Chapter 6 CorporateLevel Strategy Diane M Sullivan Ph

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Chapter 6 Corporate-Level Strategy Diane M. Sullivan, Ph. D. 2011 Sections modified from Hitt,

Chapter 6 Corporate-Level Strategy Diane M. Sullivan, Ph. D. 2011 Sections modified from Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson, Copyright © 2008 Cengage Sections modified from Gentner (2009)

The Strategic Management Process p Previously, we have examined firms competing in a single

The Strategic Management Process p Previously, we have examined firms competing in a single industry or product market. After solidifying a position in a single industry or product market, firms will often want to diversify into multiple businesses. Insert figure 1. 1 graphic

Corporate-level Strategy: Definitions p Business-level strategy (Chapter 4) n p Deals with how the

Corporate-level Strategy: Definitions p Business-level strategy (Chapter 4) n p Deals with how the business should compete (e. g. , cost leadership, differentiation, focus, integrated strategies) Corporate-level strategy (Chapter 6) n Definition: Specific actions a firm takes to gain an advantage by selecting and managing a group of different businesses p Primary form of corporate-level strategy is product diversification § Diversification involves using expertise and knowledge gained in one business to diversify into a business where it can be used in a related way n 2 main concerns with corporate-level strategy: 1) What businesses the firm should be in 2) How the firm should manage the different business units

Corporate-level Strategy: Examples p Ex. 1: Proctor & Gamble’s Diversification Strategy n Pre-2005: Product

Corporate-level Strategy: Examples p Ex. 1: Proctor & Gamble’s Diversification Strategy n Pre-2005: Product mix focused on women and baby care n 2005: Acquired Gillette, which focused on consumer health care products geared toward men n Synergy created by combining Gillette’s toothbrush (Oral-B) and P&G’s toothpaste (Crest) businesses to create Pro-Health oral care product line p Good for retailers (shelf space) p Strategy had potential but was more difficult to create operational relatedness between the products § Comingle employees requiring actual physical re-location/talent exit § Different ways to make business decisions § Conflicting organizational cultures p p In 2007, Pro-Health overtook Colgate in market share Ex. 2: Disney

3 Levels of Diversification 1. 2. 3. Low level of diversification n Single-business strategy

3 Levels of Diversification 1. 2. 3. Low level of diversification n Single-business strategy n Dominant-business strategy Moderate-to-high levels of diversification n Related constrained diversification strategy n Related linked diversification strategy Very high levels of diversification n Unrelated diversification

Performance Diversification and Firm Performance Dominant Business Related Constrained Level of Diversification Unrelated Business

Performance Diversification and Firm Performance Dominant Business Related Constrained Level of Diversification Unrelated Business

Low-level Diversification p Single-business strategy n Firm generates 95% or more of its sales

Low-level Diversification p Single-business strategy n Firm generates 95% or more of its sales revenue from its core business area n Example (pre-2008): Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company—the world’s largest producer of chewing and bubble gums p p A Post-2008 Acquired by Mars Inc. Dominant-business strategy A B n Firm generates 70 -95% of total sales revenue within a single business area n Example: UPS generated 74% of revenue from U. S. package delivery business; 17% from international package business; 9% from non-package business

Moderate-to-High Diversification p A Related constrained diversification strategy B n < 70% of revenue

Moderate-to-High Diversification p A Related constrained diversification strategy B n < 70% of revenue comes from the dominant business n There are direct links between the firm's businesses (e. g. , share products, technology; marketing; and distribution linkages) n Example: Campbell’s C

Moderate-to-High Diversification p Related linked diversification strategy n < 70% of revenue comes from

Moderate-to-High Diversification p Related linked diversification strategy n < 70% of revenue comes from the dominant business n Mix between related and unrelated diversification D A B C p Linked firms share fewer resources and assets among their businesses p Interested in constantly adjusting the mix in their portfolio of businesses and how to manage the businesses p Example: Rachel Ray

Moderate-to-High Diversification p Related linked diversification strategy example 2 A B C

Moderate-to-High Diversification p Related linked diversification strategy example 2 A B C

Very High Diversification p A Unrelated diversification strategy n Less than 70% of revenue

Very High Diversification p A Unrelated diversification strategy n Less than 70% of revenue comes from dominant business n No relationships between businesses n Often called conglomerates n Example: Jarden Corporation B C

Performance Diversification and Firm Performance Dominant Business Related Constrained Level of Diversification Unrelated Business

Performance Diversification and Firm Performance Dominant Business Related Constrained Level of Diversification Unrelated Business

3 Reasons Firms Diversify 1. Value-creating reasons n n Economies of scope Market power

3 Reasons Firms Diversify 1. Value-creating reasons n n Economies of scope Market power p n 2. Vertical Integration Financial economies Value-neutral reasons n n n n Antitrust regulation Tax laws Low performance Uncertain future cash flows Risk reduction for firm Tangible resources Intangible resources 3. Value-reducing reasons n n Diversifying managerial employment risk Increasing managerial compensation

Value-Creating Reasons to Diversify p Based a desire to develop resources that will enhance

Value-Creating Reasons to Diversify p Based a desire to develop resources that will enhance strategic competitiveness Ok, but how? n Two main ways diversification strategies can create value 1. Operational relatedness: sharing activities between businesses p 2. Ex: P&G’s paper towel business and baby diaper business both use paper products as inputs; the firm’s paper production plant produces inputs for both businesses Corporate relatedness: transferring core competencies into business p Ex: Honda’s competence in engine design and manufacturing to motorcycles, lawnmowers, cars and trucks p Often achieved via transferring or hiring personnel with competencies

Operational & Corporate Relatedness Value p The value these create are referred to as

Operational & Corporate Relatedness Value p The value these create are referred to as p Economies of Scope (for related constrained and related-linked strategies) p p p Cost savings created by sharing its resources/capabilities or transferring core competencies of one businesses to another of its businesses Market Power (for related constrained and related-linked strategies) p Exists when a firm sells its products above competitive levels and/or reduces the cost of its Value Chain activities below competitive levels p Influenced by a firm’s level of vertical integration Financial Economies (for unrelated diversification) p Cost savings realized via improved allocations of financial resources based on investments inside or outside the firm— 2 main types 1. Efficient internal capital allocations can reduce risk of the firm’s portfolio 2. Restructuring of acquired assets

Value-creating Strategies of Diversification Operational and Corporate Relatedness High Sharing Activities: Operational Relatedness Between

Value-creating Strategies of Diversification Operational and Corporate Relatedness High Sharing Activities: Operational Relatedness Between Business Low Related Constrained Diversification (Economies of Scope & Market Power) Both Operational and Corporate Relatedness (Rare Capability; Can sometimes Create Diseconomies of Scope) Unrelated Diversification (Financial Economies) Related Linked Diversification (Economies of Scope & Market Power) Low High Corporate Relatedness: Transferring Skills Into Business Through Corporate Headquarters

Value-Neutral Reasons to Diversify p External value-neutral reasons n p Antitrust Regulation and Tax

Value-Neutral Reasons to Diversify p External value-neutral reasons n p Antitrust Regulation and Tax Laws p Deregulation p Changing tax laws Internal value-neutral reasons n Low Performance n Uncertain Future Cash Flows n Firm Risk Reduction n Resources and Diversification p Excess tangible resources like plant and equipment, sales force, etc.

Value-Reducing Reasons to Diversify p Managerial Motives n Diversifying managerial employment risk p n

Value-Reducing Reasons to Diversify p Managerial Motives n Diversifying managerial employment risk p n If one business fails, the whole firm will stay intact Increasing managerial compensation p Larger firms are more complex p Generally mean larger compensation packages