BRIEF INTRODUCTION NM OSAP Recipients Meeting August 29

BRIEF INTRODUCTION NM OSAP Recipients Meeting August 29, 017

FOR THE NEW OSAP RECIPIENTS • PIRE: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation • www. pire. org • NM State Evaluation Team • • • Martha Waller, Ph. D. – mwaller@pire. org Liz Lilliott, Ph. D. – Lilliott@pire. org Lei Zhang, Ph. D. lzhang@pire. org Christina Lopez-Gutierrez- clopez@pire. org Kim Zamarin, MPH- kzamarin@pire. org

KEY STATE-WIDE SURVEY INSTRUMENTS • Baseline & Post Strategies for Success (BP SFS) • Annual Strategies for Success (ASFS) • New Mexico Community Survey • Can be found at: www. NMPrevention. org • Required for all Direct Service Providers • Collected at beginning and end of an intervention • Middle School & High School versions; 6 th – 12 th grades • Spanish & English • Required for all programs • Adults 18 and older • Collected in the spring throughout the community • English and Spanish • For Community-Based Prevention Providers (voluntary + PFS 15 counties) • Middle School & High School versions; 6 th – 12 th grades • Collected once a year • Spanish & English • Tools, syntax, data entry forms, protocols • Statewide reports for each tool (local reports only available from program

WHAT ELSE DO WE DO? (A. K. A. HOW ELSE CAN WE HELP YOU AND YOUR EVALUATOR? ) • Help you identify process and outcome indicators to measure progress in your SOW • Help you with your assessment data collection and interpretation • Focus group scripts for a variety of populations to identify contributing factors • • Help established programs polish up your OSAP reporting Provide you statewide data on NMCS and SFS for comparison Help you assess fidelity to your planned programming Help define roles and expectations between program and LE, as they vary from program to program • Help you identify new local evaluator if necessary, and train that person on OSAP roles and expectations • Help you, when stuck, in meeting your data collection needs

FISCAL YEAR 2017: NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA PRESENTATION NM OSAP Recipients Meeting August 29, 2017

FREQUENCY OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS BY SURVEY TYPE IN 2017 Survey Type N % NM Counties Represented PAPER- Convenience 7492 69. 8 32 On-line- Facebook 670 6. 2 28 Qualtrics App 788 7. 3 22 Other 1791 16. 7 31 *This represents the # of counties for both the Qualtrics App and other categories Total 10, 741 100. 0%

CONVENIENCE SAMPLE DEMOGRAPHICS: GENDER AND RACE/ETHNICITY Demographic N Actual % Census % Male 3036 41. 4 49. 1 Female 4290 58. 6 50. 9 Non-Hispanic White 2403 32. 07 42. 3 Hispanic 3316 44. 26 45. 0 Native American 1277 17. 04 8. 1 Other 496 6. 62 4. 7

CONVENIENCE SAMPLE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE Age Group N Actual % 18 -20 990 13. 2 21 -25 906 12. 1 26 -30 839 11. 2 31 -40 1289 17. 2 41 -50 1098 14. 7 51 -60 1071 14. 3 61 -70 758 10. 1 70+ 541 7. 2 Census % 5. 2 9. 3 8. 8 16. 4 14. 9 17. 4 15. 2 12. 9

FACEBOOK SAMPLE DEMOGRAPHICS: GENDER AND RACE/ETHNICITY Demographic N Actual % Census % Male 119 18. 0 49. 1 Female 542 82. 0 50. 9 Non-Hispanic White 333 49. 2 42. 3 Hispanic 294 43. 4 45. 0 Native American 25 3. 7 8. 1 Other 25 3. 7 4. 7

FACEBOOK SAMPLE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE Age Group N Actual % Census % 18 -20 20 3. 0 5. 2 21 -25 42 6. 2 9. 3 26 -30 67 9. 9 8. 8 31 -40 91 13. 4 16. 4 41 -50 117 17. 3 14. 9 51 -60 117 17. 3 17. 4 61 -70 116 17. 1 15. 2 70+ 107 15. 8 12. 9

DEMOGRAPHICS Describing the Sample

DEMOGRAPHICS: GENDER 70, 0 Actual % Weighted % 60, 3 60, 0 Percent 50, 0 40, 0 50, 9 49, 1 39, 7 30, 0 20, 0 10, 0 Male (n= 4, 177) Female (n=6, 347) Gender

DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE Actual % Weighted % 20, 0 18, 0 16, 0 15, 4 16, 3 16, 0 14, 6 Percent 14, 0 9, 3 10, 0 6, 0 14, 9 13, 6 15, 1 13, 2 12, 7 11, 1 12, 0 8, 0 17, 2 9, 3 8, 9 6, 7 5, 4 4, 0 2, 0 0, 0 18 -20 (n=1, 656) 21 -25 (n=1, 570) 26 -30 (n=1, 196) 31 -40 (n=1, 720) 41 -50 (n=1, 464) Age Range 51 -60 (n=1, 416) 61 -70 (n=998) 70+ (n=721)

DEMOGRAPHICS: RACE AND ETHNICITY 50, 0 44, 8 45, 0 44, 9 Actual % Weighted % 41, 9 40, 0 Percent 35, 0 34, 3 30, 0 25, 0 20, 0 13, 9 15, 0 8, 2 10, 0 5, 0 7, 0 5, 0 0, 0 Non-Hispanic White Hisapnic (n=4, 815) (n= 3, 686) Native American (n=1, 493) Other (n=747)

DEMOGRAPHICS: EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT 35, 0 Actual % 31, 6 Weighted % 28, 3 30, 0 25, 7 Percent 25, 0 21, 2 22, 2 21, 9 18, 8 20, 0 18, 1 15, 0 10, 0 6, 3 5, 0 0, 0 Less than High School (n=640) High School Grad/ GED (n=2, 249) Some College/ College or more Still in college Tech school (n=2, 720) (n=2, 996) (n=1, 988)

9, 0 DEMOGRAPHICS: MILITARY & LGBT STATUS Actual % Weighted % 8, 0 7, 6 7, 0 Percent 6, 0 7, 9 6, 5 5, 6 5, 0 4, 0 3, 0 2, 0 1, 0 0, 0 Military Background (n=602) LGBT (n=836)

DEMOGRAPHICS: LENGTH OF TIMING LIVING IN NM 90, 0 Actual % 83, 4 Weighted % 83, 7 80, 0 70, 0 Percent 60, 0 50, 0 40, 0 30, 0 20, 0 11, 8 4, 7 11, 5 4, 8 0, 0 Less than 1 year (n=503) 1 to 5 years (n=1, 260) More than 5 years (n=8, 876)

ALCOHOL OUTCOMES

ALCOHOL INDICATORS: WHOLE SAMPLE & GENDER Whole sample Weighted Percent 60, 0 50, 0 47, 6 Male Female 52, 5 43, 2 40, 0 30, 0 20, 0 16, 3 20, 2 12, 5 10, 0 3, 5 4, 3 2, 6 2, 8 3, 7 1, 6 3, 9 4, 5 3, 1 Past 30 -day drinking and driving*** Past 30 -day binge drinking and driving*** Past year purchased alcohol for someone under 21*** 0, 0 Past 30 -day alcohol use*** binge drinking***

ALCOHOL INDICATORS: RACE/ETHNICITY 60, 0 Weighted Percent 50, 0 40, 0 Non-Hispanic White 51, 0 46, 9 Hispanic Native American Other 45, 9 34, 9 30, 0 20, 0 19, 618, 1 12, 7 13, 8 10, 0 2, 8 3, 9 4, 5 4, 0 2, 0 3, 1 3, 7 4, 8 3, 3 4, 2 5, 1 Past 30 -day alcohol Past 30 -day binge Past year use drinking and driving purchased alcohol for someone under 21

ALCOHOL INDICATORS: AGE 70, 0 62, 6 50, 0 Weighted Percent 21 -25 57, 2 54, 2 60, 0 40, 0 18 -20 39, 7 26 -30 31 -40 41 -50 51 -60 61 -70 70+ 18 -25 54, 1 48, 6 44, 4 41, 8 34, 5 30, 3 26, 1 22, 1 18, 1 16, 4 13, 0 30, 0 25, 7 7, 9 5, 0 10, 0 12, 0 8, 4 6, 9 6, 5 4, 4 4, 02, 7 2, 12, 01, 3 6, 9 6, 0 4, 3 4, 43, 03, 1 1, 70, 90, 7 Past 30 -day drinking and driving Past 30 -day binge drinking and driving 5, 9 9, 8 3, 93, 24, 32, 7 1, 12, 4 0, 0 Past 30 -day alcohol use Past 30 -day binge drinking Past year purchased alcohol for someone under 21

ALCOHOL INDICATORS: MILITARY AND LGBT STATUS 70, 0 60, 8 Military Weighted Percent 60, 0 50, 5 LGBT All others 46, 6 40, 0 30, 0 24, 5 20, 0 15, 8 15, 7 8, 9 8, 1 10, 0 2, 6 12, 8 3, 3 3, 8 2, 3 5, 5 3, 2 0, 0 Past 30 -day alcohol use Past 30 -day binge Past year drinking and drivingdrinking and driving purchased alcohol for someone under 21

ACCESS TO ALCOHOL: 18 TO 20 YEAR OLD CURRENT DRINKERS N= 665 45, 4 Got it at a party Unrelated adult gave or bought it 39, 7 Adult family member gave or bought it 22, 4 Someone underage gave or bought it 10, 5 Parent/guardian gave or bought it 9, 3 Took it from home/someone's home 7, 8 Got it some other way 5, 8 Bought it at a restaurant/bar/public place 5, 5 0, 0 5, 0 10, 0 15, 0 20, 0 25, 0 30, 0 Weighted % 35, 0 40, 0 45, 0 50, 0

NMCS DRINKING MEASURES: TRENDS OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS 50, 0 45, 0 Weighted Percent 40, 0 45, 9 47, 5 47, 6 16, 8 16, 1 16, 3 4, 4 3, 5 4 2015 2016 2017 39, 1 35, 0 30, 0 25, 0 20, 0 18, 7 15, 0 10, 0 5, 0 0, 0 2014 NMCS Year Past 30 day drinking Past 30 day binge drinking Heavy Drinking

NMCS DRINKING MEASURES: TRENDS OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS 5, 0 4, 5 Weighted Percent 4, 0 3, 9 3, 6 3, 5 2, 9 3, 1 3, 0 2, 7 3, 5 2, 8 2, 9 2, 7 2, 0 1, 0 0, 0 2014 2015 2016 NMCS Year Past 30 day driving after having "perhaps too much to drink" Past 30 -day Binge drinking and driving Provided alcohol to a minor 2017

PRESCRIPTION PAIN KILLER OUTCOMES

RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: WHOLE SAMPLE & GENDER Whole sample Male Female Weighted Percent 35, 0 28, 0 30, 2 25, 8 21, 0 14, 0 7, 0 13, 5 13, 6 13, 2 3, 1 2, 7 0, 0 Past 30 -day prescription Past 30 -day painkiller use to Prevalence of receiving painkiller use for any reason get high prescription painkiller past year***

RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: WHOLE SAMPLE & GENDER Whole sample 100, 0 Weighted Percent 84, 1 81, 4 Male Female 87, 0 80, 0 60, 0 41, 7 40, 0 20, 0 5, 9 5, 3 39, 5 43, 6 6, 3 0, 0 Great/moderate risk of Given/shared prescription Medication locked or safely harm using Rx pain killers drugs with someone past stored away* for a non-medical reason*** year

RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: AGE RANGE 35, 0 32, 632, 3 31, 1 28, 6 30, 0 25, 3 Weighted Percent 25, 0 22, 7 21, 221, 4 21, 3 20, 0 15, 415, 7 14, 6 13, 7 12, 8 11, 9 11, 5 10, 610, 9 10, 0 5, 3 3, 6 2, 9 3, 3 5, 0 2, 8 3, 1 2, 3 2, 7 4, 2 0, 0 Past 30 -day Rx painkiller use for any Past 30 -day painkiller use to get high Past year prevalence of receiving Rx reason painkiller 18 -20 21 -25 26 -30 31 -40 41 -50 51 -60 61 -70 70+ 18 -25

100, 0 90, 0 Weighted Percent 80, 0 RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: AGE RANGE 89, 5 88, 8 86, 9 8283, 5 80, 0 78, 9 78, 0 74, 5 70, 0 60, 0 45, 3 44, 1 42, 4 41, 1 41, 2 40, 9 38, 1 40, 1 50, 0 40, 0 30, 0 20, 0 9, 27, 97, 7 7 6, 35, 3 10, 0 2, 84, 5 8, 4 0, 0 Great or moderate risk of using Rx painkillers for a non-medical reason 18 -20 21 -25 26 -30 Given or shared Rx drugs with someone 31 -40 41 -50 51 -60 61 -70 Medication locked or safely stored away 70+ 18 -25

RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: RACE/ETHNICITY Non-Hispanic White Hispanic Native American 35, 0 Other 32, 1 Weighted Percent 30, 0 24, 8 25, 0 25, 5 26, 9 20, 0 15, 0 14, 6 12, 8 11, 7 13, 7 10, 0 5, 0 2, 3 3, 7 2, 5 4, 9 0, 0 Past 30 -day prescription painkiller use Past 30 -day painkiller use to get high Prevalence of receiving prescription painkiller past year

RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: RACE/ETHNICITY Non-Hispanic White Hispanic Native American Other 100, 0 87, 0 Weighted Percent 80, 0 82, 6 79, 7 79, 8 60, 0 47, 2 40, 0 45, 0 32, 6 20, 0 5, 8 0, 0 53, 2 5, 9 7, 5 5, 7 Great or moderate risk of Given or shared Rx drugs using Rx painkillers for a non with someone -medical reason Medication locked or safely stored away

RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: ACCESS TO NALOXONE Outcomes % of No % of Yes Don’t Know When having been prescribed painkillers last year… Were prescribed naloxone as well (n=2, 753) 87. 3 4. 3 Healthcare provider/pharmacy staff talked about risks in using Rx painkillers (n=2, 565) 31. 1 68. 9 NA Healthcare provider/pharmacy staff talked about storing them safely (n=2, 466) 49. 9 50. 1 NA 79. 4 20. 6 NA Have access to naloxone when having used painkillers to get high in the past 30 days (n=334) 8. 4

RX PAINKILLER INDICATORS: MILITARY & LGBT STATUS 90 80 85, 0 Military LGBT All others 79, 4 75, 7 Weighted Percent 70 60 50 36, 2 33, 6 27, 1 40 30 20 17, 920, 0 12, 7 10 0 44, 1 40, 941, 6 12, 9 3, 5 Past 30 -day Rx painkiller use for any reason 6, 5 2, 8 6, 4 5, 5 Past 30 -day Prevalence of Great/moderate risk Given/shared Medication locked painkiller use to get receiving Rx of harm using Rx prescription drugs or safely stored high painkiller past year painkillers for a non- with someone past away medical reason year

RX PAINKILLERS: REASONS FOR USE (N=1316) 73, 2 To treat pain that my doctor or dentist identified 12, 3 For pain not identified by my physician To help me sleep 6, 8 Another reason 6, 3 5, 3 To cope with anxiety or stress 3, 1 To get high, messed up or stoned 2, 0 To have fun with a friend or friend(s) socially 0, 0 10, 0 20, 0 30, 0 40, 0 50, 0 Weighted % 60, 0 70, 0 80, 0

RX PAINKILLERS: ACCESS 81, 5 One doctor/doctors prescribed or gave to me Family member shared 6, 2 Friend shared 5, 2 Other places (e. g. , Mexico, internet) 2, 3 Bought from somebody (e. g. , friend, dealer) 2, 3 Taken from someone without asking 1, 6 0, 0 18, 0 36, 0 54, 0 Weighted % 72, 0 90, 0

NMCS RX OPIOID MEASURES: TRENDS OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS 35, 0 Wedighted Percent 30, 0 29, 5 29, 9 14, 3 15, 1 15, 6 2014 2015 2016 28, 0 25, 0 20, 0 15, 0 13, 5 10, 0 5, 0 0, 0 Past year prevalence of receiving Rx for painkillers Past 30 -day Rx painkiller use for any reason 2017

Weighted Percent NMCS RX OPIOID MEASURES: TRENDS OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS 90, 0 80, 0 70, 0 60, 0 50, 0 40, 0 30, 0 20, 0 10, 0 85, 7 81, 9 85, 0 37, 2 38, 2 6, 5 6, 0 84, 1 56, 3 5, 6 41, 7 5, 9 2014 2015 2016 2017 Perceived moderate or great risk of harm of misusing Rx painkillers Sharing or giving Rx painkillers in past year Rx painkillers stored inlocked box or cabinet*

NMCS RX OPIOID MEASURES: TRENDS OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS 30, 0 27, 6 25, 0 Weighted Percent 25, 0 22, 1 20, 0 15, 0 10, 0 12, 9 All Respondents Current users 6, 6 5, 0 2, 8 3, 9 3, 1 2016 2017 0, 0 2014 2015 Past 30 -day Rx opioid use to get high

TOBACCO INDICATORS: WHOLE SAMPLE & GENDER Whole sample 30, 0 Weighted Percent 25, 0 20, 0 15, 0 Women 26, 2 22, 6 22, 1 18, 4 17, 3 13, 0 10, 7 8, 5 10, 0 5, 0 Men 7, 8 5, 0 4, 5 1, 0 2, 5 1, 6 0, 0 Any current E-vapor product cigarette use*** chewing tobacco lifetime use*** past 30 -day use*** Past year purchased tobacco for someone under 18

TOBACCO INDICATORS: AGE 30, 0 26, 9 Weighted Percent 25, 0 20, 0 22, 8 17, 8 20, 9 19, 0 15, 0 12, 8 9, 0 10, 0 5, 0 3, 94, 1 5, 5 2, 2 6, 1 6, 6 1, 5 7, 0 2, 3 3, 8 2, 3 2, 52, 0 0, 0 18 -20 21 -25 26 -30 31 -40 41 -50 51 -60 Any current cigarette use Any current chewing tobacco use Past year purchased tobacco for someone under 18 61 -70 7, 5 0, 0 70+

TOBACCO INDICATORS: AGE 50, 0 45, 0 43, 3 43, 2 39, 0 Weighted Percent 40, 0 35, 0 30, 0 25, 0 20, 0 24, 8 19, 5 16, 2 15, 0 12, 3 10, 0 11, 9 6, 7 6, 3 5, 0 1, 5 1, 9 3, 7 2, 1 1, 2 41 -50 51 -60 61 -70 70+ 0, 0 18 -20 21 -25 26 -30 E-vapor product lifetime use 31 -40 E-vapor product past 30 -day use

TOBACCO INDICATORS: RACE AND ETHNICITY 30, 0 24, 6 22, 5 21, 7 21, 5 Weighted Percent 25, 0 20, 0 15, 0 17, 9 13, 2 12, 8 10, 0 3, 8 5, 0 4, 9 10, 6 8, 0 7, 4 6, 5 7, 1 3, 0 1, 1 2, 6 2, 3 0, 0 Any current cigarette use Any current E-vapor product chewing tobacco lifetime use past 30 -day use Non-Hispanic White Hispanic Native American Other Past year purchased tobacco for someone under 18

TOBACCO INDICATORS: MILITARY & LGBT STATUS 45, 0 39, 2 Weighted Percent 40, 0 Military LGBT All Others 35, 0 30, 0 27, 6 25, 0 20, 0 16, 4 18, 2 16, 8 15, 0 21, 1 16, 5 13, 4 7, 6 10, 0 3, 7 5, 0 4, 2 7, 4 1, 8 3, 4 1, 9 0, 0 Any current cigarette use Any current E-vapor product chewing tobacco lifetime use past 30 -day use Past year purchased tobacco for someone under 18

MENTAL HEALTH OUTCOMES

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: WHOLE SAMPLE & GENDER Whole sample Weighted Percent 20, 0 17, 8 Men Women 18, 9 16, 5 16, 0 14, 7 12, 0 8, 7 8, 0 15, 8 13, 7 9, 3 4, 9 5, 4 4, 3 5, 1 5, 0 5, 1 4, 0 0, 0 Met critical threshold for serious mental illness Having mental Suicidal thoughts Sought help on Difficulty health or in the past year mental health or assessing mental drug/alcohol health or problems in the substance abuse past year* past year treatment

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: WHOLE SAMPLE & GENDER 16, 0 Weighted Percent Whole sample Men 13, 8 Women 11, 8 12, 0 10, 0 8, 0 5, 5 6, 5 4, 4 3, 6 4, 0 3, 6 0, 0 Past year screened for alcohol or drug problems Past year screened for depression Past year screened for suicidal ideation

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: AGE 35, 0 30, 9 28, 2 Weighted Percent 30, 0 25, 0 22, 6 20, 0 15, 0 10, 0 5, 0 29, 2 20, 5 20, 8 18, 7 16, 8 13, 8 10, 9 13, 3 9, 59, 3 7, 8 5, 85, 3 3, 4 12, 3 9, 3 7, 5 5, 46, 35, 5 3, 3 2, 0 0, 7 7, 0 0, 0 Met critical threshold for serious mental illness Having mental health, drug or Suicidal thoughts in the past alcohol problems in the past year 18 -20 31 -40 21 -25 26 -30 41 -50 51 -60 61 -70 70+ 18 -25

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: AGE 25, 0 Weighted Percent 20, 0 19, 6 18, 7 19, 1 17, 717, 9 15, 8 15, 0 11, 511, 3 10, 0 7, 6 7, 3 5, 8 7, 2 5, 0 7, 3 6, 2 4, 1 2, 5 1, 2 0, 0 Sought help on mental health or drug/alcohol problems in the past year 18 -20 21 -25 26 -30 31 -40 41 -50 Difficulty assessing mental health or substance abuse treatment 51 -60 61 -70 70+ 18 -25

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: AGE 16, 0 14, 1 14, 5 13, 1 14, 0 11, 5 10, 7 12, 0 Weighted Percent 12, 4 11, 3 11, 0 10, 0 8, 0 6, 0 7, 37, 5 6, 8 6, 1 5, 1 4, 2 5, 9 5, 5 5, 2 4, 0 4, 74, 65, 1 2, 8 1, 7 2, 0 2, 92, 6 3, 7 1, 1 0, 0 Past year screened for alcohol or drug problems 18 -20 21 -25 26 -30 Past year screened for depression 31 -40 41 -50 51 -60 Past year screened for suicidal ideation 61 -70 70+ 18 -25

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: RACE & ETHNICITY Non-Hispanic White Weighted Percent 20, 0 Hispanic Native American 18, 1 18, 5 17, 2 16, 0 14, 1 12, 0 8, 0 4, 0 9, 5 7, 4 Other 16, 3 15, 1 12, 7 11, 1 8, 4 4, 9 5, 0 4, 6 4, 1 4, 5 5, 1 6, 2 7, 3 0, 0 Met critial Having mental Suicidal thoughts Sought help on Difficulty threshold for health, drug or in the past year mental health or assessing mental serious mental alcohol problems drug/alcohol health or illness in the past year problems in the substance abuse past year treatment

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: RACE & ETHNICITY 14, 0 13, 1 11, 3 Weighted Percent 12, 0 10, 8 10, 4 10, 0 8, 2 8, 0 6, 6 5, 1 4, 9 4, 3 4, 0 3, 9 4, 3 2, 8 2, 0 0, 0 Past year screened for alcohol or drug problems Non-Hispanic White Past year screened for depression Hispanic Native American Past year screened for suicidal ideation Other

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: MILITARY & LGBT 50 44, 6 45 Military Weighted Percent 40 LGBT 34, 6 35 30 25 18, 0 20 14, 2 15 10 5 17, 5 16, 4 16, 2 12, 8 13, 6 8, 4 4, 1 4, 2 4, 1 4, 8 4, 2 0 Met critical threshold for serious mental illness Having mental Suicidal thoughts Sought help on Difficulty health, drug or in the past year mental health or assessing mental alcohol problems drug/alcohol health or in the past year problems in the substance abuse past year treatment

MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: MILITARY & LGBT 30, 0 25, 9 Military Weighted Percent 25, 0 20, 0 16, 5 15, 0 10, 0 5, 0 LGBT 12, 6 10, 8 8, 6 7, 2 4, 6 4, 1 3, 2 0, 0 Past year screened for alcohol or drug problems Past year screened for depression Past year screened for suicidal ideation

Weighted Percent MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS: TRENDS 20, 0 18, 0 16, 0 14, 0 12, 0 10, 0 8, 0 6, 0 4, 0 2, 0 0, 0 17, 8 17, 6 15, 7 13, 4 8, 7 5, 1 4, 9 2017 7, 5 5, 4 2016 5, 4 4, 6 7, 5 5, 4 4, 2 4, 1 2015 2014 Needing but not receiving treatment Frequent Mental Distress/Serious Mental Illness Past year any mental illness/substance use problem

RECOGNIZING A DOSE OF RXEALITY 80, 0 75, 9 74, 7 74, 3 Whole sample Male Female 5, 14, 65, 6 5, 95, 66, 1 Suck It Up! Good Drugs Parents Gone Bad Who Host Lose the Most A Dose of Rxeality Weighted Percent 60, 0 40, 0 20, 0 3, 33, 72, 7 3, 23, 13, 2 1, 81, 71, 8 3, 13, 42, 6 0, 0 Up and Wake Up I've never Away and Now heard of any Out of Sight of these

RECOGNIZING THE MEANING OF A DOSE OF RXEALITY 80, 0 Weighted Percent Whole sample 69, 1 65, 3 61, 6 70, 0 Male Female 60, 0 50, 0 40, 0 30, 0 20, 0 14, 4 12, 7 11 10, 0 4, 1 4, 5 3, 5 4, 2 4, 9 3, 4 11, 2 10, 7 10, 2 3, 1 3, 4 2, 7 0, 0 Stay in school Prescription if you want to drugs can be be successful. dangerous if not used as intended Reality is Daily exercise Take your harsh, but is good for medication as medication your health. directed by can help. your doctor. Vaccinate your kids.

FISCAL YEAR 17: ANNUAL STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS PRELIMINARY RESULTS NM OSAP Recipients Meeting August 29, 2017

MIDDLE SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC: I Demographic information Overall Boys Girls Number of participants 3, 254 1, 569 1, 638 Mean Range 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or over 12. 8 10 -16 n 1 326 917 1175 721 80 7 12. 9 10 -16 % 0. 1 9. 8 26. 1 36. 7 24. 2 2. 9 0. 4 12. 7 10 -16 % 0. 0 10. 3 30. 7 36. 4 20. 4 2. 1 0. 1 5 th grade 6 th grade 7 th grade 8 th grade 5 806 1207 1191 0. 2 24. 6 37. 1 37. 9 0. 1 25. 7 37. 9 36. 2 Age Grade

MIDDLE SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC: II Demographic information Overall Boys Girls n % % White 827 26. 5 24. 5 Hispanic 2013 60. 7 63. 9 Native American 171 5. 6 5. 0 Other 243 7. 1 6. 6 1, 131 34. 0 36. 5 Race/Ethnicity Language Other than English Spoken Often at Home Number of Spanish Surveys 17

MIDDLE SCHOOL : LIFETIME ALCOHOL & MARIJUANA USE 35, 0 28, 0 32, 3 25, 7 21, 1 21, 0 Percent 24, 3 26, 1 15, 7 14, 0 16, 5 14, 0 14, 7 14, 0 7, 0 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected Annual SFS: Alcohol Annual SFS: Marijuana NM YRRS: Alcohol NM YRRS: Marijuana 2017

MIDDLE SCHOOL : CURRENT CIGARETTE USE 8, 0 5, 9 Percent 6, 0 4, 6 4, 8 4, 0 4, 4 4, 1 4, 3 3, 0 3, 2 3, 1 2, 0 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected Annual SFS: Cigarettes Annual SFS: Chewing Tobacco NM YRRS: Cigarettes NM YRRS: Chewing Tobacco 2017

MIDDLE SCHOOL: CURRENT ALCOHOL USE 18, 0 15, 5 16, 0 14, 0 Percent 12, 0 9, 2 10, 0 8, 5 9, 7 8, 0 5, 4 6, 0 4, 0 5, 0 3, 9 9, 8 4, 7 2, 0 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected Annual SFS: Alcohol Annual SFS: Binge Drinking NM YRRS: Alcohol NM YRRS: Binge Drinking 2017

MIDDLE SCHOOL: CURRENT OTHER DRUG USE 14, 0 12, 0 11, 9 10, 2 9, 0 Percent 10, 0 8, 0 7, 9 9, 0 6, 0 4, 0 3, 1 2, 5 2, 3 2, 8 2, 0 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected 2017 Annual SFS: Marijuana Annual SFS: Painkiller to get High NM YRRS: Marijuana NM YRRS: Painkiller to get high

HIGH SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC: I Demographic information Overall Boys Girls 3, 811 1, 938 1, 833 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 or over 15. 9 12 -18 n 14 15 517 1017 817 401 15. 9 12 -18 % 0. 4 12. 4 25. 2 27. 4 22. 7 11. 5 15. 8 12 -18 % 0. 2 0. 4 14. 7 28. 4 26. 3 20. 5 9. 5 8 th grade 9 th grade 10 th grade 11 th grade 34 1, 165 1, 017 933 1. 0 29. 8 25. 8 0. 8 31. 5 28. 0 23. 6 Number of participants Age Mean Range Grade

HIGH SCHOOL DEMOGRAPHIC: II Demographic information Overall Boys Girls n % % White 1, 076 29. 4 27. 3 Hispanic 2, 329 59. 0 63. 9 Native American 136 4. 2 2. 8 Other 270 7. 3 6. 0 1, 275 32. 7 34. 9 Identify as LGBT 357 6. 0 14. 0 Have a long-term disability 454 10. 3 17. 3 Race/Ethnicity Language Other than English Spoken Often at Home Number of Spanish Surveys 14

HIGH SCHOOL: CURRENT CIGARETTE AND ECIGARETTE USE 30, 0 27, 5 24, 0 25, 0 22, 2 Percent 20, 0 15, 0 14, 4 11, 4 10, 0 10, 3 9, 2 11, 2 5, 0 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected Annual SFS: Cigarettes Annual SFS: E-Cigarettes NM YRRS: E-Cigarettes 2017

HIGH SCHOOL: CURRENT CHEWING TOBACCO AND HOOKAH USE 25, 0 21, 9 Percent 20, 0 15, 0 10, 0 11, 9 8, 0 9, 5 8, 7 5, 0 8, 4 8, 1 7, 3 7, 0 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected Annual SFS: Chewing Tobacco Annual SFS: Hookah NM YRRS: Chewing Tobacco NM YRRS: Hookah 2017

HIGH SCHOOL: CURRENT ALCOHOL USE 35, 0 30, 0 28, 9 26, 1 26, 5 Percent 25, 0 20, 0 17, 1 15, 0 23, 7 14, 6 13, 7 10, 0 5, 0 25, 0 12, 2 11, 5 6, 3 4, 0 3, 6 6, 3 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected 2017 Annual SFS: Alcohol Annual SFS: Binge Drinking Annual SFS: Extreme Binge Drinking NM YRRS: Alcohol NM YRRS: Binge Drinking NM YRRS: Extreme Binge Drinking

30, 0 HIGH SCHOOL: CURRENT OTHER DRUG USE 27, 8 25, 3 25, 0 24, 1 22, 2 23, 9 Percent 20, 0 15, 0 10, 0 8, 5 7, 9 5, 1 4, 8 5, 0 3, 8 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected 2017 Annual SFS: Marijuana Annual SFS: Painkiller to get high NM YRRS: Marijuana NM YRRS: Painkiller to get high

HIGH SCHOOL: DRINKING AND DRIVING 35, 0 27, 8 28, 0 22, 5 19, 7 Percent 21, 0 18, 1 16, 4 14, 0 8, 9 7, 0 7, 4 5, 7 5, 6 7, 0 0, 0 2013 2015 2016 Year data were collected 2017 Annual SFS: Rode with drunk driver Annual SFS: Drink and drive NM YRRS: Rode with drunk driver NM YRRS: Drink and Drive