Alternative Dispute Resolution ADR Workshop 12 Nov 2015

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Workshop 12 Nov 2015 © Margarita Dimitrova

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Workshop 12 Nov 2015 © Margarita Dimitrova

Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Meaning of ADR Philosophies behind ADR Methods

Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Meaning of ADR Philosophies behind ADR Methods of ADR Advantages Disadvantages Further information © Margarita Dimitrova

1. Meaning of ADR © Margarita Dimitrova

1. Meaning of ADR © Margarita Dimitrova

A – ‘alternative’ “activities or possibilities that depart from or challenge traditional norms” norms

A – ‘alternative’ “activities or possibilities that depart from or challenge traditional norms” norms D – ‘dispute’ “a specific disagreement concerning a matter of fact, law or policy in which a claim or assertion of one party is met with refusal, counter-claim or denial by the other”. other R – ‘resolution’ “the way of finding solution of a dispute by the agreement of both the parties with some mutually agreed terms” terms © Margarita Dimitrova

In other words. . . …ADR is an umbrella term which encompasses various processes

In other words. . . …ADR is an umbrella term which encompasses various processes for resolve conflicts by other means than traditional litigation. It describes the ways that civil disputes can be settled with the help of an independent third party and without the need for a formal court hearing. © Margarita Dimitrova

2. Philosophies © Margarita Dimitrova

2. Philosophies © Margarita Dimitrova

The need for ADR. . . litigation can be Costly Complex Damaging for reputation

The need for ADR. . . litigation can be Costly Complex Damaging for reputation © Margarita Dimitrova

Win-Win Approach • “A better way to resolve a dispute is through persuasion and

Win-Win Approach • “A better way to resolve a dispute is through persuasion and compromise, rather than by coercion through a sovereign authority. ” Confucius • In Adversarial trial system, the focus is on ‘rights’ of the parties and on ‘winning’ the case. • In ADR system, the ‘interest’ of the parties and the aim to ‘satisfy’ that interest is what is at the forefront. This gives to a greater potential to attend a win-win solution. © Margarita Dimitrova

Integrative Approach • When disputes arise between parties of different opinions a trial process

Integrative Approach • When disputes arise between parties of different opinions a trial process could lead the parties to become antagonistic to each other. • ADR tries to attain a consensual solution between the parties based on their common interest. This integrates the parties and provides them with an option to continue their relationship on the basis of a shared interest in the future. © Margarita Dimitrova

Compliance With Social Norms • The trial system relies strictly on legal principles which

Compliance With Social Norms • The trial system relies strictly on legal principles which leads to rigid solutions. • The ADR system allows third party facilitators to adopt or consider social norms in light of the interests of the parties which flexes the finding of acceptable solution. © Margarita Dimitrova

That is why. . . • Under the Civil Procedure Rules, parties involved in

That is why. . . • Under the Civil Procedure Rules, parties involved in litigation are encouraged to use ADR. • The court can also impose cost sanctions if it decides that one or more of the parties have been unreasonable in refusing to attempt to settle their dispute out of court using ADR. © Margarita Dimitrova

3. Methods © Margarita Dimitrova

3. Methods © Margarita Dimitrova

Three main types of ADR • Arbitration • Mediation • Conciliation © Margarita Dimitrova

Three main types of ADR • Arbitration • Mediation • Conciliation © Margarita Dimitrova

Arbitration is the adjudication of a dispute with the involvement of an independent third

Arbitration is the adjudication of a dispute with the involvement of an independent third party who actively makes suggestions and actually imposes a decision on the parties. The magistrates’ court refers all civil disputes involving claims less than £ 10, 000 to arbitration Arbitration is binding and hence regulated © Margarita Dimitrova

Arbitration • The independent 3 rd party will be one or more specially-appointed experts

Arbitration • The independent 3 rd party will be one or more specially-appointed experts or lawyers. • People who work as arbitrators often belong to the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. • Arbitration is governed by the Arbitration Act 1996. © Margarita Dimitrova

Arbitration Act 1996, s. 1 a) the object of arbitration is to obtain the

Arbitration Act 1996, s. 1 a) the object of arbitration is to obtain the fair resolution of disputes by an impartial tribunal without unnecessary delay or expense. . . (b) the parties should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved… © Margarita Dimitrova

Choosing an arbitrator • Parties are free to decide between themselves whom they will

Choosing an arbitrator • Parties are free to decide between themselves whom they will appoint as an arbitrator. • Where there is no agreement a party can apply to a court under the Arbitration Act 1996 s. 18 to have one appointed by the court. • S. 33(a) requires that the arbitrator should act fairly and impartially as between the parties, giving each party a reasonable opportunity of putting his case and dealing with that of the opponent. © Margarita Dimitrova

Use of Arbitration • A dispute might be referred to arbitration by the court,

Use of Arbitration • A dispute might be referred to arbitration by the court, by law or by the parties themselves. • Arbitration is common in many trade practices. • For instance, many insurance policies contain a clause stating that any dispute over a claim will first be referred to an arbitrator before any court claim is made. • For Commercial Disputes, a judge in the Commercial Court (specialist part of the Queen’s Bench Division) may refer a dispute brought before it to an arbitrator. © Margarita Dimitrova

 • Arbitration by contract is when the parties have signed a contract and

• Arbitration by contract is when the parties have signed a contract and there is a clause in the contract where they agree to refer any dispute over the terms of the contract to an arbitrator. Such a clause is sometimes known as a ‘Scott v Avery clause’. • S. 9 of Arbitration Act 1996 Where a party tries to ignore an arbitration clause agreed in a contract, the court in which he or she is trying to make his claim will order a ‘stay’ (i. e. a stop) of proceedings so that the matter may be referred to arbitration as agreed in the contract. © Margarita Dimitrova

Mediation involves an impartial third party who listens and directs discussion but does not

Mediation involves an impartial third party who listens and directs discussion but does not suggest outcomes. Mediation is voluntary Atmosphere is informal All parties have their say Mediation is not binding © Margarita Dimitrova

Mediation • Parties in a dispute may refer themselves to mediation (a large number

Mediation • Parties in a dispute may refer themselves to mediation (a large number of visits might need to be made). • There are no fixed rules on mediation • If parties in litigation refuse an offer to mediate without good reason then even if they win their case in court, the judge can refuse to award them some or all of their legal costs. © Margarita Dimitrova

Med-Arb • This is a mixture of mediation and arbitration. • Here the parties

Med-Arb • This is a mixture of mediation and arbitration. • Here the parties agree to mediate but will refer the dispute to an arbitrator if the mediation is unsuccessful. © Margarita Dimitrova

Consolidation Conciliation involves a third part, who may make suggestions to the parties. The

Consolidation Conciliation involves a third part, who may make suggestions to the parties. The decisions are not binding © Margarita Dimitrova

Other ADR method. . . • Negotiation - involves two parties discussing and compromising

Other ADR method. . . • Negotiation - involves two parties discussing and compromising to obtain an agreed solution; no legal representation needed; not binding © Margarita Dimitrova

 • Tribunals - these are bodies established to settle particular types of disputes;

• Tribunals - these are bodies established to settle particular types of disputes; indeed they act in the same way as a court. • Their jurisdictions include social security, child support, asylum and immigration, employment, etc. • Typically a tribunal will consist of 3 members: a chairman who will be legally qualified and two lay members will have expert knowledge in the relevant field. • A decision by a tribunal can be challenged in court. © Margarita Dimitrova

 • Ombudsmen – a person or institution to investigate individuals' complaints against a

• Ombudsmen – a person or institution to investigate individuals' complaints against a company or organization, especially a public authority • For example: The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman investigates complaints about the unfair or improper treatment of citizens by UK government departments, their agencies and the NHS in England; The Financial Services Ombudsman investigates complaints about financial firms. © Margarita Dimitrova

4. Advantages of ADR Often takes less time than court generally cheaper than litigation

4. Advantages of ADR Often takes less time than court generally cheaper than litigation Less formal than courts confidential, unlike a court, which is usually open to the public Held at more suitable venues © Margarita Dimitrova not adversarial and therefore both parties can come away from the process feeling as if they have won

5. Disadvantages of ADR Not suitable for all disputes Decisions are not legally binding

5. Disadvantages of ADR Not suitable for all disputes Decisions are not legally binding (except Arbitration) Dispute may still end up in Court Need both parties to voluntarily participate © Margarita Dimitrova

6. Further information • The Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) - www. cedr.

6. Further information • The Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) - www. cedr. com • UK Mediation - www. ukmediation. net • National Mediation Helpline www. nationalmediationhelpline. co. uk • Finding an ADR provider www. civilmediation. justice. gov. uk • the ADR schemes of many industries and commercial associations. © Margarita Dimitrova