Assessing Complete Streets A Participatory GIS Audit Approach
- Slides: 24
Assessing Complete Streets: A Participatory GIS Audit Approach Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D Associate Professor Planning, Public Policy & Management Project supported by:
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Context • Theoretical Underpinning – PPGIS: Public Participation GIS – Asset Based Community Development – Community-Based Research • Guiding Principles – Easy to use – Minimize variables • Primary Goals – Collect data and understand the environment – Facilitate community organizing and capacity Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
The Community Assessment Tool Technology Pearl ST Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Complete Streets Assessment Start with subjective Then objective Overall evaluation Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Is this a reasonable walking or biking environment? Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Is this a reasonable walking or biking environment? Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
There are standards…and there are norms Is this a reasonable walking or biking environment? Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
A Typical Workshop (6 hours) • Coffee (10) • Introductions of Participants and Instructors (15) • SRTS Overview and Discussion (35) • Break (10) • Guidance on how to use the data collection tool (60) • Data Collection (2. 5 hours) • Group reflection, data synthesis, and discussion (40) • Next steps (30) Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Complete Streets General Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Complete Streets Ped Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Complete Streets Bike Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Complete Streets Transit Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Subject: received official word: RMS received the SRTS Grant Dear All: I just received a phone call from the Oregon SRTS coordinator that RMS received its grant! Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Conclusion • Compelling reasons to increase pedestrian and bicycle activity • Is it an engineering problem? • Partially yes, partially no. • Political and behavioral issue equally important • Participatory assessment tools – identify hazards and assets AND catalyze a community coalition to action • Result: good infrastructure and active users Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D University of Oregon, 2008
Questions? Project supported by: Marc Schlossberg, Ph. D Associate Professor Planning, Public Policy & Management schlossb@uoregon. edu
- Disadvantages of participatory planning approach
- Participatory development
- Disadvantages of participatory planning approach
- The rights to the streets of memphis answers
- Vertical line
- Objectives nouns
- If you ever disturb our streets again
- Green streets
- And the afternoon the evening sleeps so peacefully
- Sweet streets desserts
- Self-driving coalition for safer streets
- Sweet streets desserts
- Many have to myself a person walk the road
- Perbedaan audit konvensional dengan audit berbasis risiko
- Clinical meeting
- Beda audit medis dan audit klinis
- Penyelesaian audit dan tanggung jawab pasca audit
- Hubungan ekonomisasi efisiensi dan efektivitas
- Perbedaan prosedur audit top-down dengan bottom-up
- Auditor definition
- Perbedaan audit konvensional dengan audit berbasis risiko
- Is a latin word
- Audit universe adalah
- Overall audit plan
- What is auditing around the computer