Challenges in Result Orientation Intervention Logic Performance framework

Challenges in Result Orientation

Intervention Logic Performance framework Ex ante conditionalities Result Oriented Approach Programming period 2014 -2020

Partnership Agreement Ø Cohesion Policy ü 8 EACs fulfilled ! 17 EACs partially fulfilled including EIA/SEA 9 EACs not fulfilled including 5 GEACs × Ø Rural development ü 5 EACs fulfilled ! 2 partially fulfilled 1 not fulfilled ×

Ø General EACs Ø Complex issues vis-à-vis number of actors involved EC’s stringent assessment Partnership Thematic EACs - Fulfilment vis-à-vis division lines and competences Fulfilment vis-à-vis negative priorities Lacking experience (e. g. smart specialisation) Complex issues vis-à-vis number of actors involved Partnership

Ø Strategic level – PA Ø Implementation level – Methodological Instruction on Performance Reserve and Performance Framework

Ø Outlining minimum requirements to ensure consistency in selection of indicators and determining milestones Ø PF as two-phased process v Preparation – Four step analysis v Implementation - Monitoring and evaluation

Ø Four step analysis v Selection of appropriate indicators v Setting target values for indicators v Selection of appropriate indicators for milestones v Setting values for milestones Ø Monitoring and evaluation v Monitoring through 2014 -2023 v Evaluating partial values (beyond 2019 and 2023)

Ø Issued by the CCB Ø Defining types of indicators Ø Setting level of PR Ø Setting conditions for PF and Performance Review (use of methods, storage of information) Ø Monitoring and evaluation (detection and correction mechanism) Ø Schedule for PF and timeline for Performance Review

Ø Ø Ø Use of appropriate type of indicator Defining period for M&E Incorporating Rural Development Defining a level of OP’s PR Restrictive vs Corrective nature of M&E

Ø Ø Ø 6 OPs for Objective 1, 10 OPs for Objective 2+RD+Fishery+TP Defining targets in line with Position Paper (negative priorities) Maintain linkage and consistency btw targets activities and indicators

Igor Jašurek Central Coordination Body Government Office of the SR Tel: +421 2 57295 714 Email: igor. jasurek@vlada. gov. sk

Monitoring and Evaluation in the Slovak Republic setting up of indicators programming period 2014 - 2020

Stay of play of Monitoring and Evaluation system in the SR the process of preparing the new indicator system • „ESIF management and control system “- it anchors obligation for setting up of indicators • guideline „Principles of creation of measurable indicators at program and project level“ Table on indicators – 3 parts: measurable indicators, milestones, data for evaluation

Measurable indicators - data collected from MAs by CCA on MA and OPs Result Indicators Definition/Method of calculation, Measurement unit, Baseline, Method of baseline determination, Year baseline, Target(2023), Source, Periodicity, Activities Output indicators Definition/Method of calculation, Measurement unit, Target (2023), Source, Periodicity Result - MAs created altogether over 500 indicators 350

Milestones Indicator – rationale for selection, % of representing interventions at the level of PA, Target for 2017, 2018, 2021, 2022, 2023, Method of calculation/detail description of calculation Data for evaluation - institutional – based data - project – based data - surveys – based data Microdata Data on individual participants in operations - personal data about each participant at a project level

Lessons Learnt problems - missing - definitions, - measurable units, - targets, - delayed feedback results - coding indicators - unified indicators (ESF, ERDF) experience for the future - good principle of data collecting for setting up indicators

Dária Juhásová Central Coordination Body Government Office of the SR Tel: +421 2 57295 955 Email: daria. juhasova@vlada. gov. sk