Chapter 05 CONSUMER COMPARATIVE STATICS Introduction What happens

  • Slides: 47
Download presentation
Chapter 05 CONSUMER COMPARATIVE STATICS

Chapter 05 CONSUMER COMPARATIVE STATICS

Introduction § What happens to the quantity demanded of any good by a consumer

Introduction § What happens to the quantity demanded of any good by a consumer when there is 1. a change in the price of a single good, or 2. a change in income. § We derive individual demand elasticities with respect to prices and income. § We find that while economists generally believe that there is a ‘Law of Demand’ for market demand curves no such law is implied by a consumer’s preference-maximizing behavior for individual demand functions. 2

5. 1 Price and Income Consumption Curves § Individual demand functions, as we have

5. 1 Price and Income Consumption Curves § Individual demand functions, as we have seen in Chapter 4, generally de- pend on three parameters: the prices of the two goods and income. § Changing any one of these at a time enable us to trace the path of utility-maximizing bundles in the commodity space. 3

5. 1. 1 Price consumption curves Leontief preferences: u = min{x 1, x 2}

5. 1. 1 Price consumption curves Leontief preferences: u = min{x 1, x 2} § Keep income, m, fixed § Keep price of good 2, p 2, fixed § Keep preferences fixed § Price of x 1 drops from p 1 old to p 1 new 4

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} Leontief R maximizes utility over budget

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} Leontief R maximizes utility over budget Bo

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} Price of good 1 drops

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} Price of good 1 drops

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} S maximizes utility over budget Bn

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} S maximizes utility over budget Bn

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} T maximizes utility for an intermediate

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} T maximizes utility for an intermediate budget

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} As the budget goes from Bo

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} As the budget goes from Bo to Bn…

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} … it traces the PCC as

PCC FOR U = MIN{X 1, X 2} … it traces the PCC as the line joining R and S

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Cobb. Douglas R maximizes utility over

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Cobb. Douglas R maximizes utility over budget Bo

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Price of good 1 drops

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Price of good 1 drops

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 S maximizes utility over budget Bn

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 S maximizes utility over budget Bn

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Unchanged !

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Unchanged !

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 T maximizes utility for an intermediate

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 T maximizes utility for an intermediate budget

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 As the budget goes from Bo

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 As the budget goes from Bo to Bn…

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 … it traces the PCC as

PCC FOR U = X 1 X 2 … it traces the PCC as the line joining R and S

INCOME CONSUMPTION CURVE (ICC) Keeping everything else fixed, how do the utilitymaximizing bundles change

INCOME CONSUMPTION CURVE (ICC) Keeping everything else fixed, how do the utilitymaximizing bundles change as income changes? • • Keep price of good 1, p 1, fixed Keep price of good 2, p 2, fixed Keep preferences fixed Suppose income increases from mold to mnew

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Cobb. Douglas R maximizes utility over

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Cobb. Douglas R maximizes utility over budget Bo

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Income rises from mo to mn

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 Income rises from mo to mn

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 S maximizes utility over budget Bn

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 S maximizes utility over budget Bn

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 The ICC is the line joining

ICC FOR U = X 1 X 2 The ICC is the line joining R and S

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 Quasilinear R maximizes utility over

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 Quasilinear R maximizes utility over budget Bo

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 Income rises from mo to

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 Income rises from mo to mn

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 Unchanged ! S maximizes utility

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 Unchanged ! S maximizes utility over budget Bn

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 The ICC is the line

ICC FOR U = 2√X 1 + X 2 The ICC is the line joining R and S

INDIVIDUAL DEMAND ELASTICITIES Keeping everything else fixed, what is a consumer’s demand elasticity when

INDIVIDUAL DEMAND ELASTICITIES Keeping everything else fixed, what is a consumer’s demand elasticity when • its own price changes? Own-price elasticity of demand • when the price of another good changes? Cross-price elasticity of demand • when income changes? Income elasticity of demand

OWN-PRICE ELASTICITIES Suppose a consumer has demand functions for good 1 and good 2.

OWN-PRICE ELASTICITIES Suppose a consumer has demand functions for good 1 and good 2. The own price-elasticity for ∂x 1. “epsilon ε 11 = ∂p 1 ” The own price-elasticity for ∂x 2. ε 22 = ∂p 2 good 1 is p 1 x 1 good 2 is p 2 x 2

CROSS-PRICE ELASTICITIES Suppose a consumer has demand functions for good 1 and good 2.

CROSS-PRICE ELASTICITIES Suppose a consumer has demand functions for good 1 and good 2. The cross price-elasticity for good 1 is ∂x 1 p 2. ε 12 = ∂p 2 x 1 The cross price-elasticity for good 2 is ∂x 2 p 1. ε 21 = ∂p 1 x 2

INCOME ELASTICITIES Suppose a consumer has demand functions for good 1 and good 2

INCOME ELASTICITIES Suppose a consumer has demand functions for good 1 and good 2 The income elasticity for good 1 is ∂x 1 m. “eta” η 1 = ∂m x 1 The income elasticity for good 2 is ∂x 2 m. η 2 = ∂m x 2

5. 3 Decomposing Price Effects § When p 1 falls while p 2 and

5. 3 Decomposing Price Effects § When p 1 falls while p 2 and m remain fixed, the quantity demanded of good 1 typically increases; this is called a price effect. Price effect (PE) = Substitution effect (SE) + Income effect (IE) § This price effect can be broken down into two constituent ones, a substitution effect and an income effect. § Substitution effect: The consumer’s desire to purchase more of the good that is relatively cheaper. § Income effect: The consumer’s desire to purchase more of the goods because a reduction in p 1 increases the consumer’s purchasing power. 31

5. 3 Decomposing Price Effects § There are two ways of decomposing this price

5. 3 Decomposing Price Effects § There are two ways of decomposing this price effect: Ø One associated with Sir John Hicks and Sir Roy Allen, Ø and the other with Evgeny (Eugen) Slutsky. 32

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition 1. Find the preference-maximizing bundle A at the

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition 1. Find the preference-maximizing bundle A at the original budget Bo which yields the utility level uo. 2. Find the preference-maximizing bundle C at the new budget Bn which yields the utility level un. For the good whose price changed, the movement from A to C is the price effect. 3. Using the new price ratio, find the bundle B that barely yields the original utility level, uo. 4. For the good whose price changed, the movement from A to B (along the original indifference curve, uo) is the substitution effect, and the movement from B to C (from the original indifference curve, uo, to the new indifference curve, un) is the income effect. 33

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Bundle A maximizes utility over budget Bo 34

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Bundle A maximizes utility over budget Bo 34

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Bundle C maximizes utility over budget Bn 35

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Bundle C maximizes utility over budget Bn 35

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Price effect: Movement from A to C 36

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Price effect: Movement from A to C 36

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Move Bn back until uo is barely reached

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Move Bn back until uo is barely reached at B From C, reduce m to attain old utility at new prices 37

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Substitution effect: Movement from A to B 38

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Substitution effect: Movement from A to B 38

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Positive IE reinforces SE Normal good case: SE

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Positive IE reinforces SE Normal good case: SE > 0, IE > 0 39

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Negative IE dampens SE “Slightly” inferior good case:

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Negative IE dampens SE “Slightly” inferior good case: SE > 0, IE < 0, PE > 0 40

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Negative IE swamps SE Giffen good “Very inferior”

5. 3. 1 The Hicks-Allen decomposition Negative IE swamps SE Giffen good “Very inferior” good case: SE > 0, IE < 0, PE < 0 41

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Bundle A maximizes utility over budget Bo

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Bundle A maximizes utility over budget Bo

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Bundle C maximizes utility over budget Bn

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Bundle C maximizes utility over budget Bn

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Price effect: Movement from A to C

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Price effect: Movement from A to C

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Move Bn back until it passes through A From C, reduce m

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Move Bn back until it passes through A From C, reduce m to attain old bundle A at new prices

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Find B that maximizes utility on dashed budget

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION Find B that maximizes utility on dashed budget

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION SE is movement from A to B, IE from B to C

SLUTSKY DECOMPOSITION SE is movement from A to B, IE from B to C