Aug 2010 doc IEEE 802 15 doc Project

<Aug 2010> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> Project: IEEE P 802. 15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for comments on section 10. 11. 4. 3, Differential PSK with spreading] Date Submitted: [August 2010] Source: [Kiran Bynam] Company [Samsung Electronics] Address [Bagmane Tech Park, Block-B, Bangalore, India] Voice: [+91 -80 -41819999], FAX: [+91 -80 -41819000], E-Mail: [kiran. bynam@samsung. com] Re: [Proposed Resolution of D 0 Comment S 10 -430] Abstract: [Comment resolution] Purpose: [To change the text and euqations as per the IEEE normative text policies] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P 802. 15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P 802. 15. Submission Slide 1 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> Proposed Resolution of D 0 Comment S 10 -430 Kiran Bynam Submission Slide 2 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> D 0 Comment S 10 -430 • Comment: Link to PSDU timing parameters is not clear • Sub-clause 10. 11. 4. 3, page 182, Line 3 • Resolution Proposed: Give a write up in PSDU timing parameters saying that 6, 7 (R 0, R 1, R 2) data rates use the section 10. 11. 4. 3 Submission Slide 3 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> Proposed Resolution(s) • Please add the following line in section 10. 10, page 173, Line 12 – The Modulation for the data rates represented by 3 bits (R 0, R 1, R 2) as 0 to 5 shall be as defined in 10. 11. 4. 1. The Modulation for the data rates represented by 3 bits (R 0, R 1, R 2) as 6 to 7 shall be as defined in 10. 11. 4. 3. Submission Slide 4 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> D 0 Comment S 10 -426 • Comment: Understanding of the scheme not clear • Sub-clause 10. 11. 4. 3, page 182, Line 3 • Resolution Proposed: Can be explained with diagram Submission Slide 5 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> Proposed Resolutions • Please add this figure in 10. 11. 4. 3 SHR+PSDU Submission Spreaded DBPSK/ DQPSK Pulse Shaping Slide 6 RF Front end <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> D 0 Comment S 10 -555 • Comment: Modify eq. accordingly. • Sub-clause 10. 11. 4. 3, page 181, Line 17 • Resolution proposed – 1. h should be written in a way consistent with 10. 11. 2 - h^{(m)}. – 2. k should be omitted, since there is no mention, yet alone definition, of other BANs hopping sequences. The standard is dealing with only one BAN. – 3. T_w should multiply h^{(m)} in order for (90) to be correct. Submission Slide 7 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> Proposed Resolutions • Replace the equation 90 with following • and sentence “ is time hopping sequence of kth BAN” as hopping sequence” at Submission Slide 8 is time <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> D 0 Comment s 10 -633, S 10 -634 • Comment: specify barker sequence • Sub-clause 10. 11. 4. 3, page 182, Line 2 Submission Slide 9 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> Proposed Resolutions • Replace the text “b(i) is Barker code of length NB” with • Barker sequence “b(i) is [1 1 1 -1 -1] of length 7 (NB) “ Submission Slide 10 <author>, <company>

doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> S 10 -196, s 10 -314, s 10 -398 • Comment: "Seq_m" is not the best notation. Also Barker sequence should be explicitly specified in equation 90, 91, 92 in page 181, 182 Submission

doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -<doc#> Resolution • Seqm(i) to be replaced by sm(i) • Replace Seq-1(i) =1 , for all I with s-1 =[1 -1 1] Submission