Chapter 2 Paradigms Theory and Research Three functions

Chapter 2 Paradigms, Theory, and Research

Three functions of theory: 1) they prevent our being taken in by flukes

2) theories can shape and direct research efforts, directing us to discoveries through empirical observation

3) theories make sense of observed patterns in a way that can suggest other possibilities

Paradigm Ø the fundamental models or frames of references we use to organize our observations and reasoning

Macrotheory Ø deals with aggregate entities of society or even whole societies Ø Eg. Struggle among economic classes in a society, international relations, or the interrelations among major institutions in society, such as government, religion and family Ø Eg. Conflict theory

Microtheory Ø deals with issues of social life at the level of individuals and small groups Ø Eg. Goffman’s personal management, Foucault’s panopticon

Elements of Social Theory

Paradigms Ø are general frameworks or viewpoints: literally points from which to view Ø provide ways of looking at life and are grounded in sets of assumptions about the nature of reality Ø a paradigm offers a way of looking; a theory aims at explaining what we see.

Theories Ø are systematic sets of interrelated statements intended to explain some aspect of social life Ø theories specify paradigm

Observation Ø refers to seeing, hearing, less likely touching

Fact Ø some phenomenon that has been observed

Theory Ø a systematic explanation for the observations that relate to a particular aspect of life

Concepts Ø used in theories to explain observations, they are the basic building blocks of theory Ø are abstract elements representing classes of phenomena within the field of study

Variable Ø special kind of concept

Axioms or postulate Ø fundamental assertions, taken to be true, on which a theory is grounded

Propositions Ø specific conclusions about the relationships among concepts that are derived from the axiomatic groundwork

Hypothesis Ø derived from propositions Ø a specified, testable expectation about empirical reality that follows from a more general proposition Ø observations aimed at finding out whether this statement accurately depicts reality are part of what is typically called hypothesis testing

Deductive Theory Construction Ø general to specific Ø the first thing is to pick a topic Ø undertake an inventory of what is known or thought about it – writing down your own observations and ideas – lit review Ø this will probably uncover consistent patterns discovered by prior scholars

Constructing your theory 1) specify the topic 2) specify the range of phenomena your theory addresses. Will your theory apply to all of human social life; will it apply only to Canadian citizens, only to young people, or what? Ø 3) Identify and specify your major concepts and variables Ø 4) find out what is known (propositions) about the relationships among those variables Ø 5) reason logically from those propositions to the specific topic you are examining Ø Ø

Inductive Theory Construction Ø specific to general Ø observing aspects of social life, and then seeking to discover patterns that may point to relatively universal principles Ø field research, the direct observation of events in progress, is frequently used to develop theories through observation

Theories

Early Positivism Ø Comte and early study Ø felt that religious beliefs could be replaced with scientific study and objectivity

Comte Theological stage Comte begins with theological stage which is prior to 1300 (Ritzer and Goodman, 2004). It is characterized by the belief of supernatural powers and religious figures (Ibid).

Comte The second stage is the metaphysical, characterized by the belief that abstract forces such as nature explain everything and takes place between 1300 to 1800 (Ibid).

Comte The final stage of the evolution of thought is posivistic, characterized by the belief of science, and this stage began in 1800 (Ibid). Society’s focus was on believing what was observed from the social and physical world and the universal laws that governed them.

Conflict Paradigm Ø Developed from the evolution of capitalism Ø Usually associated with Karl Marx Ø Social behaviour could best be seen as the process of conflict: the attempt to dominate others and to avoid being dominated

Conflict Paradigm Ø Focused on the struggle among economic classes Ø Examined the way capitalism produced the oppression of workers by the owners of industry

Conflict Paradigm Ø Ideologically committed to restructuring economic relations to end the oppression being observed

Conflict Paradigm Ø Conflict paradigm often focuses on class, gender, and ethnic struggles, it can be used when different groups have competing interests Ø Eg. Role conflict, employee/employer conflict, student/faculty relations

Symbolic Interactionism Ø Focus is on the nature of interactions, meaning Ø Cooley – primary groups – those intimate associates with whom we share a sense of belonging such as family; looking glass self – looking into the reactions of people around us

Symbolic Interactionism Ø - Mead – taking the role of the other, role of communication Ø - the process of individuals reaching a common understanding through the use of language and other symbolic systems

Symbolic Interactionism Ø - the paradigm can lead to insights into the nature of interactions in ordinary social life, but can also help understand unusual forms of interaction Ø -eg. Stalking, gang membership, fetishes

Symbolic Interactionism Ø Social construction Ø Everything is created through daily communication and interaction Ø Interaction generates symbols that have a shared meaning among members Ø Meaning of a symbol assigned to it

Ethnomethodology Ø Garfinkel – people are continuously trying to make sense of the life they experience – everyone is acting like a social scientist – enthnomethodology – methodology of the people Ø Means the study of the ways in which people make sense of their social world

Ethnomethodology Ø Believe that social life merely appears to be orderly; in reality it is potentially chaotic

Ethnomethodology Ø Social order is constructed in the minds of social actors as society confronts the individual as a series of sense impressions and experiences which she or he must somehow organize into a coherent pattern

Structural Functionalism Ø Known also as social systems theory Ø A social entity, such as an organization or a whole society, can be viewed as an organism Ø A social system is made up of parts, each of which contributes to the functioning of the whole

Structural Functionalism Ø Use this paradigm to investigate the roles of social systems – such as police, politicians, prostitutes, schools, criminals Ø Eg. The IOC and its function within the sporting community

Feminist Paradigm Ø Have called attention to aspects of social life that are not revealed by other paradigms Ø Have focused on gender differences and how they relate to the rest of social organization

Feminist Paradigm Ø Draw attention to the oppression of women in many societies which shed light on oppression in general Ø Also challenged prevailing notions concerning consensus in society

Feminist Paradigm Ø Most descriptions of the predominant beliefs, values, and norms of a society are written by people representing only portions of society Ø Eg investigating the experiences of young girls in little league or in hockey

Different Theories

Feminist Theory Ø center on women’s diverse situations and the institutions that frame those situations Ø The Frailty Myth

Radicalized Discourses Ø raise important questions about the control and production of knowledge, particularly knowledge about people and communities of colour

Critical Theory Ø perspectives are concerned with empowering human beings to transcend the constraints placed on them by class and gender

Queer Theory Ø focuses on individuals calling themselves lesbians, gay, bisexuals, or transgendered people

Disability Inquiry Ø addresses the meaning of inclusion in schools and encompasses administrators, teachers, and parents who have children with disabilities