Artificial Intelligence Our Working Definition of AI Artificial

Artificial Intelligence

Our Working Definition of AI Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make computers do things that people are better at or would be better at if: • they could extend what they do to a World Wide Web-sized amount of data and • not make mistakes.

Why AI? "AI can have two purposes. One is to use the power of computers to augment human thinking, just as we use motors to augment human or horse power. Robotics and expert systems are major branches of that. The other is to use a computer's artificial intelligence to understand how humans think. In a humanoid way. If you test your programs not merely by what they can accomplish, but how they accomplish it, they you're really doing cognitive science; you're using AI to understand the human mind. " - Herb Simon

The Dartmouth Conference and the Name Artificial Intelligence J. Mc. Carthy, M. L. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. E. Shannon. August 31, 1955. "We propose that a 2 month, 10 man study of artificial intelligence be carried out during the summer of 1956 at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. The study is to proceed on the basis of the conjecture that every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it. "

Time Line – The Big Picture academic $ academic and routine 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 1956 Dartmouth conference. 1981 Japanese Fifth Generation project launched as the Expert Systems age blossoms in the US. 1988 AI revenues peak at $1 billion. AI Winter begins.

The Origins of AI Hype 1950 Turing predicted that in about fifty years "an average interrogator will not have more than a 70 percent chance of making the right identification after five minutes of questioning". 1957 Newell and Simon predicted that "Within ten years a computer will be the world's chess champion, unless the rules bar it from competition. "

Evolution of the Main Ideas • Wings or not? • Games, mathematics, and other knowledge-poor tasks • The silver bullet? • Knowledge-based systems • Hand-coded knowledge vs. machine learning • Low-level (sensory and motor) processing and the resurgence of subsymbolic systems • Robotics • Natural language processing

Symbolic vs. Subsymbolic AI: Model intelligence at a level similar to the neuron. Let such things as knowledge and planning emerge. Symbolic AI: Model such things as knowledge and planning in data structures that make sense to the programmers that build them. (blueberry (isa fruit) (shape round) (color purple) (size. 4 inch))

The Origins of Subsymbolic AI 1943 Mc. Culloch and Pitts A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity “Because of the “all-or-none” character of nervous activity, neural events and the relations among them can be treated by means of propositional logic”

Interest in Subsymbolic AI 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10

The Origins of Symbolic AI • Games • Theorem proving

Games • 1950 Claude Shannon published a paper describing how a computer could play chess. • 1952 -1962 Art Samuel built the first checkers program • 1957 Newell and Simon predicted that a computer will beat a human at chess within 10 years. • 1967 Mac. Hack was good enough to achieve a class-C rating in tournament chess. • 1994 Chinook became the world checkers champion • 1997 Deep Blue beat Kasparpov • 2007 Checkers is solved • Summary

Games • AI in Role Playing Games – now we need knowledge

Logic Theorist • Debuted at the 1956 summer Dartmouth conference, although it was hand-simulated then. • Probably the first implemented A. I. program. • LT did what mathematicians do: it proved theorems. It proved, for example, most of theorems in Chapter 2 of Principia Mathematica [Whitehead and Russell 1910, 1912, 1913]. • LT began with the five axioms given in Principia Mathematica. From there, it began to prove Principia’s theorems.

Logic Theorist • LT used three rules of inference: • Substitution (which allows any expression to be substituted, consistently, for any variable): • From: A B A, conclude: fuzzy cute fuzzy • Replacement (which allows any logical connective to be replaced by its definition, and vice versa): • From A B, conclude A B • Detachment (which allows, if A and A B are theorems, to assert the new theorem B): • From man and man mortal, conclude: mortal

Logic Theorist In about 12 minutes LT produced, for theorem 2. 45: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. (p q) p A (A B) p (p q) (A B) ( B A) (p q)) ( (p q) p) (p q) p Q. E. D. (Theorem 2. 45, to be proved. ) (Theorem 2. 2. ) (Subst. p for A, q for B in 1. ) (Theorem 2. 16. ) (Subst. p for A, (p q) for B in 3. ) (Detach right side of 4, using 2. )

Logic Theorist The inference rules that LT used are not complete. The proofs it produced are trivial by modern standards. For example, given the axioms and theorems prior to it, LT tried for 23 minutes but failed to prove theorem 2. 31: [p (q r)] [(p q) r]. LT’s significance lies in the fact that it opened the door to the development of more powerful systems.

Mathematics 1956 Logic Theorist (the first running AI program? ) 1961 SAINT solved calculus problems at the college freshman level 1967 Macsyma Gradually theorem proving has become well enough understood that it is usually no longer considered AI.

Discovery AM “discovered”: • Goldbach’s conjecture • Unique prime factorization theorem

What About Things that People Do Easily? • Common sense reasoning • Vision • Moving around • Language

What About Things People Do Easily? • If you have a problem, think of a past situation where you solved a similar problem. • If you take an action, anticipate what might happen next. • If you fail at something, imagine how you might have done things differently. • If you observe an event, try to infer what prior event might have caused it. • If you see an object, wonder if anyone owns it. • If someone does something, ask yourself what the person's purpose was in doing that.

They Require Knowledge • Why do we need it? Find me stuff about dogs who save people’s lives. • How can we represent it and use it? • How can we acquire it?

Why? • Why do we need it? Find me stuff about dogs who save people’s lives. Two beagles spot a fire. Their barking alerts neighbors, who call 911. • How can we represent it and use it? • How can we acquire it?

Even Children Know a Lot A story described in Charniak (1972): Jane was invited to Jack’s birthday party. She wondered if he would like a kite. She went into her room and shook her piggy bank. It made no sound.

We Divide Things into Concepts • What’s a party? • What’s a kite? • What’s a piggy bank?

What is a Concept? Let’s start with an easy one: chair

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair?

Chair? The bottom line?

How Can We Teach Things to Computers? A quote from John Mc. Carthy: In order for a program to be capable of learning something, it must first be capable of being told it. Do we believe this?

Some Things are Easy If dogs are mammals and mammals are animals, are dogs mammals?

Some Things Are Harder If most Canadians have brown eyes, and most brown eyed people have good eyesight, then do most Canadians have good eyesight?

Some Things Are Harder If most Canadians have brown eyes, and most brown eyed people have good eyesight, then do most Canadians have good eyesight? Maybe not for at least two reasons: It might be true that, while most brown eyed people have good eyesight, that’s not true of Canadians. Suppose that 70% of Canadians have brown eyes and 70% of brown eyed people have good eyesight. Then assuming that brown-eyed Canadians have the same probability as other browneyed people of having good eyesight, only 49% of Canadians are brown eyed people with good eyesight.

Concept Acquisition Pat Winston’s program (1970) learned concepts in the blocks micro-world.

Concept Acquisition The arch concept:

Further Complications from How Language is Used • After the strike, the president sent them away. • After the strike, the umpire sent them away. The word “strike” refers to two different concepts.

When Other Words in Context Aren’t Enough • I need a new bonnet. • The senator moved to table the bill.

Compiling Common Sense Knowledge • CYC (http: //www. cyc. com) • UT (http: //www. cs. utexas. edu/users/mfkb/RKF/tree/ ) • Word. Net (http: //www. cogsci. princeton. edu/~wn/)

Distributed Knowledge Acquisition • Acquiring knowledge for use by people • Oxford English Dictionary (http: //oed. com/about/contributors/ ) • Wikipedia • Acquiring knowledge for use by programs • ESP (http: //www. espgame. org/) • Open Mind (http: //commons. media. mit. edu: 3000/) • CYC (http: //www. cyc. com)

Reasoning We can describe reasoning as search in a space of possible situations.

Breadth-First Search

Depth-First Search

The British Museum Algorithm A simple algorithm: Generate and test When done systematically, it is basic depth-first search. But suppose that each time we end a path, we start over at the top and choose the next path randomly. If we try this long enough, we may eventually hit a solution. We’ll call this The British Museum Algorithm or The Monkeys and Typewriters Algorithm http: //www. arn. org/docs 2/news/monkeysandtypewriters 051103. htm

A Version of Depth-First Search: Branch and Bound Consider the problem of planning a ski vacation. Fly to A $600 Fly to B $800 Stay D $200 Stay E $250 (800) (850) Total cost (1200) Fly to C $2000

Problem Reduction Goal: Acquire TV Steal TV Earn Money Buy TV Or another one: Theorem proving in which we reason backwards from theorem we’re trying to prove.

Hill Climbing Problem: You have just arrived in Washington, D. C. You’re in your car, trying to get downtown to the Washington Monument.

Hill Climbing – Some Problems

Hill Climbing – Is Close Good Enough? B A Is A good enough? • Choose winning lottery numbers

Hill Climbing – Is Close Good Enough? B A Is A good enough? • Choose winning lottery numbers • Get the cheapest travel itinerary • Clean the house

Expert Systems Expert knowledge in many domains can be captured as rules. Dendral (1965 – 1975) If: The spectrum for the molecule has two peaks at masses x 1 and x 2 such that: • x 1 + x 2 = molecular weight + 28, • x 1 -28 is a high peak, • x 2 – 28 is a high peak, and • at least one of x 1 or x 2 is high, Then: the molecule contains a ketone group.

To Interpret the Rule Mass spectometry Ketone group:

Expert Systems 1975 Mycin attaches probability-like numbers to rules: If: (1) the stain of the organism is gram-positive, and (2) the morphology of the organism is coccus, and (3) the growth conformation of the organism is clumps Then: there is suggestive evidence (0. 7) that the identity of the organism is stphylococcus.

Expert Systems – Today: Medicine One example domain, medicine, has expert systems whose tasks include: • arrhythmia recognition from electrocardiograms • coronary heart disease risk group detection • monitoring the prescription of restricted use antibiotics • early melanoma diagnosis • gene expression data analysis of human lymphoma • breast cancer diagnosis

Expert Systems – Today: Build Your Own e. Xpertise 2 Go: http: //www. expertise 2 go. com/ Acquired. Intelligence: http: //www. aiinc. ca/demos/ (whales, graduate school)

Taking the AP Chemistry Exam QUESTION: Sodium azide is used in air bags to rapidly produce gas to inflate the bag. The products of the decomposition reaction are: (a) Na and water. (b) Ammonia and sodium metal. (c) N 2 and O 2(d) Sodium and nitrogen gas. (e) Sodium oxide and nitrogen gas. (d) Sodium and nitrogen gas.

SYSTEM-GENERATED ANSWER: # What are the products of the given decomposition reaction? • By definition, oxidation-reduction reactions occur when electrons are transferred from the atom that is oxidized to the atom that is reduced. We need to look for changes in the oxidation states of the elements in the reaction. • In the reactants, the oxidation state(s) of the element Na is/are (1). In the product, the oxidation state(s) is/are (0). Therefore, the reaction causes a change in oxidation state. • Therefore, this is an oxidation reduction reaction. • By definition, a Binary Ionic-Compound Decomposition Reaction occurs when a binary ionic compound is heated. • Therefore, this reaction is a Binary-Ionic Compound Decomposition reaction. • In general, a Binary Ionic-Compound Decomposition Reaction converts a binary ionic-compound into basic elements. • In this reaction, Na. N 3 reacts to produce Na and N 2. # The products of the decomposition reaction are: (d) Sodium and nitrogen gas. The work of Bruce Porter et al here at UT