CHAPTER 4 ActivityBased Costing and ActivityBased Management Dr
CHAPTER 4 Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management Dr. Hisham Madi 1 -1
Background Ø Historically, firms produced a limited variety of goods and at the same time, their indirect costs were relatively small. Ø Indirect (or overhead) costs were a relatively small percent- age of total costs. Ø Using simple costing systems to allocate costs broadly was easy, inexpensive, and reasonably accurate. Ø Plantwide Overhead Rate: Ø Total Estimated Overhead* /Total Estimated Base** § *Obtain total of all overhead costs to be allocated. § ** Determine best “base” – direct labor hours, machine hours, etc. Ø This rate is used to allocate overhead costs to all products 1 -2
Background Ø The end-result: Ø Products using fewer resources are overcosted and products using more resources are undercosted. Ø However, as product diversity and indirect costs have increased, broad averaging has resulted in greater inaccuracy of product costs Ø Different products consume activities at different rates, traditional costing does not recognize these differences 1 -3
Over and Undercosting-defined Ø Consider the cost of a restaurant bill for four colleagues who meet monthly to discuss business developments. Ø The restaurant bill for the most recent meeting is as follows: Ø $27 is the average cost per diner. Ø This cost-averaging approach treats each diner the same Ø When costs are averaged across all four diners, both Emma and Matthew are overcosted, James is undercosted, and Jessica is accurately costed. 1 -4
Over and Undercosting-defined Ø Broad averaging can lead to undercosting or overcosting of products or services: Ø Product undercosting—a product consumes a high level of resources but is reported to have a low cost per unit (James’s dinner) Ø Product overcosting—a product consumes a low level of resources but is reported to have a high cost per unit (Emma’s dinner). 1 -5
Over and Undercosting-defined Ø What are the strategic consequences of product undercosting and overcosting Ø Undercosted products will be underpriced and may even lead to sales that actually result in losse sales bring in less revenue than the cost of resources they use. Ø Overcosted products lead to overpricing, causing these products to lose market share to competitors producing similar products. 1 -6
Cross-subsidization Ø When a company has a situation in which undercosting or overcosting of products occurs due to broad averaging of costs, this is referred to as product-cost cross-subsidization Ø if a company undercosts one of its products, it will overcost at least one of its other products. Ø Product-cost cross-subsidization is very common in situations in which a cost is uniformly spread— meaning it is broadly averaged— across multiple products without recognizing the amount of resources consumed by each product 1 -7
Cross-subsidization In the restaurant-bill example; Ø The amount of cost cross-subsidization of each diner can be readily computed because all cost items can be traced as direct costs to each diner Ø If all diners pay $27, Emma is paying $12 more than her actual cost of $15. She is cross- subsidizing James who is paying $15 less than his actual cost of $42. 1 -8
Cross-subsidization Ø When the resources represented by indirect costs are used by two or more diners, we need to find a way to allocate costs to each diner Ø Consider, for example, a $40 bottle of juice whose cost is shared equally Ø Each diner would pay $10 ($40 ÷ 4) Ø Suppose Matthew drinks 2 glasses of juice while Emma, James, and Jessica drink one glass each for a total of 5 glasses Ø Allocating the cost of the bottle of Juice on the basis of the glasses of Juice that each diner drinks would result in Matthew paying $16 ($40 * 2/5) and each of the others $8 ($40 * 1/5). Ø In this case, by sharing the cost equally, Emma, James, and Jessica are each paying $2 ($10 – $8) more and are crosssubsidizing Matthew who is paying $6 ($16 – $10) less for the wine he consumes 1 -9
Simple Costing System Using a Single Indirect-Cost Pool 1 -10
Simple Costing System Using a Single Indirect-Cost Pool Step 1: Identify the Products That Are the Chosen Cost Objects. The cost objects are the 60, 000 simple S 3 lenses and the 15, 000 complex CL 5 lenses that Plastim will produce in 2011 Step 2: Identify the Direct Costs of the Products. Plastim identifies the direct costs— direct materials and direct manufacturing labor—of the lenses. Step 3: Select the Cost-Allocation Bases to Use for Allocating Indirect (or Overhead) Costs to the Products Plastim uses direct manufacturing labor-hours as the only allocation base to allocate all manufacturing and nonmanufacturing indirect costs to S 3 and CL 5. 1 -11
Simple Costing System Using a Single Indirect-Cost Pool Step 4: Identify the Indirect Costs Associated with Each Cost. Allocation Base. Because Plastim uses only a single cost-allocation base, Plastim groups all budgeted indirect costs of $2, 385, 000 for 2011 into a single overhead cost pool Step 5: Compute the Rate per Unit of Each Cost-Allocation Base. 1 -12
Simple Costing System Using a Single Indirect-Cost Pool Step 6: Compute the Indirect Costs Allocated to the Products. Plastim expects to use 30, 000 total direct manufacturing laborhours to make the 60, 000 S 3 lenses and 9, 750 total direct manufacturing labor-hours to make the 15, 000 CL 5 lenses Step 7: Compute the Total Cost of the Products by Adding All Direct and Indirect Costs Assigned to the Products 1 -13
Refining a Costing System Ø A refined cost system reduces the use of broad averages for assigning costs of resources to cost objects Reasons for Refining a Costing System Ø Increase in product diversity. The growing demand for customized products has led to product diversity with the result that products and services demand differing quantities of resources Ø Increase in indirect costs. With product and process technology, companies have experienced a decrease in direct costs (especially direct labor) with a resulting increase in indirect costs Ø Competition in product markets. Markets have become more competitive, forcing managers to obtain more accurate cost information to help them make strategic decisions, such as pricing and product mix 1 -14
Refining a Costing System Three guidelines are presented for refining a costing system 1. Direct-cost tracing. Identify as many direct costs as is economically feasible. ü This guideline aims to reduce the amount of costs classified as indirect, thereby minimizing the extent to which costs have to be allocated, rather than traced 2. Indirect-cost pools. Expand the number of indirect-cost pools until each pool is more homogeneous ü All costs in a homogeneous cost pool have the same or a similar cause- andeffect (or benefits-received) relationship with a single cost driver that is used as the cost-allocation base 1 -15
Refining a Costing System For example, Øa single indirect-cost pool containing both indirect machining costs and indirect distribution costs that are allocated to products using machine-hours ØThis pool is not homogeneous because machine-hours are a cost driver of machining costs but not of distribution costs, which has a different cost driver, number of shipments ØIf, instead, machining costs and distribution costs are separated into two indirect-cost pools (with machine-hours as the cost-allocation base for the machining cost pool and number of shipments as the cost-allocation base for the distribution cost pool), each indirect-cost pool would become homogeneous. 1 -16
Refining a Costing System 3. Cost-allocation bases. ü The cost driver serves as the cost allocation base for each homogeneous indirect-cost pool 1 -17
Activity-Based Costing Systems Ø Activity-based costing (ABC) refines a costing system by identifying individual activities as the fundamental cost objects. Ø An activity is an event, task, or unit of work with a specified purpose—for example, designing products, setting up machines, operating machines, and distributing products. Ø ABC systems identify activities in all functions of the value chain, calculate costs of individual activities, and assign costs to cost objects such as products and services 1 -18
Activity-Based Costing Systems Ø ABC systems identify activities in all functions of the value chain, calculate costs of individual activities, and assign costs to cost objects such as products and services 1 -19
Cost Hierarchies Ø A cost hierarchy categorizes various activity cost pools on the basis of the different types of cost drivers, or cost-allocation bases. Ø ABC systems commonly use a cost hierarchy with four levels—output unit-level costs, batch-level costs, product-sustaining costs, and facility-sustaining costs —to identify cost-allocation bases that are cost drivers of the activity cost pools. 1 -20
Cost Hierarchies Output unit-level costs Ø are the costs of activities performed on each individual unit of a product or service. Ø These costs increase as the number of units produced increases. Ø Machine operations costs (such as the cost of energy, machine depreciation, and repair) related to the activity of running the automated molding machines are output unit-level costs. Ø They are output unit-level costs because, over time, the cost of this activity increases with additional units of output produced (or machine-hours used) 1 -21
Cost Hierarchies Batch-level costs Ø are the costs of activities related to a group of units of a product or service rather than each individual unit of product or service. Ø Setup machine, shipment setup. Ø Indirect setup cost increase with setup hours and number of shipments Product-sustaining costs (service-sustaining costs) Ø are the costs of activities undertaken to support individual products or services regardless of the number of units or batches produced Ø Design costs are an example of this type of cost. Ø Design costs depend largely on the time designers spend on designing and modifying the product, 1 -22
Cost Hierarchies Ø Product research and development costs, costs of making engineering changes, and marketing costs to launch new products. 1 -23
Cost Hierarchies Facility-sustaining costs Ø are the costs of activities that cannot be traced to individual products or services but that support the organization as a whole. Ø Examples of this type of cost include general administration, rent, and building security. Ø These costs usually lack a cause-and-effect relationship between the cost and the allocation base. 1 -24 Ø This lack of a cause-and-effect relationship causes some companies not to allocate these costs to products and instead to deduct them as a separate lump-sum amount from operating income
Cost Hierarchies Ø Companies may achieve greater accuracy in overhead cost allocation by recognizing these four different levels of activities and, from them, developing specific activity cost pools and their related cost drivers. Ø Once a company has classified its activities and identified the related resources, managers may discover that some manufacturing overhead costs can be traced directly to products. Ø An example of a traceable manufacturing overhead cost at C&C Sports is the cost of operating the chenille machine. This cost, includes depreciation and indirect materials, is directly traceable to the award jackets because the chenille machine is used only to produce award jackets, and should not be allocated to pants and jerseys 1 -25
1 -26
Implementing Activity-Based Costing Step 1: Identify the products that are the chosen cost objects The cost objects are the 60, 000 S 3 and the 15, 000 CL 5 lenses that Plastim will produce in 2011 Step 2: Identify the direct costs of the products Step 3: Select the Activities and Cost-Allocation Bases to Use for Allocating Indirect Costs to the Products Plastim identifies six activities—(a) design, (b) molding machine setups, (c) machine operations, (d) shipment setup, (e) distribution, and (f) administration—for allocating indirect costs to products. 1 -27
Implementing Activity-Based Costing Step 3: Select the Activities and Cost-Allocation Bases to Use for Allocating Indirect Costs to the Products ØAnalysis of the activities performed to manufacture a product or provide a service ØThe system assigns overhead costs directly to the appropriate activity cost pool. ØFor example, rather than define the design activities of product design, process design, and prototyping as separate activities, Plastim defines these three activities together as a combined “design” activity and forms a homogeneous design cost pool. 1 -28
1 -29
Implementing Activity-Based Costing Step 4: Identify the Indirect Costs Associated with Each Cost-Allocation Base Ø Plastim assigns budgeted indirect costs for 2011 to activities, to the extent possible, on the basis of a cause-and-effect relationship between the cost-allocation base for an activity and the cost Ø The company must identify the cost drivers for each cost pool. Ø The cost driver must accurately measure the actual consumption of the activity by the various products. Ø 1 -30
Implementing Activity-Based Costing Ø To achieve accurate costing, a high degree of correlation must exist between the cost driver and the actual consumption of the overhead costs in the cost pool. Ø The strength of the cause-and-effect relationship between the cost -allocation base and the cost of an activity varies across cost pools. Ø For example, the cause-and-effect relationship between direct manufacturing labor-hours and administration activity costs is not as strong as the relationship between setup-hours and setup activity costs. 1 -31
Implementing Activity-Based Costing Step 5: Compute the Rate per Unit of Each Cost-Allocation Base Budgeted Indirect cost rate = Total Budgeted Indirect Cost Budgeted quantity of cost allocation base Step 6: Compute the Indirect Costs Allocated to the Products Step 7: Compute the Total Cost of the Products by Adding All Direct and Indirect Costs Assigned to the Products 1 -32
1 -33
ABC vs. Simple Costing Schemes 1. ABC systems trace more costs as direct costs; 2. ABC systems create homogeneous cost pools linked to different activities; 3. For each activity-cost pool, ABC systems seek a costallocation base that has a cause-and-effect relationship with costs in the cost pool; 4. ABC is generally perceived to produce superior costing figures due to the use of multiple drivers across multiple levels 1 -34
Costs and limitations of an ABC system ABC can be expensive to use Ø The increased cost of identifying multiple activities and applying numerous cost drivers discourages many companies from using ABC. Ø Activity cost rates also need to be updated regularly Ø As ABC systems get very detailed and more cost pools are created, more allocations are necessary to calculate activity costs for each cost pool. This increases the chances of misidentifying the costs of different activity cost pools. 1 -35
When to Use ABC How does a company know when to use ABC? 1. Indirect costs are significant in proportion to direct costs and use only one or two cost-drivers; 2. Product lines differ greatly in volume and manufacturing complexity. 3. Product lines are numerous and diverse, and they require differing degrees of support services; 4. The manufacturing process or the number of products has changed significantly—for example, from labor-intensive to capital-intensive due to automation. 5. Operations staff has substantial disagreement with the reported costs of manufacturing and marketing products and services 1 -36
Activity-Based Management Ø The process of using activity-based costing information to manage a business’s activities, and thus its costs. Ø is a method of management decision making that uses activity-based costing information to improve customer satisfaction and profitability 1 -37
Activity-Based Management Ø A method of management that uses ABC as an integral part in critical decision-making situations, including: § Pricing and product-mix decisions § Cost reduction and process improvement decisions ü Reduce costs by improving the way work is done without compromising customer service or the actual or perceived value (usefulness) customers obtain from the product or service ü Eliminate activities that consume resources but do not contribute to the value of the product non value added. 1 -38
Activity-Based Management § Design decisions ü Identifying new designs to reduce costs. § Planning and managing activities 1 -39
ABC and Service/Merchandising Firms Ø The overall objective of ABC in service firms is no different than it is in a manufacturing company Ø That objective is to identify the key activities that generate costs and to keep track of how many of those activities are performed for each service provided § § § 1 -40 Health Care Banking Telecommunications Retailing Transportation
1 -41
- Slides: 41
