Assault and Battery Assault and Battery 2 separate
Assault and Battery
Assault and Battery • 2 separate offences • One can be committed without the other • Together they are called “common assault” • Both common law offences • But they are recognised in Statute - S. 39 Criminal Justice Act – states they are both summary offences with a maximum sentence of 6 months’ imprisonment or a fine.
Assault - Definition • Ireland; Burstow – D intentionally or recklessly causes the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence
Assault – Actus Reus • Actus Reus: • An act • Causing the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence
Assault – Actus Reus – “An act” • Cannot be an omission • Can be actions, gestures, words or silence • E. g. waving a knife, a gesture like running a finger across your throat • Constanza – Words alone are enough for an assualt – D stalked V and content of letters was an assault as V read them as threats – therefore other written communications like emails and texts can also constitute assault • Ireland; Burstow – Silence can amount to an assault - silent telephone calls • Tuberville v Savage – words can also prevent an assault if they indicate D is not intending to cause the harm
Assault – Actus Reus – “Causing V to apprehend Immediate Violence or Force” • “Cause”: • Apply usual rules of causation • “Apprehend”: • If V doesn’t apprehend immediate force, assault has not been committed - Lamb – if other person is not afraid there can be no assault – 2 friends playing with a gun, one man shot by the other but no assault as the shot man had not appreciated that the gun would go off • Don’t need fear – just apprehension/anticipation • “Immediate”: • Quite a wide interpretation of this - Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station – “peeping Tom” looked through V’s bedroom window at night. She apprehended immediate and unlawful personal violence even thought he was outside – immediate does not need to be instantaneous • Ireland; Burstow – V only needs to apprehend the “possibility” of an immediate attack – fear doesn’t need to be rational as long as genuine • “Violence or force” • V does not need to apprehend any injury, pain or harm • Force apprehended can be a mere touch, provided it is unwanted • Must be unlawful – usually due to lack of consent
Assault - Mens Rea • Matches the AR • Savage: • Intention to cause the victim to apprehend unlawful and immediate violence; or • Recklessness as to whether the victim apprehends unlawful and immediate violence • Can be direct or indirect (oblique) intent • Recklessness is Cunningham recklessness – D must realist that his acts or words could cause V to apprehend violence
Answering Questions on Assault 1. Was there an act? What was it? 2. Did the act: • • Cause (normal causation rules) V to apprehend Immediate Violence/force? 3. Was there intention or recklessness to cause V to apprehend unlawful and immediate violence
- Slides: 8