Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11

Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

Presentation outline Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Analysis 2 – Brick Façade Questions Diab Shetayh

Project Overview Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth Project Title: Paint Branch High School Function: Education Location: Burtonsville, MD Building Size: 349, 000 SF Project Cost: $ 80, 973, 293 VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgments X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Date of Construction: 12/15/2009 – July 30, 2013 Delivery Method: Modified CM @ Risk Diab Shetayh

Project Overview Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgments X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis PB Phase Diagram Phase 1: • Construction of the new facility • Substantial completion date: June 1, 2012 Phase 2: • Reconfigure Parking lots for staff & Students • Substantial completion date: August 19, 2011 Phase 3: • Abatement & demolition of old facility • Substantial completion date: July 30, 2013 Diab Shetayh Phase 2 Phase 3 Pha se 1

Project Team Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgments X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Owner: Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) Moseley Architects Architect: HESS Construction + Engineering Services Construction Manager: ADTEK Engineers B 2 E Consulting Engineers Civil Engineer Wolfman & Associates MEP Engineer: Structural Engineers: Diab Shetayh Project Team

Overview of Analyses Analysis 1: LEED Certification Presentation Outline: • Reviewing LEED scorecard for opportunities I. Project Overview • Analyzing opportunities for additional costs II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination Analysis 2: Brick Façade • Cost & Schedule impact to project • Mechanical Breadth • Structural Breadth Analysis 3: BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion • Reviewing clash detection logs and case studies IX. Acknowledgements • Determine cost and schedule savings to project X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

Analysis 1 – LEED Certification Daylight: • with brighter learning environments, test scores increase by 25% • Ability to learn 20 -25% faster on standardized tests Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination Problem: • State of the art High School • LEED Gold Certified (43 Points) Air Quality: • Children miss 10 million school days a year due to asthma • Poor air quality can cause mold growth and disease to spread Research Goals/Methodology: • Review LEED scorecard for opportunities • Achieve LEED Platinum Certification (52 Points) Acoustics: • Students score up to 20% higher on word recognition tests • Poor acoustics cause distraction, which affects a students ability to learn VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural. Engineering. Spring 2011––Senior. Thesis Green Schools Statistics LEED Version 2. 2 Diab Shetayh

LEED Scorecard Sustainable Sites • Credit 7. 1 – Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof • Placed 50% of parking under canopy LEED Credit Opportunities Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Sustainable Sites Credit 7. 1 Points Heat Island Effect, Non Roof 1 Energy & Atmosphere Points Credit 2. 1 On-Site Renewable Energy 1 -3 Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 1 Credit 5 Measurement & Verification 1 Indoor Environmental Quality Points Credit 1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 1 Credit 5 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control 1 Credit 7. 1 Thermal Comfort, Design 1 Total Possible Points Diab Shetayh 9 Energy & Atmosphere • Credit 2. 1 – On-Site Renewable Energy • Incorporated Wind Turbine on site • Credit 4 – Enhanced Refrigerant Management • Changed refrigerant to R 134 A • Credit 5 – Measurement & verification • Third Party to establish plan Indoor Environmental Quality • Credit 1 - Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring • Incorporated CO 2 monitoring Systems • Credit 5 - Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control • Proposed entry grates at all major entrances • Credit 7. 1 - Thermal Comfort, Design • Heating & Cooling loads to be calculated by ME

Credit 7. 1 – Heat Island Effect, Non. Roof Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Requirements: • 50% of parking spaces under deck/roof • Material used must have a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI)2 of at least 29 Total Parking spaces: 355 Total Parking Spaces Required: 178 Total Parking Spaces Under Canopy: 188 = Single cantilever System = Double Cantilever System Diab Shetayh

Credit 7. 1 – Cost Analysis Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team Canopy System III. Overview of Analyses IV. Cost Analysis Total Parking Spots Total Linear Ft Cost/LF Total Cost Single Cantilever 47 470 $300 $ 141, 000 Analysis 1 – LEED Certification Double Cantilever 141 780 $600 $ 468, 000 V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade Total 188 1, 250 $900 $ 609, 000 VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements = Single cantilever System X. Questions = Double Cantilever System Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

Complete Cost Analysis LEED Cost Analysis Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. X. Acknowledgements Advantages: Sustainable Sites Credit 7. 1 Heat Island Effect, Non Roof Points Cost 1 $609, 000 Points Cost 1 -3 $25, 000 • Savings in operating Costs Energy & Atmosphere Credit 2. 1 On-Site Renewable Energy Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 1 N/A Credit 5 Measurement & Verification 1 $55, 000 Points Cost Indoor Environmental Quality Credit 1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 1 $123, 200 Credit 5 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control 1 $156, 695 Credit 7. 1 Thermal Comfort, Design 1 N/A Total Possible Points/Cost Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Analysis 1 Conclusion Diab Shetayh 9 $968, 859 • Increased Test Scores • Cleaner learning Environment Disadvantages: • High Upfront Cost

Analysis 2 – Brick Façade Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination Problem: • Congested site • Façade is primarily face brick Research Goals/Methodology: • Contacting Prefab. Manufacturers • Determine cost & Schedule impact with new system VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Current System: • 4” face brick • 1” Air Space • 2” Rigid Insulation • 10” CMU Proposed System: • 1” face Brick • 3. 5” Polyurethane • 4” Steel Stud • 5/8” Gypsum Board • 1” Membrane (2) • ½” Fiberboard

Calculations Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth Total SF of Brick: 108, 000 SF Prefab. Panel Size: 12’ X 40’ = 480 SF Total Number of Panels Needed: 225 Panels VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Panels Installed Per day : 8 -15 panels (5 man crew) Diab Shetayh Current System: • 4” face brick • 1” Air Space • 2” Rigid Insulation • 10” CMU Proposed System: • 1” face Brick • 3. 5” Polyurethane • 4” Steel Stud • 5/8” Gypsum Board • 1” Membrane (2) • ½” Fiberboard

Façade Comparison Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth Advantages: • Decrease in Project Schedule • Minimize Site Congestion • Better quality VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Analysis 2 Conclusion Schedule Savings: 139 Days – 19 Days = 120 Days (6 Months) Additional Cost: $4, 320, 000 - $2, 226, 960 = $2, 093, 040 Diab Shetayh Disadvantages: • More Expensive System

Mechanical Breadth Wall Sections Comparison in R –values and U-values Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Calculate each systems heat transfer Conduct cost analysis between both systems Current System: • 4” face brick • 1” Air Space • 2” Rigid Insulation • 10” CMU Proposed System: • 1” face Brick • 3. 5” Polyurethane • 4” Steel Stud • 5/8” Gypsum Board • 1” Membrane (2) • ½” Fiberboard Diab Shetayh Current System Proposed System

Current Façade Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Proposed Façade

Cost ANALYSIS Alternative Interior Finish: • Changed CMU finish to Gypsum wall board • Changed Rigid insulation to Polyurethane Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Cost ANALYSIS Diab Shetayh

Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural. Engineering. Spring 2011––Senior. Thesis Diab Shetayh

Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural. Engineering. Spring 2011––Senior. Thesis Diab Shetayh

Conclusion Analysis 1: Presentation Outline: • Achieved LEED Platinum Certification I. Project Overview • Total Additional Cost - $968, 859 II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification • Additional Cost w/ Prefab System - $2, 093, 040 V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade • Savings in project schedule – 6 months VI. Mechanical Breadth Analysis 2: VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

Acknowledgements Academic Acknowledgements: • Dr. Riley – CM Advisor Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth • Dr. Robert Leicht • Dr. John Messner • Penn State AE faculty Special Thanks To: • Matt Evans (HESS Construction) VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination • Saurabh Gangwar (Hess Construction) VIII. Conclusion • George Houke (HESS Construction) IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions • Paint branch Project Team Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Acknowledgements

Presentation Outline: I. Project Overview II. Project Team III. Overview of Analyses IV. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI. Mechanical Breadth Questions? VII. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII. Conclusion IX. Acknowledgements X. Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Questions?