Aerodynamics of Flow Around a Cylinder Group 2

  • Slides: 25
Download presentation
Aerodynamics of Flow Around a Cylinder Group 2 A: Adya Ali Andrew Parry James

Aerodynamics of Flow Around a Cylinder Group 2 A: Adya Ali Andrew Parry James Sizemore Dwayne White

Overview Objective ã Theory ã Experimental Procedure ã Results and Discussion ã Error Analysis

Overview Objective ã Theory ã Experimental Procedure ã Results and Discussion ã Error Analysis ã Conclusion ã

Objective To find the aerodynamic lift and drag forces on a circular cylinder placed

Objective To find the aerodynamic lift and drag forces on a circular cylinder placed in uniform free-stream velocity. ã To find drag, lift and pressure coefficients using different methods: ã ãWake Measurements ãNormal pressure distribution

Theory Skin friction drag (Df): resultant viscous forces acting on a body ã Pressure

Theory Skin friction drag (Df): resultant viscous forces acting on a body ã Pressure drag (Dp): due to unbalanced pressure forces caused by flow separation ã Total drag = skin friction drag + pressure drag ã ã D = Df + Dp

Method 1 - Wake Measurements Determine the velocity profiles in the wake ã Select

Method 1 - Wake Measurements Determine the velocity profiles in the wake ã Select two sections ã ãSection 1 (imaginary)- to account for the pressure difference ãSection 2 - to obtain wake measurements ã *Courtesy of Dr. Alvi’s Lab Manual (exp 7)

Method 1 - Equations ã Conservation of Momentum: W= width of body u 1,

Method 1 - Equations ã Conservation of Momentum: W= width of body u 1, u 2=velocities ã Assume no pressure loss between sections 1 & 2.

Method 1 - Equations (cont’d) ã Total Pressure: ã Drag Force:

Method 1 - Equations (cont’d) ã Total Pressure: ã Drag Force:

Method 1 - Equations (cont’d) Dimensionless Drag coefficient, CD

Method 1 - Equations (cont’d) Dimensionless Drag coefficient, CD

Method 2 -Pressure Distribution For large Reynolds number (Re>103), skin friction drag is negligible.

Method 2 -Pressure Distribution For large Reynolds number (Re>103), skin friction drag is negligible. ã Total drag pressure drag ã Image reproduced from “Aerodynamics for Engineers”, J. Bertin & M. Smith

Method 2 -Pressure Distribution (cont’d) For a cylinder, Drag force: ã Lift force: r

Method 2 -Pressure Distribution (cont’d) For a cylinder, Drag force: ã Lift force: r = radius of cylinder p = pressure = angular position

Experimental Technique ã Apparatus ãWind tunnel - airflow driven by a fan Image reproduced

Experimental Technique ã Apparatus ãWind tunnel - airflow driven by a fan Image reproduced from “Fundamentals of Aerodynamics” J. Anderson, Jr. ãPitot-static tube - used to measure the velocity of the wind in the wake

Experimental Technique ãCylindrical test model - with pressure ports along its circumference Courtesy Dr.

Experimental Technique ãCylindrical test model - with pressure ports along its circumference Courtesy Dr. Alvi’s Lab Manual

Experimental Technique ãScanivalve and scanivalve digital interface unit ãADC Card on Pentium-based PC ãComputer-controlled

Experimental Technique ãScanivalve and scanivalve digital interface unit ãADC Card on Pentium-based PC ãComputer-controlled vertical drive

Experimental Technique ã Procedure ãWake Measurement: äSelect 2 locations, äSet wind tunnel speed counter

Experimental Technique ã Procedure ãWake Measurement: äSelect 2 locations, äSet wind tunnel speed counter at 550; (V=30. 68 m/s) äMeasure dynamic pressure upstream of the cylinder äMove pitot-static tube to the center of the cylinder

Experimental Technique äMeasure output at vertical locations (4 mm intervals) äRepeat procedure with the

Experimental Technique äMeasure output at vertical locations (4 mm intervals) äRepeat procedure with the cylinder at x/D = 10 ãNormal Pressure Distribution äSet wind tunnel speed counter at 550 (30. 68 m/s) äRecord the output gauge pressure at each port äRepeat the procedure for counter reading at 350 (17. 83 m/s)

Results ã Wake Profile x/D=5

Results ã Wake Profile x/D=5

Results ã Wake Profile x/D=10

Results ã Wake Profile x/D=10

Drag Coefficients: V= 30. 68 (m/s) X/D=5: Re = 53, 649 ã n ã

Drag Coefficients: V= 30. 68 (m/s) X/D=5: Re = 53, 649 ã n ã CD =. 76 (+/-). 39 X/D=10: Re = 54, 034 Theoretical Drag Coefficient: Re = 59, 380 n CD = ã n 1 . 67 (+/-). 013 V =30. 68 (m/s)

Pressure Coefficient

Pressure Coefficient

Drag Coefficients ã V=17. 83 (m/s): Re = 35, 000 ã CD = 1.

Drag Coefficients ã V=17. 83 (m/s): Re = 35, 000 ã CD = 1. 26 (+/-). 54 V=30. 68: Re = 60, 000 ã CD = ã ã Theoretical Drag Coefficient: CD = 1; CL = 0 Transition Re: 300, 000 - 500, 000 1. 19 (+/-). 079 V =17. 83 (m/s) V =30. 68 (m/s)

Lift Coefficients ã Theoretical Lift Coefficient: n CL = 0

Lift Coefficients ã Theoretical Lift Coefficient: n CL = 0

Error Analysis ã Instrument ã Pitot-static tube ã Center calibration for cylinder wake ã

Error Analysis ã Instrument ã Pitot-static tube ã Center calibration for cylinder wake ã Integration ã Trapezoidal approximation ã Wind Tunnel ã Length of the wind tunnel ã Width of wind tunnel

Conclusion ã ã Method 2 (pressure ports) seems more accurate. Pressure differential inside the

Conclusion ã ã Method 2 (pressure ports) seems more accurate. Pressure differential inside the wake is unsteady. Outside the wake the pressure differential is steady. The pitot-static tube can measure turbulent fluctuations accurately.

THE END QUESTIONS?

THE END QUESTIONS?