Attachment Theory Dr K A Korb University of

Attachment Theory Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Background • John Bowlby observed orphaned infants after World War II (1940 s) – Concluded that early social attachment between an infant and a caretaker is essential for normal social development – Determined that babies and mothers have an innate tendency to form an attachment • Mary Ainsworth continued Bowlby’s research – Proposed that infants’ attachment to a caregiver differs in the degree of security in the attachment – Differences in security of attachment influence personality and social relationships in infancy and beyond Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Attachment Theory • Infants need a “secure base” (i. e. are able to trust) their primary caregiver – A Secure Attachment leads to subsequent healthy development – An Insecure Attachment leads to unhealthy development • Attachment style affects relationships throughout life Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Attachment Theory • Secure base: A responsive caregiver provides security to explore the environment – If the caregiver’s responses to the child’s needs are appropriate, then the child will feel confident to explore a strange environment, occasionally returning to the caregiver for confirmation – If the caregiver’s responses to the child are inappropriate, the child becomes insecure and are less likely to use the caregiver as a base for exploring a strange environment • Caregiver – Typically the infant’s mother – May include others who respond to an infant’s needs Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Methodology • Strange Situation: Experimental task for infants – Infant, parent, and experimenter go into a laboratory room – Eight episodes of about three minutes apiece are used to determine the security of the infant’s attachment to the parent • Secure Attachment: Explore environment with parent, distressed when parent leaves, delighted when parent returns • Insecure Attachment – Resistant: Clings to parent, cries when the parent leaves, angry when returns – Avoidant: Not care if mother leaves and ignores the parent upon return Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

From Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, &Wall (1978) Strange Situation Event Attachment Issue 1 Parent and baby enter playroom. 2 Parent sits quietly while baby plays. Parent as secure base for exploration 3 Stranger enters and talks with parent. Baby’s response to new adult 4 Parent leaves the room. Baby is alone with the stranger. Baby’s response to separation 5 Parent returns. Stranger leaves. Baby’s response to reunion 6 Parent leaves. Baby alone in the room. Baby’s response to separation 7 Stranger enters and offers comfort. Baby’s ability to accept comfort from a stranger 8 Parent returns and offers comfort if needed and tries to get the baby to play. Baby’s response to reunion Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Attachment Styles • Securely Attached: Belief that the caregiver will protect and provide for them – Explores the environment with the parent – Might protest separation from parent but smiles more often when the parent is present – Shows pleasure at reunion with parent – 65% of middle-class American infants • Insecure-Avoidant: Belief that the caregiver will not protect or provide. The caregiver is not a safe haven in stressful circumstances – Does not protest at parent’s departure – Responds the same to the stranger and the parent, or more positively to the stranger – Avoid parent upon return – 20% of middle-class American infants Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Attachment Styles • Insecure-Resistant: Uncertainty about whether the parent will protect or provide safety in stressful circumstances – – Remain close to parent. Refuse to explore the new environment Distressed at separation of parent Mixture of approach and avoidance when reunited 10% of middle-class American infants • Disorganized or Disoriented: No consistent way of dealing with the stress – Exhibits contradictory behavior at the strange situation – Typical attachment style when the infant is abused or neglected – Less than 5% of middle-class American infants Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Attachment Styles • Attachment depends on: – Caregiver’s sensitivity to the infant’s needs • Children are less likely to develop a secure attachment if they are raised in an orphanage • Parents living in poverty tend to provide less sensitive environments • Sensitivity to infants can be taught to mothers, that then leads to a higher probability of secure attachment (Van den Boom, 1994) – Family stress • Infants exposed to verbally aggressive fighting among their parents form more insecure attachments Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Attachment Styles • Attachment depends on: – Parental psychopathology • Depressed mothers tend to have lower quality interactions with their infants – Infant’s temperament • If an infant is irritable and the mother has no social support, then the child is more likely to develop an insecure attachment Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Stability of Attachment Styles • Securely attached infants in stable middleclass American families tend to remain securely attached through two years of age – Stressful life events may cause the attachment style to change • Attachment styles are not as stable with dysfunctional families Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Attachment Styles • Attachment Theory predicts that the quality of the attachment predicts subsequent development – Longitudinal study found that securely attached infants were more competent at age-appropriate tasks throughout adolescence (Sroufe, Egeland, Carlson, & Collins, 2005) • An infant’s attachment style to a caregiver predicts: – – – – Effective social functioning during childhood and adolescence Sociability through early, middle, and late adulthood Self-esteem School grades Teenage sexual activity Quality of attachment to their own children Attitudes toward their own children Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Cultural Variations in Attachment Styles • The same four types of attachments have been found in various cultures, but the proportion of children in each category differ by culture – Avoidant attachments are rare in cultures where the child is seldom apart from the mother • Little research examines the causes and effects of secure attachments in non-Western cultures Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Adult Attachment Styles 1. I am afraid that I will lose my partner’s love. 2. I often worry that my partner will not want to stay with me. 3. I often worry that my partner doesn’t really love me. 4. I worry that romantic partners won’t care about me as much as I care about them. 5. I often wish that my partner’s feelings for me were as strong as my feelings for him or her. 6. I worry a lot about my relationships. 7. When my partner is out of sight, I worry that he or she might become interested in someone else.

Adult Attachment Styles 1. I prefer not to show a partner how I feel deep down. 2. I feel comfortable sharing my private thoughts and feelings with my partner. (R) 3. I find it difficult to allow myself to depend on romantic partners. 4. I am very comfortable being close to romantic partners. (R) 5. I do not feel comfortable opening up to romantic partners. 6. I prefer not to be too close to romantic partners. 7. I get uncomfortable when a romantic partner wants to be very close.

Comparing Developmental Theories Active/Passive Nature/Nurture Stage/Continuous Piaget Active Both Stage Information Processing Active Both Sociocultural Active Both Continuous Neo-Piagetians Active Both Stage Social Learning Both Nurture Continuous Psychosocial Passive Both Stage Attachment Passive Nurture Stage Ecological Systems Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Critique of Attachment Theory • Strengths – Explains development in social relationships – Enables predictions about subsequent social relationships – Provides information about specific interventions that can improve social functioning • Weaknesses – Only comparative cross-cultural research has been conducted – Does not well predict behavior in cultures where children have more than one primary caregiver Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Implications of Attachment Theory for Education • Parents need to be sensitive to their infants’ needs. • Parents need to provide a stable home environment for their children • If children are not functioning well in school, the first problem to investigate is their home life. • Any caring, stable adult can provide a secure attachment for a needy child Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos

Revision • Describe the Strange Situation. • What does Attachment Theory predict? – What evidence has been gathered to support this hypothesis? Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos