Benefits and opportunities for applying Integrated Management System

Benefits and opportunities for applying Integrated Management System (IMS) strategies in the nuclear industry Kevin Gribbin Director, Integrated Management Systems Intergraph – Process, Power and Marine Sunday, October 31, 2021

Difference Between Winning & Losing § “Virtually everything in business today is an undifferentiated commodity except how a company manages its information. How you manage information determines whether you win or lose” § PAGE 2 PRESENTATION TITLE - Bill Gates, CEO Microsoft

Deliverables § Documents § Many sources – Consortium members, vendors, partners, suppliers………. § Many formats – some intelligent, some not…. . § Drawings § Many sources………. . § Fewer formats……. . § Data § § § PAGE 3 PRESENTATION TITLE Many sources…. One format Persistent – is not format and version dependent

The ‘Real’ Issues § Documents and Data § Data Longevity § Data Access § Data Tracking § Data Conversion § Data Integrity § Data Revision § Data Version § Data Integration § Data Status § Data Exchange § Data Transport § Data Management § Data Quality § Data Concurrency § Data Sharing § Data Replication § Data Synchronization § Data Security § Data Archive § Data Retention § Data Disposition. . . etc. • Cost of data - known? • Value of data - often neglected PAGE 4 PRESENTATION TITLE

Time and Technology Demand File Management File/Doc/Data Management CAD Intelligent CAD Data Centric Word Processing Document Processing Data Processing d n a m e D n o i t a Integr ‘ 70 s PAGE 5 ‘ 80 s PRESENTATION TITLE ‘ 90 s ‘ 01 ‘ 02 ‘ 04 ‘ 06 ‘ 08 . . .

Why Integration vs Automation § Guidelines for Specifying Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering Applications for Electric Power Plants. §EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) report NP-5159 M, Research Project 2514 -3, May 1987 PAGE 6 PRESENTATION TITLE

Relative Annual Savings From Automation and Integration at an Average Nuclear Power Plant Data set savings Automation savings Integration savings Delta x increase in savings between automation and integration Equipment Tagout $69, 000 $124, 000 1. 79 x Valve Index $21, 600 $167, 600 7. 76 x Instrument Identification $17, 800 $135, 100 7. 59 x Motor Index $15, 200 $123, 100 8. 09 x Piping Index $12, 000 $84, 400 7. 03 x Action Request $12, 100 $44, 200 3. 65 x Commitment Tracking $5, 000 $14, 900 2. 98 x Circuit Breaker Index $5, 000 $37, 700 7. 54 x EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) report NP-5159 M, Research Project 2514 -3, May 1987 PAGE 7 PRESENTATION TITLE

Affect on RAM (Reliability, Availability and Maintainability) by re-using the data more than once in other activities § example equipment valve specs and associated activities § [including: - performance monitor, performance analysis, reliability assurance, reactor safety, incident investigation, industrial safety assurance and analysis, valve/valve operator maintenance, maintenance procedure development, equipment history analysis, operational procedure development, emergency operations, operating experience evaluation] § yielded an annual cost saving of $8 M alone (in 1987!). EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) report NP-5159 M, Research Project 2514 -3, May 1987 PAGE 8 PRESENTATION TITLE

Why Integration vs Automation § AUTOMATION: computerizing data and tasks for use within a single activity or department. § INTEGRATION: computerizing data transfer among multiple activities, departments or companies. PAGE 9 PRESENTATION TITLE

Point to Point Integration Application ‘A’ What? When? Application ‘B’ Why? Application ‘C’ To whom? Application ‘E’ Application ‘F’ Application ‘G’ l Incompatible Formats l Inconsistent Data Duplication l Poor Information Integrity l Complex Change Mgmt l No Auditability l who / what / when Need to know? Application ‘D’ PAGE 10 PRESENTATION TITLE Application ‘H’ l Geometric IT Cost Curve

Integrated Management System l Single Format for Exchange Application ‘A’ Application l Single Source of “Truth” ‘E’ l Simpler Change Mgmt Application ‘B’ IMS Application ‘C’ Application l Lower Integration Costs ‘F’ l One-Time Data Entry l Audit Trail Application ‘G’ l Modular Integration for Gradual Evolutionary Growth Application ‘D’ PAGE 11 PRESENTATION TITLE Application ‘H’ l Lower licensing and training cost

Engineering data in Operations spreads across multiple plant operational systems and time domains Extended Supply Chain ERP Supply Chain Product / plant Lifecycle mgmt Enterprise Plant Production Unit Specialty Quality Admin Batch Mgt In Process Testing SCADA SPC / Trends Production Process Machine Data Capture Control Logic EDMS Process Automation Supply Chain Procurement Chemistry Mgt Process Planning Optimisation Data Historian MES CRM Financials Plant Centric ERP Product Specs Trading Exchange FCP Factory Schedule LIMS Reliability monitoring & optimization OO “where time IN market is imperative” Machine Process Work Order Plant Production Business Supply Customer Logic Operations Schedule Process Chain Control Mgt Execution Original diagram source courtesy: AMR Research PAGE 12 PRESENTATION TITLE

Benefits for the Plant Operations and Maintenance § Facilitate longer production runs §Can you cut Time-to-KW? §The benefit is profit margin on additional production §What is value of larger market share § Cut plant down-time with IIM and project management §Cut non-productive time §Opportunity for integration of engineering data with planned maintenance PAGE 13 PRESENTATION TITLE

Cost vs. Benefits § Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary §From Document, to Asset, to Data Centric §Value-add Now vs. Bet your business for future gain § Base on ROI vs. absolute cost §What is the cost of not doing? §Exercise a “Business Appraisal” to determine Metrics and Measurement §Generate more KW’s §Make money vs. Save money PAGE 14 PRESENTATION TITLE

Question/Answer PAGE 15 PRESENTATION TITLE