API RP 17 N Subsea Production System Reliability

API RP 17 N Subsea Production System Reliability and Technical Risk Management & Integrity Management 19 th January 2012 Don Wells (Hess)

Agenda • • • Introduction Scope Membership General Progress Detail Progress Integration 17 Committee/ISO

Introduction • Incorporate Integrity Management into current API 17 N …Subsea Reliability and Technical Risk Management • Recognize and incorporate integration with other Industry initiatives • Incorporate updates based on feedback from using existing 17 N document • Respond to recent industry experiences

Scope • Review of Summer Meeting topics • Continue previously presented scope • Additional scope – API 17 A requirements Design and Operations of Subsea Production Systems – Greenfield – Brownfield – Future requirements

Membership • Organized into subcommittees – Design and Decommission – Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning – Operations – Technology Qualification – Regulations • Room for additional membership • Opportunity to Make a Difference

General Progress • 2010 – 2011 – Storming and forming - Complete – Gap Analysis – Mostly Complete – Interfacing with Runar Østebø – • Statoil & convener of ISO/TC 67 WG 4 • 2012 - Planned – Define Tone (prescriptive / recommend) – Work the Gaps – Work the Interfaces – Industry Peer Assist Workshop • SURF IM Forum

Detail Progress • Define Scope - Completed • Define Charter – Completed • Divide and Conquer – Design and Decommission • New Key Process (KP) for Through Life to be Developed • Does API want Risk Based or Safety Case Approach? (Hybrid? ) – Do we want/need to meet with BSEE to discuss?

Detail Progress • Divide and Conquer – Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning • Matrix Developed • Where & How to test being worked • Does Verification and Validation need new KP? (Rewrite KP 06? ) • MOC being worked

Detail Progress • Divide and Conquer – cont. – Operations • Reviewed and Raised issues with existing 12 KPs • Proposed 3 additional KPs – Field Modifications – Inspection and Monitoring – Remedial Intervention • Added 3 Processes to “Project Phase Guide to Processes”

Detail Progress • Divide and Conquer – cont. – Technology Qualification • New Risks Identified – Obsolescence – Misuse of TRLs – New Technologies – New materials • Keep integrated as a section in API 17 N – If not, make it a Technical Reference – Make Generic vs. Prescriptive – Robust, Goal Based with examples • Utilize DNV RP A-203 as much as possible – Evaluate the use in early conceptual phase • Survey Industry to ID Qualifying Technologies main challenges

Detail Progress • Divide and Conquer – cont. – Regulations • Managing Committees 1 -4 Interfaces • Will lead Prescriptive vs. Recommend discussions • On hold until more definition / decisions from other committees

Path Forward • Path Forward – Continue Subcommittee work – Outline of Process to use as QA tool – Common Matrix to combine / review completed work – Work the idea of using SURF IM Forum to discuss with industry and gather additional input • Write • Review • Ballot

Interface / Integration • API 17 A, API Q 1 • ISO – 14224 - Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment – 20815 - Production assurance and reliability management – 15663 - Life Cycle Costing – TR 12489 - Reliability modeling and calculation of safety systems • Review committee draft document • Feedback 17 N specific comments – DNV RP A 203/API RP 17 Q?