ASSOCIATION FOR SARVA SEVA FARMS 1 No of

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
(ASSOCIATION FOR SARVA SEVA FARMS )

(ASSOCIATION FOR SARVA SEVA FARMS )

1. No. of CIG’s Formed 677 C. I. G % of groups where majority

1. No. of CIG’s Formed 677 C. I. G % of groups where majority belong to a particular caste/ Sub caste ST 62% Sahariya, Bheel, Bairwa No. of benefited (Financed) 306 C. I. G

(I) Activitywise No. of CIG’s benefitted. (I) Agriculture & Allied (Nos. ) NIL (i)

(I) Activitywise No. of CIG’s benefitted. (I) Agriculture & Allied (Nos. ) NIL (i) Land Based (Agriculture) 14 (ii) Dairy 4 (iii) Livestock i. e. goatery, sheep rearing 72

(II) Non-Farm ( Activity wise No. ) (I) Service Based Activity (a) Tent House

(II) Non-Farm ( Activity wise No. ) (I) Service Based Activity (a) Tent House (b) RCC Shuttering (c) Flour Mill (d) Bartan Catering & Music Centre (e) Light Decoration (f) Handpump Mistri (g) Band Baja (h) Soap making ( i) Bakery ( j) Sweet Maker (k) Retail Shop ( l) Hotel Dhaba (m) Welding Work shop (n) Bicycle lease centre 16 7 28 6 1 5 8 5 1 1 2 3 4 15

(II) Production Based : (a) Bangles Industry (b) Tailoring (c) Regzine Bag Making (d)

(II) Production Based : (a) Bangles Industry (b) Tailoring (c) Regzine Bag Making (d) Vermi Compost (e) Others (Infra) School Rooms, etc. Nil 30 4 Nil 80

2. Preparation, sanction, implementation of Sub-Projects. (a) Ave. time taken for preparation, . (b)

2. Preparation, sanction, implementation of Sub-Projects. (a) Ave. time taken for preparation, . (b) Ave. time for sanction of projects (c) Ave. time taken for Group contribution. (d) Ave. time taken for transfer of funds to CIG account (e) Ave. time taken for acquisition of assets. 45 Days 4 Months 3 -4 Months

3. CIG Performance : [A] % of Groups earning a net income. (i) Rs.

3. CIG Performance : [A] % of Groups earning a net income. (i) Rs. 15000 Per Month (ii) Rs. 10000 -15000 (iii) Rs. 5000 -10000 (iv) Rs. 5000 (v) No. Income 4% 6. 50% 36% 45% 10% [B] % Groups who have acquired additional assets 8 -10% [C] % of groups linked to the market. 85%

4 % of Group members who lost their assets : (a) Through Sale (b)

4 % of Group members who lost their assets : (a) Through Sale (b) Death (c) Other reasons 2 -3% 20 -25% 2% 5 Capacity Building of CIG’s % CIG given : (a) Orientation Trg. : No. of days : 2 24% (b) Skill Building Trg. : No. of days : 1 Month 75% (c) EMD : Nil

6. % of Groups linked to bank credit. Nil 7. Insurance : (i) No.

6. % of Groups linked to bank credit. Nil 7. Insurance : (i) No. of Groups who insured their assets (ii) No. of claims filed (iii) No. of Claims disbursed (iv) Pending 70 Group 34 Group 22 Group 12 Group

8. List 10 Groups whom you consider a success story and mention reasons for

8. List 10 Groups whom you consider a success story and mention reasons for success. 1. Sangam CIG, Devri ( Welding’s Lathe Machine) 2. Guru Kripa CIG, Devri ( Febrication ) 3. Kacchi CIG, Nargardh ( Tent House ) 4. Pateliya CIG, Sandokda ( Fiour Mill ) 5. Thakur baba CIG, Dhuan ( Goatry ) 6. Shaktiman CIG, Dhuan ( Goatry ) 7. Shri krishna CIG, Shabad ( Band baja ) 8. Shri ganesh CIG, Bhanwargarh ( RCC shutt. ) 9. Shambhu CIG, Ghatti ( RCC shutt. ) 10. Krishna CIG Ghatti ( Band baja )

9. Lessons learnt – what worked and what not ? What next ? This

9. Lessons learnt – what worked and what not ? What next ? This programme is partnership between NGO’s & GO. But this programme partnership is not running. Therefore for successfully programme implementation this partnership needs good co-ordination.