Anthropometrics and assessment of energy expenditure Liz Hudson

  • Slides: 40
Download presentation
Anthropometrics and assessment of energy expenditure Liz Hudson MPH, RD September, 26 th 2016

Anthropometrics and assessment of energy expenditure Liz Hudson MPH, RD September, 26 th 2016

Anthropometric data • Height • Weight • BMI • Ideal Body Weight (BMI)

Anthropometric data • Height • Weight • BMI • Ideal Body Weight (BMI)

Ideal Body weight (IBW) and Usual Body Weight (UBW) • Include these measures in

Ideal Body weight (IBW) and Usual Body Weight (UBW) • Include these measures in every assessment, % of IBW and/or UBW provides important clinical information and can be part of criteria to diagnose malnutrition • Usual body weight is more useful in those who are ill • IBW Men: 106 lbs for first 5 feet of height + 6 lbs for every inch over 5 feet; for males under 5 feet in height, start with 106 lbs and subtract 6 lbs for every inch below 5 feet • IBW Women: 100 lbs for first 5 feet of height and plus 5 lbs for every inch thereafter; for women under 5 ft, start with 100 lbs and subtract 5 lbs for every inch under 5 ft

Example • Calculate the IBW of a man that is 190. 5 cm tall

Example • Calculate the IBW of a man that is 190. 5 cm tall (height and weight in electronic medical records are most often in the metric scale) • Step 1. Convert 190. 5 cm to inches there are 2. 54 cm per inch, 190. 5 /2. 54 = 75 inches. • Step 2: How many inches over 5 ft is that? There are 12 inches per foot. 5 x 12 = 72 inches. 75 -60 = 15 (this man is 6 ft 3 inches) • Step 3: Plug into formula 106 lbs + (6 lbs x 15 inches) = 106+90 = 196 lbs. Report in kg 196/2. 2 = 89. 1 kg • IBW for a man 6 ft, 3 inches = 89. 1 kg

Note on adjusted body weight • Use in the past was common for obese

Note on adjusted body weight • Use in the past was common for obese patients • Rationale is that fat is less metabolically active than lean tissue; thus using actual body weight in an obese person will overestimate energy needs • However, studies have shown that in very overweight persons, calculating HBE using the adjusted wt tends to make calculations less accurate; underestimating total energy needs

Body Mass Index (BMI) BMI >=40 35 -39. 9 30 -34. 9 25 -29.

Body Mass Index (BMI) BMI >=40 35 -39. 9 30 -34. 9 25 -29. 9 18. 5 -24. 9 <18. 5 17 -18. 4 16 -16. 9 <16 Classification Obesity grade III (morbid obesity) Obesity grade II Obesity grade I Overweight Normal Underweight Mild thinness Moderate thinness Severe thinness

BMI • Metric: BMI = Weight in kg / Height in meters ^2 •

BMI • Metric: BMI = Weight in kg / Height in meters ^2 • English: BMI = Weight (lbs) / Height in inches^2 x 703 • Does not measure body fat directly • Most researches and health practitioners think that it provides an acceptable estimation of body fat • What do you guys think? • BMI should be measured in conjunction with other information related to the patient’s health status

Weight Status as a Predictor of Morbidity and Mortality • In young to middle

Weight Status as a Predictor of Morbidity and Mortality • In young to middle aged adults, morbidity/ mortality is highest in the highest quintile of BMI • In the elderly, morbidity/mortality is highest in the lowest quintile of BMI • In most populations, there is a U-shaped relationship between mortality and BMI

Body Composition: Skinfold thickness (subcutaneous fat) • Validity depends on measurement technique and repetition

Body Composition: Skinfold thickness (subcutaneous fat) • Validity depends on measurement technique and repetition over time • Changes take 3 to 4 weeks • Accuracy decreases with increasing obesity • Skinfold sites most reflective of body fatness are over the triceps and the biceps, below the scapula, suprailiac, and upper thigh

Body Composition: circumference measurements • Waist circumference: smallest area below the ribcage and above

Body Composition: circumference measurements • Waist circumference: smallest area below the ribcage and above the umbilicus; measurements >40 for men and >35 for women are risk factors for disease • Mid arm circumference (MAC) in combination with TSF can determine arm muscle area (lean body mass)

Body Composition: Other measurements – refer to book • Underwater weighing • Total body

Body Composition: Other measurements – refer to book • Underwater weighing • Total body potassium • Neutron activation analysis • BIA: fat free mass and fat mass • CT: subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat • MRI: size of skeleton and internal organs; abdominal fat • DEXA: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; bone mineral density and fat and boneless lean tissue

Nutrition focused physical exam • Four basic physical examination techniques utilized • Inspection •

Nutrition focused physical exam • Four basic physical examination techniques utilized • Inspection • Palpation • Percussion • Auscultation • Recommend refer to appendix 29 for further detail

Energy Expenditure: Predictive Equations • Objectives: • Compare/contrast predictive equations used to calculate energy

Energy Expenditure: Predictive Equations • Objectives: • Compare/contrast predictive equations used to calculate energy requirements • Discuss the strengths and limitations of various predictive equations used in clinical practice • BRIEFLY Describe the role of indirect calorimetry (IC) in assessing energy expenditure

Review of Terminology Use This! • Basal metabolic rate (BMR), may also be presented

Review of Terminology Use This! • Basal metabolic rate (BMR), may also be presented as Basal energy expenditure (BEE): minimum amount of energy expended that is compatible with life • Resting metabolic rate (RMR) or Resting Energy Expenditure (REE): energy expended in the activities necessary to sustain normal body functions now used in place of BEE, tends to be 10 -20% higher than BEE • Estimated energy expenditure (EEE): Often used interchangeably with REE • Thermic Effect of Food (TEF): increase in energy expenditure associated with consumption, digestion, and absorption of food • Total energy expenditure (TEE): REE + TEF + activity expenditure = TEE

Factors affecting REE • Age: REE highly affected by proportion of lean body mass,

Factors affecting REE • Age: REE highly affected by proportion of lean body mass, which often decreases with increased age • Body composition: people with higher percentage of lean body mass will have higher resting metabolism • Body size • Climate: REE can be affected by living in extreme temps • Gender • Hormonal Status: hormones affect metabolic rate • Body temperature: fever increases REE • Other: i. e caffeine, nicotine, alcohol can stimulate REE

Thermic Effect of Food • Presence, magnitude, duration influenced by: • • • Size

Thermic Effect of Food • Presence, magnitude, duration influenced by: • • • Size of the meal Ratio of protein, carbohydrate, and fat Fiber content Time of day the meal is eaten Degree of psychological stress Age

Thermic Effect of Food • Thermic effect of digestion results in a 5 -10%

Thermic Effect of Food • Thermic effect of digestion results in a 5 -10% increase in RMR • • Greater with larger meal Peaks at 60 -180 minutes Longer in obese patients Longer in older patients

Predictive Equations • So many choices….

Predictive Equations • So many choices….

Harris-Benedict Equation • Basal energy expenditure • Men: BEE= 66. 47 + 13. 75(W)

Harris-Benedict Equation • Basal energy expenditure • Men: BEE= 66. 47 + 13. 75(W) + 5(H) – 6. 75(A) • Women: BEE = 655. 09+9. 56(W)+1. 85(H)– 4. 68(A) • Activity factors • Stress/injury factors W=weight in kg; H=height in cm; A=age in years

Mifflin-St. Jeor Equation • Resting metabolic rate • Men: RMR = 10(W) + 6.

Mifflin-St. Jeor Equation • Resting metabolic rate • Men: RMR = 10(W) + 6. 25(H) – 5(A) + 5 • Women: RMR = 10(W) + 6. 25(H) – 5(A) -161 • Activity factors • Stress/injury factors • TEE = REE x AF (study or population-specific activity factor) W=actual weight in kg; H=height in cm; A=age in years

Mifflin St. Jeor Equation • Best validated of predictive equations in estimating REE in

Mifflin St. Jeor Equation • Best validated of predictive equations in estimating REE in healthy patients • Like HBE, studies were done in healthy patients, so stress factors must be applied if used in medical or surgical patients

 • Activity factors • Sedentary: 1 -1. 39 • Low active: 1. 4

• Activity factors • Sedentary: 1 -1. 39 • Low active: 1. 4 -1. 59 • Active: 1. 6 -1. 89 • Very Active: 1. 9 -2. 5 • • Injury factors Surgery: Minor: 1. 0– 1. 2 Major: 1. 1– 1. 3 Skeletal trauma: 1. 1– 1. 6 Head trauma: 1. 6– 1. 8 Infection: • Mild: 1. 0– 1. 2 • Moderate: 1. 2– 1. 4 • Severe: 1. 4– 1. 8 • Burns (% body surface area [BSA]): • <20% BSA: 1. 2– 1. 5 • 20%– 40% BSA: 1. 5– 1. 8 • >40% BSA: 1. 8– 2. 0

Simplistic Weight-Based Equations • 11 -14 kcal/kg (morbid obesity) • 15 -18 kcal/kg (obese/overweight)

Simplistic Weight-Based Equations • 11 -14 kcal/kg (morbid obesity) • 15 -18 kcal/kg (obese/overweight) • 22 -25 kcal/kg (normal, healthy weight) • 25 -30 kcal/kg (underweight, or have increased needs) • 30 -35 kcal/kg (underweight, higher degree of increased needs, hematologic malignancy) • 40+ kcal/kg (increased needs, weight gain)

Using Predictive Equations to Estimate Energy Requirements Is the patient Critically Ill? Yes. Is

Using Predictive Equations to Estimate Energy Requirements Is the patient Critically Ill? Yes. Is the patient obese? Is a hypocaloric regimen appropriate? Yes 22 -25 kcal/kg IBW or 11 -14 kcal/kg actual body weight No. Is the patient <60? No Use Penn State 2003 b No Yes Penn State 2003(b) No Penn State 2010 Use Mifflin St. Jeor using actual body weight

Penn State Equation • PSU 2010 (Modified Penn State Equation) • RMR = Mifflin(0.

Penn State Equation • PSU 2010 (Modified Penn State Equation) • RMR = Mifflin(0. 71) + VE (64) + Tmax(85) – 3085 • Used for patients with BMI over 30 and older than 60 years old. Validated in 2010 by the ADA Evidence Analysis Library (EAL). – 2003 b • RMR = Mifflin(0. 96) + VE(31) + Tmax(167) – 6212 REE calculated using the HBE or MSJ equation; VE=minute ventilation in liters per minute; Tmax=degrees Celsius

Critical Illness— Mechanically Ventilated, trauma: Ireton-Jones Equation (1992) • Estimated energy expenditure • Ventilator-dependent

Critical Illness— Mechanically Ventilated, trauma: Ireton-Jones Equation (1992) • Estimated energy expenditure • Ventilator-dependent patients: • EEE = 1925 + 5(W) – 10(A) + 281(S) + 292(T) + 851(B) • Obese patients: • EEE = 1444 + 606(S) + 9(Q=W) – 12(A) + 400(V) A=age in years; W=actual weight in kg; V=ventilated (0=absent, 1=present); S=sex (0=female, 1=male); T=trauma (0=absent, 1=present)

Indirect Calorimetry IC measures the volume of inspired oxygen and expired carbon dioxide to

Indirect Calorimetry IC measures the volume of inspired oxygen and expired carbon dioxide to determine VO 2 and VCO 2 to calculate resting energy expenditure (REE) and respiratory quotient (RQ).

Indirect Calorimetry • REE is calculated using the Abbreviated Weir Equation – REE (kcal/d)

Indirect Calorimetry • REE is calculated using the Abbreviated Weir Equation – REE (kcal/d) = {VO 2(3. 94) + VCO 2(1. 11)} 1440 min/day • RQ is calculated as a ratio of carbon dioxide expired to oxygen consumed – RQ = VCO 2/VO 2

Indications for IC • Inability to accurately estimate energy requirements • Inadequate clinical response

Indications for IC • Inability to accurately estimate energy requirements • Inadequate clinical response to nutrition therapy

Inability to Accurately Estimate Energy Requirements • • Trauma SIRS/fever MODS ARDS COPD Paralysis

Inability to Accurately Estimate Energy Requirements • • Trauma SIRS/fever MODS ARDS COPD Paralysis Altered body composition: – Underweight – Obesity – Alterations in fluid balance • Wounds • Paralytics • Sedation

Inadequate Clinical Response to Nutrition Therapy • Malnutrition despite “adequate” nutrition support • Poor

Inadequate Clinical Response to Nutrition Therapy • Malnutrition despite “adequate” nutrition support • Poor wound healing • Failure to wean from mechanical ventilation • Underfeeding vs. overfeeding

Protein Requirements Not often done… • Can be determined through calculation of nitrogen balance

Protein Requirements Not often done… • Can be determined through calculation of nitrogen balance • Compares nitrogen (protein) intake to nitrogen (protein) output • Limitations inaccurate urine collection and presence of renal dysfunction

Protein Requirements Condition Descriptor Adult Maintenance Older Adults Renal disease: pre-dialysis Renal disease: hemodialysis

Protein Requirements Condition Descriptor Adult Maintenance Older Adults Renal disease: pre-dialysis Renal disease: hemodialysis Renal disease: peritoneal dialysis Renal Disease: CRRT Hepatitis (acute or chronic) Liver disease/cirrhosis Cancer cachexia Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) IBD Short bowel syndrome Solid organ transplant: (Acute posttransplant) Solid organ transplant (long-term) Pulmonary Disease Pregnancy Critical Illness (burns, sepsis, TBI) Stroke Protein Requirement 0. 8 -1. 0 g/kg 1. 0 -1. 2 g/kg 0. 6 -0. 8 g/kg 1. 2 -1. 3 g/kg >1. 5 -2. 5 g/kg 1 -1. 5 g/kg 1. 2 -1. 6 g/kg 1 -1. 5 g/kg 1. 5 -2. 5 g/kg 1. 0 -1. 5 g/kg 1. 5 -2. 0 g/kg 1. 2 -1. 5 g/kg +25 g/day 1. 5 -2. 0 g/kg 1 -1. 25 g/kg

Protein requirements: Older adults • Evidence suggests that older adults need more dietary protein

Protein requirements: Older adults • Evidence suggests that older adults need more dietary protein than younger adults to support good health, promote recovery from illness, and maintain functionality. • Older adults need to make-up for age-related changes in protein metabolism • Need more protein to offset inflammatory and catabolic conditions associated with chronic and acute diseases that occur commonly with aging • Persons older than 65 years of age need at least 1. 0 -1. 2 g of protein per kg body weight to maintain and regain lean body mass and function

Protein Requirements: Wounds • For patients at risk for pressure ulcers, the recommendation for

Protein Requirements: Wounds • For patients at risk for pressure ulcers, the recommendation for protein intake may be as high as 1. 5 g/kg to 2. 0 g/kg per day • The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel recommends. 1. 0 g per kg to 1. 5 g per kg per day • Excess dietary protein in amounts greater than 1. 5 g per kg to 2 g per kg body weight per day can be a risk factor for dehydration, especially in the elderly

Fluid requirements • Goals of fluid management include maintenance of adequate hydration, tissue perfusion,

Fluid requirements • Goals of fluid management include maintenance of adequate hydration, tissue perfusion, and electrolyte balance • Depends on many factors • Insensible losses: fluid lost on a daily basis from the lungs, skin, respiratory tract • Measured losses: stool, urine, wound and/or ostomy drainage • Alterations in fluid balance due to • Metabolic changes: fever and hyperthyroidism • Medical therapy: diuretics

Estimating Fluid Needs: Different methods • m. L/kg method • Wt in kg –

Estimating Fluid Needs: Different methods • m. L/kg method • Wt in kg – 20 x 20 (<50 years old) or 15 (>50 years old) + 1500 ml • Example: 65 y/o who weighs 70 kg (70 -20) x 15 + 1500 = 2250 ml daily • RDA method • 1 m. L fluid per kcal of estimate needs • Chronological age method • Age 16 -30 (active): 40 ml/kg, age 20 -55: 35 m. L/kg, age 55 -75: 30 m. L/kg, age >75: 25 m. L/kg • Fluid Balance method • Urine output + 500 m. L/day • Body Surface area method • 1500 m. L per square meter of body surface area

Let’s practice!

Let’s practice!