CHAPTER 18 HOW MUCH SHOULD A CORPORATION BORROW
CHAPTER 18 HOW MUCH SHOULD A CORPORATION BORROW? Brealey, Myers, and Allen Principles of Corporate Finance 12 th Edition
Topics Covered Corporate Taxes Corporate and Personal Taxes Cost of Financial Distress The Pecking Order of Financial Choices
Industry Debt Levels Note: Debt-to-total capital ratio = D/(D + E), where D and E are book values of long-term debt and equity.
Tax-Deductible Interest The tax deductibility of interest increases the total income that can be paid out to bondholders and stockholders
Capital Structure & Corporate Taxes
Capital Structure & Corporate Taxes Example You own all the equity of Space Babies Diaper Co. the company has no debt. The company’s annual cash flow is $900, 000 before interest and taxes. The corporate tax rate is 35%. You have the option to exchange half of your equity position for 5% bonds with face value of $2, 000. Should you do this and why?
Capital Structure & Corporate Taxes Example - You own all the equity of Space Babies Diaper Co. The company has no debt. The company’s annual cash flow is $900, 000 before interest and taxes. The corporate tax rate is 35% You have the option to exchange half of your equity position for 5% bonds with a face value of $2, 000. Should you do this and why? Total Cash Flow All equity = 585 *1/2 Debt = 620 (520 + 100)
Capital Structure & Corporate Taxes Example:
Capital Structure & Corporate Taxes Firm value = value of all equity firm + PV tax shield
Market Value Balance Sheets
Capital Structure & Corporate Taxes Johnson & Johnson Balance Sheet September 2014 (figures in $millions)
Capital Structure & Corporate Taxes Johnson & Johnson Balance Sheet September 2014 (figures in $millions) (w/ $10 billion Debt for Equity Swap)
C. S. & Taxes (Personal & Corp) Operating Income ($1. 00) Or paid out as equity income Paid out as interest Corporate Tax None Tc Income after corp taxes $1. 00 – Tc Personal taxes Tp Tp. E (1. 00 -Tc) Income after all taxes $1. 00 – Tp $1. 00 − Tc − Tp. E(1. 00 − Tc) =(1. 00 − Tp. E)(1. 00 − Tc) To bondholders To stockholders
C. S. & Taxes (Personal & Corp) Relative Advantage Formula ( Debt vs. Equity ) Advantage RAF > 1 Debt RAF < 1 Equity
C. S. & Taxes (Personal & Corp) Example
C. S. & Taxes (Personal & Corp) Another Example
C. S. & Taxes (Personal & Corp) Today’s RAF & Debt vs. Equity preference Why are companies not all debt?
Financial Distress Costs of Financial Distress - Costs arising from bankruptcy or distorted business decisions before bankruptcy Market value = value if all equity financed + PV tax shield - PV costs of financial distress
Financial Distress Maximum value of firm Market value of the firm Costs of financial distress PV of interest tax shields Value of levered firm Value of unlevered firm Optimal amount of debt Debt
Default Payoff Scenarios
Ace Limited Example Total payoff to Ace Limited security holders. There is a $200 bankruptcy cost in the event of default (shaded area).
Conflicts of Interest Circular File Company has $50 of 1 -year debt
Conflicts of Interest Circular File Company has $50 of one-year debt Why does the equity have any value? Shareholders have an option—they can obtain the rights to the assets by paying off the $50 debt.
Conflicts of Interest Circular File Company may invest $10 as follows Assume the NPV of the project is -$2. • What is the effect on the market values?
Conflicts of Interest Circular File Company value (post project) Firm value falls by $2, but equity holder gains $3
Conflicts of Interest Circular File Company value (assumes a safe project with NPV = $5) While firm value rises, the lack of a high potential payoff for shareholders causes a decrease in equity value.
Financial Distress Games Cash In and Run Playing for Time Bait and Switch
Ms. Ketchup Faces Credit Rationing • Henrietta Ketchup has two possible investment projects
The Pecking Order of Financing Choices Trade-Off Theory � Theory that capital structure is based on trade- off between tax savings and distress costs of debt Pecking-Order Theory � Theory stating firms prefer to issue debt over equity if internal finances are insufficient
Asymmetric Information 1. Stock-for-debt exchange offers Stock price falls Debt-for-stock exchange offers Stock price rises 2. Issuing common stock drives down stock prices; repurchase increases stock prices. 3. Issuing straight debt has a small negative impact.
Issues and Stock Prices Why do security issues affect stock price? The demand for a firm’s securities ought to be flat. Any firm is a drop in the bucket. Plenty of close substitutes. Large debt issues don’t significantly depress the stock price.
Pecking Order Theory Consider the following story: The announcement of a stock issue drives down the stock price because investors believe managers are more likely to issue when shares are overpriced. Therefore firms prefer internal finance since funds can be raised without sending adverse signals. If external finance is required, firms issue debt first and equity as a last resort. The most profitable firms borrow less not because they have lower target debt ratios but because they don't need external finance.
Pecking Order Theory Some Implications: Internal equity may be better than external equity Financial slack is valuable If external capital is required, debt is better. (There is less room for difference in opinions about what debt is worth).
Implications of the Pecking Order Firms prefer internal finance Adapt target dividend payout ratios to investment opportunities while avoiding changes in dividends Internally generated cash flows is sometimes more than capital expenditures, other times not 1. 2. 3. • • • Due to dividend policies, plus fluctuations in profitability and investment opportunities If more, firm pays off debt or invests in marketable securities If less, firm first draws down cash balance or sells marketable securities If external finances are required, firms issue the safest security first 4. • They start with debt then possibly hybrid securities, such as convertible bonds, then equity as a last resort
The Pecking Order - Evidence 1. 2. 3. 4. Size. Large firms tend to have higher debt ratios. Tangible assets. Firms with high ratios of fixed assets to total assets have higher debt ratios. Profitability. More profitable firms have lower debt ratios. Market to book. Firms with higher ratios of market-to-book value have lower debt ratios
- Slides: 35