Alberta Infant Motor Scale AIMS Performance of Greek

Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) Performance of Greek Preterm Infants: Comparisons With Full-Term Infants of the Same Nationality and Impact of Prematurity-Related Morbidity Factors by Dimitrios Syrengelas, Vassiliki Kalampoki, Paraskevi Kleisiouni, Vassiliki Manta, Stavros Mellos, Roser Pons, George P. Chrousos, and Tania Siahanidou ptjournal Volume 96(7): 1102 -1108 June 30, 2016 © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

Mean values of preterm and full-term infants according to monthly age level for each of the 4 subscales of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: (A) prone, (B) supine, (C) sitting, and (D) standing. Dimitrios Syrengelas et al. PHYS THER 2016; 96: 1102 -1108 © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

Mean total of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score curves of 403 preterm infants versus the 1, 038 full-term infants. Dimitrios Syrengelas et al. PHYS THER 2016; 96: 1102 -1108 © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

Distribution and Mean (SD) AIMS Scores of Full-term and Preterm Greek Infants According to Monthly Age Level. Dimitrios Syrengelas et al. PHYS THER 2016; 96: 1102 -1108 © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

Distribution of Neonatal Morbidity Factors in the Group of 403 Preterm Infantsa. Dimitrios Syrengelas et al. PHYS THER 2016; 96: 1102 -1108 © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

Results of Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis Showing Changes in AIMS Score by Neonatal Morbidity Factorsa. Dimitrios Syrengelas et al. PHYS THER 2016; 96: 1102 -1108 © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association