ARB Title Work Order ARB Date www dhs

[ARB Title] [Work Order #] [ARB Date] www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us >

ARB Agenda • [Agenda Items] • See ARB Process for required items for ARB 1, 2, 3 and 4 meetings. www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 2

Background [ARB 1 -3 ] • Provide a description of the purpose of the initiative www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 3

Initiative Overview Initiative #1 Business Problem § Business Problem #1 Business Solution § Business Solution #1 § Business Problem #2 Business Outcome § Outcome #1 § Outcome #2 § Outcome #3 Initiative #2 § Business Problem #3 § Business Solution #2 § Business Problem #4 § Business Solution #3 § Outcome #4. www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 4

System Requirements [ARB 1 Only] • • System requirement #1 System requirement #2 System requirement #3 System requirement #4 www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 5

Architecture [ARB 2 and 3 Only] • • • Interfaces Conversion Batch Archive Purge requirements Disaster Recovery www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 6

Implementation Scope [ARB 2, 3 & 4] Activity Y / N. A. Notes Cross-Application Dependencies Systems internal or external to DHS Deployment Expectations Teams required to be in Saturday and Sunday to support deployment and validation. Pre-Deployment Activities Put up maintenance pages for multiple apps Post-Deployment Activities Execute specific batch jobs or data manipulation scripts Post-Implementation Activities X days after deployment, do Y www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 7

Key DSD Considerations [ARB 3 Only] BIS Domain Key Considerations Security Network Knowledge Management Platform Integration and Middleware Data Operations and Support Application Business Privacy Access www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 8

Deployment Scope [ARB 4 Only] Area System Description Database System 1 Reference table updates and ACD supporting Initiative #1 System 2 Reference table updates only System 3 Reference table updates only System 1 No significant capacity impacts are anticipated. System 2 Capacity increase resulting Initiative #1 statewide rollout. System 3 No significant capacity impacts are anticipated. Capacity Batch System 1 System 2 System 3 Correspondence System 1 System 2 System 3 Rules (Corticon) System 1 System 2 System 3 www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 9

System Operational Readiness [ARB 4 Only] SAT Activity Y/N Date Notes Performance Testing Completed Vulnerability Testing Completed UAT User Acceptance Testing Completed Conversion Testing Completed Batch Testing Completed Deployment Readiness Outstanding TFS Defects From Testing [Functional and non-functional] Batch Schedule and Manual Updated Playbook Reviews Scheduled Final User Roles / Account Sign-Offs Health Checks / Business Metrics Included Operational Preparations Completed [Field support, war rooms scheduled, etc. ] www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 10

Business Operational Readiness Review [ARB 4] Project Management Activity Y/N Date Notes Is the Integrated Work Plan Current? Have the Business Requirements Document and Requirements Traceability Matrix been updated? Is the UAT Test Plan Approved? Is the Testing completed? UAT Has the testing Exit Criteria been met? Has Requirements Traceability been established through identification of Testing Scenarios? Is the completed UAT approved? User Training & Materials Have all defects been reviewed and current status approved? Has the Training Plan been approved? Have Training Materials been approved? Is User Reference Documentation approved and available? Is the Training completed? www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 11

Business Operational Readiness Review Contd. . Activity [ARB 4] Y/N Date Notes Has the Field confirmed they are ready to use the new release (user has required hardware, forms, other tools needed)? Implementation Has the Program Office confirmed they are ready for implementation verification activities? Is the Implementation Playbook approved? Do we have confirmation that agreed upon End. User communication has been completed? Do we have confirmation that the Field Support Team has been identified and notified of the release? Do we have confirmation that the post-release Support Process has been identified and communicated? Has the post-release Field Support Team confirmed they will be in place for post-release activities? www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 12

Timeline & Testing Activities Phase Activities System Requirements Specific Provisions or Tools Expected Timeframe Team Foundation Server (TFS) Complete General System Design TFS, Erwin <Enter Dates> Detailed System Design TFS, Erwin <Enter Dates> Development, Unit Testing Visual Studio, TFS, Cognos, Informatica, MBUnit, Soap. UI <Enter Dates> Integration Testing, ADA Compliance, Security Testing MTM, Quick Test Pro (QTP)*, Soap. UI, Acc. Verify, Web Inspect <Enter Dates> System Acceptance Testing (SAT) SAT Environment Readiness Testing, Performance Testing, Regression Testing MTM, QTP*, Soap. UI, Load. Runner* <Enter Dates> User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Support Lot Vendor and Program Office as required <Enter Dates> Test for Production (TFP) Production Readiness Testing MTM, QTP* <Enter Dates> Production Deployment Testing MTM, QTP* <Enter Dates> * While new scenarios/scripts will be created using MTM, Quick Test Pro and Load Runner will continue to be used until all existing assets are converted to use the new tools. www. dhs. state. pa. us www. dpw. state. pa. us > 13