Alternative ICAP Proposal NSTAR Strategy James Daly Director

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
Alternative ICAP Proposal NSTAR Strategy James Daly Director Electric and Gas Energy Supply (781)

Alternative ICAP Proposal NSTAR Strategy James Daly Director Electric and Gas Energy Supply (781) 441 -8258

What problem are we trying to solve: Reliability • NEPOOL reliability standard is 1

What problem are we trying to solve: Reliability • NEPOOL reliability standard is 1 day outage in 10 years • Translates to Loss Of Load Expectation (LOLE) = 0. 1 day/year • NEPOOL Installed Reserve is 31% of peak load in 20042005 • NEPOOL Required Reserve is 12. 4% of peak load in 2004 -2005 2

NEPOOL Load Growth & LOLE Power Year Peak Load (MW) ICAP Resources Summer (MW)

NEPOOL Load Growth & LOLE Power Year Peak Load (MW) ICAP Resources Summer (MW) Summer Requirement (MW) LOLE 2004 -05 25, 735 33, 710 28, 915 0. 0005 2005 -06 26, 305 33, 710 29, 366 0. 0010 2010 -11 27, 740 33, 710 31, 104 0. 0109 2013 -14 28, 880 33, 710 32, 441 0. 0433 Source: ISO Staff “RTEP 04 Resource Adequacy Analysis” presentation 03/18/2004 3

NEPOOL Load Growth: Installed vs. Required Reserves Installed Reserves Required Reserves Power Year MW

NEPOOL Load Growth: Installed vs. Required Reserves Installed Reserves Required Reserves Power Year MW % 2004 -05 7, 975 31. 0 3, 180 12. 4 2005 -06 7, 405 28. 2 3, 061 11. 6 2010 -11 5, 970 21. 5 3, 364 12. 1 2013 -14 4, 830 16. 7 3, 561 12. 3 Source: ISO Staff “RTEP 04 Resource Adequacy Analysis” presentation 03/18/2004 4

Boston Area LOLE: Meets criteria over 10 Years So does CT Year (Jan –

Boston Area LOLE: Meets criteria over 10 Years So does CT Year (Jan – Dec) Base case using existing transmission capabilities 2004 0. 001 2005 0. 001 2010 0. 011 2013 0. 033 Source: ISO Staff “RTEP 04 Resource Adequacy Analysis” presentation 03/18/2004 5

It is not a capacity issue. We have plenty of capacity. It’s an operating

It is not a capacity issue. We have plenty of capacity. It’s an operating reserves issue! 6

Coalition Alternative Filed at FERC 03/22/2004 • Implement Locational Operating Reserve Market – Ensures

Coalition Alternative Filed at FERC 03/22/2004 • Implement Locational Operating Reserve Market – Ensures that units needed for operating reserve are adequately compensated – Newly implemented region wide Forward Reserves Market cleared at $4. 495/k. W-month last January • Implement single region-wide ICAP market – – NEPOOL historically planned for reliability on a pool wide basis Integrates transmission planning and operating realities Compensates all generators for comparable services Demand curve key points set at: • 100% of Objective Capability, not 106. 7% • X-intercept at 112% of Objective Capability, not 118% • Same as NYISO 7

Coalition Alternative (continued) • Units compensated in the Locational Operating Reserve Market are units

Coalition Alternative (continued) • Units compensated in the Locational Operating Reserve Market are units needed for: – 2 nd contingency reserve coverage – Local voltage support – Or other local operating needs • Existing units receive a transitional payment under cost-of-service type (RMR) agreements • Contract forward for new resources needed for Locational Operating Reserve Market under RFP 8

Coalition Alternative (Continued) • ISO/NEPOOL provides 3 -year notice prior to changing the price

Coalition Alternative (Continued) • ISO/NEPOOL provides 3 -year notice prior to changing the price signals established in the ICAP demand curve • Participating ICAP resources provide three-year commitment to remain on the system • No delisting allowed • Liquidated damages for failure to perform • ISO approval of maintenance schedule • New generation should be fully integrated into the grid 9

ISO Vs Coalition Alternative Costs Total 5 Year Costs $M ISO No Cap $2,

ISO Vs Coalition Alternative Costs Total 5 Year Costs $M ISO No Cap $2, 865 ISO W/ Cap $1, 591 ISO Adjusted $597 Coalition Alternative $154 10

Coalition March 22 filing in support at FERC: • • • Attorney General of

Coalition March 22 filing in support at FERC: • • • Attorney General of Massachusetts Attorney General of Rhode Island Associated Industries of Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources New Hampshire Office of Consumer Advocate NSTAR Electric And Gas Corporation National Grid USA Rhode Island Division of Public Utilities and Carriers Strategic Energy LLC (in part) Vermont Electric Power Company (in part) Filed separately but supporting in part: • Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control • Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel 11