Army National Guard Engineer Force Since 1636 National

Army National Guard Engineer Force Since 1636

National Guard Engineer Regiment Organization ARNG Partnership DSCA Support to USACE and COCOM

Total Engineer Force Mix EAB EN Units MISSION COMMAND AC 9, 352 20% ARNG 33, 740 74% 15% SPECIALTY FUNCTIONS TOTAL 45, 682 53% COMBAT EFFECTS CONSTRUCTION EFFECTS USAR 2, 590 6% 31% 49% 10% 42% 55% 28% ACTIVE 8% 35% 32% ARNG 40% USAR 14, 488 17% 30, 479 35% 31, 811 37% 10, 369 12% 87, 147 TOTAL

The Opportunity ARNG Engineer forces have the ability and force structure to fill a need for engineering capacity to USACE in its support to the CCMDs and ASCCs at an economical advantage. The use of ARNG Eng forces for specific USACE missions provide the opportunity to build on the Total Army and Total Engineer Regiment Strategy as well as ensuring Reserve Components retain meaningful missions and maintain core competency.

ARNG Force Structure

Army National Guard Engineer Force Structure WASHINGTON MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA MICHIGAN 898 BEB 176 Vert CO 204 MAC 260 EN SPT CO 230 Vert PLT 1049 FFTG HQ 1050 FFTG TM 1051 FFTG TM 1052 FFTG TM 164 BN HQ 815/816 Horiz CO 188 Vert CO 817/818 Sapper CO 957 MRBC 835 Asphalt TM (Utility TM/17) 897 Concrete TM 769 S&D TM 623 Vert CO 181/317 FFTG TM 107/507 BN HQ 1436 Horiz CO 1430/1434 Vert CO 1431/1433 Sapper CO (W) 1432 EN SPT PLT 1437 MRBC 1440 FFTG HQ 1439/1442 FFTG TM 1208 S&D TM SOUTH DAKOTA BEB(A-FY 17) 224 BN HQ 831 Horiz CO 833 Sapper CO (W) 832 MAC(J-FY 17) OREGON BEB (A-FY 16) 1249 BN HQ 234 Vert CO (J-FY 16) 224 EN SPT CO 162 MAC WYOMING 133 EN SPT CO 1041 MRBC IDAHO UTAH BEB(A-FY 17) 126 ESC (J-FY 17) 937 FFTG TM 938 FFTG TM 1457 BN HQ 116 Horiz CO 624 Vert CO 118 Sapper CO 115 EN Facility DET ALASKA 207 CMT 208 Utility DET ARIZONA 253 BN HQ 819 Sapper CO (M) 258 Horiz CO 259 Quarry TM 257 Well Drill TM 194/260 FFTG TM HAWAII 227 BEB 230 Vert CO (-) 297 FFTG TM GUAM 1224 ESC CALIFORNIA 578 BEB 579 BN HQ 649 Horiz CO 315 Vert CO 216 MAC 235 Sapper CO (W) 132 MRBC 233 FFTG TM 645 Asphalt TM(J-FY 16) 129 Concrete TM 1401 Quarry TM 149 S&D TM 184 CMT NEVADA 609 Sapper CO 240 Vert CO 277 EN SPT PLT 777 Concrete TM COLORADO 947 Horiz CO 1157 FFTG HQ 199 FFTG TM 200 FFTG TM OKLAHOMA BEB (A-FY 18) 120 BN HQ 3120 EN SPT CO 1220 Horizontal CO(JFY 18) 2120 Vertical CO 1120 Asphalt TM (Utility TM/17) 720 S&D TM NEW MEXICO 920 Horizontal CO TEXAS BEB(A-FY 16) 156 BEB 176 BDE HQ 111/386 BN HQ 342 Horiz CO(J-FY 16) 822 Horiz CO 236/272 Vert CO 840 MAC 442 MAC 454 Clear CO 836 Sapper CO (M) 551 MRBC 211 Concrete TM 112 S&D TM 111 Area Clear PLT FEST-M (FY 17) 153 BN HQ 842 Horiz CO 155 Vert CO 211 Sapper CO (M) 200 MRBC 216 FFTG HQ 451 FFTG TM 927 S&D TM ARKANSAS BEB(A-FY 18) 875 BN HQ 1038 Horiz CO(J-FY 18) 1037 MAC 1036/1039 Sap CO (W) LOUISIANA BEB (A-FY 16) 225 BDE HQ 205/527/528 BN HQ 769 BN HQ(J-FY 16) 843/844/921/922 Horiz CO 1020/1021/1022/1023 Vert CO 926 MAC 927 Sapper CO (M) 928 Sapper CO (M) (JFY 16) 2225 MRBC 831 S&D TM 832 Utility TM 830 Concrete TM Activations (2015, 2016, 2017, 2018) Inactivation's (2015, 2016, 2017, 2018) Conversions: (SRC/FY) As of 27 APR 15 G-Notional Units are in Italics KANSAS 891 BN HQ 242 Horiz CO 226 Vert CO 772 MAC IOWA MISSOURI 35 BDE HQ 203/1140 BN HQ 220 Horiz CO 276 Vert CO 294 EN Support CO 1138/1141 Sapper CO (W) 1438 MRBC 117 Asphalt TM 880 EN SPT PLT 235 CMT 1135 Clearance CO 335 Area Clear PLT WISCONSIN 173 BEB 724 BN HQ 229 Horiz CO 829 Vert CO 950 Clearance CO 273 Sapper CO (W) 824 Concrete TM 106 Quarry TM 924 EN Facility DET 949 S&D TM MINNESOTA 334 BEB 682 BN HQ 850 Horiz CO 851 Vert CO 434 FFTG TM 147 S&D TM MAINE SOUTH CAROLINA 122 & 178 BN HQ 124 Horiz CO 1223 Vert CO 1782 EN Support CO 1221 Clear CO 174 MAC 1222 Sapper CO(M) 1225 S&D TM 1226 Asphalt TM (Utility TM/16) 1227 Concrete TM 172 EN SPT PLT 264 FFTG HQ 265/266/267/268 FFTG TM 125 MRBC 710 EHCC 1120 Area Clear PLT ILLINOIS 766 BEB 661 Horiz CO(J-FY 17) 631 EN Support CO 661/662 FFTG TM INDIANA 776 BEB(A-FY 14) 113 BN HQ 1313 Horiz CO 1413 Vert CO 713 Sapper CO (M) 719 FFTG HQ 819/1019 FFTG TM 1213 S&D TM OHIO BEB(A-FY 18) 16 BDE HQ 112/216 BN HQ 1191/1192 Horiz CO 1194 Vert CO 945 EN Support CO(JFY 18) 837 MAC(J-FY 18) 811/ 812 Sapper CO (M) 290 S&D TM 292 Asphalt TM 291 Concrete TM 5694 FFTG HQ 295/296 FFTG TM 204 CMT MISSISSIPPI BEB (A-FY 18) 168 BDE HQ 223/890 BN HQ 857/858 Horiz CO 289/859 Vert CO 287 MAC 288 Sapper CO (M) 231 S&D TM 230 Concrete TM(JFY 18) 251 Quarry TM(J-FY 18) ALABAMA X IX VIII II VI III V IV NOTE: Numerals and Colors Signify FEMA Region I 877 BN HQ 168/186 Horiz CO 166 Vert CO 1151 ESC 1305 S&D TM 1152/1153 FFTG TM 1301/1312 Concrete TM 77 Quarry TM 1307 EHCC GEORGIA 177 BEB 878 BN HQ 877 Horiz CO 810/848 Sapper CO (W) 874 Utility TM 175 EN SPT PLT 177 TOPO CO 1048 S&D TM 870 EHCC FLORIDA 753 BEB(FY 17) 779 BN HQ 868 Horiz CO 869 Vert CO(J-FY 17) 870 Sapper CO (W) 669 Concrete TM 269 Well Drill TM NEW YORK BEB(A-FY 18) 204 BN HQ 827 Horiz CO(J-FY 18) 1156 Vert CO 152 EN Support CO 204 Quarry TM 133 BN HQ 251 Sapper CO (W) 262 Horiz CO 136 Vert CO 185 EN Support CO 1035 S&D TM NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY 160 Vert PLT 104 BEB(FY 15) 150 Horiz CO (-) (J-FY 15) 160 Vert PLT 827 S&D TM 572 BEB (A-FY-16) 131 Horiz CO(J-FY 16) VIRGIN ISLANDS MASSACHUSETTS Utilities DET(A-FY 15) 1011 Vert PLT(J-FY 15) 652 EN SPT PLT PUERTO RICO 130/190 BN HQ 1010 Horiz CO 215 Vert CO 1011 Vert CO (-) 1013/1014 Sapper CO (W) 892 MRBC 380 EN SPT PLT 215 FFTG TM NORTH CAROLINA 104 BEB 105/505 BN HQ 875 Horiz CO 878/882 Vert CO 151 MAC 171/883 Sapper CO (W) 621 S&D TM 430/677 FFTG TM 429 Concrete TM 823 Quarry TM 1131 Well Drill HQ 1132/1133 Well Drill TM 725 EN SPT PLT 881 EN SPT CO FEST-M (FY 17) KENTUCKY 201/206 BN HQ 207 Horiz CO 149 Vert CO 130 EN Support CO 577/1123 Sapper CO (M) 176/177/178 FFTG TM 118 EN SPT PLT 613 EN Facility Det 441 S&D TM MRBC(A-FY 16) TENNESSEE BEB (A-FY 16) 194 BDE HQ 230 BN HQ 190 MAC 212 Vert CO 255 Asphalt TM 775 Well Drilling TM 774 S&D VERMONT 101 BN HQ 379 Horiz CO 181 Vert CO 182 Sapper CO (M) 179/180 FFTG TM 189 Asphalt TM 188 EN Facility Det 183/195 S&D TM RHODE ISLAND 861 EN SPT CO CONNECTICUT 192 BN HQ 248 EN Support CO 250 MRBC 246/256 FFTG TM 247 Well Drill TM 242 CMT WEST VIRGINIA 111 BDE HQ 1092 BN HQ 821 Horiz CO 115 Vert CO 119 Sapper CO (W) 601 EN SPT PLT 193 EN SPT CO 229 S&D TM VIRGINIA BEB (A-FY 17) 276 BN HQ 180 ESC 237 Sapper CO 189 MRBC(J-FY 16) 1033 EN SPT CO 157 Quarry TM *DC NO EN UNITS PENNSYLVANIA BEB (A-FY 17) 337 BEB 103 BEB) 252 Horiz CO(J-FY 17) DELAWARE 160 Vert CO(-) 150 Horiz PLT(J-FY 15) MARYLAND 244 Vert CO 243 EN SPT PLT 253 Sapper CO

National Guard Engineer Formations BRIGADES 35 th EN BDE MOARNG 16 th EN BDE OHARNG 168 th EN BDE MSARNG 176 th EN BDE TXARNG 111 th EN BDE WVARNG 194 th EN BDE TNARNG 225 th EN BDE LAARNG

Execution: • Relationships established across three regions and seven sub-regions, with an EN BDE as the senior synchronizing agent. Proposed Partnership Regions • Does not constitute 100% of training events, and does not establish command relationships. • The partnerships should extend to Active Component, Army Reserve and USACE component Engineers. Breakdown: Regions represent a balanced mix of Construction and Combat capability For Official Use Only / Pre-Decisional

Army National Guard Engineer Partnership Initiative Available Force Pool For Official Use Only / Pre-Decisional

Domestic Support of Civil Authorities First in – Last Out

DSCA CAPABILITIES CONCEPT CURRENT SKILL SETS EXIST WITHIN EXISTING UNIT MTOE ORGANIZATIONS THAT CAN BE NESTED WITH DSCA RELATED TASKS SAMPLING OF DSCA MISSIONS STATE EMA ARNORTH NGB DART MI QM TC UNIFIED DSCA CONTENGENCY FORMATIONS CRITERA SC - RED HORSE ANG PRIME BEEF S-TEAMS COMPLETE 4) TRAIN / CERTIFY FORSCOM AG IN -3) CONCEPT / IMPLEMENTATION - SOCIALIZE / FORMALIZE NORTHCOM EN AV 2) COA DEVELOPMENT - DETERMINE SYNCHRONIZING AGENCY - ESTABLISH TRAINING REQ NEMA MP ARNG CONCEPT 1) MISSION ANALYSIS - DETERMINE CAPABILITY GAP - DETERMINE CAPABILITIES THAT EXIST WITHIN FORCE STRUCTURE FEMA RECON ASSESSMENT POWER DE-WATER SECURITY RESCUE MOBILITY COMMUNICATION - CONTINGENCY BASED FOCUSED ON UNITS WITH DESIRED METL SKILL SET / EQUIP CAPABILITIES KNOWN CAPABILITIES / QUANTITIES IOT ALLOW FOR PREDICTABLE RESOURCE INTER AGENCY/ORGANIZATION - CAPABILITY MET WITH ARMY, AIR, OR EMA DOES NOT REDUCE UNITS WARTIME READINESS CURRENT 5) TRACK READINESS CYCLE WHO IS THE SYNCHRONIZING AGENCY? SYNCHRONIZING AGENCY UNIT METL / CAPABILITIES SYNCHRONIZING DOCUMENTS/ORGANIZATIONS TEAMS AVAILABLE FOR DCSA DEPLOYMENT THROUGH DCO OR EMAC SECURITY TEAM POWER TEAM RECON ROUTE HAZ MAT FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE MOBILITY TEAM DE-WATER TEAM SEARCH TEAM NEAR TERM FAR TERM

State Partnership Program Partnerships Improve Training and Deployment Effectiveness

UNCLASSIFIED What is the State Partnership Program (SPP)? ØJoint Department of Defense (Do. D) program managed by the National Guard and executed by the States ØLinks a State’s National Guard with a partner nation’s military/ security forces in a cooperative, mutually beneficial relationship • Supports CCMD and Embassy security cooperation objectives • Innovative, low-cost, small footprint security cooperation program • Cultivates enduring personal and institutional relationships that enhance influence and promote access • Trains National Guardsmen for Title 32 and Title 10 missions Ohio National Guardsman provides oversight as Serbian soldier fires an M-240 B machine gun during an SPP exchange 18 FEB 2015 Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade, Vermont Gov. Jim Douglas, and Vermont TAG Maj. Gen. Michael Dubie meet at Vermont National Guard headquarters North Dakota National Guard and visiting Ghanaian dignitaries tour flood protection facilities, including an Aqua. Fence in Fargo, ND

SPP History • SPP began in 1993 with partnerships between US States and newly independent former Soviet republics, in coordination with US European Command • SPP has grown significantly since then, with 68 current partnerships worldwide • Two new partnerships have been approved for 2015 • New partner States will be announced by mid-2015 18 FEB 2015 Former CNGB Lt Gen John B Conaway lays a wreath at the Freedom Monument in Riga, Latvia, during the first National Guard delegation visit to the Baltic region, November 1992

UNCLASSIFIED Typical SPP Activities • Disaster preparedness and crisis management • Military medical and engineer activities • Leadership, officer, and NCO development • Defense reform and military modernization • Aviation logistics, maintenance, and safety • Border, port, and aviation security • Critical infrastructure and resources protection • Deployment planning and family support North Carolina National Guard PAO describes the key points of public relations for officers from the Macedonian Ministry of Defense New Hampshire National Guardsman observes as members of Salvadoran Army practice mountain casualty evacuation Kansas National Guard combat engineer partners with an Armenian Peacekeeping Brigade soldier during a demining exercise Wisconsin National Guard Command Sgt. Maj. Ralph Rosemore talks to Nicaraguan military members during a leadership exchange at an NCO academy in Managua, Nicaragua 18 FEB 2015

UNCLASSIFIED SPP in the Real World SPP partners reassure European partners during the Ukraine crisis – Minnesota National Guard deployed eight F-16 s to participate in Exercises THRACIAN STAR and SABER STRIKE in Estonia – Michigan National Guard deployed three RQ-7 Shadows Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to Latvia for Exercise SABER STRIKE ‘ 14 a month early to help reassure our allies Michigan National Guard deployed three RQ-7 Shadows to Lielvarde AB, Latvia 18 FEB 2015 Michigan National Guard TAG MG Gregory Vadnais confers with Latvian Chief of Defense Lieutenant General Raimonds Graube in preparation for Exercise SABER STRIKE ‘ 14 Minnesota ANG F-16 s on the ground in Bulgaria for Exercise THRACIAN STAR

UNCLASSIFIED Conclusion • SPP is in its third decade of forging unique partnerships, built for success on enduring relationships that enhance influence and promote access • SPP continues to evolve to meet Combatant Commands’ security cooperation objectives and national security goals while maintaining relationships with some of our staunchest allies and partners in every corner of the world • Many have proven ready and willing to share the burden of maintaining international security and stability 18 FEB 2015

USEUCOM - 22 Alabama / Romania California / Ukraine Colorado / Slovenia Georgia / Georgia Illinois / Poland Indiana / Slovakia Iowa / Kosovo Kansas / Armenia Maine / Montenegro Maryland / Estonia Maryland / Bosnia Michigan / Latvia Minnesota / Croatia New Jersey / Albania North Carolina / Moldova Ohio / Hungary Ohio / Serbia Oklahoma / Azerbaijan Pennsylvania / Lithuania Tennessee / Bulgaria Texas, Neb / Czech Republic Vermont / Macedonia USAFRICOM - 6 California / Nigeria New York / South Africa North Carolina / Botswana North Dakota / Ghana Michigan / Liberia Utah, So Carolina / Morocco 51 Global ARNG SPP Engineer Partnerships All 51 partnerships can support USACE troop labor construction projects to include humanitarian assistance projects and military training construction USNORTHCOM - 1 Rhode Island / Bahamas USSOUTHCOM - 13 Arkansas / Guatemala Connecticut / Uruguay Kentucky / Ecuador Louisiana / Belize Massachusetts / Paraguay Mississippi / Bolivia New Mexico / Costa Rica Puerto Rico / Honduras Puerto Rico / Dominican Rep. South Dakota / Suriname Texas / Chile West Virginia / Peru Wisconsin / Nicaragua USCENTCOM - 5 Arizona / Kazakhstan Colorado / Jordan Louisiana / Uzbekistan Montana / Kyrgyzstan Virginia / Tajikistan USPACOM - 4 Hawaii , Guam / Philippines Hawaii, Guam / Indonesia Idaho / Cambodia Oregon / Bangladesh Washington / Thailand NG International Engagement

ARNG Engineers in Support of USACE while leveraging the SPP For Engineers Construction is Training

Use of ARNG for Oversight • Problem: Oversight of small projects OCONUS using DACs can be uneconomic relative to the project cost. • Solution: ARNG / USAR professional engineer assets can supplement USACE by conducting site assessments and perform construction oversight for Title X OCONUS projects. • Military labor is not charged to the project • Oversight visits could form part of training for personnel or synchronized with State Partnership Programs • NAD conducted a pilot program with NGB on project in Mauritania • Pilot demonstrated partnership with NGB is viable and provides cost savings 20

USACE National Guard Bureau Engineer Training and Execution Program (ETEP) What is it: USACE and NGB Proof of Concept. Assess feasibility of providing NGB Engineers to support USACE assigned projects Desired End State: USACE execution at less cost and/or increased oversight. Increased CCMD support The Mauritania Plan Future Opportunities : Win-Win: Facts: • NGB (ND ARNG) engineers successful mission into • Uniformed assets can enter locations USACE civilians • NGB Troop construction with NAU assistance for design Mauritania to scope projects in support of AFRICOM/USARAF as part of USACE PDT cannot (COCOM engages USACE in more difficult locations) and material /equipment procurement, technical oversight (Working FMS for Armenia) • PDT led by USACE Europe District (NAU) with North • mil-to-mil assistance, supports COCOM TSC goals and • Insert NGB Liaison into NAU for command control of Dakota NG providing Architect, civil and electrical for Design Build RFP development and site visit. objectives • USACE maintains responsibility to execute (ownership soldiers learn from experienced USACE engineers and control) • Mentorship: USACE civilians work with troops, NGB • Support provided by NGB aligns with unit and individual • NGB labor paid as part of training NGB Engineer METL • Project funds NGB travel expenses only and USACE • Retainage- NGB troops receive real hands-on training Engineer labor and travel • Readiness- Increase readiness (NGB Goal sustaining an • Approximate savings 3 engineers x 80 hrs x $135 hr operational force) • COCOM and ASCC coordination conducted • Lowers project cost and or increases construction future teams, real time coordination with NGB deployed teams and NAU Engineer assets (working, expected in July) • Construction Oversight assistance (long term TDY as opposed to current periodic visit model) • CMEP engagement support • Build Foreign Military Engineers- Training Program • Planned engagements with TEC both at HQ level and 416 th CRU. oversight • Furtherance of State Partnership Program Objectives • Relationship building!!!! 21

NDARNG Engineers Mauritania Capt. Lorna Meidinger, of Bismarck, North Dakota, who serves with the 957 th Engineer Company (Multi-Role Bridge), takes notes while visiting a U. S. Army Corps of Engineer construction project site in Mauritania, Africa. (ARNG Photo, 5/16/2014) 22

ARNG Engineers in OCONUS RESOLUTE CASTLE 15

RESOLUTE CASTLE 2015 (RC 15) Resolute Castle 15 • US-led (TN/ALARNG) Engineer Readiness Training Exercise (ENRETE), Romania (ROU) & Bulgaria (BGR), 13 JUN-05 SEP 15 • Range improvement construction ISO OAR-S HC SVNT DRACONES Exercise Control / Exercise Directors 194 th OAR Mission Command Element ENG BDE TNARNG 877 th ENG BN ALARNG expansion X (-) MCE • CONUS-Based CL VII 194 th ENG - Ship NLT 01 APR 15 - LAD: 01 JUN 15 1 • S&D Team to ROU, 10 APR 15 877 th ENG (Alabama) • Leverage State Partnerships - 877 th EN BN (ALARNG) in ROU - 194 th EN BDE and 230 th EN BN (TNARNG), BGR • Mission Command: 194 th EN BDE Locations MCE 194 th ENG 1 2 - 194 th EN BDE Vertical/Horizontal Construction Company Team Vertical Engineer Range projects and Mobility Corridor improvements at NSTA 194 th ENG (Tennessee) E Construction Company Team: Vertical Engineer Range projects and Mobility Corridor improvements Cincu Training Area. E - 877 th EN BN Vertical/Horizontal • Bulgaria: NSTA X (-) E • Host Nation Participation TBD 2 E E • S&D Team to BGR, 03 APR 15 • Romania: Cincu E • RC ODT Rotations

UNCLASSIFIED Questions 18 FEB 2015