Can the PERMA profiler tool support children to

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
Can the PERMA profiler tool support children to improve their own well-being? Alice Clarke

Can the PERMA profiler tool support children to improve their own well-being? Alice Clarke 3 rd year Doctorate in Educational Psychology student Cardiff University

Involvement Ø Small-scale research project for university Ø Joined the working group Ø Worked

Involvement Ø Small-scale research project for university Ø Joined the working group Ø Worked jointly with Llangynwyd Primary to run intervention and collect data

Research question Two measures Can the PERMA profiler tool support children to improve their

Research question Two measures Can the PERMA profiler tool support children to improve their own wellbeing? • Numerical assessment of wellbeing using profiler data • Qualitative evaluation of pupil’s experiences Basically, imitating how the app will work and asking pupils to evaluate the process, while also testing out the methodology.

Study design Year 5/6 class – 27 out of 28 pupils agreed to data

Study design Year 5/6 class – 27 out of 28 pupils agreed to data being shared

Intervention Ø Pupils identified based on overall wellbeing score at 2 nd collection point

Intervention Ø Pupils identified based on overall wellbeing score at 2 nd collection point Lowest wellbeing Highest wellbeing 7 pupils invited to take part in intervention 5 recruited

Intervention 3 wellbeing meetings with the researcher Meeting 1 • Look at PERMA graph

Intervention 3 wellbeing meetings with the researcher Meeting 1 • Look at PERMA graph and choose area of focus • Set a target • Look at list of actions and select one Meeting 2 • Review target and action from last week • Pick next action Meeting 3 • Review target and action from last week • Target achieved? • Survey about process

Quantitative data – control group Control group - changes in PERMA strands over time

Quantitative data – control group Control group - changes in PERMA strands over time 10 9 PERMA score 8 P 7 E 6 R M 5 A N 4 Lon 3 Overall 2 1 T 2 Data collection points T 3

Quantitative data – Intervention Group Intervention group - changes in PERMA strands over time

Quantitative data – Intervention Group Intervention group - changes in PERMA strands over time 10 P PERMA score 9 8 E 7 R 6 M 5 A 4 N 3 Lon 2 1 T 2 Data collection points T 3 Overall

Limitations Ø This was incredibly small scale! Ø Target setting was not very scientific.

Limitations Ø This was incredibly small scale! Ø Target setting was not very scientific. Ø Various methodological problems affecting quantitative data – smaller intervention group, not randomly allocated, the conditions under which data was collected. Ø Qualitative data is much more useful and meaningful.

Qualitative measures Ø Questions about: Ø the wellbeing actions suggested and carried out Ø

Qualitative measures Ø Questions about: Ø the wellbeing actions suggested and carried out Ø whether they understood more about wellbeing now Ø whether they perceived any changes in their wellbeing Ø whether they thought the app sounded useful

Results of survey – 5 pupils Average usefulness rating of 9 and above: •

Results of survey – 5 pupils Average usefulness rating of 9 and above: • Seeing their PERMA graph • Meeting with the researcher to talk about a target and set actions • Being given a list of actions to choose from • Agreeing to try an action • Talking with the researcher about how they got on with the action Less useful (rated 8 or below): • Answering the questions on the PERMA profiler • Choosing a target to work towards

Results of survey – 5 pupils Ø ALL of the actions were rated either

Results of survey – 5 pupils Ø ALL of the actions were rated either ‘Useful’ or ‘Highly useful’ Ø Reasons why other children might enjoy doing the same actions: “They might feel proud of themselves like I do”, “Watching something that makes you laugh can be very helpful to cheer you up if you’re sad. ” Ø 3/5 pupils reported that they understood more about their wellbeing as a result of the project. Ø All 5 reported that they believed their wellbeing had improved (either a little or a lot). I think this is because I didn’t like my life and it made me feel a lot better about myself and made me feel happy. I always used to be down every day and now I have found a way to become happy when I’m sad. It’s helped me feel more positive.

Survey questions about the app Ø After hearing a description of the PERMA app:

Survey questions about the app Ø After hearing a description of the PERMA app: Ø All 5 pupils said they would definitely want to use it. Ø And that it would be either ‘useful’ or ‘very useful’ for children to improve their wellbeing. Ø Reasons included: Ø Would be fun and interesting Ø Would keep it private Ø Will help children understand wellbeing Ø Will help children not to be grumpy

Conclusions and implications Ø Possible buffer effect when pupils pay more attention to their

Conclusions and implications Ø Possible buffer effect when pupils pay more attention to their wellbeing. Increase in resilience perhaps? Ø Wider context of pupils lives will always be mitigating factor in any well-being intervention Ø Pupils respond well to being given concrete well-being actions to go and carry out. Ø School staff and EPs need to think carefully about how they present well-being data to pupils, and emphasise that it is constantly fluctuating, not something they need to get a ‘high score’ on all the time.