Chapter 5 Link Layer and LANs A note

  • Slides: 108
Download presentation
Chapter 5 Link Layer and LANs A note on the use of these ppt

Chapter 5 Link Layer and LANs A note on the use of these ppt slides: We’re making these slides freely available to all (faculty, students, readers). They’re in Power. Point form so you can add, modify, and delete slides (including this one) and slide content to suit your needs. They obviously represent a lot of work on our part. In return for use, we only ask the following: q If you use these slides (e. g. , in a class) in substantially unaltered form, that you mention their source (after all, we’d like people to use our book!) q If you post any slides in substantially unaltered form on a www site, that you note that they are adapted from (or perhaps identical to) our slides, and note our copyright of this material. Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 4 th edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley, July 2007. Thanks and enjoy! JFK/KWR All material copyright 1996 -2007 J. F Kurose and K. W. Ross, All Rights Reserved 5: Data. Link Layer 1

Chapter 5: The Data Link Layer Our goals: r understand principles behind data link

Chapter 5: The Data Link Layer Our goals: r understand principles behind data link layer services: m m error detection, correction sharing a broadcast channel: multiple access link layer addressing reliable data transfer, flow control: done! r instantiation and implementation of various link layer technologies 5: Data. Link Layer 2

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Link-layer switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link virtualization: ATM, MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 3

Link Layer: Introduction Some terminology: r hosts and routers are nodes r communication channels

Link Layer: Introduction Some terminology: r hosts and routers are nodes r communication channels that connect adjacent nodes along communication path are links m m m wired links wireless links LANs r layer-2 packet is a frame, encapsulates datagram data-link layer has responsibility of transferring datagram from one node to adjacent node over a link 5: Data. Link Layer 4

Link layer: context r datagram transferred by different link protocols over different links: m

Link layer: context r datagram transferred by different link protocols over different links: m e. g. , Ethernet on first link, frame relay on intermediate links, 802. 11 on last link r each link protocol provides different services m e. g. , may or may not provide rdt over link transportation analogy r trip from Princeton to Lausanne m limo: Princeton to JFK m plane: JFK to Geneva m train: Geneva to Lausanne r tourist = datagram r transport segment = communication link r transportation mode = link layer protocol r travel agent = routing algorithm 5: Data. Link Layer 5

Link Layer Services r framing, link access: m encapsulate datagram into frame, adding header,

Link Layer Services r framing, link access: m encapsulate datagram into frame, adding header, trailer m channel access if shared medium m “MAC” addresses used in frame headers to identify source, dest • different from IP address! r reliable delivery between adjacent nodes m we learned how to do this already (chapter 3)! m seldom used on low bit-error link (fiber, some twisted pair) m wireless links: high error rates • Q: why both link-level and end-end reliability? 5: Data. Link Layer 6

Link Layer Services (more) r flow control: m pacing between adjacent sending and receiving

Link Layer Services (more) r flow control: m pacing between adjacent sending and receiving nodes r error detection: m errors caused by signal attenuation, noise. m receiver detects presence of errors: • signals sender for retransmission or drops frame r error correction: m receiver identifies and corrects bit error(s) without resorting to retransmission r half-duplex and full-duplex m with half duplex, nodes at both ends of link can transmit, but not at same time 5: Data. Link Layer 7

Where is the link layer implemented? r in each and every host r link

Where is the link layer implemented? r in each and every host r link layer implemented in “adaptor” (aka network interface card NIC) m m Ethernet card, PCMCI card, 802. 11 card implements link, physical layer r attaches into host’s system buses r combination of hardware, software, firmware host schematic application transport network link cpu memory controller link physical host bus (e. g. , PCI) physical transmission network adapter card 5: Data. Link Layer 8

Adaptors Communicating datagram controller receiving host sending host datagram frame r sending side: m

Adaptors Communicating datagram controller receiving host sending host datagram frame r sending side: m encapsulates datagram in frame m adds error checking bits, rdt, flow control, etc. r receiving side m looks for errors, rdt, flow control, etc m extracts datagram, passes to upper layer at receiving side 5: Data. Link Layer 9

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Link-layer switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link Virtualization: ATM. MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 10

Error Detection EDC= Error Detection and Correction bits (redundancy) D = Data protected by

Error Detection EDC= Error Detection and Correction bits (redundancy) D = Data protected by error checking, may include header fields • Error detection not 100% reliable! • protocol may miss some errors, but rarely • larger EDC field yields better detection and correction otherwise 5: Data. Link Layer 11

Parity Checking Single Bit Parity: Detect single bit errors Two Dimensional Bit Parity: Detect

Parity Checking Single Bit Parity: Detect single bit errors Two Dimensional Bit Parity: Detect and correct single bit errors 0 0 5: Data. Link Layer 12

Internet checksum (review) Goal: detect “errors” (e. g. , flipped bits) in transmitted packet

Internet checksum (review) Goal: detect “errors” (e. g. , flipped bits) in transmitted packet (note: used at transport layer only) Sender: r treat segment contents as sequence of 16 -bit integers r checksum: addition (1’s complement sum) of segment contents r sender puts checksum value into UDP checksum field Receiver: r compute checksum of received segment r check if computed checksum equals checksum field value: m NO - error detected m YES - no error detected. But maybe errors nonetheless? 5: Data. Link Layer 13

Checksumming: Cyclic Redundancy Check r view data bits, D, as a binary number r

Checksumming: Cyclic Redundancy Check r view data bits, D, as a binary number r choose r+1 bit pattern (generator), G r goal: choose r CRC bits, R, such that m m m <D, R> exactly divisible by G (modulo 2) receiver knows G, divides <D, R> by G. If non-zero remainder: error detected! can detect all burst errors less than r+1 bits r widely used in practice (802. 11 Wi. Fi, ATM) 5: Data. Link Layer 14

CRC Example Want: D. 2 r XOR R = n. G equivalently: D. 2

CRC Example Want: D. 2 r XOR R = n. G equivalently: D. 2 r = n. G XOR R equivalently: if we divide D. 2 r by G, want remainder R R = remainder[ D. 2 r G ] 5: Data. Link Layer 15

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Link-layer switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link Virtualization: ATM, MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 16

Multiple Access Links and Protocols Two types of “links”: r point-to-point m PPP for

Multiple Access Links and Protocols Two types of “links”: r point-to-point m PPP for dial-up access m point-to-point link between Ethernet switch and host r broadcast (shared wire or medium) m old-fashioned Ethernet m upstream HFC m 802. 11 wireless LAN shared wire (e. g. , cabled Ethernet) shared RF (e. g. , 802. 11 Wi. Fi) shared RF (satellite) humans at a cocktail party (shared air, acoustical) 5: Data. Link Layer 17

Multiple Access protocols r single shared broadcast channel r two or more simultaneous transmissions

Multiple Access protocols r single shared broadcast channel r two or more simultaneous transmissions by nodes: interference m collision if node receives two or more signals at the same time multiple access protocol r distributed algorithm that determines how nodes share channel, i. e. , determine when node can transmit r communication about channel sharing must use channel itself! m no out-of-band channel for coordination 5: Data. Link Layer 18

Ideal Multiple Access Protocol Broadcast channel of rate R bps 1. when one node

Ideal Multiple Access Protocol Broadcast channel of rate R bps 1. when one node wants to transmit, it can send at rate R. 2. when M nodes want to transmit, each can send at average rate R/M 3. fully decentralized: m m no special node to coordinate transmissions no synchronization of clocks, slots 4. simple 5: Data. Link Layer 19

MAC Protocols: a taxonomy Three broad classes: r Channel Partitioning m m divide channel

MAC Protocols: a taxonomy Three broad classes: r Channel Partitioning m m divide channel into smaller “pieces” (time slots, frequency, code) allocate piece to node for exclusive use r Random Access m channel not divided, allow collisions m “recover” from collisions r “Taking turns” m nodes take turns, but nodes with more to send can take longer turns 5: Data. Link Layer 20

Channel Partitioning MAC protocols: TDMA: time division multiple access r access to channel in

Channel Partitioning MAC protocols: TDMA: time division multiple access r access to channel in "rounds" r each station gets fixed length slot (length = pkt trans time) in each round r unused slots go idle r example: 6 -station LAN, 1, 3, 4 have pkt, slots 2, 5, 6 idle 6 -slot frame 1 3 4 5: Data. Link Layer 21

Channel Partitioning MAC protocols: FDMA: frequency division multiple access r channel spectrum divided into

Channel Partitioning MAC protocols: FDMA: frequency division multiple access r channel spectrum divided into frequency bands r each station assigned fixed frequency band r unused transmission time in frequency bands go idle r example: 6 -station LAN, 1, 3, 4 have pkt, frequency bands 2, 5, 6 idle frequency bands FDM cable time 5: Data. Link Layer 22

Random Access Protocols r When node has packet to send m transmit at full

Random Access Protocols r When node has packet to send m transmit at full channel data rate R. m no a priori coordination among nodes r two or more transmitting nodes ➜ “collision”, r random access MAC protocol specifies: m how to detect collisions m how to recover from collisions (e. g. , via delayed retransmissions) r Examples of random access MAC protocols: m slotted ALOHA m CSMA, CSMA/CD, CSMA/CA 5: Data. Link Layer 23

Slotted ALOHA Assumptions: r all frames same size r time divided into equal size

Slotted ALOHA Assumptions: r all frames same size r time divided into equal size slots (time to transmit 1 frame) r nodes start to transmit only slot beginning r nodes are synchronized r if 2 or more nodes transmit in slot, all nodes detect collision Operation: r when node obtains fresh frame, transmits in next slot m if no collision: node can send new frame in next slot m if collision: node retransmits frame in each subsequent slot with prob. p until success 5: Data. Link Layer 24

Slotted ALOHA Pros r single active node can continuously transmit at full rate of

Slotted ALOHA Pros r single active node can continuously transmit at full rate of channel r highly decentralized: only slots in nodes need to be in sync r simple Cons r collisions, wasting slots r idle slots r nodes may be able to detect collision in less than time to transmit packet r clock synchronization 5: Data. Link Layer 25

Slotted Aloha efficiency Efficiency : long-run fraction of successful slots (many nodes, all with

Slotted Aloha efficiency Efficiency : long-run fraction of successful slots (many nodes, all with many frames to send) r suppose: N nodes with many frames to send, each transmits in slot with probability p r prob that given node has success in a slot = p(1 -p)N-1 r prob that any node has a success = Np(1 -p)N-1 r max efficiency: find p* that maximizes Np(1 -p)N-1 r for many nodes, take limit of Np*(1 -p*)N-1 as N goes to infinity, gives: Max efficiency = 1/e =. 37 At best: channel used for useful transmissions 37% of time! 5: Data. Link Layer ! 26

Pure (unslotted) ALOHA r unslotted Aloha: simpler, no synchronization r when frame first arrives

Pure (unslotted) ALOHA r unslotted Aloha: simpler, no synchronization r when frame first arrives m transmit immediately r collision probability increases: m frame sent at t 0 collides with other frames sent in [t 0 -1, t 0+1] 5: Data. Link Layer 27

Pure Aloha efficiency P(success by given node) = P(node transmits). P(no other node transmits

Pure Aloha efficiency P(success by given node) = P(node transmits). P(no other node transmits in [p 0 -1, p 0] = p. (1 -p)N-1 = p. (1 -p)2(N-1) … choosing optimum p and then letting n -> infty. . . = 1/(2 e) =. 18 even worse than slotted Aloha! 5: Data. Link Layer 28

CSMA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access) CSMA: listen before transmit: If channel sensed idle: transmit

CSMA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access) CSMA: listen before transmit: If channel sensed idle: transmit entire frame r If channel sensed busy, defer transmission r human analogy: don’t interrupt others! 5: Data. Link Layer 29

CSMA collisions spatial layout of nodes collisions can still occur: propagation delay means two

CSMA collisions spatial layout of nodes collisions can still occur: propagation delay means two nodes may not hear each other’s transmission collision: entire packet transmission time wasted note: role of distance & propagation delay in determining collision probability 5: Data. Link Layer 30

CSMA/CD (Collision Detection) CSMA/CD: carrier sensing, deferral as in CSMA m collisions detected within

CSMA/CD (Collision Detection) CSMA/CD: carrier sensing, deferral as in CSMA m collisions detected within short time m colliding transmissions aborted, reducing channel wastage r collision detection: m easy in wired LANs: measure signal strengths, compare transmitted, received signals m difficult in wireless LANs: received signal strength overwhelmed by local transmission strength r human analogy: the polite conversationalist 5: Data. Link Layer 31

CSMA/CD collision detection 5: Data. Link Layer 32

CSMA/CD collision detection 5: Data. Link Layer 32

“Taking Turns” MAC protocols channel partitioning MAC protocols: m share channel efficiently and fairly

“Taking Turns” MAC protocols channel partitioning MAC protocols: m share channel efficiently and fairly at high load m inefficient at low load: delay in channel access, 1/N bandwidth allocated even if only 1 active node! Random access MAC protocols m efficient at low load: single node can fully utilize channel m high load: collision overhead “taking turns” protocols look for best of both worlds! 5: Data. Link Layer 33

“Taking Turns” MAC protocols Polling: r master node “invites” slave nodes to transmit in

“Taking Turns” MAC protocols Polling: r master node “invites” slave nodes to transmit in turn r typically used with “dumb” slave devices r concerns: m m m polling overhead latency single point of failure (master) data poll master data slaves 5: Data. Link Layer 34

“Taking Turns” MAC protocols Token passing: r control token passed from one node to

“Taking Turns” MAC protocols Token passing: r control token passed from one node to next sequentially. r token message r concerns: m m m token overhead latency single point of failure (token) T (nothing to send) T data 5: Data. Link Layer 35

Summary of MAC protocols r channel partitioning, by time, frequency or code m Time

Summary of MAC protocols r channel partitioning, by time, frequency or code m Time Division, Frequency Division r random access (dynamic), m ALOHA, S-ALOHA, CSMA/CD m carrier sensing: easy in some technologies (wire), hard in others (wireless) m CSMA/CD used in Ethernet m CSMA/CA used in 802. 11 r taking turns m polling from central site, token passing m Bluetooth, FDDI, IBM Token Ring 5: Data. Link Layer 36

LAN technologies Data link layer so far: m services, access error detection/correction, multiple Next:

LAN technologies Data link layer so far: m services, access error detection/correction, multiple Next: LAN technologies m addressing m Ethernet m switches m PPP 5: Data. Link Layer 37

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-Layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Link-layer switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link Virtualization: ATM, MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 38

MAC Addresses and ARP r 32 -bit IP address: m network-layer address m used

MAC Addresses and ARP r 32 -bit IP address: m network-layer address m used to get datagram to destination IP subnet r MAC (or LAN or physical or Ethernet) address: m function: get frame from one interface to another physically-connected interface (same network) m 48 bit MAC address (for most LANs) • burned in NIC ROM, also sometimes software settable 5: Data. Link Layer 39

LAN Addresses and ARP Each adapter on LAN has unique LAN address 1 A-2

LAN Addresses and ARP Each adapter on LAN has unique LAN address 1 A-2 F-BB-76 -09 -AD 71 -65 -F 7 -2 B-08 -53 LAN (wired or wireless) Broadcast address = FF-FF-FF-FF = adapter 58 -23 -D 7 -FA-20 -B 0 0 C-C 4 -11 -6 F-E 3 -98 5: Data. Link Layer 40

LAN Address (more) r MAC address allocation administered by IEEE r manufacturer buys portion

LAN Address (more) r MAC address allocation administered by IEEE r manufacturer buys portion of MAC address space (to assure uniqueness) r analogy: (a) MAC address: like Social Security Number (b) IP address: like postal address r MAC flat address ➜ portability m can move LAN card from one LAN to another r IP hierarchical address NOT portable m address depends on IP subnet to which node is attached 5: Data. Link Layer 41

ARP: Address Resolution Protocol Question: how to determine MAC address of B knowing B’s

ARP: Address Resolution Protocol Question: how to determine MAC address of B knowing B’s IP address? 137. 196. 7. 78 1 A-2 F-BB-76 -09 -AD 137. 196. 7. 23 r Each IP node (host, router) on LAN has ARP table r ARP table: IP/MAC address mappings for some LAN nodes 137. 196. 7. 14 m LAN 71 -65 -F 7 -2 B-08 -53 137. 196. 7. 88 < IP address; MAC address; TTL> 58 -23 -D 7 -FA-20 -B 0 TTL (Time To Live): time after which address mapping will be forgotten (typically 20 min) 0 C-C 4 -11 -6 F-E 3 -98 5: Data. Link Layer 42

ARP protocol: Same LAN (network) r A wants to send datagram to B, and

ARP protocol: Same LAN (network) r A wants to send datagram to B, and B’s MAC address not in A’s ARP table. r A broadcasts ARP query packet, containing B's IP address m dest MAC address = FFFF-FF-FF m all machines on LAN receive ARP query r B receives ARP packet, replies to A with its (B's) MAC address m frame sent to A’s MAC address (unicast) r A caches (saves) IP-to- MAC address pair in its ARP table until information becomes old (times out) m soft state: information that times out (goes away) unless refreshed r ARP is “plug-and-play”: m nodes create their ARP tables without intervention from net administrator 5: Data. Link Layer 43

DHCP: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Goal: allow host to dynamically obtain its IP address

DHCP: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Goal: allow host to dynamically obtain its IP address from network server when joining network m support for mobile users joining network m host holds address only while connected and “on” (allowing address reuse) m renew address already in use r DHCP overview: m 1. host broadcasts “DHCP discover” msg m 2. DHCP server responds with “DHCP offer” msg m 3. host requests IP address: “DHCP request” msg m 4. DHCP server sends address: “DHCP ack” msg 5: Data. Link Layer 44

DHCP client-server scenario A B 223. 1. 1. 2 223. 1. 1. 4 223.

DHCP client-server scenario A B 223. 1. 1. 2 223. 1. 1. 4 223. 1. 1. 3 223. 1. 2. 1 DHCP server 223. 1. 1. 1 223. 1. 2. 9 223. 1. 3. 27 223. 1. 2. 2 223. 1. 3. 2 E arriving DHCP client needs address in this (223. 1. 2/24) network 5: Data. Link Layer 45

DHCP client-server scenario DHCP server: 223. 1. 2. 5 DHCP discover src : 0.

DHCP client-server scenario DHCP server: 223. 1. 2. 5 DHCP discover src : 0. 0, 68 dest. : 255, 67 yiaddr: 0. 0 transaction ID: 654 arriving client DHCP offer src: 223. 1. 2. 5, 67 dest: 255, 68 yiaddrr: 223. 1. 2. 4 transaction ID: 654 Lifetime: 3600 secs DHCP request time src: 0. 0, 68 dest: : 255, 67 yiaddrr: 223. 1. 2. 4 transaction ID: 655 Lifetime: 3600 secs DHCP ACK src: 223. 1. 2. 5, 67 dest: 255, 68 yiaddrr: 223. 1. 2. 4 transaction ID: 655 Lifetime: 3600 secs 5: Data. Link Layer 46

Addressing: routing to another LAN walkthrough: send datagram from A to B via R

Addressing: routing to another LAN walkthrough: send datagram from A to B via R assume A knows B’s IP address 88 -B 2 -2 F-54 -1 A-0 F 74 -29 -9 C-E 8 -FF-55 A 111 E 6 -E 9 -00 -17 -BB-4 B 1 A-23 -F 9 -CD-06 -9 B 222. 220 111. 112 R 222. 221 222 B 49 -BD-D 2 -C 7 -56 -2 A CC-49 -DE-D 0 -AB-7 D r two ARP tables in router R, one for each IP network (LAN) 5: Data. Link Layer 47

r A creates IP datagram with source A, destination B r A uses ARP

r A creates IP datagram with source A, destination B r A uses ARP to get R’s MAC address for 111. 110 r A creates link-layer frame with R's MAC address as dest, r r r frame contains A-to-B IP datagram This is a really important A’s NIC sends frame example – make sure you understand! R’s NIC receives frame R removes IP datagram from Ethernet frame, sees its destined to B R uses ARP to get B’s MAC address R creates frame containing A-to-B IP datagram sends to B 88 -B 2 -2 F-54 -1 A-0 F 74 -29 -9 C-E 8 -FF-55 A E 6 -E 9 -00 -17 -BB-4 B 111 1 A-23 -F 9 -CD-06 -9 B 222. 220 111. 112 R 222. 221 222 B 49 -BD-D 2 -C 7 -56 -2 A CC-49 -DE-D 0 -AB-7 D 5: Data. Link Layer 48

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-Layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Link-layer switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link Virtualization: ATM and MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 49

Ethernet “dominant” wired LAN technology: r cheap $20 for NIC r first widely used

Ethernet “dominant” wired LAN technology: r cheap $20 for NIC r first widely used LAN technology r simpler, cheaper than token LANs and ATM r kept up with speed race: 10 Mbps – 10 Gbps Metcalfe’s Ethernet sketch 5: Data. Link Layer 50

Star topology r bus topology popular through mid 90 s m all nodes in

Star topology r bus topology popular through mid 90 s m all nodes in same collision domain (can collide with each other) r today: star topology prevails m active switch in center m each “spoke” runs a (separate) Ethernet protocol (nodes do not collide with each other) switch bus: coaxial cable star 5: Data. Link Layer 51

Ethernet Frame Structure Sending adapter encapsulates IP datagram (or other network layer protocol packet)

Ethernet Frame Structure Sending adapter encapsulates IP datagram (or other network layer protocol packet) in Ethernet frame Preamble: r 7 bytes with pattern 1010 followed by one byte with pattern 10101011 r used to synchronize receiver, sender clock rates 5: Data. Link Layer 52

Ethernet Frame Structure (more) r Addresses: 6 bytes m if adapter receives frame with

Ethernet Frame Structure (more) r Addresses: 6 bytes m if adapter receives frame with matching destination address, or with broadcast address (eg ARP packet), it passes data in frame to network layer protocol m otherwise, adapter discards frame r Type: indicates higher layer protocol (mostly IP but others possible, e. g. , Novell IPX, Apple. Talk) r CRC: checked at receiver, if error is detected, frame is dropped 5: Data. Link Layer 53

Ethernet: Unreliable, connectionless r connectionless: No handshaking between sending and receiving NICs r unreliable:

Ethernet: Unreliable, connectionless r connectionless: No handshaking between sending and receiving NICs r unreliable: receiving NIC doesn’t send acks or nacks to sending NIC m m m stream of datagrams passed to network layer can have gaps (missing datagrams) gaps will be filled if app is using TCP otherwise, app will see gaps r Ethernet’s MAC protocol: unslotted CSMA/CD 5: Data. Link Layer 54

Ethernet CSMA/CD algorithm 1. NIC receives datagram 4. If NIC detects another from network

Ethernet CSMA/CD algorithm 1. NIC receives datagram 4. If NIC detects another from network layer, transmission while creates frame transmitting, aborts and sends jam signal 2. If NIC senses channel idle, starts frame transmission 5. After aborting, NIC If NIC senses channel enters exponential busy, waits until channel backoff: after mth idle, then transmits collision, NIC chooses K at random from 3. If NIC transmits entire {0, 1, 2, …, 2 m-1}. NIC waits frame without detecting K·512 bit times, returns to another transmission, NIC Step 2 is done with frame ! 5: Data. Link Layer 55

Ethernet’s CSMA/CD (more) Jam Signal: make sure all other transmitters are aware of collision;

Ethernet’s CSMA/CD (more) Jam Signal: make sure all other transmitters are aware of collision; 48 bits Bit time: . 1 microsec for 10 Mbps Ethernet ; for K=1023, wait time is about 50 msec See/interact with Java applet on AWL Web site: highly recommended ! Exponential Backoff: r Goal: adapt retransmission attempts to estimated current load m heavy load: random wait will be longer r first collision: choose K from {0, 1}; delay is K· 512 bit transmission times r after second collision: choose K from {0, 1, 2, 3}… r after ten collisions, choose K from {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …, 1023} 5: Data. Link Layer 56

CSMA/CD efficiency r Tprop = max prop delay between 2 nodes in LAN r

CSMA/CD efficiency r Tprop = max prop delay between 2 nodes in LAN r ttrans = time to transmit max-size frame r efficiency goes to 1 m as tprop goes to 0 m as ttrans goes to infinity r better performance than ALOHA: and simple, cheap, decentralized! 5: Data. Link Layer 57

802. 3 Ethernet Standards: Link & Physical Layers r many different Ethernet standards m

802. 3 Ethernet Standards: Link & Physical Layers r many different Ethernet standards m common MAC protocol and frame format m different speeds: 2 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps, 10 G bps m different physical layer media: fiber, cable application transport network link physical MAC protocol and frame format 100 BASE-TX 100 BASE-T 2 100 BASE-FX 100 BASE-T 4 100 BASE-SX 100 BASE-BX copper (twister pair) physical layer fiber physical layer 5: Data. Link Layer 58

Manchester encoding r used in 10 Base. T r each bit has a transition

Manchester encoding r used in 10 Base. T r each bit has a transition r allows clocks in sending and receiving nodes to synchronize to each other m no need for a centralized, global clock among nodes! r Hey, this is physical-layer stuff! 5: Data. Link Layer 59

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Link-layer switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link Virtualization: ATM, MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 60

Hubs … physical-layer (“dumb”) repeaters: m bits coming in one link go out all

Hubs … physical-layer (“dumb”) repeaters: m bits coming in one link go out all other links at same rate m all nodes connected to hub can collide with one another m no frame buffering m no CSMA/CD at hub: host NICs detect collisions twisted pair hub 5: Data. Link Layer 61

Switch r link-layer device: smarter than hubs, take active role m store, forward Ethernet

Switch r link-layer device: smarter than hubs, take active role m store, forward Ethernet frames m examine incoming frame’s MAC address, selectively forward frame to one-or-more outgoing links when frame is to be forwarded on segment, uses CSMA/CD to access segment r transparent m hosts are unaware of presence of switches r plug-and-play, self-learning m switches do not need to be configured 5: Data. Link Layer 62

Switch: allows multiple simultaneous transmissions A r hosts have dedicated, direct connection to switch

Switch: allows multiple simultaneous transmissions A r hosts have dedicated, direct connection to switch r switches buffer packets r Ethernet protocol used on each incoming link, but no collisions; full duplex m each link is its own collision domain r switching: A-to-A’ and B-to- B’ simultaneously, without collisions m not possible with dumb hub C’ B 6 1 5 2 3 4 C B’ A’ switch with six interfaces (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 5: Data. Link Layer 63

Switch Table r Q: how does switch know that A’ reachable via interface 4,

Switch Table r Q: how does switch know that A’ reachable via interface 4, B’ reachable via interface 5? r A: each switch has a switch table, each entry: m C’ B 6 r Q: how are entries created, maintained in switch table? something like a routing protocol? 1 5 (MAC address of host, interface to reach host, time stamp) r looks like a routing table! m A 2 3 4 C B’ A’ switch with six interfaces (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 5: Data. Link Layer 64

Switch: self-learning r switch learns which hosts can be reached through which interfaces m

Switch: self-learning r switch learns which hosts can be reached through which interfaces m m Source: A Dest: A’ A A A’ C’ when frame received, switch “learns” location of sender: incoming LAN segment records sender/location pair in switch table B 1 6 5 2 3 4 C B’ A’ MAC addr interface TTL A 1 60 Switch table (initially empty) 5: Data. Link Layer 65

Switch: frame filtering/forwarding When frame received: 1. record link associated with sending host 2.

Switch: frame filtering/forwarding When frame received: 1. record link associated with sending host 2. index switch table using MAC dest address 3. if entry found for destination then { if dest on segment from which frame arrived then drop the frame else forward the frame on interface indicated } else flood forward on all but the interface on which the frame arrived 5: Data. Link Layer 66

Self-learning, forwarding: example Source: A Dest: A’ A A A’ C’ B r frame

Self-learning, forwarding: example Source: A Dest: A’ A A A’ C’ B r frame destination unknown: flood A 6 A’ 1 2 4 5 r destination A location known: selective send C A’ A B’ 3 A’ MAC addr interface TTL A A’ 1 4 60 60 Switch table (initially empty) 5: Data. Link Layer 67

Interconnecting switches r switches can be connected together S 4 S 1 S 2

Interconnecting switches r switches can be connected together S 4 S 1 S 2 A B S 3 C F D E I G H r Q: sending from A to F - how does S 1 know to forward frame destined to F via S 4 and S 3? r A: self learning! (works exactly the same as in single-switch case!) 5: Data. Link Layer 68

Self-learning multi-switch example Suppose C sends frame to I, I responds to C S

Self-learning multi-switch example Suppose C sends frame to I, I responds to C S 4 1 S 2 A B C 2 S 3 F D E I G H r Q: show switch tables and packet forwarding in S 1, S 2, S 3, S 4 5: Data. Link Layer 69

Institutional network to external network mail server router web server IP subnet 5: Data.

Institutional network to external network mail server router web server IP subnet 5: Data. Link Layer 70

Switches vs. Routers r both store-and-forward devices m routers: network layer devices (examine network

Switches vs. Routers r both store-and-forward devices m routers: network layer devices (examine network layer headers) m switches are link layer devices r routers maintain routing tables, implement routing algorithms r switches maintain switch tables, implement filtering, learning algorithms 5: Data. Link Layer 71

Summary comparison 5: Data. Link Layer 72

Summary comparison 5: Data. Link Layer 72

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-Layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Hubs and switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link Virtualization: ATM 5: Data. Link Layer 73

Point to Point Data Link Control r one sender, one receiver, one link: easier

Point to Point Data Link Control r one sender, one receiver, one link: easier than broadcast link: m no Media Access Control m no need for explicit MAC addressing m e. g. , dialup link, ISDN line r popular point-to-point DLC protocols: m PPP (point-to-point protocol) m HDLC: High level data link control (Data link used to be considered “high layer” in protocol stack! 5: Data. Link Layer 74

PPP Design Requirements [RFC 1557] r packet framing: encapsulation of network-layer r r datagram

PPP Design Requirements [RFC 1557] r packet framing: encapsulation of network-layer r r datagram in data link frame m carry network layer data of any network layer protocol (not just IP) at same time m ability to demultiplex upwards bit transparency: must carry any bit pattern in the data field error detection (no correction) connection liveness: detect, signal link failure to network layer address negotiation: endpoint can learn/configure each other’s network address 5: Data. Link Layer 75

PPP non-requirements r no error correction/recovery r no flow control r out of order

PPP non-requirements r no error correction/recovery r no flow control r out of order delivery OK r no need to support multipoint links (e. g. , polling) Error recovery, flow control, data re-ordering all relegated to higher layers! 5: Data. Link Layer 76

PPP Data Frame r Flag: delimiter (framing) r Address: does nothing (only one option)

PPP Data Frame r Flag: delimiter (framing) r Address: does nothing (only one option) r Control: does nothing; in the future possible multiple control fields r Protocol: upper layer protocol to which frame delivered (eg, PPP-LCP, IPCP, etc) 5: Data. Link Layer 77

PPP Data Frame r info: upper layer data being carried r check: cyclic redundancy

PPP Data Frame r info: upper layer data being carried r check: cyclic redundancy check for error detection 5: Data. Link Layer 78

Byte Stuffing r “data transparency” requirement: data field must be allowed to include flag

Byte Stuffing r “data transparency” requirement: data field must be allowed to include flag pattern <01111110> m Q: is received <01111110> data or flag? r Sender: adds (“stuffs”) extra < 01111110> byte after each < 01111110> data byte r Receiver: m two 01111110 bytes in a row: discard first byte, continue data reception m single 01111110: flag byte 5: Data. Link Layer 79

Byte Stuffing flag byte pattern in data to send flag byte pattern plus stuffed

Byte Stuffing flag byte pattern in data to send flag byte pattern plus stuffed byte in transmitted data 5: Data. Link Layer 80

PPP Data Control Protocol Before exchanging networklayer data, data link peers must r configure

PPP Data Control Protocol Before exchanging networklayer data, data link peers must r configure PPP link (max. frame length, authentication) r learn/configure network layer information m for IP: carry IP Control Protocol (IPCP) msgs (protocol field: 8021) to configure/learn IP address 5: Data. Link Layer 81

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection

Link Layer r 5. 1 Introduction and r r services 5. 2 Error detection and correction 5. 3 Multiple access protocols 5. 4 Link-Layer Addressing 5. 5 Ethernet r 5. 6 Hubs and switches r 5. 7 PPP r 5. 8 Link Virtualization: ATM and MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 82

Virtualization of networks Virtualization of resources: powerful abstraction in systems engineering: r computing examples:

Virtualization of networks Virtualization of resources: powerful abstraction in systems engineering: r computing examples: virtual memory, virtual devices m Virtual machines: e. g. , java m IBM VM os from 1960’s/70’s r layering of abstractions: don’t sweat the details of the lower layer, only deal with lower layers abstractly 5: Data. Link Layer 83

The Internet: virtualizing networks 1974: multiple unconnected nets m ARPAnet m data-over-cable networks m

The Internet: virtualizing networks 1974: multiple unconnected nets m ARPAnet m data-over-cable networks m packet satellite network (Aloha) m packet radio network ARPAnet "A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication", V. Cerf, R. Kahn, IEEE Transactions on Communications, May, 1974, pp. 637 -648. … differing in: m addressing conventions m packet formats m error recovery m routing satellite net 5: Data. Link Layer 84

The Internet: virtualizing networks Internetwork layer (IP): r addressing: internetwork appears as single, uniform

The Internet: virtualizing networks Internetwork layer (IP): r addressing: internetwork appears as single, uniform entity, despite underlying local network heterogeneity r network of networks Gateway: r “embed internetwork packets in local packet format or extract them” r route (at internetwork level) to next gateway ARPAnet satellite net 5: Data. Link Layer 85

Cerf & Kahn’s Internetwork Architecture What is virtualized? r two layers of addressing: internetwork

Cerf & Kahn’s Internetwork Architecture What is virtualized? r two layers of addressing: internetwork and local network r new layer (IP) makes everything homogeneous at internetwork layer r underlying local network technology m cable m satellite m 56 K telephone modem m today: ATM, MPLS … “invisible” at internetwork layer. Looks like a link layer technology to IP! 5: Data. Link Layer 86

ATM and MPLS r ATM, MPLS separate networks in their own right m different

ATM and MPLS r ATM, MPLS separate networks in their own right m different service models, addressing, routing from Internet r viewed by Internet as logical link connecting IP routers m just like dialup link is really part of separate network (telephone network) r ATM, MPLS: of technical interest in their own right 5: Data. Link Layer 87

Asynchronous Transfer Mode: ATM r 1990’s/00 standard for high-speed (155 Mbps to 622 Mbps

Asynchronous Transfer Mode: ATM r 1990’s/00 standard for high-speed (155 Mbps to 622 Mbps and higher) Broadband Integrated Service Digital Network architecture r Goal: integrated, end-end transport of carry voice, video, data m meeting timing/Qo. S requirements of voice, video (versus Internet best-effort model) m “next generation” telephony: technical roots in telephone world m packet-switching (fixed length packets, called “cells”) using virtual circuits 5: Data. Link Layer 88

ATM architecture AAL ATM ATM physical end system switch end system r adaptation layer:

ATM architecture AAL ATM ATM physical end system switch end system r adaptation layer: only at edge of ATM network m data segmentation/reassembly m roughly analagous to Internet transport layer r ATM layer: “network” layer m cell switching, routing r physical layer 5: Data. Link Layer 89

ATM: network or link layer? Vision: end-to-end transport: “ATM from desktop to desktop” m

ATM: network or link layer? Vision: end-to-end transport: “ATM from desktop to desktop” m ATM is a network technology Reality: used to connect IP backbone routers m “IP over ATM” m ATM as switched link layer, connecting IP routers IP network ATM network 5: Data. Link Layer 90

ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) r ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL): “adapts” upper layers (IP or

ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) r ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL): “adapts” upper layers (IP or native ATM applications) to ATM layer below r AAL present only in end systems, not in switches r AAL layer segment (header/trailer fields, data) fragmented across multiple ATM cells m analogy: TCP segment in many IP packets AAL ATM ATM physical end system switch end system 5: Data. Link Layer 91

ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) [more] Different versions of AAL layers, depending on ATM service

ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) [more] Different versions of AAL layers, depending on ATM service class: r AAL 1: for CBR (Constant Bit Rate) services, e. g. circuit emulation r AAL 2: for VBR (Variable Bit Rate) services, e. g. , MPEG video r AAL 5: for data (eg, IP datagrams) User data AAL PDU ATM cell 5: Data. Link Layer 92

ATM Layer Service: transport cells across ATM network r analogous to IP network layer

ATM Layer Service: transport cells across ATM network r analogous to IP network layer r very different services than IP network layer Network Architecture Internet Service Model Guarantees ? Congestion Bandwidth Loss Order Timing feedback best effort none ATM CBR ATM VBR ATM ABR ATM UBR constant rate guaranteed minimum none no no no yes yes yes no no (inferred via loss) no congestion yes no no 5: Data. Link Layer 93

ATM Layer: Virtual Circuits r VC transport: cells carried on VC from source to

ATM Layer: Virtual Circuits r VC transport: cells carried on VC from source to dest m call setup, teardown for each call before data can flow m each packet carries VC identifier (not destination ID) m every switch on source-dest path maintain “state” for each passing connection m link, switch resources (bandwidth, buffers) may be allocated to VC: to get circuit-like perf. r Permanent VCs (PVCs) m long lasting connections m typically: “permanent” route between to IP routers r Switched VCs (SVC): m dynamically set up on per-call basis 5: Data. Link Layer 94

ATM VCs r Advantages of ATM VC approach: m Qo. S performance guarantee for

ATM VCs r Advantages of ATM VC approach: m Qo. S performance guarantee for connection mapped to VC (bandwidth, delay jitter) r Drawbacks of ATM VC approach: m Inefficient support of datagram traffic m one PVC between each source/dest pair) does not scale (N*2 connections needed) m SVC introduces call setup latency, processing overhead for short lived connections 5: Data. Link Layer 95

ATM Layer: ATM cell r 5 -byte ATM cell header r 48 -byte payload

ATM Layer: ATM cell r 5 -byte ATM cell header r 48 -byte payload m Why? : small payload -> short cell-creation delay for digitized voice m halfway between 32 and 64 (compromise!) Cell header Cell format 5: Data. Link Layer 96

ATM cell header r VCI: virtual channel ID m will change from link to

ATM cell header r VCI: virtual channel ID m will change from link to link thru net r PT: Payload type (e. g. RM cell versus data cell) r CLP: Cell Loss Priority bit m CLP = 1 implies low priority cell, can be discarded if congestion r HEC: Header Error Checksum m cyclic redundancy check 5: Data. Link Layer 97

ATM Physical Layer (more) Two pieces (sublayers) of physical layer: r Transmission Convergence Sublayer

ATM Physical Layer (more) Two pieces (sublayers) of physical layer: r Transmission Convergence Sublayer (TCS): adapts ATM layer above to PMD sublayer below r Physical Medium Dependent: depends on physical medium being used TCS Functions: m Header checksum generation: 8 bits CRC m Cell delineation m With “unstructured” PMD sublayer, transmission of idle cells when no data cells to send 5: Data. Link Layer 98

ATM Physical Layer Physical Medium Dependent (PMD) sublayer r SONET/SDH: transmission frame structure (like

ATM Physical Layer Physical Medium Dependent (PMD) sublayer r SONET/SDH: transmission frame structure (like a container carrying bits); m bit synchronization; m bandwidth partitions (TDM); m several speeds: OC 3 = 155. 52 Mbps; OC 12 = 622. 08 Mbps; OC 48 = 2. 45 Gbps, OC 192 = 9. 6 Gbps r TI/T 3: transmission frame structure (old telephone hierarchy): 1. 5 Mbps/ 45 Mbps r unstructured: just cells (busy/idle) 5: Data. Link Layer 99

IP-Over-ATM Classic IP only r 3 “networks” (e. g. , LAN segments) r MAC

IP-Over-ATM Classic IP only r 3 “networks” (e. g. , LAN segments) r MAC (802. 3) and IP addresses IP over ATM r replace “network” (e. g. , LAN segment) with ATM network r ATM addresses, IP addresses ATM network Ethernet LANs 5: Data. Link Layer 100

IP-Over-ATM app transport IP Eth phy IP AAL Eth ATM phy app transport IP

IP-Over-ATM app transport IP Eth phy IP AAL Eth ATM phy app transport IP AAL ATM phy 5: Data. Link Layer 101

Datagram Journey in IP-over-ATM Network r at Source Host: m IP layer maps between

Datagram Journey in IP-over-ATM Network r at Source Host: m IP layer maps between IP, ATM dest address (using ARP) m passes datagram to AAL 5 m AAL 5 encapsulates data, segments cells, passes to ATM layer r ATM network: moves cell along VC to destination r at Destination Host: m AAL 5 reassembles cells into original datagram m if CRC OK, datagram is passed to IP 5: Data. Link Layer 102

IP-Over-ATM Issues: r IP datagrams into ATM AAL 5 PDUs r from IP addresses

IP-Over-ATM Issues: r IP datagrams into ATM AAL 5 PDUs r from IP addresses to ATM addresses m just like IP addresses to 802. 3 MAC addresses! ATM network Ethernet LANs 5: Data. Link Layer 103

Multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) r initial goal: speed up IP forwarding by using fixed

Multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) r initial goal: speed up IP forwarding by using fixed length label (instead of IP address) to do forwarding m m borrowing ideas from Virtual Circuit (VC) approach but IP datagram still keeps IP address! PPP or Ethernet header MPLS header label 20 IP header remainder of link-layer frame Exp S TTL 3 1 5 5: Data. Link Layer 104

MPLS capable routers r a. k. a. label-switched router r forwards packets to outgoing

MPLS capable routers r a. k. a. label-switched router r forwards packets to outgoing interface based only on label value (don’t inspect IP address) m MPLS tables forwarding table distinct from IP forwarding r signaling protocol needed to set up forwarding m RSVP-TE m forwarding possible along paths that IP alone would not allow (e. g. , source-specific routing) !! m use MPLS for traffic engineering r must co-exist with IP-only routers 5: Data. Link Layer 105

MPLS forwarding tables in label out label dest 10 12 8 out interface A

MPLS forwarding tables in label out label dest 10 12 8 out interface A D A R 6 0 0 1 in label 0 R 4 R 5 out label dest 10 6 A 1 12 9 D 0 0 1 R 3 out interface D 1 0 0 R 2 in label 8 out label dest 6 A out interface 0 in label 6 out. R 1 label dest - A A out interface 0 5: Data. Link Layer 106

Chapter 5: Summary r principles behind data link layer services: m error detection, correction

Chapter 5: Summary r principles behind data link layer services: m error detection, correction m sharing a broadcast channel: multiple access m link layer addressing r instantiation and implementation of various link layer technologies m Ethernet m switched LANS m PPP m virtualized networks as a link layer: ATM, MPLS 5: Data. Link Layer 107

Chapter 5: let’s take a breath r journey down protocol stack complete (except PHY)

Chapter 5: let’s take a breath r journey down protocol stack complete (except PHY) r solid understanding of networking principles, practice r …. . could stop here …. but lots of interesting topics! m wireless m multimedia m security m network management 5: Data. Link Layer 108