Aortic Emergencies Moritz Haager Sept 19 2002 Objectives
Aortic Emergencies Moritz Haager Sept 19, 2002
Objectives • Define aortic dissection + AAA, and why its important • Review pathophysiology and classification • Discuss diagnostic modalities • Discuss management options
What is Dissection? • Aortic dissection dissecting aortic aneurysm • “longitudinal cleavage of the aortic media created by a dissecting column of blood”Rosen’s Emergency Medicine
Relevance • • • Underreported Incidence 5 -10/ 1, 000 and rising Mortality 1 -2%/hour (33% in 1 st 24 hrs) High rate of misdiagnosis ~28% One study suggests EP’s suspect AD in <50% of cases » Sullivan et al. Am J Emerg Med 18: 46 -50. 2000 • Variable presentation including MI • Lack of suspicion for AD is #1 cause of misdiagnosis
Sad but true. . • 42 yo M presents c/o pain in R groin + leg • Also atypical CP/back pain preceding • Sniffed coke ~2 hrs ago + popped viagra ~1 hr ago at a “sex party” • PMHx: HTN, smoker • O/E: 92/ 160/100 /16; pale, diaphoretic, unwell looking; 2/6 SEM at apex, clear lungs, soft nontender belly w/ Ø masses, R foot/ leg cool w/ Ø femoral, popliteal or tibial pulses • ECG: isolated ventricular beats • B/W: normal except +ve tox for cocaine • CT: Stanford Type B dissection • TEE: 3. 5 cm intimal tear, Ø AR Famularo et al. J Emerg Med 21(1): 78 -9. 2001
Pathophysiology • Requires 3 basic features: 1. Abnormal media 2. Blood entry into media (intimal tear, or vasa vasorum rupture) 3. Pressure forces favoring propagation
Pathophysiology • Peripheral complications: expanding hematoma dissects into, or compresses branches, or fistulizes into adj. structures – – – – Cerebral CVA, syncope, Spinal Neuro deficits Cardiac MI, tamponade Respiratory Hemoptysis, pleural effusion GI Hematemesis, dysphagia, mesenteric ischemia Renal ARF, HT N Limbs Extremity ischemia
• Intimal tears occur in 96% of all AD cases • Felt to occur 2 o to shearing forces and hemodynamic stresses • Propagation factors: – Degree of HTN – Slope of pulse wave (d. P/d. T) • Spontaneous cure = rupture back into true lumen (rare)
• Hemopericardium and tamponade can occur with dissection into pericardial sac
-Coronary artery involvement in ~1% presents as MI -0. 1 -0. 2% of MI’s are complicated by admin of lytics in setting of AD
Clinical Presentation • • Sudden, severe chest pain (~76 -90%) Migratory CP is highly specific (~71%) Back pain (~53%), abd pain Other Sx depending on site of involvement – – Syncope (~9%) Neuro Sx (~6 -13%) GI Sx Resp Sx • Can be painless in up to 15% (chronic) Moore et al. Am J Card. 89: 1235 -1238 2002 Hals. Emerg Med Reports 2000
Risk Factors for AD • • • Hypertension (60 -90%) Age 50 -70 yo Male (3: 1) CTD’s (Marfans ~5%, Ehlers-Danlos) Turners, Coarctation, Ebstein’s Anomaly Congenital bi-/tricuspid AV Family Hx or previous dissection Cocaine, metamphetamine Iatrogenic Trauma Hals. Emerg Med Reports 2000
Classification • De. Bakey: – Type I: involve ascending aorta, arch, and descending aorta – Type II: ascending aorta proximal to L subclavian artery – Type IIIa: descending aorta only; above diaphragm only – Type IIIb: descending aorta only; extension below diaphragm
De. Bakey
Stanford • • Type A: involvement of ascending aorta Type B: no involvement of ascending aorta ~62. 5% of pts w/ AD have a Type A Involvement of ascending aorta is of prognostic and therapeutic importance
Classification
How to diagnose AD • Clinical suspicion above all • 3 clinical variables shown to be useful: • Aortic pain (immediate onset, tearing, ripping) • Mediastinal widening / aortic widening on CXR • Pulse or BP differentials – Likelihood of AD: • Ø of above variables 7% risk of AD • Pain or widening alone 31 + 39% risk of AD respectively • > 2 variables or isolated BP / pulse diff > 83% risk of AD » Von Kodolitsch et al. Arch Intern Med. 160: 2977 -82. 2000 • Diagnostic modalities • ECG, CXR, CT, TEE, Angiogram, MRI
ECG findings in AD • • • ~85% will be abnormal LVH Non-specific ST-T wave changes MI (RCA most common) Bottom line: – not sensitive or specific – beware thrombolysis until AD excluded
CXR findings in AD • 80 -90% will be abnormal • Most findings non-specific: – – – – – Mediastinal widening (~59 -75%) Calcium sign (pathognomonic) Double density aorta Obliteration of aortic knuckle Loss of PA window Tracheal deviation to right Depressed left main stem bronchus New left pleural effusion Apical cap Size disparity of ascending + descending aorta
TEE • • Rosen: 98% sensitive, 77% specific Moore et al: 88% sensitive 1 st test in Europe and Japan Advantages: – – Can differentiate Type A + B dissections Rapid, can be done at bedside No contrast or radiation Can detect AR and pericardial effusion • Disadvantages – Availability, operator dependence – Limited info on distal aorta Moore et al. Am J Card. 89: 1235 -1238. 2002
CT scanning • Dynamic helical CT nearly 100% sensitive and specific (dye) (Moore et al: 93% sens) • Advantages: – Availability, can differentiate Type A + B – Able to identify sealed-off false lumens – Able to identify other pathology (eg PE) • Disadvantages: – Dye reactions (1/10, 000 fatal) – No info on AV function or intimal tear location – No info about extension into other arteries
Angiography • 81 -87% sensitive, 96% specific • Previous gold standard • Advantages: – Anatomical delineation of aortic tree – Ability to demonstrate AR – Can differentiate Type A + B dissections • Disadvantages: – False –ves due to false lumen thrombosis – Invasive, time consuming, expensive
MRI • Near 100% sensitivity and specificity • No role in critical pts but good for serial follow-up • Advantages: – Excellent anatomical delineation, info on AR, intimal tear location, type and extent of AD • Disadvantages: – Time-consuming – Unable to monitor pt
Intravascular U/S • New technique – intravascular U/S probe • Currently evolving uses include – Identification of unstable plaques in CAD – Diagnostic and therapeutic use in AD • 3 -D imaging of aorta + surrounding structures • Guidance of intra-vascular stent placement – less invasive procedure than classic surgery • Fenestration of intimal flap – Not available at most centers at this time Chavan et al. Circulation 96: 2124 -2127. 1997
3 -D IVUS
So what test do I order 1 st? • Moore et al: CT is initial test of choice followed by TEE to clarify Dx or better delineate surrounding anatomy + AR » Moore et al. Am J Card. 89: 1235 -1238. 2002 • In Calgary, TEE is considered highly accurate and available, and should be considered a 1 st line test » Peter Giannacarro, personal communication
Can we predict outcomes? • Pulse deficit is independent predictor of 5 -day mortality RR 2. 73, 95% CI 1. 7 -4. 4 • Stat sig trend of increasing mortality with increasing number of pulse deficits – Bosssone et al. Am J Card 89: 851 -855. 2002 • Mortality predictors: – – – Age > 70 (OR 1. 7, 95% CI 1. 05 -2. 77) Abrupt onset CP (OR 2. 6, 95% CI 1. 22 -5. 54) Hypotension/shock/tamponade (OR 2. 97, 95% CI 1. 25 -3. 29) ARF (OR 1. 77; 95% CI 1. 80 -12. 6) Pulse deficit (OR 2. 03; 95% CI 1. 25 -3. 29) Abnormal ECG (OR 1. 77; 95% CI 1. 06 -2. 95) – Rajendra et al. Circulation. 105: 200 -206. 2002
Management • ABC’s and then 2 basic principles: – Control d. P/d. T • 1 st control your HR, then lower the pressure – Surgery if indicated • All Type A dissections need urgent OR • Controversies + New Ideas – Surgery for Type B dissections – Intravascular repair
Medical Tx • Control HR – IV BB’s – aim for HR 60 -80 bpm • Propranolol 1 mg IVP q 5 min • Esmolol 500 mcg/kg bolus, then titrate infusion 50 -200 mcg/kg/min • Metoprolol 5 mg IVP q 5 min • Diltiazem 20 mg IV bolus, then 5 -15 mg/hr if BB contraindicated (heart block, asthma, COPD, CHF)
Medical Tx • Control BP • aim for BP 100 -120 mm. Hg sys or min BP req’d to maintain end-organ perfusion • Nitroprusside 0. 5 mcg/kg/min – titrate up prn • Monotherapy • Labetalol 20 mg IVP, then 20 -80 mg q 5 -10 min until in target HR, then 1 -2 mg/hr
Surgical Tx • Indicated for: – All Type A dissections – Type B w/ complications: • • • Aortic rupture Severe distal ischemia Refractory HTN Progressive dissection despite Tx Intractable pain • Mortality for Type A repair is ~7 -12% • Co-morbidities increase mortality • 5 yr survival is 77% Type A + 88% Type B
Why not operate on all? • Medical Tx of Type B has ~20% mortality • Surgical Tx of Type B has 10 -15% mortality, and 3. 5 -36% risk of paraplegia • This may be changing with advent of endovascular repair, fenestration procedures, and IVUS.
New Surgical Methods • IVUS-guided fenestration of intimal flap » Chavan et al. Circulation 96: 2124 -2127. 1997 • Intravascular stent placement – Cover intimal flap reducing flow to false lumen clotting of false lumen – 1. 6 hrs vs 8 hrs for conventional Sx – One recent series of 70 Type B AD pts tx’d w/ stent-grafts reported 92. 9% success and 9. 6% all cause mortality at 29 months » Palma et al. Ann Thorac Surg 73: 138 -42. 2002
AAA: some facts • • • Incidence rising: 2% >65 yo 9 men for every 1 female Most have no antecedent Sx 50 -80% mortality rate Misdiagnosed in 30 -60% of cases
Definitions • Aneurysm = irreversible localized dilatation of an artery to > 1. 5 original diameter (~3 cm in abd aorta) • Types of aneurysms: – True = involves intima, media, and adventitia – Pseudoaneurysm = only intact + bulging layer is adventita – Inflammatory aneurysm = surrounding fibrosis and adhesions
Pseudoaneurysm • Damged intima + media • Adventitia prevents rupture
Anatomy 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Aorta Inf phrenic R hepatic Common hepatic Gastroduodenal Inf pancreaticoduodenal 7. L common iliac 8. L renal 9. Splenic 10. L gastric
Anatomy
Risk Factors for AAA • • Age 50 -70 Male (9: 1) White Atherosclerosis HTN Smoking Family Hx Loss of elastin / CTD’s (Marfans)
Clinical presentation • Unruptured vs. Ruptured – Unruptured: • Vague abd pain / back pain / pulsations / fullness • SMA syndrome (wt loss, vomiting) • Renal colic, radicular Sx, embolic phenomena – Ruptured: • Classic: abd pain, pulsatile mass, hypotension • Atypical: – Back or flank pain + hematuria – LLQ pain + GI bleeding – Sx of high-output failure
Physical Findings • Pulsatile abd mass – Palpate each sid of aorta; if >2. 5 cm w/u – PPV ~43% • Other findings neither sensitive or specific
How do to Diagnose AAA • Clinical suspicion • Diagnostic imaging – – Abd U/S CT abd Angiography MRI • What test, when, and for whom?
Plain Films • Initial screening • Findings in 60 -75% – Calcified wall – Paravertebral soft tissue mass – Loss of psoas shadow – Loss of renal silhouette – Erosion of vertebral bodies • Negative study does NOT exclude Dx
Ultrasound • Test of choice, esp in unstable pts • Advantages: – – 100% sensitive + specific for AAA Rapid (~5 min vs. ~80 min for CT) can be done at bedside non-invasive • Disadvantages – Poor at identifying rupture – Technically difficult in obesity / bowel gas
Computed Tomography • 100% sensitive + specific for AAA • Advantages – Able to detect ruptures – Obesity + bowel gas don’t limit study – Surrounding anatomy • Disadvantages – – Unstable pts Time IV contrast (can do without) Not 100% sensitive for rupture
Angiography • NOT a ED screening tool • Tends to underestimate AAA size • May aid in planning of surgery (e. g. renal a. stenosis) • Helical CT can produce 3 -D images + may replace angiography
MRI • Not useful in acute setting • Excellent anatomical delineation • Used primarily prior to elective repair
ED Management • • • – – – Depends on context: Incidental Dx of AAA Ruptured AAA in “stable” pt Unstable pt with ruptured AAA Basic principles: ABC’s Surgical referral for all • • • Elective surgery has ~5% mortality Emergent surgery in non-ruptured AAA ~25% mortality Emergent surgery for RAAA ~50% mortality Controversies: Role of volume resuscitation
Fluid Resuscitation • Evidence in penetrating trauma forgoing aggressive volume resusitation – Bickell et al. N Eng J Med 1994 (331): 1105 -1109 • Fluids can cause dilutional coagulopathy • Ø studies compare ED resus strategies in AAA • Recent Cochrane Review: no evidence to support any specific fluid resus strategy in setting of traumatic hypovolemic shock » Kwan et al. Coch Data Sys Rev. 2002 • Recommendations are to aim for min BP necessary to maintain end-organ perfusion + use blood products early
Natural Hx • Formation enlargement rupture DEATH • How can we intervene? – – Primary prevention Early management + observation Elective surgery Emergency surgery
Risk of Rupture • Risk factors – – Size of AAA COPD HTN smoking • What is the risk of rupture? – <4 cm: ~1 -1. 2% – 4 -5 cm: 1 -3% • One study suggests surgeons estimate risk of rupture >2 x published risk » Lederle. Arch Intern Med 156: 1007 -009. 1996
Current Surgical Indications • • • All symptomatic aneurysms All saccular aneurysms Poor risk pt w/ AAA >6 cm Good risk pt w/ AAA >5 cm Young, good risk pt w/ AAA 4 -5 cm » Sternbergh et al. Surg Clin NA 78: 827 -834. 1998
Elective repair of small AAA’s • 5 yr survival ~76% vs ~30% for emergent • 2 recent RCT’s suggest no survival benefit from immediate surgery for AAA’s 4 -5. 4 cm – RR 1. 21; 95% CI 0. 95 -1. 54 » Lederle et al. N Eng J Med 346: 1437 -44. 2002 – RR 0. 94; 95% CI 0. 75 -1. 17 » UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet 352: 1649 -55. 1998
Traditional vs Endovascular • ELG repair advantages: – Less invasive – Dec’d blood loss, procedure times, ICU stays, hospitalization time, and recovery time – Dec’d morbidity but not mortality • Disadvantages – Expense, limited long-term experience but may be less durable than conventional repair • Utility – Clear morbidity advantage in elderly, high risk pts demonstrated in recent observational study » Sicard et al. Ann Surg 234: 427 -37. 2001 – No good evidence to support use in small AAA’s or younger pts » Brewster. Surgery 131: 363 -7. 2002
Late complications • Graft infection – – – Early or late (up to years after) ~30 -50% mortality Staphylococcus epidermidis Present w/ sepsis +/- AEF Tx is abx, graft excision, + bypass • Aorto-enteric fistula (AEF) – Can form anywhere (usually duodenum) – Acute or chronic GIB – Tx is graft replacement
Questions? 1 hour boy!!. . all you had to do is talk for 1 lousy hour! I could be drunk by now!!
- Slides: 74