CHAP 8 IMPEACHMENT of WITNESSES Prof JANICKE 2020

  • Slides: 27
Download presentation
CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT of WITNESSES Prof. JANICKE 2020

CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT of WITNESSES Prof. JANICKE 2020

DEFINITION AND METHODS • IMPEACHMENT IS THE PROCESS OF ATTEMPTING TO WEAKEN THE PERCEIVED

DEFINITION AND METHODS • IMPEACHMENT IS THE PROCESS OF ATTEMPTING TO WEAKEN THE PERCEIVED CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS • MOST COMMONLY DONE ON CROSS • AT LEAST SIX METHODS OF IMPEACHMENT EXIST, EACH WITH ITS OWN RULES (COMMON LAW OR WRITTEN) 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 2

MEANING OF “EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE” • IMPEACHING OTHER THAN BY QUESTIONING THE TARGET WITNESS •

MEANING OF “EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE” • IMPEACHING OTHER THAN BY QUESTIONING THE TARGET WITNESS • DOING THE IMPEACHMENT BY – CALLING A WITNESS TO IMPEACH THE TARGET WITNESS, OR – INTRODUCING A DOCUMENT TO IMPEACH A WITNESS 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 3

3 GENERAL MODES OF IMPEACHMENT • 3 FORMS OF ATTACK ON THE WITNESS’S BELIEVABILITY

3 GENERAL MODES OF IMPEACHMENT • 3 FORMS OF ATTACK ON THE WITNESS’S BELIEVABILITY DUE TO SOME GENERAL WEAKNESS AS A WITNESS 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 4

1. IMPAIRED GENERAL COMPETENCY E. G. , PROVE LIMITED VISION E. G. , PROVE

1. IMPAIRED GENERAL COMPETENCY E. G. , PROVE LIMITED VISION E. G. , PROVE LIMITED ABILITY TO REMEMBER 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 5

2. POOR CHARACTER FOR VERACITY assigned RULE 608 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 6

2. POOR CHARACTER FOR VERACITY assigned RULE 608 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 6

2. POOR CHARACTER FOR VERACITY BAD OPINION OR REPUTATION FOR TRUTHFULNESS IS ALLOWED EXTRINSIC

2. POOR CHARACTER FOR VERACITY BAD OPINION OR REPUTATION FOR TRUTHFULNESS IS ALLOWED EXTRINSIC WITNESS TESTIMONY IS USED; BUT NO SPECIFICS ARE ALLOWED 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 7

MORE ABOUT POOR CHARACTER FOR VERACITY • CAN ATTEMPT THIS ON CROSS OF THE

MORE ABOUT POOR CHARACTER FOR VERACITY • CAN ATTEMPT THIS ON CROSS OF THE TARGET WITNESS; AND GET SPECIFIC • BUT IF DENIED, YOU ARE STUCK WITH THE ANSWER • NO REBUTTAL EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 8

EXAMPLES • ON CROSS, ASKING A WITNESS ABOUT: LYING IN GRADE-SCHOOL, TO A FRIEND

EXAMPLES • ON CROSS, ASKING A WITNESS ABOUT: LYING IN GRADE-SCHOOL, TO A FRIEND • ON CROSS, ASKING ABOUT LYING TO A PARENT 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 9

3. CONVICTION FOR CERTAIN CRIMES ASSIGNED: RULE 609 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 10

3. CONVICTION FOR CERTAIN CRIMES ASSIGNED: RULE 609 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 10

3. CONVICTION OF A CRIME AS IMPEACHMENT IS ALLOWED IF: – IT WAS FOR

3. CONVICTION OF A CRIME AS IMPEACHMENT IS ALLOWED IF: – IT WAS FOR A CRIME INVOLVING DISHONESTY (MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY) • NO WEIGHING PROBATIVE VALUE vs PREJUDICE – FOR OTHER FELONIES, SUBJECT TO WEIGHING PROBATIVENESS AGAINST RISK OF PREJUDICE 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 11

TIME LIMIT ON USING CONVICTIONS • USUALLY A TEN-YEAR LIMIT FOR EITHER OF THE

TIME LIMIT ON USING CONVICTIONS • USUALLY A TEN-YEAR LIMIT FOR EITHER OF THE ALLOWABLE TYPES 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 12

PROCEDURE – IF THE WITNESS ADMITS THE CONVICTION, NO EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE CAN BE ADDED

PROCEDURE – IF THE WITNESS ADMITS THE CONVICTION, NO EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE CAN BE ADDED TO PROVE THE CONVICTION – IF THE WITNESS DOES NOT ADMIT, CAN USE CONVICTION RECORD – • CRIME; DATE OF CONVICTION; SENTENCE. NO DETAILS 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 13

FURTHER RESTRICTIONS ON USING CONVICTIONS TO IMPEACH • CAN’T USE IF THERE IS –

FURTHER RESTRICTIONS ON USING CONVICTIONS TO IMPEACH • CAN’T USE IF THERE IS – (i) A REHABILITATION CERTIF. , OR – (ii) A PARDON BASED ON FINDING OF INNOCENCE 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 14

THE SPECIFIC MODES OF IMPEACHMENT • 3 FORMS OF ATTACK ON A WITNESS’S CREDIBILITY

THE SPECIFIC MODES OF IMPEACHMENT • 3 FORMS OF ATTACK ON A WITNESS’S CREDIBILITY FOR THIS PARTICULAR CASE 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 15

MODES OF SPECIFIC IMPEACHMENT 4. IMPAIRED SPECIFIC COMPETENCY, i. e. , ON THE OCCASION

MODES OF SPECIFIC IMPEACHMENT 4. IMPAIRED SPECIFIC COMPETENCY, i. e. , ON THE OCCASION IN QUESTION • EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 16

5. PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT assigned: RULE 613 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 17

5. PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT assigned: RULE 613 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 17

6. BIAS/PREJUDICE • EXAMPLES: – IN LOVE WITH THE PLAINTIFF – HATES THE DEFENDANT

6. BIAS/PREJUDICE • EXAMPLES: – IN LOVE WITH THE PLAINTIFF – HATES THE DEFENDANT – IS P’s NEIGHBOR, SIMILARLY SITUATED – HATES ALL TALL PEOPLE – IS P’s BUSINESS PARTNER • 2020 IF DENIED, EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 18

PROBLEMS/CASES • • • Abel 8 A Manske 8 B 8 C 8 D

PROBLEMS/CASES • • • Abel 8 A Manske 8 B 8 C 8 D >> 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 19

 • Luce • 8 E 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 20

• Luce • 8 E 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 20

SOME SURPRISING THINGS 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 21

SOME SURPRISING THINGS 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 21

MIRANDA DOESN’T APPLY • NON-MIRANDIZED STATEMENT CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH A TESTIFYING DEFENDANT!

MIRANDA DOESN’T APPLY • NON-MIRANDIZED STATEMENT CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH A TESTIFYING DEFENDANT! 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 22

SILENCE AS IMPEACHABLE? • TRICKY AREA • IF MIRANDIZED, SILENCE CANNOT BE USED, EVEN

SILENCE AS IMPEACHABLE? • TRICKY AREA • IF MIRANDIZED, SILENCE CANNOT BE USED, EVEN TO IMPEACH • IF NOT MIRANDIZED, SILENCE CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH! 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 23

4 TH AMENDMENT? • ILLEGALLY SEIZED ITEMS CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH A TESTIFYING

4 TH AMENDMENT? • ILLEGALLY SEIZED ITEMS CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH A TESTIFYING DEFENDANT 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 24

PROBLEMS/CASES • • Webster Harris 8 F Havens 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 25

PROBLEMS/CASES • • Webster Harris 8 F Havens 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 25

RELIGION assigned: RULE 610 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 26

RELIGION assigned: RULE 610 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 26

SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ASSIGNED: recall RULE 408(a) 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 27

SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ASSIGNED: recall RULE 408(a) 2020 Chap. 8 -- Impeachment 27