BReg DCATAP DCAT Application profile for Base Registries
BReg. DCAT-AP DCAT Application profile for Base Registries in Europe WG Meeting 16 Sep 2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate - General Informatics Directorate D – Digital Services DIGIT D 2 – Interoperability Unit Specific Contract n° 157 under ABC IV – Lot 3 Framework Contract Access to Base Registries ISA 2 action 2016. 28 Project Officer: Peter Burian
Disclaimer The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this document. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on the European Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. © European Union, 2019 2
Working Group Meeting - 16 September 2019 • Introductions • Open Issues • Editor’s Draft • Next Steps • AOB 3
BReg. DCAT-AP Around the table… NEW PARTICIPANTS? 4
OPEN ISSUES 5
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) To include a way to describe that a piece of information is authoritative. 1. A new property for Data Elements Range: boolean 2. Reuse of dct: conforms. To 3. Reuse of dqv: has. Quality. Annotation and dqv: Quality. Policy 6
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 1: A new property for Data Elements Range: boolean pros cons Easy to implement Semantics: different criteria on what is. Authoritative means for different organisations (e. g. , a telecom regulator authority receives information from private entities) New property to be created (not included in DCAT) 7
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 2: Reuse of dct: conforms. To 8
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 2: Reuse of dct: conforms. To 9
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 2: Reuse of dct: conforms. To e. g. , created by a third party 10
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 2: Reuse of dct: conforms. To Mapping 11
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 2: Reuse of dct: conforms. To pros cons Part of DCAT-AP We need to create a common definition of ‘authoritative data’ (dct: Standard) Universal (applicable to all cases) 12
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 3: Reuse of dqv: has. Quality. Annotation and ldqd: trustworthiness : my. Dataset a dcat: Dataset ; dqv: has. Quality. Annotation : authoritativeness. Certificate. Quality Certificate : authoritativeness. Certificate a dqv: Quality. Certificate ; oa: has. Body : is. Authoritative; oa: motivated. By dqv: quality. Assessment ; dqv: in. Dimension ldqd: trustworthiness. Contextual quality dimension : is. Authoritative a skos: Concept ; skos: pref. Label ”Data is authoritative"@en ; skos: definition "Dataset maintained by an EU Member State…. "@en. . 13
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #02: property 'is. Authoritative’ (REOPENED) OPTION 3: Reuse of dqv: has. Quality. Annotation and ldqd: trustworthiness pros cons Standard way to describe quality ? of assets 14
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #05: Content of Datasets Description Challenge: To describe the atomic parts of datasets, indicating the specific topics and if the elements of the dataset are authoritative. • OPTION 1: Data. Source/Data. Element 15
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #05: Content of Datasets Description OPTION 1: Data. Source/Data. Element pros cons Running example in BE Classes not included in DCAT Dataset -> theme(s) Data. Element -> type(s) 16
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #05: Content of Datasets Description OPTION 2: Dataset has. Part Dataset Implementing DCAT-AP 17
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #05: Content of Datasets Description OPTION 2: Dataset has. Part Dataset pros cons Existing property Dataset -> theme(s) (atomic) Dataset -> theme Compatible with all DCAT-APs 18
BReg. DCAT-AP Issue #06: Quality of Datasets Proposal to define quality of data (optionally): • Dataset dqv: has. Quality. Measurement to indicate completeness. E. g. , o “ 2% items missing in the dataset” o Measurement of dqv: Metric defined as “rate of missing items” • Dataset has one (or more) quality annotations to indicate completeness: o dqv: has. Quality. Annotation, range dqv: Quality. Annotation. o E. g. , “ 98% completeness”. • Dataset conforms to one (or more) quality specifications (dct: conforms. To) • Dataset has feedback from users. 19
BReg. DCAT-AP Editor’s Draft v 0. 07(docx) 20
BReg. DCAT-AP NEXT STEPS 21
BReg. DCAT-AP Next steps • The 9 th of October – presentation in public ABR Webinar on Framework on Base Registry Access and Interconnection • Mid. October: Iteration on the draft with your comments, Last WG meeting for the final comments and endorsement November 2019 DCAT-AP v 2 Major Release 22
BReg. DCAT-AP AOB 23
- Slides: 23