ato AIR TRAFFIC ORGANIZATION ControllerPilot Data Link Communications

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
ato AIR TRAFFIC ORGANIZATION Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) Program Update ACP WG N

ato AIR TRAFFIC ORGANIZATION Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) Program Update ACP WG N 4 New Orleans November 2004 Vic Patel FAA/ATO-P 6/12/2021 FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 1

Agenda • • 6/12/2021 Where is the CPDLC program located in the ATO ?

Agenda • • 6/12/2021 Where is the CPDLC program located in the ATO ? Why CPDLC ? CPDLC Build 1 CPDLC “National Build” FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 2

CPDLC in the Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Chief Operating Officer Air Traffic Organization Russ

CPDLC in the Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Chief Operating Officer Air Traffic Organization Russ Chew ATO-E Vice President En Route & Oceanic Services Transition Team Liaison John Thornton Rick Day (Acting) Directors of En Route Area Operations Osterdahl, Lyons, Trevino Safety & Commitment Assurance Mike Gough 6/12/2021 Director of En Route Program Operations Mike Gough Director Oceanic & Offshore Services Dave Ford Director of Safety and Operations Support Luis Ramirez Director of Finance & Planning Manager of Administration Greg Burke Pat Reese (Acting) FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 3

Director of En Route Program Operations Mike Gough (Acting) En Route Future Automation R.

Director of En Route Program Operations Mike Gough (Acting) En Route Future Automation R. Mendez (Acting) • ERAM • URET, CRMR, D-Pos • DSR, TMA • WARP, FISDL, CWIS • Second level support • Overall domain integration and program control Domain Systems Engineering R. Mendez • Interface with Operations Planning and En. Route Planning for new initiatives • Maintain and execute ITDP • Analyze and resolve ambiguous issues • Allocate needs to Programs 6/12/2021 En Route Current Automation S. Reynolds (Acting) • DRVSM, Enhancements • HID/NAS LAN • HOST, DARC, EBUS, ECG • Second level support En Route Field Support B. Hanlin • On-site AOS Support • Matrix Management En Route Comm & Surveillance J. Pino (Acting) • Program Office interface with performing organizations for: VTABS, VSCS Tech Refresh, BI-6, Long Range Radar • CPDLC • Second level support En Route Facilities Management G. Oswald • Facility life cycle program management of the 21 ARTCCs, the San Juan and Guam CERAPs, the HCF, and the ATCSCC En Route Program Support M. T. Cheung • BFM duties/collection for all Programs • Admin support Program Control C. Butcher • External requests portal • Integrated En Route Domain Automation Schedules FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 4

CPDLC National Build Organizational Chart En Route Communications & Surveillance Area Manager, ATO-E Joseph

CPDLC National Build Organizational Chart En Route Communications & Surveillance Area Manager, ATO-E Joseph P. Pino (Acting) Union Liaisons Tom M. Davis – PASS Bradley Troy – NATCA Engineering Doug Balint George Chandler (WJHTC) ATN - Vic Patel (WJHTC) ISS - Ruben Bigio (WJHTC) Training Bob Orlosky Dan Kokotkiewicz Evan Darby (WJHTC) Steve Ferra (WJHTC) Tim Hancock 2 nd Level Engineering Rick Cohen Acquisition Vacant M. Murphy (Scheduling) Adrienne Scott (AUATAC) Barry Buschow (AUATAC) Testing (WJHTC) Evan Darby Software & Safety Garry Strong Operational Requirements Timothy Hancock Jack Smit (AUATAC) Al Miller (AUATAC) Brian Moriarty (AUATAC) Contracting Daniel Lear Evan Darby (WJHTC) Steve Ferra (WJHTC) Rick Cohen (WTHTC) Mark Palazzo (ZMA) Ron Tornese (MITRE) Phil Condon (MITRE) Business Financial Mgmt. Teresa Wooley George Chandler Steve Ferra, Test Lead Implementation Denise De. Lozier Anna Burner (AUATAC) 6/12/2021 MITRE CAASD Frank Buck Bob Dailyda Steve Giles CPDLC Program Manager Joseph P. Pino Logistics George G. White Phil O’Connor (AUATAC) FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N CPDLC I Z Org Chart v 7. 3. ppt 9 -28 -04 5

Why CPDLC ? • Supports FAA Flight Plan Goals and ATO Business Objectives –

Why CPDLC ? • Supports FAA Flight Plan Goals and ATO Business Objectives – Increased Safety • Potential reduction of operational errors – Greater Capacity • • Increased sector capacity via decreased communications workload Increased fuel efficiency Increased airport arrival efficiency rate Ability to meet future ATC demands – International Leadership • Harmonization with EUROCONTROL LINK 2000+ and CASCADE programs • Enables realization of benefits by other tools – Delivery of complex resolutions via Conflict Probe • Establishes an infrastructure for the future – Data link is a fundamental building block of the future NAS 6/12/2021 FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 6

CPDLC Build 1 • Ceased operations at 12: 01 AM on October 1, 2004

CPDLC Build 1 • Ceased operations at 12: 01 AM on October 1, 2004 – $3. 3 M annually for Miami sustainment only • Does not include FAA personnel costs • FY 05 funding of $3 M insufficient to sustain Miami – 24 months of successful operation with no associated OEs – Over 80, 000 messages exchanged with no corruption – Approximately 16, 000 operational transactions – Over 2, 640 minutes of voice channel occupancy time saved – Over 800 “cleared direct” MT issued – 31 aircraft equipped with Rockwell Collins avionics • Capturing lessons learned for incorporation into formulation of national program in the ERAM time frame 6/12/2021 FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 7

CPDLC National Build • Program under investment analysis • “Opening” baseline is to develop

CPDLC National Build • Program under investment analysis • “Opening” baseline is to develop the 4 “Build 1 Services” capturing lessons learned from Miami experience – Integrate with ERAM architecture • Develop independently and in parallel with ERAM baseline releases • Build CPDLC release on ERAM EIC then sync to available release – Benefits and alternatives analyses will examine “extensible” services • Benefits vs. “price of risk” analyses will define final program • Use ERAM-provided common services, e. g. data reduction, adaptation, software distribution, monitoring & control • Implement architectural mitigation in lieu of extensive design assurance 6/12/2021 FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 8

CPDLC National Build (cont’d) • Provide robust failure recovery and ground security solutions •

CPDLC National Build (cont’d) • Provide robust failure recovery and ground security solutions • Implement SARPs Edition 2 communications stack – Interoperable with EUROCONTROL Link 2000+ • Replace Build 1 R-side controller CHI and introduce D-side CHI • Introduce interfacility communications capability – 2 key sites for testing beyond WJHTC • Initial Operating Capability (IOC) at first key site in June 2010 • Deploy nationally after 2010 – Strategy requires coordination with ERAM and aviation community • First rollouts to maximum benefit areas, e. g. hubs, as practically feasible 6/12/2021 • ATN SARPS edition 3 with security future enhancements • Work closely with EUROCONTROL FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 9

www. ato. faa. gov 6/12/2021 FE D E R A L A V I

www. ato. faa. gov 6/12/2021 FE D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z 10