CEE 320 Winter 2006 Vehicle Dynamics CEE 320

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Vehicle Dynamics CEE 320 Steve Muench

Outline 1. Resistance a. Aerodynamic b. Rolling c. Grade CEE 320 Winter 2006 2. 3. 4. 5. Tractive Effort Acceleration Braking Force Stopping Sight Distance (SSD)

Main Concepts CEE 320 Winter 2006 • • • Resistance Tractive effort Vehicle acceleration Braking Stopping distance

Resistance is defined as the force impeding vehicle motion CEE 320 Winter 2006 1. 2. 3. 4. What is this force? Aerodynamic resistance Rolling resistance Grade resistance

Aerodynamic Resistance Ra Composed of: CEE 320 Winter 2006 1. Turbulent air flow around vehicle body (85%) 2. Friction of air over vehicle body (12%) 3. Vehicle component resistance, from radiators and air vents (3%) from National Research Council Canada

Rolling Resistance Rrl CEE 320 Winter 2006 Composed primarily of 1. Resistance from tire deformation ( 90%) 2. Tire penetration and surface compression ( 4%) 3. Tire slippage and air circulation around wheel ( 6%) 4. Wide range of factors affect total rolling resistance 5. Simplifying approximation:

Grade Resistance Rg Composed of – Gravitational force acting on the vehicle θg For small angles, Rg CEE 320 Winter 2006 θg W

Available Tractive Effort The minimum of: CEE 320 Winter 2006 1. Force generated by the engine, Fe 2. Maximum value that is a function of the vehicle’s weight distribution and road-tire interaction, Fmax

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Tractive Effort Relationships

Engine-Generated Tractive Effort • Force Fe = Engine generated tractive effort reaching wheels (lb) Me = Engine torque (ft-lb) ε 0 = Gear reduction ratio ηd = Driveline efficiency r = Wheel radius (ft) CEE 320 Winter 2006 • Power

Vehicle Speed vs. Engine Speed V = velocity (ft/s) r = wheel radius (ft) ne = crankshaft rps i = driveline slippage CEE 320 Winter 2006 ε 0 = gear reduction ratio

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Typical Torque-Power Curves

Maximum Tractive Effort • Front Wheel Drive Vehicle CEE 320 Winter 2006 • Rear Wheel Drive Vehicle • What about 4 WD?

Diagram R a h ma R rlf h W F f bf lf W θg R rlr CEE 320 Winter 2006 L lr W r F br θg

Vehicle Acceleration • Governing Equation • Mass Factor CEE 320 Winter 2006 (accounts for inertia of vehicle’s rotating parts)

Example A 1989 Ford 5. 0 L Mustang Convertible starts on a flat grade from a dead stop as fast as possible. What’s the maximum acceleration it can achieve before spinning its wheels? μ = 0. 40 (wet, bad pavement) 1989 Ford 5. 0 L Mustang Convertible Torque 300 @ 3200 rpm Curb Weight 3640 Weight Distribution Front 57% Rear 43% Wheelbase 100. 5 in Tire Size P 225/60 R 15 Gear Reduction Ratio 3. 8 CEE 320 Winter 2006 Driveline efficiency 90% Center of Gravity 20 inches high

Braking Force • Front axle CEE 320 Winter 2006 • Rear axle

Braking Force • Ratio CEE 320 Winter 2006 • Efficiency

Braking Distance • Theoretical – ignoring air resistance For grade = 0 • Practical CEE 320 Winter 2006 • Perception • Total

Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) • Worst-case conditions – Poor driver skills – Low braking efficiency – Wet pavement CEE 320 Winter 2006 • Perception-reaction time = 2. 5 seconds • Equation

Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) CEE 320 Winter 2006 from ASSHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2001 Note: this table assumes level grade (G = 0)

SSD – Quick and Dirty 1. Acceleration due to gravity, g = 32. 2 ft/sec 2 2. There are 1. 47 ft/sec per mph CEE 320 Winter 2006 3. Assume G = 0 (flat grade) V = V 1 in mph a = deceleration, 11. 2 ft/s 2 in US customary units tp = Conservative perception / reaction time = 2. 5 seconds

CEE 320 Winter 2006

Primary References • Mannering, F. L. ; Kilareski, W. P. and Washburn, S. S. (2005). Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, Third Edition). Chapter 2 CEE 320 Winter 2006 • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officals (AASHTO). (2001). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fourth Edition. Washington, D. C.