An Introduction to IonOptics Series of Five Lectures

  • Slides: 21
Download presentation
An Introduction to Ion-Optics Series of Five Lectures JINA, University of Notre Dame Sept.

An Introduction to Ion-Optics Series of Five Lectures JINA, University of Notre Dame Sept. 30 – Dec. 9, 2005 Georg P. Berg 1

The Lecture Series 1 st Lecture: 9/30/05, 2: 00 pm: Definitions, Formalism, Examples 2

The Lecture Series 1 st Lecture: 9/30/05, 2: 00 pm: Definitions, Formalism, Examples 2 nd Lecture: 10/7/05, 2: 00 pm: Ion-optical elements, properties & design 3 rd Lecture: 10/14/05, 2: 00 pm: Real World Ion-optical Systems 4 th Lecture: 12/2/05, 2: 00 pm: Separator Systems 5 th Lecture: 12/9/05, 2: 00 pm: Demonstration of Codes (TRANSPORT, COSY, Mag. Net) 2

2 nd Lecture: 10/7/05, 2: 00 pm: Ion-optical elements, properties & design • Electro-magnetic

2 nd Lecture: 10/7/05, 2: 00 pm: Ion-optical elements, properties & design • Electro-magnetic elements in ion-optical systems Dipoles, Quadrupoles, Multipoles, Wien Filters • Combining elements, ion-optics properties • Field measurements • Review 1 st Lecture (4) • Overview magnetic elements (5) • Creation of magnetic B (6 - 8) • Dipole magnets (9 -11) • Quadrupole magnets, doublet, triplet (12 – 16) • Wien Filter (17) • Field measurements (18 -19) • Outlook 3 rrd Lecture: A beam line & spectrometer (20) • Q&A 3

Review 1 st Lecture (1) Lorentz Force: TRANSPORT of Ray X 0 Xn =

Review 1 st Lecture (1) Lorentz Force: TRANSPORT of Ray X 0 Xn = R X 0 (3) using Matrix R R = Rn Rn-1 … R 0 (4) TRANSPORT of s Matrix (Phase space ellipsoid) Beam emittance: s 11 s 22 - (s 12) 2 e = Ö`````` s 1 = Rs 0 RT (10) (5) Taylor expansion, higher orders, solving the equation of motion, diagnostics, examples 4

Schematic Overview of Magnetic Elements (Iron dominated) Pole shape Field Pole, analyt. Bx w.

Schematic Overview of Magnetic Elements (Iron dominated) Pole shape Field Pole, analyt. Bx w. I Iron dominated: B field is determined by properties & shape of iron pole pieces Required w. I = Ampere-turns for desired magnet strength B 0, g, a 3, a 4 can be calculated formula in last column. Coils are not shown in drawing in 1 st colunm G. Schnell, Magnete, Verlag K. Thiemig, 5 Muenchen 1973

Creation of magnetic fields using current Current loop Helmholtz coil, Dipole Helmholtz coil, reversed

Creation of magnetic fields using current Current loop Helmholtz coil, Dipole Helmholtz coil, reversed current, Quadrupole Biot-Savart’s Law Magnetization in Ferromagnetic material: B = m. H (17) B = magn. Induction H = magn. Field m = magn. permeability 6

Creation of magnetic fields using permanent magnets Magnet iron is soft: Remanence is very

Creation of magnetic fields using permanent magnets Magnet iron is soft: Remanence is very small when H is returned to 0 Permanent magnet material is hard: Large remaining magnetization B Permanent magnets can be used to design dipole, quadrupole and other ionoptical elements. They need no current, but strength has to be changed by echanica adjustment. 7

Magnetization Curves Vanadium Permandur Pure Iron Field lines of H-frame dipole 8

Magnetization Curves Vanadium Permandur Pure Iron Field lines of H-frame dipole 8

Example: Dipole H-Magnet Iron dominated Dipole Magnet with constant field in dipole gap (Good-field

Example: Dipole H-Magnet Iron dominated Dipole Magnet with constant field in dipole gap (Good-field region). 40 o Bend Angle Return Yoke 6 o& 12 o Edge Angles Vertical Focusing Coil Central Ray Coil • Soft magnet iron, B(H) • Hollow copper conductor for high current density • Iron magnetization saturates at about 1. 7 T Dipole Gap: +/- 30 mm Pole Units in mm 9

Field lines in an iron-dominated Dipole magnet Field lines of H-frame dipole Coil For

Field lines in an iron-dominated Dipole magnet Field lines of H-frame dipole Coil For symmetry reasons only a quarter of the full dipole is calculated & shown Gap Ý Good-field region Defined by ion-optical requirement, e. g. d. B/B < 10 -4 The Field calculation was performed Using the finite element (FE) code Mag. Net (Infolytica). 10

Fringe field & Effective field length Leff Iron Pole length 2 Leff = B

Fringe field & Effective field length Leff Iron Pole length 2 Leff = B ds / B 0 (18) Note: 1) The fringe field is important even in 1 st order ion-optical calculations. 2) Rogowski profile to make Leff = Pole length. 3) The fringe field region can be modified with field clamp or shunt. 11

Current in & out of drawing plane Standard Quadrupole y out Pole Piece Return

Current in & out of drawing plane Standard Quadrupole y out Pole Piece Return Yoke in N S in S N in Coils in x out Note: Magnet is Iron/Current configuration with field as needed in ion-optical design. 2 d/3 d finite elements codes solving POISSON equation are well established 12

Collins Quadrupole Layered Shielding for Storage Ring Ref. K. I. Blomqvist el al. NIM

Collins Quadrupole Layered Shielding for Storage Ring Ref. K. I. Blomqvist el al. NIM A 403(1998)263 13

Forces on ions ( quadrupole) Quadrupole Hexapole Octopole ß Ü Þ Ý Horizontally defocusing

Forces on ions ( quadrupole) Quadrupole Hexapole Octopole ß Ü Þ Ý Horizontally defocusing quadrupole for ions along – z axis into the drawing plane. See Forces ÝÜßÞ in direction v x B A focusing quadrupole is obtained by a 90 o rotation around the z axis 14

SINGLET Ion optics of a quadrupole SINGLET & DOUBLET VERTICAL HORIZONTAL 15

SINGLET Ion optics of a quadrupole SINGLET & DOUBLET VERTICAL HORIZONTAL 15

Focusing with a quadrupole TRIPLET <- x ( +15 mm) Screen shot of TRANSPORT

Focusing with a quadrupole TRIPLET <- x ( +15 mm) Screen shot of TRANSPORT design calculation of Quadrupole Triplet upstream of St. George target. Shown are the horiz. (x) and vert. (y) envelops of the phase ellipse. z (8 m) ^ Note beam at Slit has +/- 2 mrad and at target TGT +/- 45 mrad angle opening. This symmetical triplet 1/2 F-D-1/2 F corresponds to an optical lens. ^ Slit 1 mm <- y +15 mm 16

(1) F=0 v = E/B when q. E = qv x B with E

(1) F=0 v = E/B when q. E = qv x B with E ^ B The Wien Filter with E ^ B (19) Design study of Wien Filter for St. George Electrostatic system of Danfysik Wien Filter Units in mm Gradient of E Field lines 1, 813 k. V/mm B Field lines 0. 3 T 17

Hall Probe RH Hall Effect: UH = ¾¾ BI d (20) Lorentz force ev

Hall Probe RH Hall Effect: UH = ¾¾ BI d (20) Lorentz force ev x B on electrons with velocity v that constitute the current I RH = Hall constant, material property Remarks: • Precision down to ~ 2 10 -4 • Needs temperature calibration • Probe area down to 1 mm by 1 mm • Average signal in gradient field (good for quadrupole and fringe field measurement) 18

Nuclear spin precesses in external field B With Larmor frequency f. L = 2

Nuclear spin precesses in external field B With Larmor frequency f. L = 2 m ¾ B h NMR Probe (21) m = p, d magn. Moment h = Planck constant Nucleus with spin f. L (proton)/B = 42. 58 MHz/T f. L (deuteron)/B = 6. 538 MHz/T Fig. 1 Principle of measurement: Small (e. g. water probe), low frequency wobble coil B + B~ , tuneable HF field B» (Fig. 1) with frequency ft , observe Larmor resonance on Oscilloscope (Fig. 2). When signal a & b coincide the tuneable frequence ft = f. L • Precision ~ 10 -5 • Temperature independent • Needs constant B in probe ( 5 x 5 mm) to see signal! Fig. 2 19

Grand Raiden High Resolution Spectrometer Max. Magn. Rigidity: 5. 1 Tm Bending Radius: 3.

Grand Raiden High Resolution Spectrometer Max. Magn. Rigidity: 5. 1 Tm Bending Radius: 3. 0 m Solid Angle: 3 msr Beam Line/Spectrometer fully matched 20

End Lecture 2 21

End Lecture 2 21