Cambrian School District 2012 2013 Academic Performance Index

Cambrian School District 2012 -2013 Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) September 19, 2013

Overview Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Moving Forward

Academic Performance Index (API) ØCalifornia growth model ØWeighted score ØAdvancing from lower levels earns more points Ø 800 and above = high performing

District API Change 2012 to 2013 District API 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 All Students 867 878 873 885 880 -5 Asian 936 960 957 965 966 +1 Hispanic 782 791 775 797 787 -10 White 892 902 899 903 -6 Economically Disadvantaged 770 760 755 774 773 -1 English Learners 774 790 785 814 794 -20 Students with Disabilities 591 650 674 689 684 -5

Bagby API Change 2012 to 2013 Bagby API 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 All Students 906 924 905 904 883 - 21 Hispanic 836 848 826 830 777 -53 White 922 940 929 907 -22 Economically Disadvantaged 830 816 792 811 771 -40 846 815 847 798 -49 English Learners

Fammatre API Change 2012 to 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 All Students 913 910 888 897 858 -39 Asian 985 977 947 955 950 -5 Hispanic 847 850 819 796 744 -52 White 926 918 905 922 873 -49 Economically Disadvantaged 810 802 743 753 730 -23 882 831 858 803 -55 English Learners

Farnham API Change 2012 to 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 All Students 865 847 850 899 894 -4 Hispanic 800 755 737 831 819 -12 White 898 890 926 919 -7 Economically Disadvantaged 777 706 732 812 789 -23 English Learners 833 776 758 828 811 -17 690 718 786 733 -53 Students with Disabilities

Sartorette API All Students Change 2012 to 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 890 898 876 877 +1 971 969 956 980 +24 Asian Hispanic 781 830 773 789 786 -3 White 920 915 903 910 +7 Economically Disadvantaged 784 796 739 774 749 -25 820 793 820 767 -53 English Learners

Price API Change 2012 to 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 All Students 841 864 874 883 +9 Asian 914 949 955 974 966 -8 Hispanic 746 763 759 783 792 +9 White 868 892 893 897 906 +9 Economically Disadvantaged 737 752 756 760 790 +30 724 763 776 802 +26 English Learners

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • Federal Performance Model • Percent Proficient and Above • Numerically significant student subgroups • 2013 and 2014 targets • 2013 targets • ELA 89. 2% • ELA 100% • 2014 targets Math 89. 5% Math 100%

Cambrian ELA Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 88. 90% 90. 00% 92. 20% 90. 60% 88. 90% 89. 20% 80. 60% 81. 40% 80. 00% 79. 70% 78. 40% 70. 00% 74. 90% 60. 00% 57. 20% 74. 70% 76. 70% 73. 40% 67. 60% 53. 20% 60. 30% 55. 70% 52. 50% 53. 60% 50. 00% 50. 40% 40. 00% 42. 70% 52. 30% 47. 70% 46. 00% 44. 60% 45. 00% 30. 00% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 NCLB 2003/04 2004/05 ALL Students 2005/06 Asian 2006/07 2007/08 Disadvantaged 2008/09 EL 2009/10 Hispanic 2010/11 2011/12 Special ED 2012/13 White 2013/14

Cambrian Math Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 89. 20% 90. 00% 90. 40% 88. 20% 89. 80% 89. 50% 80. 00% 75. 00% 79. 00% 74. 10% 73. 20% 70. 60% 69. 30% 70. 00% 68. 10% 69. 50% 58. 90% 60. 00% 58. 00% 53. 30% 50. 70% 50. 00% 46. 00% 40. 00% 43. 80% 53. 90% 50. 30% 49. 00% 46. 70% 46. 10% 44. 10% 40. 70% 42. 80% 43. 10% 30. 00% 26. 50% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 NCLB 2003/04 2004/05 ALL Students 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Asian Disadvantaged 2008/09 EL 2009/10 Hispanic 2010/11 2011/12 Special ED 2012/13 White 2013/14

District AYP ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian Missed AYP Criteria White Hispanic English Learners Economically Disadvantaged (SED) • Students with Disabilities (SWD) • • Math Met AYP Criteria • Asian Missed AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED • SWD

Bagby ELA Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 90. 00% 89. 20% 82. 50% 82. 40% 78. 70% 80. 00% 78. 40% 79. 10% 70. 00% 76. 40% 72. 00% 67. 60% 61. 40% 60. 00% 79. 20% 62. 50% 58. 10% 59. 10% 53. 30% 50. 00% 46. 00% 51. 20% 50. 00% 49. 30% 45. 70% 44. 30% 40. 00% 35. 20% 30. 00% 24. 40% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 NCLB 2004/05 2005/06 ALL Students 2006/07 2007/08 Disadvantaged 2008/09 EL 2009/10 Hispanic 2010/11 White 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

Bagby Math Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 87. 00% 90. 00% 85. 70% 84. 00% 80. 20% 80. 00% 83. 80% 81. 00% 71. 40% 69. 80% 70. 00% 60. 00% 59. 80% 80. 50% 74. 30% 64. 00% 66. 30% 67. 90% 89. 50% 58. 50% 57. 50% 53. 30% 50. 00% 48. 90% 47. 50% 40. 00% 37. 00% 30. 00% 26. 50% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 NCLB 2004/05 2005/06 ALL Students 2006/07 2007/08 Disadvantaged 2008/09 EL 2009/10 Hispanic 2010/11 White 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

Bagby AYP ELA Missed AYP Criteria • • White Hispanic English Learners SED Math Missed AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED

Fammatre ELA Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 92. 10% 91. 20% 88. 10% 90. 00% 86. 40% 83. 30% 79. 70% 80. 00% 73. 80% 80. 00% 76. 60% 74. 00% 70. 00% 68. 90% 67. 60% 61. 80% 64. 90% 60. 00% 57. 90% 50. 00% 65. 60% 67. 40% 58. 70% 53. 40% 55. 70% 42. 90% 46. 00% 40. 00% 89. 20% 81. 10% 47. 80% 40. 90% 42. 30% 35. 20% 30. 00% 24. 40% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 NCLB 2004/05 2005/06 ALL Students 2006/07 Asian 2007/08 2008/09 Disadvantaged 2009/10 EL 2010/11 Hispanic 2011/12 White 2012/13 2013/14

Fammatre Math Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 93. 70% 90. 00% 92. 60% 89. 40% 87. 20% 80. 00% 80. 40% 82. 80% 71. 40% 78. 00% 70. 00% 65. 80% 60. 00% 91. 00% 81. 80% 77. 00% 63. 50% 89. 50% 74. 60% 70. 60% 63. 80% 58. 00% 51. 80% 52. 60% 50. 00% 52. 10% 50. 00% 47. 80% 47. 50% 40. 00% 37. 00% 30. 00% 26. 50% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 NCLB ALL Students 2006/07 Asian 2007/08 2008/09 Disadvantaged 2009/10 EL 2010/11 Hispanic 2011/12 White 2012/13 2013/14

Fammatre AYP ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian Missed AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learner • SED Math Met AYP Criteria • Asian Missed AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED

Farnham ELA Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 90. 00% 89. 20% 84. 00% 80. 00% 81. 40% 75. 20% 70. 00% 78. 40% 73. 90% 75. 60% 67. 60% 64. 90% 64. 00% 63. 90% 60. 00% 57. 60% 56. 80% 50. 00% 52. 90% 47. 10% 48. 30% 46. 00% 40. 70% 37. 50% 40. 00% 56. 40% 42. 60% 35. 20% 35. 70% 30. 00% 24. 40% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 NCLB 2004/05 ALL Students 2005/06 2006/07 Disadvantaged 2007/08 EL 2008/09 2009/10 Hispanic 2010/11 Special ED 2011/12 White 2012/13 2013/14

Farnham Math Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 90. 00% 89. 50% 84. 00% 81. 50% 82. 60% 78. 20% 80. 00% 79. 00% 78. 20% 73. 20% 70. 00% 68. 50% 69. 80% 63. 80% 62. 00% 60. 30% 57. 60% 60. 00% 60. 30% 55. 90% 52. 80% 50. 00% 54. 00% 51. 10% 51. 70% 50. 00% 50. 90% 2010/11 2011/12 43. 40% 40. 00% 37. 00% 30. 00% 26. 50% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 NCLB 2003/04 2004/05 ALL Students 2005/06 2006/07 Disadvantaged 2007/08 EL 2008/09 2009/10 Hispanic Special ED 2012/13 White 2013/14

Farnham AYP ELA Missed AYP Criteria • • • White Hispanic English Learners SED SWD Math Missed AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED • SWD

Sartorette ELA Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 92. 00% 90. 00% 95. 60% 89. 10% 87. 70% 89. 20% 84. 00% 83. 00% 84. 60% 80. 00% 82. 90% 78. 40% 72. 60% 78. 30% 70. 00% 64. 50% 75. 40% 73. 80% 67. 60% 59. 80% 60. 00% 57. 60% 53. 80% 48. 10% 50. 00% 46. 00% 53. 00% 51. 10% 49. 40% 43. 80% 40. 00% 40. 20% 35. 20% 30. 00% 24. 40% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 NCLB 2004/05 2005/06 ALL Students 2006/07 Asian 2007/08 2008/09 Disadvantaged 2009/10 EL 2010/11 Hispanic 2011/12 White 2012/13 2013/14

Sartorette Math Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 92. 20% 90. 00% 92. 70% 90. 80% 86. 00% 89. 50% 81. 60% 85. 00% 81. 10% 80. 00% 79. 90% 100. 00% 95. 60% 73. 50% 76. 30% 72. 80% 70. 00% 65. 70% 60. 00% 54. 50% 57. 50% 51. 10% 50. 00% 52. 80% 47. 50% 40. 00% 55. 50% 53. 70% 51. 90% 49. 50% 43. 90% 37. 00% 30. 00% 26. 50% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 NCLB 2003/04 2004/05 ALL Students 2005/06 2006/07 Asian 2007/08 2008/09 Disadvantaged 2009/10 EL 2010/11 2011/12 Hispanic 2012/13 White 2013/14

Sartorette AYP ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian Missed AYP Criteria • White • Hispanic • English Learners • SED Math Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White (Safe Harbor) • Hispanic (Safe Harbor) Missed AYP Criteria • English Learners • SED

Price ELA Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 86. 50% 90. 00% 80. 40% 80. 00% 89. 20% 81. 70% 80. 50% 82. 00% 78. 10% 75. 50% 76. 70% 74. 60% 70. 00% 93. 10% 91. 50% 88. 40% 69. 60% 61. 10% 60. 00% 56. 80% 55. 50% 54. 80% 53. 00% 50. 00% 55. 70% 63. 00% 61. 70% 59. 30% 46. 00% 40. 00% 35. 20% 40. 90% 30. 00% 24. 40% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 NCLB 2003/04 2004/05 ALL Students 2005/06 Asian 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Disadvantaged 2009/10 EL 2010/11 Hispanic 2011/12 2012/13 White 2013/14

Price Math Percent Proficient and Above 100. 00% 87. 20% 90. 00% 81. 70% 89. 50% 83. 70% 86. 20% 80. 00% 79. 00% 70. 00% 68. 50% 63. 00% 64. 00% 60. 00% 56. 80% 50. 00% 47. 50% 40. 00% 41. 80% 36. 20% 37. 00% 30. 00% 58. 90% 35. 20% 65. 80% 63. 80% 60. 80% 58. 90% 45. 20% 42. 70% 39. 00% 33. 90% 35. 00% 32. 40% 26. 50% 20. 00% 10. 00% 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 NCLB 2004/05 2005/06 ALL Students 2006/07 Asian 2007/08 2008/09 Disadvantaged 2009/10 EL 2010/11 Hispanic 2011/12 White 2012/13 2013/14

Price AYP ELA Met AYP Criteria • Asian • White (Safe Harbor) • English Learners (Safe Harbor) • SED (Safe Harbor) Missed AYP Criteria • Hispanic Math Met AYP Criteria • English Learners (Safe Harbor) Missed AYP Criteria • Asian • White • Hispanic • SED

Program Improvement (PI) Formal designation, under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), for Title l funded districts and schools that do not make AYP criteria for numerically significant subgroups

Program Improvement ü 2013 -14 üDistrict and Sartorette--Year 3 üFarnham--Year 2 üPrice--Year 1

Program Improvement Requirements Year 1 District • Provide assistance to revise and implement SPSAs • Provide timely and varied school and student data to sites • Review LEA Plan • Notify parents of PI status School • Revise and implement SPSA based on results of data • Establish system to continuously monitor school progress Year 2 District • Continue implementation and monitoring of LEA Plan rewritten and approved in 2011 • Provide assistance to revise and implement SPSAs • Provide timely and varied school and student data to sites • Provide ongoing support to sites • Notify parents of PI status School • Revise and implement SPSA • Maintain system to continuously monitor student and school progress • Offer Supplementary Educational Services (SES) for qualifying students Year 3 District • Continue Year 2 requirements • Refine and monitor LEA Plan • Ensure SPSAs are in alignment with refined LEA Plan • Provide assistance to sites for SPSA implementation • Notify parents of PI status School • Continue Year 2 requirements • Refine and implement SPSA • Collaborate with LEA to improve student achievement • Refine system to monitor student and school progress

Moving Forward ü Disaggregate data ü Provide highly qualified ELD support ü Implement Elementary ELD Coordinator to oversee services and ensure fidelity ü Oversee use of Data Walls at all sites ü Target and effectively monitor students on a regular basis ü Adjusting interventions, instruction, and students per data results