Argumentative Terms Quiz Jeopardy Style Single Sided Arguments

Argumentative Terms Quiz “Jeopardy Style”

Single Sided Arguments

Definitions “A”nswers Toulmain Fallacies What the Romans Knew 100 100 100 200 200 200 300 300 300 400 400 400 500 500 500

Double Arguments

“D”liberate Nature Rogers More Fallacies More of the Romans 200 200 200 400 400 400 600 600 600 800 800 800 1000 1000

Final Argument!

Your Bid ? ? ?

Final Argument Answer an incomplete syllogism where general knowledge must be supplied to understand

Final Argument Question What is Enthememe?

Definitions for 100 that which corresponds with reality

Definitions for 200 A cited quotation of an authority

Definitions for 300 an act which demonstrates validity or falsity

Definitions for 400 Attitude toward self, topic, and audience

Definitions for 500 a method or process of discovering ideas

“A”nswers for 100 finding the parts of the problem and then separating them to see how they fit

“A”nswers for 200 facts stated in similar manner can be interpreted differently

“A”nswers for 300 using the credential of an advocate to validate the argument

“A”nswers for 400 form of persuasion relying on reason

“A”nswers for 500 an extended comparison intended to show logical and parallel conclusions

Toulmain for 100 Holding Toulmain’s profession

Toulmain for 200 conclusion or thesis

Toulmain for 300 guarantee of the validity of the grounds

Toulmain for 400 implicit assumptions of the warrant

Toulmain for 500 inclusion of numerical significance or comparison

Fallacies for 100 presenting reasonable arguments over reality

Fallacies for 200 either/or argument which ignores alternatives

Fallacies for 300 reframing an opponent’s argument for easier refutation

Fallacies for 400 a precipitous move from true assertions about one or few to all

Fallacies for 500 reporting a partial truth for the sake of substantiating a position

Romans for 100 use of words to appeal to reason

Romans for 200 when an irrelevant element leads reason astray

Romans for 300 use of reputation to present reason

Romans for 400 reference to the relevant possibilities

Romans for 500 attacking an argument based on the credentials of the advocates

Definitions for 100? What is Truth?

Definitions for 200? What is Testimony?

Definitions for 300? What is Experimentation?

Definitions for 400? What is Tone?

Definitions for 500? What is an Heuristic?

“A”nswers for 100? What is Analysis?

“A”nswers for 200? What is Ambiguity?

“A”nswers for 300? What is an Appeal to Authority?

“A”nswers for 400? What is Argument?

“A”nswers for 500? What is Analogy?

Toulmain for 100? What is a Philosopher?

Toulmain for 200? What is a Claim?

Toulmain for 300? What is a Warrant?

Toulmain for 400? What is Backing?

Toulmain for 500? What are Quantifiers?

Fallacies for 100? What is Protecting the Hypothesis?

Fallacies for 200? What is a False Dichotomy?

Fallacies for 300? What is a Straw Man?

Fallacies for 400? What is a Hasty Generalization?

Fallacies for 500? What is Distorting Facts?

Romans for 100? What is logos?

Romans for 200? What is non sequitor?

Romans for 300? What is Ethos?

Romans for 400? What is a priori?

Romans for 500? What is ad Hominem?

“D”liberate for 200 a forced choice between multiple unattractive alternatives

“D”liberate for 400 point about which two or more perspectives are at odds

“D”liberate for 600 leading down from our understanding into new knowledge

“D”liberate for 800 when one infers what is true of a whole must be true for each part of the whole

“D”liberate for 1000 explicit claim different from tacit qualifications

“D”liberate for 200? What is a Dilemma?

“D”liberate for 400? What is a Dispute?

“D”liberate for 600? What is Deduction?

“D”liberate for 800? What is Division?

“D”liberate for 1000? What is Death by a Thousand Qualifications?

Nature for 200 an irrelevant thesis used to distract

Nature for 400 tainted original

Nature for 600 an attempt to shift attention from merits of argument to source of argument

Nature for 800 Physical examination of elements

Nature for 1000 implying a first step leads to the next and so-forth to the conclusion

Nature for 200? What is a Red Herring?

Nature for 400? What is a Genetic Fallacy?

Nature for 600? What is Poisoning the Well?

Nature for 800? What is Observation?

Nature for 1000? What is a Slippery Slope?

Rogers for 200 Improve the opponent’s position

Rogers for 400 State the problem

Rogers for 600 Give the opponent’s position

Rogers for 800 The last step in the Rogerian argument

Rogers for 1000 Carl Rogers profession

Rogers for 200? What is the fourth step?

Rogers for 400? What is a the first thing to do?

Rogers for 600? What is The Second Step in the Process?

Rogers for 800? What is Present the Compromise?

Rogers for 1000? What is a Psychologist?

More Fallacies for 200 giving utterance to two meanings at the same time in one word

More Fallacies for 400 those which lead arguments astray

More Fallacies for 600 draw an inference from unknown, though likely true, premise

More Fallacies for 800 an array of consequences which will or may follow

More Fallacies for 1000 failure to use suitable qualifiers in substantiation

More Fallacies for 200? What is equivocation?

More Fallacies for 400? What are fallacies?

More Fallacies for 600? What is an Appeal to Ignorance?

More Fallacies for 800? What is Parade of Horrors?

More Fallacies for 1000? What is a Oversimplification?

More Romans for 200 merit of an argument has nothing to do with the person making it

More Romans for 400 Persuading through threat of reprisal

More Romans for 600 conclusion is hidden in the assumption

More Romans for 800 reducing the issue to the point of absurdity

More Romans for 1000 After this, therefore because of this

More Romans for 200? What is tu quoque?

More Romans for 400? What ad baculum?

More Romans for 600? What is an Petition Principii?

More Romans for 800? What is Reductio ad Absurdium?

More Romans for 1000? What is a Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc?

Turn in your final bid answer, and I will tally your points!