BAY TEAM 2002 Architect Angela Ribas Engineer Matthias

BAY TEAM 2002 Architect: Angela Ribas Engineer: Matthias Niebling Construction Manager: Kevin Coyne UC Berkeley Bauhaus-University Weimar, Germany Stanford University Product Manager: Torsten Schluesselburg Owner: David Steinbach FH Aargau, Switzerland Weimar, Germany MEMBERS

• BAY AREA / SAN FRANCISCO • UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO • MAIN CAMPUS AT FULTON STREET SURROUNDING: • GOLDEN GATE PARK (HUGE GREEN AREA) • RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD • HILL AREA CAMPUS LOCATION

GOLDEN GATE AVE. N FULTON STREET CAMPUS VIEW

N AREATEXTURES ANALYSIS

N SITE PANORAMIC VIEW • FLAT GROUND • FACING FULTON STREET SITE MAP BUILDING LOCATION

FOREST PLAZA Matrix $5. 9 Mil $6. 8 Mil PROS: A • Daylight / Green area inside • Owners preference • More unusual design E • Large glass facade • Interesting structure C • Construction Sequencing • EBF system is cost efficient CONS: A • More conventional design • Extended footprint E • Relatively simple box - structure • Interesting structure and details C • Retractable roof/Glass facade costly • Base Isolation System costly DECISION MATRIX

FOREST A_First concept “AN OPEN AND FRIENDLY SPACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN INTERACT” CORE VIEW DESIGN CONCEPT

N Large classrooms Computer room Mechanical room Technical support Storage Restrooms Auditorium PLAN BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN

N Seminar rooms Small classrooms Large classrooms Restrooms PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN

N Faculty office Student office Instructional lab Seminar rooms Small classrooms Storage Restrooms SECOND FLOOR PLAN

N Chair’s office Faculty lounge Secretaries ADM offices Faculty office THIRD FLOOR Restrooms PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN

N C B B A A C SECTION AA SECTION BB SECTION CC SECTIONS

NORTH FACADE EAST FACADE SOUTH FACADE WEST FACADE 3 -D FACADES

LOUVERS GLASS SECTION VERTICAL / HORIZONTAL LOUVER DETAIL

EVALUATION

All members: Grade 50 steel 180 x 10 [mm] HEB 340 HEB 260 HEB 240 Concrete Walls: 30 cm STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

HEA 220 HEB 300 HEB 340 10, 16 m 30, 48 m 10, 16 m GRAVITY SYSTEM

Concrete Walls: 30 cm Q 180 x 10 [mm] HEB 240 O 457 x 10 [mm] GRAVITY SYSTEM

780 k. Nm 480 k. Nm 150 k. Nm Moments My (design) according to the ASCE Standard including: 1. 2 D + 1. 0 E + 0. 5 L + 0. 2 S MOMENT DIAGRAM

250 k. N 150 k. N Screws: M 20, 5. 6 CONNECTION DETAILS

Symmetrical Lateral System LATERAL SYSTEM

Ground Plate: 40 cm FOUNDATION

Maximum Deformation: 2. 8 cm EARTHQUAKE-DEFORMATION

1, 80 m 400 x 60 x 10 [mm] Max. 9 mm Max. 560 mm 1800 x 200 x 10 [mm] 1, 80 m 2, 50 m Frequency: 10, 6 Hz Frequency: 1, 25 Hz Structural System of the Staircase STAIRCASE

HEB 300 STAIRCASE LOCATION

Moment: 58, 4 k. N Shear: 30, 9 k. N Lever arm: 19 cm N= +/- 315 k. N Screws: M 22, 8. 8 pre-tensioned STAIRCASE CONNECTION DETAILS

ROOF DETAIL

Q 120 x 4. 5 mm Q 60 x 4. 0 mm Q 100 x 4. 0 mm STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONSYSTEM DETAIL

A E C Framework Truss in the Main Facade Use joists (cost) Gravity deformations are too big ` Use 4 cables to hold each joist up Cables are too expensive, no benefit compared to 3 D-Truss satisfies load requirements STRUCTURAL TRUSS ITERATION

Existing Buildings Fulton street Site Access (Fulton Project Office Material Laydown & Storage Crane Building Perimeter Site Plan

EXCAVATION: • 18’ Hard Strata SUPERSTRUCTURE: • Steel Moment Frame • Cast-in-Place Composite Concrete/Steel Floor System FOUNDATION: • Poured Reinforced Concrete Mat Slab w/ 4 Interior Column Footings EXTERIOR FACADE: • Hollow-Core Concrete Panels • Glass/Louver Curtain Wall System Materials and Methods

Construction Method Pros/Cons

Schedule Duration = 9 months Start: 9/20/2015 – End: 7/7/2016 MILESTONE #1: 3/01/16 – Foundation Complete MILESTONE #2: 5/10/16 – Shell Complete MILESTONE #3: 9/30/16 – Move-In Schedule

Total: $5, 423, 956 Per Square Foot: $164. 4 Cost

MEP/Life-Cycle Cost

4 -D Model

TEAM INTERACTION / OUTPUT W L BO SH #2 FI ES N EN AL TA TI O N PR FI N O . Q #1 R TI TA EN TE IN W FF -O W L BO SH ES PR FI K C KI

- Great learning experience - Other cultures - Different ways of working - Other disciplines - Kick off - Software solutions - Good mix between disciplinary, bi- disciplinary and multi disciplinary work ADVANTAGES

- Group space ADVANTAGES (ctd. )

- Group space - Very effective - Easy access - Expandable - Granularity - Inventory file ADVANTAGES (ctd. )

- Information Gathering - Information Technology - Geography PROBLEMS / DIFFICULTIES

The discussion forum should be used more often Heavy initial use of discussion forum was lessened for a reliance on Email. We should announce team-meetings (with all the members) once a week Discussing Discussion with everybody everyone (otherdisciplines)bringsan animproved learning experience. The notification mechanism should be improved Importance of knowing if an email, attachment arrived and was useful. Process Improvement

THANKS TO: • All the mentors of the AEC program • Humberto Cavallin Architect Robert Alvarado Architect Daniel Gonzales • Dr. Greg Luth Prof. Frank Werner Prof. Juergen Ruth • ECW Weimar BGS Ingenieursozietaet Weimar Infograph Software Solutions THANK YOU