AFP Project Organization and Next Steps q Next

AFP Project Organization and Next Steps q Next steps to the approval process q Organization chart q IB composition q Marco Bruschi (CERN/INFN Bologna) q AFP Kick Off meeting – September 20 th 2012 1

Next steps to the approval process q In the next slides I will address the formal steps leading to the approval of the project (LHCC and RRB approval is the final step) q This process was initiated for AFP with the Technical and Physics review we passed at the beginning of this week. Another iteration has been requested q The outcome of these two reviews is encouraging, although some important points should be seriously considered by the AFP group, namely: § The finalization of the design of the HBP and its final qualification § Providing more quantitative details about the physics potential of AFP q The next weeks should be devoted to answer in a documented way the questions risen from the Technical and Physics review q The next appointment should then be the presentation of a set of milestones until q the detectors installation: § agreed by the extended institute board § presented at the next AUW (Nov 18 th -23 rd) § finally presented to the ATLAS management Use the AFP session at the next ATLAS week to start discussion about organization of AFP management and activities (October 2 nd) 2

APPROVAL PROCESS https: //edms. cern. ch/document/1093133/5 fall 2013/spring 2014 summer 2014 fall 2014 end 2014 TB: spring 2014 (Sep 17 th ) (Sep 20 th ) (Sep 18 th ) 3

APPROVAL PROCESS 4

Organization chart (Management) FD PL M. Bruschi (Bologna) FD TC Interface with LHC: D. Macina(CERN) Movable Beam Pipe G. Spigo (CERN) AFP INT. PL C. Royon (Saclay) FD IB H. Stenzel (Giessen) AFP TC TBA Si Tracker P. Sicho (Prague) C. Davia (Manchester) Timing M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook) A. Brandt (Arlington) Physics A. Kupco (Prague) ? ? ? q AFP PL elected by the AFP institutes at the end of the TDR q A TC is URGENTLY NEEDED. Procedure to select her/him should start asap q Upgrade Project Coordination meeting (Frequent, to follow the regular development of the q activity): PL, AFP TC, FD TC, Physics coords, Silicon Coords, Timing Coords General meetings: Organized frequently by the PL, Opened to all the members which are contributing to the project. All the main decisions, status of the project and general strategy are discussed at these meetings 5

Full Organization Chart: Physics: A. Kupco (Prague), Deputy? Physics topics: L. Schoeffel (Saclay), O. Kepka (Prague) Detector design: A. Kupco (Prague) Simulation: L. Schoeffel (Saclay), T. Sykora (Prague) Alignment and Calibration: P. Bussey (Glasgow) Proton tracking: J. Chwastowski (Cracow), O. Kepka (Prague) Reco, integration: T. Sykora (Prague) MC production: L. Schoeffel (Saclay) 6

Silicon Tracker: P. Sicho (Prague), C. Davia (Manchester) Mechanics: F. Cadoux (Geneva), N. Grouas (Saclay) Cooling: V. Vacek (Prague) Sensors: GF Dalla Betta (Trento), S. Grinstein (Barcelona) Bump Bonding: G. Darbo (Genova), GL Alimonti (Milano), S. Grinstein (Barcelona) FEI 4 b: P. Sicho (Prague), G. Darbo (Genova) Module assembly: F. Cadoux (Geneva), C. Gemme (Genova) Internal electrical services and Optobox: S. Welch (Oklahoma) Optoboard: S. Smith (Ohio) Voltage Regulators: M. Citterio (Milano) DCS: P. Sicho (Prague), D. Caforio (Bologna) ROD-BOC: G. Avoni (Bologna) Optical links: M. Weber (Bern) External services: P. Sicho (Prague) DAQ: P. Morettini (Genova) System tests: Su Dong (SLAC), P. Sicho (Prague) Radiation tests: S. Seidel (New Mexico) Test beam: D. Caforio (Bologna), P. Grenier (SLAC) 7

Timing Detector: M. Rijssenbeek (St. Brook), A. Brandt (UTA) Detector: A. Brandt (Texas) Simulation: M. Przybycien (Cracow) QUARTIC: J. Pinfold (Alberta), A. Brandt (Texas) Physics: A. Kupco MCP-PMT: A. Brandt (Texas) (Prague), Deputy: ? Electronics: M. Rijssenbeek (S. (Saclay), Brook) O. Kepka (Prague) Physics topics: L. Schoeffel CFD: J. Pinfold (Alberta), M. Rijssenbeek Detector design: A. Kupco (Prague) (S. Brook) ADC: M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook) Simulation: L. Schoeffel (Saclay), T. Sykora (Prague) HPTDC: J. Pinfold (Alberta) Alignment and Calibration: P. Bussey (Glasgow) Sampling chip: E. Delagnes, H. Grabas (Saclay) Proton tracking: J. Chwastowski (Cracow), O. Kepka (Prague) Pulser: T. Kubo (S. Brook) Reco, integration: T. Sykora (Prague) Reference Clock: V. Shah, A. Davis (Texas) MC production: L. Schoeffel (Saclay) Optomodules: S. Khanov (Oklahoma) RCE: D. Tsybychev (S. Brook) Mechanics: J. Pinfold (Alberta) Testing: A. Brandt (Texas) Beam and laser tests: A. Brandt (Texas), D. Caforio (Bologna) DCS: NN Trigger: M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook) LV/HV: NN 8

FDIB Prague CU Interested to join AFP INSTITUTES Olomouc Canada/Alberta Prague AS Czech Rep/Olomouc Cracow AGH-UST Czech Rep/Prague AS Cracow IFJ PAN Czech Rep/Prague TU Orsay LAL France/Saclay DESY Berlin HU Giessen Lund Portugal Lip CERN Alberta Bologna BNL Columbia NYU Stony Br. Italy/Bologna Italy/Genova Italy/Milano FD and AFP Institutes ü 20 FD Institutes ü 20 Institutes expressed strong interest to ü ü ü join AFP 12 NEW Institutes 9 Institutes are considering to join Final list at the end of TDR/MOU AFP (considering to join) Italy/Trento Poland/Cracow AGH UST Canada/Toronto Poland/Cracow IFJ PAN Italy/Lecce Portugal Lip Italy/Cosenza Spain/Barcelona Switzerland/Bern Norway/Bergen+OSLO Switzerland/Geneva UK/Manchester UK/Glasgow USA/Albany USA/Arlington USA/New Mexico USA/Ohio Valparaiso USA/Oklahoma SU USA/SLAC USP USA/Stony Brook USA/Washington 9

Conclusions q Big effort from the AFP 210 m community from January 2011 to become one of the upgrade project q Intense and successful work of a group which is becoming stronger and stronger q The forthcoming year will be crucial to obtain the final approval from the ATLAS collaboration q This time should be devoted to: § Finalize the HBP design + final prototyping § Finalize other R&D + final prototyping § Improve the present knowledge on as many as possible physics § § cases strengthen the collaboration and finally reinforce the weak points about manpower and funding writing the TDR and aim to final approval in 2014 10

LET’S MOVE FORWARD ! 11

Backup 12

Upgrade Project Management Team 13

MOU 14

Upgrade Project Institute Board 15

ATLAS Phase-I Lo. I Timeline 2011 4 th March: Phase-I Sub-committee presentation to ATLAS Week 29 th July: 2011 Phase-I Sub-committee report competed 14 th Oct: Lo. I Sub-section author presentations to ATLAS week 4 th Nov: “Independent Readers” appointed in consultation with E 29 th Nov: Lo. I Draft-0 released on CDS for comment to collaboratio 6 th Dec: LHCC status report and presentation to ATLAS weekly 13 th Dec: Deadline for ATLAS comments to Draft-0 20 th Dec: Draft-1 released and made available to LHCC for comme 2012 11 th Jan: Deadline for Draft-1 comments 12 h Jan: EB endorsement 17 th Jan: Draft-2 sent to ATLAS CB and for information to LHCC 3 rd Feb: Request CB approval 17 th Feb: Final minor corrections and submit for printing 22 nd March: Next LHCC 27 th March: Next UAB (Stanford during ATLAS Upgrade Week) 23 rd April: Next LHC RRB

Reminder: Cost Estimation LHC RRB Meeting April 2012: M. Nessi on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration - First cost estimation presented in the LOI https: //indico. cern. ch/material. Display. py? contrib. Id=21&session. Id=3&material. Id=slides&c onf. Id=174803 = 36 MCHF NEXT STEPS: Def. 5 projects Internal review process EB, CB approval TDR + MOUs (2012/2013) (2013/2014) (Next cost estimation revision with TDRs) https: //cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1402470/ (CERN-LHCC-2011 -012 )

ATLAS CORE Guidelines n Basic idea n n CORE thus includes things like n n n Focus on direct production costs (“externalized costs”) Exclude basic infrastructure, personnel costs Guidelines in consultation with W Bartel (DESY) components (but not necessarily spares, except in TDAQ) production (incl. industrial manpower but not institute manpower) outsourced parts of assembly outsourced parts of installation, commissioning CORE does NOT include items such as n n n infrastructure (i. e. production area, halls, tech support etc. ) R&D, design, (early stage) prototyping institute manpower, physicists taxes contingency ATLAS Resources Coordination 18