AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Persuasive Appeals Logos includes

AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Persuasive Appeals Logos includes data, statistics, proven facts. It also includes logical arguments… Arguments that make sense! Reasoning!

Logos = Logic – Reason (objective proof) is used to spell out claims that are logically sound and supported by reliable evidence. – Logic can be either deductive, inductive, or both

Premise vs. Conclusion – Ask yourself what you are trying to prove. What is your conclusion? – The statements that give your reasons are your premises. – I am an optimist. It does not seem to be much use being anything else. (Churchill) – “I am an optimist” is the conclusion – “It does not seem to be much use being anything else” is the premise or reason for the conclusion

Premises vs Conclusion – A dog was kept in the stalls, and yet, though someone had been in and fetched out a horse, [the dog] had not barked. . Obviously the. . . visitor was someone whom the dog knew well. (Sherlock Holmes in “The Adventure of Silver Blaze” – Explicit Premise: the dog didn’t bark – General fact premise: he assumes we know that all dogs bark at strangers – Conclusion: The visitor wasn’t a stranger.

Distinguishing the Difference – What is the author trying to convince you to believe? This is the claim/conclusion – Conclusion indicators: therefore, thus, hence, so, consequently, this shows that – Then ask what reasons the author gives to convince you. These are the premises. – Premise indicators: because, since, given that, for, on the grounds that, this follows from

Inductive Reasoning – Particular to the general – Generalizations are made on an observed fact (often used in scientific experimentation). – Easiest for the audience to accept because evidence is provided – Example: Every patient suffering from flu that the doctor examined had a fever. Therefore, fever must be a symptom of flu.

Deductive Reasoning Syllogism – moving from the general belief to the particular – every syllogism contains at least three parts: – a major premise (global assumption) – a minor premise (specific claim) – a conclusion

An example of a syllogism all men are mortal (major premise) Socrates is a man (minor premise) Socrates is mortal (conclusion)

A visual representation all men are mortal Socrates is a man all things mortal men Socrates is mortal

An example of a syllogism all mammals have hair (major premise) fish do not have hair (minor premise) fish are not mammals (conclusion)

A visual representation all things with hair all mammals have hair fish do not have hair mammals fish are not mammals fish

A visual representation All women are bad drivers. Jean is a woman. bad drivers woman Jean is a bad driver.

Simple Syllogism Practice

What is an enthymeme? – sometimes called a “truncated syllogism” – a syllogism without stating either the major or minor premise (it is implied) – less formal than the syllogism – sometimes more persuasive

An example of an enthymeme We cannot trust this man because he has perjured himself in the past. Enthymemes are often “because” statements.

The syllogism behind this enthymeme… Those who perjure themselves cannot be trusted. (major premise) This man perjured himself in the past. (minor premise) This man cannot be trusted. (conclusion)

Beware. Think Critically. Enthymemes are sometimes used to hide the underlying assumption upon which an argument is based. Find it and challenge it.

What are the unstated assumptions? – I failed that course because the instructor didn’t like me. Assumption: The instructor fails students he doesn’t like. – I’m not surprised he made the team. After all, his father is the superintendent of schools. Assumption: The superintendent gives special favors to his family – If I’d only taken my boss to lunch more often, I could have gotten that raise. Assumption: The boss denies raises to people who don’t take him to lunch very often.

Practice

We shouldn't elect Joe as committee chair because he is too bossy Claim: We shouldn't elect Joe as committee chair Data: because he is too bossy Warrant:

BOSSY PEOPLE MAKE BAD COMMITTEE CHAIRS. Warrant

Buy this stereo system because it has a powerful amplifier Claim: Buy this stereo system Data: because it has a powerful amplifier Warrant:

STEREO SYSTEMS WITH POWERFUL AMPLIFIERS ARE WORTH BUYING. Warant

Drugs should not be legalized because legalization would greatly increase the number of drug addicts. Claim: Drugs should not be legalized Data: because legalization would greatly increase the number of drug addicts. Warrant:

INCREASED ACCESS TO DRUGS WILL LEAD TO MORE ADDICTS. Warrant

Practicing the piano is good for kids because it teaches discipline Claim: Practicing the piano is good for kids Data: because it teaches discipline Warrant:

KIDS NEED TO BE TAUGHT DISCIPLINE. Warrant

Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should be eliminated because doing so will greatly reduce the nation's illegitimacy rate. Claim: Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should be eliminated Data: because doing so will greatly reduce the nation's illegitimacy rate. Warrant:

WELFARE BENEFITS ENCOURAGE ILLEGITIMACY. Warrant

Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should not be eliminated because these benefits are needed to prevent unbearable poverty among our nation's most helpless citizens. Claim: Welfare benefits for unwed mothers should not be eliminated Data: because these benefits are needed to prevent unbearable poverty among our nation's most helpless citizens. Warrant:

UNWED MOTHERS ARE HELPLESS AND POVERTYSTRICKEN WITHOUT WELFARE BENEFITS. Warrant

We should strengthen the Endangered Species Act because doing so will preserve genetic diversity on the planet. – Claim: We should strengthen the Endangered Species Act – Data: because doing so will preserve genetic diversity on the planet. – Warrant:

THE ENGDANGERED SPECIES ACT PRESERVES GENETIC DIVERSITY. Warrant

The Endangered Species Act is too stringent because it severely damages the economy. –Claim: The Endangered Species Act is too stringent –Data: because it severely damages the economy. –Warrant:

OVERLY STRINGENT ACTS DAMAGE THE ECONOMY. Warrant