Changing the focus from Inputs to Impact RBM

Changing the focus from Inputs to Impact: RBM Framework for evaluating HEC Ranking Criteria Dr. Irfan Hyder Dean CBM Io. BM, Karachi 1

HEC’s Focus FROM IMPACT FACTOR TO IMPACT 2

HEC Ranking Criteria 3

Result Based Management Framework 4

Definitions Inputs Process Outputs Outcomes Impact Measure Input Process Output Outcome Definition Resources, time, effort Process, Procedures Produced, Generated Value added to KAP: Knowledge, Attitude, Practice Impact Change in Society, Industry, Economy 5

RBM Classification of HEC Criteria Variables Weight Input Process Output Outcome Impact Quality Assurance 15 8 1 6 Teaching Quality 30 27 3 Research 41 8 6 9 18 Finance & Facility 10 10 Social Integration 4 3 1 & Community Development 100 48 14 11 27 - 6

From Inputs to Impact • Too much focus on inputs; 47% • No attempt to measure impact on society, industry and economy – Extremism, employability, …. • No outcomes related to jobs, employers • Little focus on society and community: 4% • Requires focus on national objectives. Too focus on international requirements. • Around 50% of QS criteria is focused on impact 7

A: Quality Assurance Sr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HEC QA Criteria Adoption of HEC criteria for faculty hiring Adoption: HEC criteria of M. Phil/MS Programs Adoption: HEC criteria of Ph. D programs Adoption: HEC plagiarism policy Rating of QEC # International awards won by students Affiliation with accreditation councils International Ranking Weight Measure 15 4 1 Process 1 2 3 1 2 1 Process Outcome Output Outcome 8

B: Teaching Quality Sr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HEC QA Criteria Ratio: Full time faculty to total faculty Ratio: Full-time Ph. D faculty to FT Faculty Ratio: Full time Faculty to Student Selectivity: Enrollment Applicant to Intake Training of full-time faculty Faculty degrees from other universities # National Awards won by full-time faculty # International awards won by FT Faculty Ratio of fresh Ph. D induction Weight Measure 30 3 7 7 4 2 2 1 2 2 Input Input Outcome Input 9

C: Research & Development Sr HEC QA Criteria (41 points) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 # International registered patents …. # National registered patents, …. # Commercialization of patents, … # University linkages through ORIC Ratio: Ph. D Students to total enrollment Amount of external grants won # Travel grants won # Papers published: IFJ + HEC recognized Js # ISI IFJ publications #citations/paper; 11 -University H-Index # W-Category Journals; 13 # X-Journals Utilization: Bandwidth + Digital lib # Conferences: International + National # Ph. D output + #Ph. D per full time faculty Weight Measure 1 1 1 2 3 4 2 3 6 6 3 2 3 4 Outcome Output Process Input Output Input Outcome Output Input Process Output 10

D: Finance and Facilities Sr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 HEC QA Criteria Ratio: Non Salary expenditure to budget Amount generated thru own resources Amount spent on research/library Computers per student Computers per fulltime faculty #books in library/student #students on external scholarship Weight Measure 10 2 2 2 1 1 Input Input 11

E: Society Integration & Community Development Sr 1 2 3 4 HEC QA Criteria #community engagements, services #international visits: student in/out bound #enrolled foreign students #foreign faculty Weight Measure 4 1 1 Input Output Input 12