AHP Preregistration Workshop Discovering Opportunities in Practice Education

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
AHP Pre-registration Workshop: Discovering Opportunities in Practice Education Supervision in Practice-based Learning (Pr. BL)

AHP Pre-registration Workshop: Discovering Opportunities in Practice Education Supervision in Practice-based Learning (Pr. BL) Dougie Lauchlan Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy (AHP PE Lead for GCU)

Why is the development of supervision important? • Demonstrate professional commitment to learning &

Why is the development of supervision important? • Demonstrate professional commitment to learning & development: • of our professions • of our workforce (nationally & locally) • of ourselves • Demonstrate currency of practice • Informed by evidence-base • Can help support workforce planning • Grow capacity • Grow a sense of belonging 2

Typical Models of AHP Pr. BL Supervision • Traditional model 1: 1 • Is

Typical Models of AHP Pr. BL Supervision • Traditional model 1: 1 • Is it the traditional model? • Shared model 1: 2, 1: 3 • Typically borne from staffing shortages (unable to resource a 1: 1) • Two/multiple-student model • 2: 1, 3: 1, 4: 1 (typical in NZ/Australia) • Collaborative/Peer-assisted Learning Model • Not just about the numbers! 3

Alternative/Emerging Models • Role-emerging or Contemporary Placements • • • Lack of existing AHP

Alternative/Emerging Models • Role-emerging or Contemporary Placements • • • Lack of existing AHP service “New” populations Lone-working Typically do not have registered AHP “Long-arm” supervision http: //www. knowledge. scot. nhs. uk/ahppe/nationalprogramme/student-placements-preregistration/ahpplacement-experiences-(1). aspx 4

What is the evidence base for Collaborative Models of supervision? • Student learning experience

What is the evidence base for Collaborative Models of supervision? • Student learning experience • Enhanced/deeper learning • Organisation required (Flood, 2010, O’Connor, 2012) • Client care • Students bring enthusiasm (Secomb, 2007) • Service providers/service • Reduces the number of placements required • Greater overall productivity of staff/students (Baldry Currens & Bithell, 2003, Rindflesch et al, 2008) 5

Our experience? • NES projects • • • Ryan Harper Legacy (Diagnostic Imaging) Oban

Our experience? • NES projects • • • Ryan Harper Legacy (Diagnostic Imaging) Oban Social care Project (Physio) PAMIS (OT & Physio) Alzheimers Scotland (OT & Physio) Scottish Fire & Rescue Service (OT) Peer Assisted Learning (Dietetics) • GCU placement growth in indep/third sector • Student/PE experience 6

What additional strategies can I employ? • • • Focus/themed project Practical sessions Independent

What additional strategies can I employ? • • • Focus/themed project Practical sessions Independent study Supported learning (observation/peer-review) Develop a “rounded” experience (eg. related tasks) • Pr. BL does not need to be 100% client contact time! 7

Stakeholder statements: the PROs • • • Enhanced student support Supportive relationship with PE

Stakeholder statements: the PROs • • • Enhanced student support Supportive relationship with PE Shared learning = more learning Less individual pressure Time for discussion Greater confidence Time to reflect and develop thinking Allowed greater client contact time Frees up time for teaching & other tasks More independent working from students 8

Stakeholder statements: the CONs • • Enhanced pre-placement preparation Potential of unrealistic expectations Mismatched

Stakeholder statements: the CONs • • Enhanced pre-placement preparation Potential of unrealistic expectations Mismatched levels of students does need support Space and practicality of another student 9

“As a P. E you have to do some preparation and organisation beforehand for

“As a P. E you have to do some preparation and organisation beforehand for a 2: 1 placement. But once the placement is underway you’ll find you have more time for clinical teaching and as the students become more independent you’ll have more time for feedback/discussion but also to time to pursue other tasks. ” “It promotes collaborative learning, honesty and helps with their professional growth and development. It gives them peer support and develops communication skills and team working. ” “There is increased direct contact time with each patient if each student takes half of your daily caseload. ” “There are ‘cons’ to the 2: 1 model - such as if one student is clearly stronger/ more outspoken/confident than the other or if there is a personality clash. But if a clear plan is in place before the placement starts to deal with the challenges” Pamela Dougan, Senior Physiotherapist, A&A 10

“It didn't feel as pressurising when it came to these sessions and this atmosphere

“It didn't feel as pressurising when it came to these sessions and this atmosphere helped me view the placement less of an assessment and more towards a learning opportunity. ” “It was easier to see some patients together with a fellow student especially those that need the support of two to mobilise. ” Deodatus Quek, Physio student “Having the 2: 1 model this has allowed me to have time to settle in the placement and to find my feet because when having discussions with a group I am able to have time to think as well as contributing to the conversation. ” “I still received a 1: 1 to hear feedback mid-placement, which was good to know what they thought of my personal progress and I was able to talk with them myself. ” Jennifer Hewitt, Physio student 11

Short video testimonial from Kath? 12

Short video testimonial from Kath? 12

Overarching Workshop Aims • Benefits are there to be realised but can we: •

Overarching Workshop Aims • Benefits are there to be realised but can we: • Recognise the importance of providing a range of good quality practice education opportunities • We need to develop new ways of working 13