreasing as more labor is used? © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 70
Solution l Multiplying the K and L by 2 yields: l we know the production process exhibits constant returns to scale. Holding the number of vats constant at 4 will still result in a downward sloping marginal product of labor curve. That is the marginal product of labor decreases as more labor is used. © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 71
- Slides: 71