APGrid PMA Stauts Yoshio Tanaka yoshio tanakaaist go

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
APGrid PMA: Stauts Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio. tanaka@aist. go. jp) Grid Technology Research Center, AIST,

APGrid PMA: Stauts Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio. tanaka@aist. go. jp) Grid Technology Research Center, AIST, Japan National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology

Ap. Grid: Asia Pacific Partnership for Grid Computing Open community for Grid researchers in

Ap. Grid: Asia Pacific Partnership for Grid Computing Open community for Grid researchers in Asia Pacific India Ap. Grid can be A meeting point for all Grid researchers in Asia-Pacific A communication channel to the GGF, and other grid communities A pool for finding international project partners

Pacific Rim Application and Grid Middleware Assembly NSF-funded project lead by UCSD/SDSC. 1 st

Pacific Rim Application and Grid Middleware Assembly NSF-funded project lead by UCSD/SDSC. 1 st workshop was held in March 2002. Establish sustained collaborations and advance the use of the Grid technologies for applications. Expected outcomes: Advance scientific applications Increase productive and effective use of the grid by researchers and scientists in the Pacific Rim Increase interoperability of grid middleware in Pacific Rim and throughout the world Tightly collaborating with Ap. Grid. Having workshops 2~3 times a year.

Testbed in Asia Pacific – unique features – Truly (naturally) multi national/political/institutional VO beyond

Testbed in Asia Pacific – unique features – Truly (naturally) multi national/political/institutional VO beyond boundaries Not an application-dedicated testbed – general platform 言語と文字 Diversity of languages, culture, policy, interests, … Grid BYO – Grass roots approach Each institution contributes his resources for sharing Not a single source funded for the development Physical resources Most contributed resources are small-scale clusters Networking is there, however the bandwidth is not enough We can have experiences on running international VO verify the feasibility of this approach for the testbed development

Grids in Asia Pacific Architecture, technology Based on GT 2 Allow multiple CAs Build

Grids in Asia Pacific Architecture, technology Based on GT 2 Allow multiple CAs Build MDS Tree Grid middleware/tools from Asia Pacific Ninf-G (Grid. RPC programming) Nimrod-G (parametric modeling system) system SCMSWeb (resource monitoring) Grid Data Farm (Grid File System), etc. Status 22 organizations (10 countries) 23 clusters (1688 CPUs)

Grass-roots Approach (strategy) Ap. Grid GIIS CA globus CA globus CA globus Assumption Each

Grass-roots Approach (strategy) Ap. Grid GIIS CA globus CA globus CA globus Assumption Each institution has installed GT 2 Necessary steps Gather and exchange trusted CA info. and trust with each other Configure MDS to build an Ap. Grid MDS tree For application use Install additional software in project -basis

Status and problems Most participating organizations have less interests in Security Many participants are

Status and problems Most participating organizations have less interests in Security Many participants are application people Not enough human resources working on security Satisfy in using Globus Simple CA without providing CP/CPS This would be acceptable inside AP for experimental use. potential/ongoing collaboration with US and EU e. g. : AIST/Japan – Tera. Grid KISTI/Korea – PPDG and i. VDGL ASCC/Taiwan – LCG … Need to launch production level CAs

APGrid PMA: Asia Pacific Grid PMA General Policy Management Authority in Asia Pacific Launched

APGrid PMA: Asia Pacific Grid PMA General Policy Management Authority in Asia Pacific Launched on June 1 st, 2004 Defines minimum CA requirements APGrid PMA approved that we accept two levels of CA: Experimental-level CA Alternative of the Globus CA Can be trusted within A-P communities Production-level CA Strict management is necessary Expected to be trusted by international communities KISTI GRID CA and AIST GRID CA has been approved as a production level CA ASGC CA are under reviewing their CP/CPS (expected to be approved shortly) Australia has a plan to launch a new production-level CA

Questions (examples) Can Tera. Grid trust AIST GRID CA? How is the procedure for

Questions (examples) Can Tera. Grid trust AIST GRID CA? How is the procedure for reviewing? Do AIST GRID CA need to be reviewed by individual organizations (NCSA, PSC, SDSC, …)? If KISTI GRID CA wish to be trusted by Tera. Grid, is separate review necessary? Can DOEGrid PMA be responsible? Can APGrid PMA help? Can Ap. Grid/PRAGMA trust Tera. Grid CA? How is the procedure for reviewing? Do Ap. Grid/PRAGMA need to review all CAs (NCSA, PSC, SDSC, etc. )? Can APGrid PMA be responsible? Can DOEGrid PMA help? KEK/Japan may launch a new CA. Do the CA need to be reviewed by EUGrid PMA? Can APGrid PMA help? How do we keep consistency of CP/CPS? Recently, Academia Sinica revised the CP/CPS

More Information APGrid PMA http: //www. apgridpma. org/ Ap. Grid http: //www. apgrid. org/

More Information APGrid PMA http: //www. apgridpma. org/ Ap. Grid http: //www. apgrid. org/ PRAGMA http: //www. pragma-grid. net/ NAREGI http: //www. naregi. org/ GTRC/AIST http: //www. gtrc. aist. go. jp/ My email address yoshio. tanaka@aist. go. jp