AGATA Demonstrator Test With a 252 Cf Source

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
AGATA Demonstrator Test With a 252 Cf Source: Neutron-Gamma Discrimination Menekşe ŞENYİĞİT

AGATA Demonstrator Test With a 252 Cf Source: Neutron-Gamma Discrimination Menekşe ŞENYİĞİT

Investigation the possibilities of discriminating neutrons and gamma rays are important ! Methods for

Investigation the possibilities of discriminating neutrons and gamma rays are important ! Methods for neutron-gamma discrimination with tracking: • The energy deposited in the first and second interaction points; • The difference in incoming direction of the gamma ray ; • Selection based on the FM value

To check our methods, we consider an experiment with AGATA triple cluster , 252

To check our methods, we consider an experiment with AGATA triple cluster , 252 Cf source and Ba. F 2 detector is used for timing. Test period is about 3 -4 hours. Ba. F 2 60 Co source 252 Cf Lead Shield ( AGATA single cluster source cm 3) Loss in gammas ~92 -99% Loss in neutrons ~47 -50%

Simulations 2. Simulated data: ü About 1 Me. V -rays ü Neutrons emitted from

Simulations 2. Simulated data: ü About 1 Me. V -rays ü Neutrons emitted from 252 Cf sour with 2. 95 Ci (at LNL) Counts 1. Simulations Geant 4 with AGATA triple cluster 3. Tracking with MGT code Neutron Energy (Me. V)

Gamma-ray energy spectrum after tracking (mgt) ü Neutrons emitted from 252 Cf source with

Gamma-ray energy spectrum after tracking (mgt) ü Neutrons emitted from 252 Cf source with PHDEF ü Distance between lead shield and AGATA triple cluster is 60 cm Number of events: 35046000 Neutron multiplicity: 4 counts Run time: 3 hours Tracking efficiency for gammas: 0. 97 Eγ (ke. V)

Gamma-ray energy spectrum after tracking (mgt) * Neutrons emitted from 252 Cf source with

Gamma-ray energy spectrum after tracking (mgt) * Neutrons emitted from 252 Cf source with PHDEF and 1 Me. V -rays * Distance between lead shield and AGATA triple cluster is 60 cm total peak 834 ke. V bump 1 Me. V gamma θg - θc 43 25 61 10 Efirst 17 3 45 1 θg – θc or Efirst 46 26 69 11 θg – θc or Efirst or Esecond or FM 57 43 85 19 834 ke. V, 72 Ge 834 ke. V No conditions counts With conditions Eγ (ke. V)

Time of Flight Spectra for 70 cm • In this experiment we would also

Time of Flight Spectra for 70 cm • In this experiment we would also like to use the TOF technique in order to know when a neutron is hitting detectors to check how succesful our methods are. -rays Neutrons Counts • One problem is that one don’t know the time resolution of the AGATA detectors. • Without PSA, it may be around 10 ns but this may be reduced very much by the PSA. • Time resolution dependent. TOF is energy

Time Resolution Since we don’t know what the time resolution will be for AGATA

Time Resolution Since we don’t know what the time resolution will be for AGATA detectors, we made TOF simulations by using different resolution values. -rays Neutrons TOF, Time resolution = 1 ns TOF, Time resolution = 3 ns -rays Neutrons Counts -rays Neutrons TOF, Time resolution = 5 ns

 -rays Neutrons Counts -rays Neutrons TOF, Time resolution = 10 ns TOF, Time

-rays Neutrons Counts -rays Neutrons TOF, Time resolution = 10 ns TOF, Time resolution = 15 ns

Conclusions • We developed 3 methods for neutron-gamma discrimination by using tracking. We would

Conclusions • We developed 3 methods for neutron-gamma discrimination by using tracking. We would like test these methods in a real test experiment where we shall use a 252 Cf neutron source, one triple Agata detector and a Ba. F 2 detector for timing. • We made some simulation in order to check the effect of our methods. • We checked the effect of different time resolution. Ø We are preparing a proposal for this test experiment which can be run just after the summer.